Is fretwell trying....
 

.....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

Is fretwell trying....
 

On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.

When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is
overlooked.

When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the
group, at least there's some interaction. I don't know who *e#c is
since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the
feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people
interacting on subjects that don't include boats.

I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and
Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.

Is fretwell trying....
 

On 8/16/12 11:47 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.

When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is
overlooked.

When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the
group, at least there's some interaction. I don't know who *e#c is
since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the
feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people
interacting on subjects that don't include boats.

I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and
Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.



There's really no reason to put up "boating-related" posts here. If
Poster A said he just bought a nice old dory to refinish in his garage
over the winter, three or four of the right-wing droolers and iLoogy
would initiate attacks on the poster's boat of choice and the color he
planned to paint it.

Why bother?


--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

Is fretwell trying....
 

On Aug 16, 11:47*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? *We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.

When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is
overlooked.

When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the
group, at least there's some interaction. *I don't know who *e#c is
since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the
feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people
interacting on subjects that don't include boats.

I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and
Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.

NO, . " He "....me....would rather not see ANY Political garbage, as
it only causes arguements....but I think thats all Harry has.

Is fretwell trying....
 

On Aug 16, 11:54*am, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 8/16/12 11:47 AM, jps wrote:





On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? *We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.

When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is
overlooked.

When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the
group, at least there's some interaction. *I don't know who *e#c is
since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the
feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people
interacting on subjects that don't include boats.

I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and
Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.

There's really no reason to put up "boating-related" posts here. If
Poster A said he just bought a nice old dory to refinish in his garage
over the winter, three or four of the right-wing droolers and iLoogy
would initiate attacks on the poster's boat of choice and the color he
planned to paint it.

Why bother?

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

Then dont bother at all. You wont be missed.

Is fretwell trying....
 

I don't know who *e#c is since he hasn't used his real name or
initials in years,

And is " jps " supposed to mean something? Pfffft

Is fretwell trying....
 

On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:54:12 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/16/12 11:47 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.

When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is
overlooked.

When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the
group, at least there's some interaction. I don't know who *e#c is
since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the
feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people
interacting on subjects that don't include boats.

I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and
Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.



There's really no reason to put up "boating-related" posts here. If
Poster A said he just bought a nice old dory to refinish in his garage
over the winter, three or four of the right-wing droolers and iLoogy
would initiate attacks on the poster's boat of choice and the color he
planned to paint it.

Why bother?

So true. Why not just get to the stuff that matters. They're idiots
are we're not so much.

Is fretwell trying....
 

On Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:08:13 PM UTC-4, jps wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:54:12 -0400, X ` Man

wrote:



On 8/16/12 11:47 AM, jps wrote:

On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:



On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"

wrote:



....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may

have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?



None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing

tried.



You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would

be intellectually trampled badly.



I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.



When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is

overlooked.



When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the

group, at least there's some interaction. I don't know who *e#c is

since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the

feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people

interacting on subjects that don't include boats.



I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and

Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.







There's really no reason to put up "boating-related" posts here. If

Poster A said he just bought a nice old dory to refinish in his garage

over the winter, three or four of the right-wing droolers and iLoogy

would initiate attacks on the poster's boat of choice and the color he

planned to paint it.



Why bother?



So true. Why not just get to the stuff that matters. They're idiots

are we're not so much.

"They're idiots are we're not so much. "
What idiot wrote that?

Is fretwell trying....
 

On Aug 16, 1:03*am, wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"

wrote:
....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? *We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.

I didn't. I really enjoyed your pontoon stories and glad you got a
good deal on that new engine.

You still got lotsa bugs in those mango's that hang over the water?

Is fretwell trying....
 

*e#c wrote:
....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.
I agree with this post.

Is fretwell trying....
 

jps wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.
I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.
When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is
overlooked.

When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the
group, at least there's some interaction. I don't know who *e#c is
since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the
feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people
interacting on subjects that don't include boats.

I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and
Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.
You missed his point. You are dumping your anti-gun and political ****
here instead of the appropriate groups. If you want this group to die,
let it die. I think the lack of your off-topic bull**** would actually
encourage boaters to visit and stay here.

Is fretwell trying....
 

X ` Man wrote:
On 8/16/12 11:47 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:03:51 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:15:12 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

....to compete with jps, and Harry for lack of content posts? We may
have a three way run.....or are they going to have a threesome?

None of the three could make a boat related post if they ****ing
tried.

You see, they dont post their **** in a Political Group, as they would
be intellectually trampled badly.

I gave up years ago on the idea that this was really a boating group.

When people post boating-related content here, it oftentimes is
overlooked.

When a thread gets 50 or 100 responses from members who monitor the
group, at least there's some interaction. I don't know who *e#c is
since he hasn't used his real name or initials in years, but I get the
feeling he'd rather see a dead group with no posts than people
interacting on subjects that don't include boats.

I'd rather see stupid **** spewing from the likes of Bertie Poop and
Three Poontang than come here and see nothing.



There's really no reason to put up "boating-related" posts here. If
Poster A said he just bought a nice old dory to refinish in his garage
over the winter, three or four of the right-wing droolers and iLoogy
would initiate attacks on the poster's boat of choice and the color he
planned to paint it.

Why bother?


You seem to be the first one on the attack, Harry.