| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On Jul 31, 8:57*am, BAR wrote:
In article , says... As long ago as 2003, the US military was gearing up for the reality that global climate change would affect the scarcity of food, water and energy. The warning from the US military, then, was that global warming should "be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a U.S. national security concern." What more does it take to attract people's attention? For another read, see the report: "An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and the Implications for United States Security." The military has a plan to invade Canada. The military has plans for every contingency. http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...hp/t-9586.html http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nati...ecret-defence- plans-included-file-on-invasion-of-fiji/story-e6frg8yo-1226389513967 It doens't matter whose military it is, they are always planning for every possible scenario. Say what? Didn't y'all learn your lesson in 1812? |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
"X ` Man" wrote in message
m... On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats? Oh, wait... --------------------------------- And your English degree gives you more credibility? |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
"X ` Man" wrote in message m... On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats? Oh, wait... --------------------------------- And your English degree gives you more credibility? Do you really believe he has that degree, he has lied about each and every other one of his and his wifes? Why would you take his word for this one, especially when you see how he presents himself here. Do you really think he studied English beyond the 5th grade? |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/12 6:12 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/31/2012 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "X ` Man" wrote in message m... On 7/31/12 7:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:19:13 -0400, wrote: In summation: Wow, the last skeptic has been drug across the finish line and now, only now, the "skeptics" believe what virtually every other scientist has known for years! That, in retrospect, might really be the bad news. === Either way, global warming is probably going to be bad news. There are several reasons in my opinion why there have been die hard skeptics, including myself. 1) Al Gore was absolutely the wrong spokesman for the original message. His overall lack of credibility and borderline hysteria made him a poor messenger. 2) It is abundantly clear that there have been many past instances of global warming/cooling that demonstrably had nothing to do with fossil fuel emissions. Which means that warming and cooling and warming again is just a natural cycle that the Earth goes through. Isn't wonderful that we have a university-educated, Ph.D level climatologist like BAR here in rec.boats? Oh, wait... --------------------------------- And your English degree gives you more credibility? Do you really believe he has that degree, he has lied about each and every other one of his and his wifes? Why would you take his word for this one, especially when you see how he presents himself here. Do you really think he studied English beyond the 5th grade? What a funny little failure you are, Snotty. How's that Never Winning Kiddie Racing Team doing these days? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 6:31 PM, X ` Man wrote:
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. You are a liberal because your union thug handlers instructed you to be so. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/2012 7:20 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/31/2012 6:31 PM, X ` Man wrote: I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. You are a liberal because your union thug handlers instructed you to be so. Wow, is that his sig? LOL! |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/12 7:48 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/31/2012 7:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 7/31/2012 6:31 PM, X ` Man wrote: I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. You are a liberal because your union thug handlers instructed you to be so. Wow, is that his sig? LOL! What's your sig? "I am stupid. Please take a pencil and put a quarter in the cup." -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On Jul 31, 8:57*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote: On 7/31/12 7:48 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/31/2012 7:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 7/31/2012 6:31 PM, X ` Man wrote: I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. You are a liberal because your union thug handlers instructed you to be so. Wow, is that his sig? LOL! What's your sig? "I am stupid. Please take a pencil and put a quarter in the cup." Snotty wouldn't be near that polite... more like 'put some bills in the f**king cup and don't touch that f**kin' pencil". |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
On 7/31/12 9:39 PM, North Star wrote:
On Jul 31, 8:57 pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 7/31/12 7:48 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/31/2012 7:20 PM, Meyer wrote: On 7/31/2012 6:31 PM, X ` Man wrote: I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. You are a liberal because your union thug handlers instructed you to be so. Wow, is that his sig? LOL! What's your sig? "I am stupid. Please take a pencil and put a quarter in the cup." Snotty wouldn't be near that polite... more like 'put some bills in the f**king cup and don't touch that f**kin' pencil". snerk Probably his family motto. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
In article ,
says... On Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:57:42 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... As long ago as 2003, the US military was gearing up for the reality that global climate change would affect the scarcity of food, water and energy. The warning from the US military, then, was that global warming should "be elevated beyond a scientific debate to a U.S. national security concern." What more does it take to attract people's attention? For another read, see the report: "An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and the Implications for United States Security." The military has a plan to invade Canada. The military has plans for every contingency. http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...hp/t-9586.html http://www.theaustralian.com.au/nati...ecret-defence- plans-included-file-on-invasion-of-fiji/story-e6frg8yo-1226389513967 It doens't matter whose military it is, they are always planning for every possible scenario. I didn't realize they were so crazy! It is called being prepared. |
Interesting New Global Warming Study
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com