| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:35:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:47:21 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: The internet itself is considered a form of interstate commerce under United States Code. Cite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Baker I KNEW someone would bring up U.S. v Baker, that's why I asked!!! You do realize that he was aquitted of all original counts, right? The only thing they could get him for was a trumped up charge when they couldn't persue the original charges. You wanted a cite that the internet is considered a form of interstate commerce under the United States Code. I gave you one. His quilt or innocence is irrelevant to this conversation, but the ibls.com cite, given above, is completely relevant. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Eat me, Eric... | General | |||
| Tax'n'Eat | General | |||
| Eat me | General | |||
| Let them eat cake!!!! | General | |||
| Let them eat bread. | General | |||