|
Idiot's theory
More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. |
Idiot's theory
On 8/25/12 2:55 PM, jps wrote:
More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. PsychoScotty, the resident moron, believes in trickle-down. The conservatives he so admires have been peeing on him for decades. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Idiot's theory
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:55:11 -0700, jps wrote:
More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? |
Idiot's theory
|
Idiot's theory
In article , dump-on-
says... On 8/25/12 3:03 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. Too bad you or yours weren't in that crowd. What a nasty, low life scum thing to say. You truly are a dirtbag. |
Idiot's theory
jps wrote:
More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. Gun control wouldn't help in this case or most others. The scumbags can always get guns. |
Idiot's theory
BAR wrote:
In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. I hit a deer with my car many years ago and the cop that showed up for the accident report had to kill the injured deer that was laying on the side of the road with a broken leg. From less than 50 feet away he missed it and it took a 2nd shot to kill it. The police certainly need more firearm training - I could have hit it one-handed at that range. |
Idiot's theory
X ` Man wrote:
On 8/25/12 3:03 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. Too bad you or yours weren't in that crowd. You don't have to be an asshole all of the time, Harry. |
Idiot's theory
On Aug 25, 10:30*pm, Earl wrote:
BAR wrote: In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. *As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. *If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. *They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. I hit a deer with my car many years ago and the cop that showed up for the accident report had to kill the injured deer that was laying on the side of the road with a broken leg. *From less than 50 feet away he missed it and it took a 2nd shot to kill it. *The police certainly need more firearm training - I could have hit it one-handed at that range. Sure you could Kruger... maybe with Margaret holding the other hand. |
Idiot's theory
In article , earl83868
@hotmail.com says... jps wrote: More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. Gun control wouldn't help in this case or most others. The scumbags can always get guns. I just read that Camden NJ is dissolving its police force, they can't afford it. Better buy your guns for self defense and protection now if you live in that area. |
Idiot's theory
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:46:16 -0400, BAR wrote:
I just read that Camden NJ is dissolving its police force, they can't afford it. Better buy your guns for self defense and protection now if you live in that area. No chance, NJ still has very restrictive gun laws. Out of 8.8 million, they issue only 1000 carry permits. But not to worry, we still have a very low crime rate. |
Idiot's theory
On 8/26/12 9:40 AM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:46:16 -0400, BAR wrote: I just read that Camden NJ is dissolving its police force, they can't afford it. Better buy your guns for self defense and protection now if you live in that area. No chance, NJ still has very restrictive gun laws. Out of 8.8 million, they issue only 1000 carry permits. But not to worry, we still have a very low crime rate. Virginia has very permissive gun laws, but there's a major shopping center in Northern Virginia we used to go to that I wouldn't step foot in on a bet. It's about five miles from where John Herring lives, and it is called "Springfield Mall." It's a gathering place for members of Mara Salvatrucha. The mall is in prosperous Fairfax County, Virginia, which has no shortage of police and apparently no ability to get rid of MS 13. What's going on in Camden is just more union-busting, aided and abetted by the loudmouth governor of that state. The plan is to transfer the lower paid and less experienced officers to a county force, and force layoffs on the higher paid, more experienced officers. -- What do the Republican Party of the United States and the Muslim Brotherhood of the Arab World have in common? They're both faith-based parties, they both deny science, and they both wage war on women. |
Idiot's theory
|
Idiot's theory
|
Idiot's theory
In article , says...
On 8/26/2012 12:46 PM, wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:53:06 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/26/12 9:40 AM, thunder wrote: On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 07:46:16 -0400, BAR wrote: I just read that Camden NJ is dissolving its police force, they can't afford it. Better buy your guns for self defense and protection now if you live in that area. No chance, NJ still has very restrictive gun laws. Out of 8.8 million, they issue only 1000 carry permits. But not to worry, we still have a very low crime rate. Virginia has very permissive gun laws, but there's a major shopping center in Northern Virginia we used to go to that I wouldn't step foot in on a bet. It's about five miles from where John Herring lives, and it is called "Springfield Mall." It's a gathering place for members of Mara Salvatrucha. The mall is in prosperous Fairfax County, Virginia, which has no shortage of police and apparently no ability to get rid of MS 13. What's going on in Camden is just more union-busting, aided and abetted by the loudmouth governor of that state. The plan is to transfer the lower paid and less experienced officers to a county force, and force layoffs on the higher paid, more experienced officers. It was the ridiculous union contracts and unrealistic pension plans that bankrupted these local governments. You have cops retiring at 20 years, making more money in retirement than they ever made working and if they can get some kind of disability it is all tax free. Yeah, I know at least one cop that "fell down" right before he retired, just in time to get disability but still play golf:) Says "it happens"... Bull****, and I'll tell you why. Insurance companies have detectives just for that sort of thing. |
Idiot's theory
|
Idiot's theory
North Star wrote:
On Aug 25, 10:30 pm, Earl wrote: BAR wrote: In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. I hit a deer with my car many years ago and the cop that showed up for the accident report had to kill the injured deer that was laying on the side of the road with a broken leg. From less than 50 feet away he missed it and it took a 2nd shot to kill it. The police certainly need more firearm training - I could have hit it one-handed at that range. Sure you could Kruger... maybe with Margaret holding the other hand. Kurger isn't my last name, Sherlock, and Margret isn't my wife's name. Nice stalking attempt but you'll have to get some help from someone smarter. |
Idiot's theory
On Aug 27, 10:19*pm, Earl wrote:
North Star wrote: On Aug 25, 10:30 pm, Earl wrote: BAR wrote: In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. *As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. *If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. *They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. I hit a deer with my car many years ago and the cop that showed up for the accident report had to kill the injured deer that was laying on the side of the road with a broken leg. *From less than 50 feet away he missed it and it took a 2nd shot to kill it. *The police certainly need more firearm training - I could have hit it one-handed at that range. Sure you could Kruger... maybe with Margaret holding the other hand. Kurger isn't my last name, Sherlock, and Margret isn't my wife's name. Nice stalking attempt but you'll have to get some help from someone smarter. Sure Freddie...er..Dan |
Idiot's theory
In article , earl8386
@hotmail.com says... North Star wrote: On Aug 25, 10:30 pm, Earl wrote: BAR wrote: In article , says... More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. T he cops are responsible for killing 1 man and wounding 9 others when the two cops started shooting. They should be given expert marksmanship badges for firing off 14 rounds and hitting 10 people. I hit a deer with my car many years ago and the cop that showed up for the accident report had to kill the injured deer that was laying on the side of the road with a broken leg. From less than 50 feet away he missed it and it took a 2nd shot to kill it. The police certainly need more firearm training - I could have hit it one-handed at that range. Sure you could Kruger... maybe with Margaret holding the other hand. Kurger isn't my last name, Sherlock, and Margret isn't my wife's name. Nice stalking attempt but you'll have to get some help from someone smarter. Don, John, Harry and Scotty do this! Somehow the notion that someone is someone else just pops into their minds! Good luck trying to convince the stupid. |
Idiot's theory
On Aug 25, 2:02*pm, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:55:11 -0700, jps wrote: More guns equals more safety... NYPD Gunfire In Empire State Building Shooting Wounded All Nine Bystanders, Says Ray Kelly The argument that arming more people will result in a safer public is complete bull****. People tried to make this argument about Colorado. *As if 20 people armed in a theater would have helped the situation. *If anything, more people would have died or been injured. This evidence won't matter to the gun nuts. *They'll carry on using the same bull**** argument, just like they want to keep selling trickle down economics after it's been debunked for the 1000th time. You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) |
Idiot's theory
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
On Aug 25, 2:02*pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. |
Idiot's theory
|
Idiot's theory
On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards |
Idiot's theory
In article om,
says... On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards So you that lockstep to FOX don't know anything? Thanks for making my point! |
Idiot's theory
On 10/11/2012 12:34 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards So you that lockstep to FOX don't know anything? Thanks for making my point! Geeze dummy. You're wound tighter than a clockspring today. Careful, or your boss might send you home on medical leave; permenantly. |
Idiot's theory
On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards .... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? |
Idiot's theory
In article , says...
On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. |
Idiot's theory
On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. |
Idiot's theory
In article om,
says... On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, GuzzisRule wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. How do you know when I work? I'm putting in about 75 hours per week, we're swamped. How about you? |
Idiot's theory
On 10/12/2012 9:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In raweb.com, says... On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. How do you know when I work? I'm putting in about 75 hours per week, we're swamped. How about you? Prove you "put in" 75 hours a week. |
Idiot's theory
In article ,
says... On 10/12/2012 9:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In raweb.com, says... On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. How do you know when I work? I'm putting in about 75 hours per week, we're swamped. How about you? Prove you "put in" 75 hours a week. ESAD |
Idiot's theory
On 10/12/2012 2:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 10/12/2012 9:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In raweb.com, says... On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. How do you know when I work? I'm putting in about 75 hours per week, we're swamped. How about you? Prove you "put in" 75 hours a week. ESAD That wasn't nice Loogie. You claim to be a better person than that. |
Idiot's theory
In article om,
says... On 10/12/2012 2:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/12/2012 9:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In raweb.com, says... On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. How do you know when I work? I'm putting in about 75 hours per week, we're swamped. How about you? Prove you "put in" 75 hours a week. ESAD That wasn't nice Loogie. You claim to be a better person than that. Where did I "claim" such? |
Idiot's theory
On 10/13/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 10/12/2012 2:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/12/2012 9:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In raweb.com, says... On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. How do you know when I work? I'm putting in about 75 hours per week, we're swamped. How about you? Prove you "put in" 75 hours a week. ESAD That wasn't nice Loogie. You claim to be a better person than that. Where did I "claim" such? Standby while I search the net for evidence3 that you say you are not a ****head. |
Idiot's theory
In article om,
says... On 10/13/2012 8:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 10/12/2012 2:11 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/12/2012 9:51 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In raweb.com, says... On 10/12/2012 8:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/11/2012 12:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:50:17 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Aug 25, 2:02 pm, wrote: You do a lot of whining about your 'problem', but present no proposed solutions. Cat got your tongue? Evidently so. Three times, I asked him a simple question about credit card hypocrisy and didn't get an answer. BUT! I DID get called a 'jerk' though. ?;^ ) jps will only have a conversation with you if you totally agree, lock step, with his position. Otherwise, he "filters" you. Can't be considering any other views on issues, ya know. It's really no loss. Gee, kind of sounds like the right wingers here. If you don't lockstep to FOX, you aren't correct about anything. You got it bass ackwards ... Funny how it's kevin calling names and getting vulgar at those who don't follow him lock step, then calling us intolerant? Get a job, loser. I'm tired of supporting you. You'll be out of work soon if you don't get off the internet during WORKING hours. How do you know when I work? I'm putting in about 75 hours per week, we're swamped. How about you? Prove you "put in" 75 hours a week. ESAD That wasn't nice Loogie. You claim to be a better person than that. Where did I "claim" such? Standby while I search the net for evidence3 that you say you are not a ****head. You said I "claim to be a better person than that", you are a liar. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com