|
This is a good read about Zimmerman
In article om,
says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
In article om,
says... On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. You didn't look at the link I posted?????? |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. You didn't look at the link I posted?????? I hardly ever do. |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
In article om,
says... On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. You didn't look at the link I posted?????? I hardly ever do. Well then, that answers why you are ignorant. |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:08:52 PM UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article b.com>, says... > > On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > > In article b.com>, > > says... > >> > >> On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>> In article b.com>, > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>> In article .com>, > >>>>> says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>> In article b.com>, > >>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article .com>, > >>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article > , > >>>>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; convicted-and-this-is-why/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; law? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> All of them. A precedent is a precedent. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> How so, specifically? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been > >>>>>>>> written and passed yet? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> That's not what you said. > >>>>>> Words have meaning. > >>>>> > >>>>> I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would > >>>>> be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged > >>>>> with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? > >>>>> > >>>> Show us the precedent in question. > >>> > >>> I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... > >>> > >> Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. > > > > You didn't look at the link I posted?????? > > > I hardly ever do. Well then, that answers why you are ignorant. Ouch! Snerk! |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
On 7/23/2012 3:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. You didn't look at the link I posted?????? I hardly ever do. Well then, that answers why you are ignorant. One does not become enlightened by following your links. Sorry dude. |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
On 7/23/2012 3:12 PM, wrote:
On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:08:52 PM UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote: In article b.com>, says... > > On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > > In article b.com>, > > says... > >> > >> On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>> In article b.com>, > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>> In article .com>, > >>>>> says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>> In article b.com>, > >>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article .com>, > >>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article > , > >>>>>>>>>>> says... > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; convicted-and-this-is-why/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida > >>>>>>>>>>>> ; law? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> All of them. A precedent is a precedent. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> How so, specifically? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been > >>>>>>>> written and passed yet? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> That's not what you said. > >>>>>> Words have meaning. > >>>>> > >>>>> I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would > >>>>> be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged > >>>>> with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? > >>>>> > >>>> Show us the precedent in question. > >>> > >>> I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... > >>> > >> Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. > > > > You didn't look at the link I posted?????? > > > I hardly ever do. Well then, that answers why you are ignorant. Ouch! Snerk! Stb yer toe? Did ye? |
This is a good read about Zimmerman
On 7/23/2012 3:37 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/23/2012 3:08 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 11:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 11:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 10:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 10:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/23/2012 9:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/23/2012 8:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 10:03:19 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: http://sparkiearbuckle.sayanythingbl...erman-will-be- convicted-and-this-is-why/ It seems like all of your facts come from a liberal blog How many of those 100 year old precedents are based on current Florida law? All of them. A precedent is a precedent. I'm afraid you dun been fooled. Fool How so, specifically? How can you create a precedent based on a law that might not have been written and passed yet? No. You can, however use precedent in a second degree murder trial. That's not what you said. Words have meaning. I said a precedent is a precedent. In the case of Zimmerman, this would be a precedent for second degree murder. That's what he's been charged with. WTF did you think the precedent cited were for, jaywalking? Show us the precedent in question. I didn't know any of the precedents suggested were in question.... Which precedents were suggested, by whom, for what. Quit dancin boy. You didn't look at the link I posted?????? I hardly ever do. Well then, that answers why you are ignorant. One does not become enlightened by following your links. Sorry dude. I read the link. It was a hysterical internet blogger, being typically imaginative and hitting all the talking points the left has made up about this tradgedy... Short on facts, but understandable why kevin would think it was a "good read"... LOL! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com