|
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 8:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Damned right! Don't believe good science, believe FOX!!! http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2011/9#temp Of cousce it's too soon to tell, but your noaa charts suggest the global heat wave might have reached a peak around 2007. Could be we are already on the back side of the curve. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
|
Interesting New Global Warming Study
In article m,
says... On 7/31/2012 8:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:46:07 -0400, John H. wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:16:06 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:43:31 -0400, John H. wrote: Thanks for posting. It is a good heuristic read, if nothing else (or should be). Well, hey...you gotta remember the source. === What source is that? The NYT. If the source of information is a liberal rag, shouldn't it be disregarded? === Actually I first saw it on the Weather Underground web site. If they have any political bias it is news to me. The report itself was published in scientific circles and has attracted quite a bit of attention elsewhere. As far as I know no one has tried to discredit it. The study itself was funded by some folks who are more conservative than you or I. As I stated previously, it is highly regrettable when serious issues of science become politicized. People like John just won't believe science, they only believe what FOX tells them. Besides being a Dumbocrat, you are probably a union slave as well. You are boring and repetitive;just like krause. Well, once again and as usual, you are wrong on both. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
In article om,
says... On 7/31/2012 8:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Damned right! Don't believe good science, believe FOX!!! http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2011/9#temp Of cousce it's too soon to tell, but your noaa charts suggest the global heat wave might have reached a peak around 2007. Could be we are already on the back side of the curve. Uh, no..... |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
|
Interesting New Global Warming Study
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/31/12 8:32 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats who is correct? Yes! It's sort of sad that bottomfeeders like you and your buttbuddy Meyer find it necessary to change the posts of others to make them fit into your narrow little minds. But, what the hell, that's all you Conservatrashers have these days, right? John does childish things when a topic isn't going his way. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 8:38 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/31/12 8:32 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:55:34 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats who is correct? Yes! It's sort of sad that bottomfeeders like you and your buttbuddy Meyer find it necessary to change the posts of others to make them fit into your narrow little minds. But, what the hell, that's all you Conservatrashers have these days, right? Don't be sad. You'll be reunited with Skipper soon enough. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 8:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, says... On 7/31/2012 8:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:46:07 -0400, John H. wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:16:06 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:43:31 -0400, John H. wrote: Thanks for posting. It is a good heuristic read, if nothing else (or should be). Well, hey...you gotta remember the source. === What source is that? The NYT. If the source of information is a liberal rag, shouldn't it be disregarded? === Actually I first saw it on the Weather Underground web site. If they have any political bias it is news to me. The report itself was published in scientific circles and has attracted quite a bit of attention elsewhere. As far as I know no one has tried to discredit it. The study itself was funded by some folks who are more conservative than you or I. As I stated previously, it is highly regrettable when serious issues of science become politicized. People like John just won't believe science, they only believe what FOX tells them. Besides being a Dumbocrat, you are probably a union slave as well. You are boring and repetitive;just like krause. Well, once again and as usual, you are wrong on both. OK, but the second sentence stands. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 8:54 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/31/2012 8:12 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Damned right! Don't believe good science, believe FOX!!! http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/2011/9#temp Of cousce it's too soon to tell, but your noaa charts suggest the global heat wave might have reached a peak around 2007. Could be we are already on the back side of the curve. Uh, no..... Here's your chance to insert an unbroken long link to back up your bold assertion. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com