It's Sunday, the day to...
 

On 5/21/2012 7:29 AM, Tim wrote:
On May 21, 5:40 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/20/12 10:38 PM, Tim wrote:

On May 20, 6:40 pm, X ` Man

The hypocrisy of religion, which I differentiate from a belief in a
creator.

OK, so why do you think it's worthy of discussion on a boating news
group?

Do you really feel it that necessary?

This is not a boating news group and hasn't been for years.

Sure it is. You just choose it not to be.


Ding, ding, ding... we have a winner...!!!

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

On 5/21/2012 6:28 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/20/12 11:06 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 5:20 pm, X ` Man

And what could be more Mosaic than the 10
commandments?

the "10 Commandments" and the "Mosaic Law" are two different
objects, Harry.

The commandments were Gods benchmark, and the Law was how the
Israelite's were to be judged.

Of course, modern day Christians are *selective* in what they want to
impose on others.

As well as your *selective* scripture references.



Mosaic law includes the 10 Commandments. And the point is that those who
use "selected" passages in the bible to try to control others, as
fundies are wont to do, and ignore the passages they don't like, are
hypocritical control freaks and nothing more. The bible says a lot of
things and if you are going to cite it as *the* source of what is right
or wrong, you can't cherry pick.



Who the **** are you to judge us? I will not be judged by a ****ing
pedophile....

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

On 5/21/2012 7:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/21/12 7:29 AM, Tim wrote:
On May 21, 5:28 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/20/12 11:06 PM, Tim wrote:









On May 20, 5:20 pm, X ` Man

And what could be more Mosaic than the 10
commandments?

the "10 Commandments" and the "Mosaic Law" are two different
objects, Harry.

The commandments were Gods benchmark, and the Law was how the
Israelite's were to be judged.

Of course, modern day Christians are *selective* in what they want to
impose on others.

As well as your *selective* scripture references.

Mosaic law includes the 10 Commandments. And the point is that those who
use "selected" passages in the bible to try to control others, as
fundies are wont to do, and ignore the passages they don't like, are
hypocritical control freaks and nothing more. The bible says a lot of
things and if you are going to cite it as *the* source of what is right
or wrong, you can't cherry pick.

Then why do you?

I don't use the bible to try to control people or as a device to spread
hatred and cruelty. That's a fundamentalist trait.

You use bullying, stalking, and cowardice... just like the imaginary
people you are talking about here....

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

In article , says...

On 5/21/2012 6:28 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/20/12 11:06 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 5:20 pm, X ` Man

And what could be more Mosaic than the 10
commandments?

the "10 Commandments" and the "Mosaic Law" are two different
objects, Harry.

The commandments were Gods benchmark, and the Law was how the
Israelite's were to be judged.

Of course, modern day Christians are *selective* in what they want to
impose on others.

As well as your *selective* scripture references.



Mosaic law includes the 10 Commandments. And the point is that those who
use "selected" passages in the bible to try to control others, as
fundies are wont to do, and ignore the passages they don't like, are
hypocritical control freaks and nothing more. The bible says a lot of
things and if you are going to cite it as *the* source of what is right
or wrong, you can't cherry pick.



Who the **** are you to judge us? I will not be judged by a ****ing
pedophile....

Who is "us"?

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

In article , says...

On 5/20/2012 6:01 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 9:10 am, wrote:


If you take a wife and she's not a virgin, you're supposed to kill her.
Says so right in the Bible!


OT (mosaic) law.

And your point?

Nobody has been paying attention to him and harry, so now they are
attacking you personally with their hate speech...

Hey, by the way, you accused me of calling Zimmerman a "murderer".
Please show me where I EVER called him that, or apologize.

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

In article , says...

On 5/20/2012 6:00 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 8:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/20/12 9:46 AM, Tim wrote:









On May 20, 8:26 am, wrote:
In , dump-on-
says...

...revel in your heresy.

One of my relatives by marriage is a Southern Baptist bible thumper who
is always misquoting or misinterpreting the "old" testament in his
attempts to justify his bigotry. That in itself is funny, because the
"old" testament isn't even really his "big book of religion."

Anyway, he was on same rant about the defense of marriage bull**** the
far-right pushes and tried to quote some religious nonsense about how
the creator wanted marriage to be between one man and one woman.

That's always been a bit confusing because Adam and Eve only had sons.
It also conflicts with Deuteronomy 22:15, where the creator tells a man
with two wives how he should handle the matters that arise when you have
children with two different women. And remember Judges 8:30, in which
Gideon has 71 sons, many, many wives and a concumbine? Well, Gideon's
behavior, what do you expect from a horn player, eh?

Religion...why, it's whatever you want it to be!

Well, there's always this, too!

Deut. 22:13-21

"If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then turns against her,
14 and charges her with shameful deeds and publicly defames her, and
says, ?I took this woman, but when I came near her, I did not find her a
virgin,? 15 then the girl?s father and her mother shall take and bring
out the evidence of the girl?s virginity to the elders of the city at
the gate. 16 "And the girl?s father shall say to the elders, ?I gave my
daughter to this man for a wife, but he turned against her; 17 and
behold, he has charged her with shameful deeds, saying, "I did not find
your daughter a virgin." But this is the evidence of my daughter?s
virginity.? And they shall spread the garment before the elders of the
city. 18 "So the elders of that city shall take the man and chastise
him, 19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give it
to the girl?s father, because he publicly defamed a virgin of Israel.
And she shall remain his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days. 20
"But if this charge is true, that the girl was not found a virgin, 21
then they shall bring out the girl to the doorway of her father?s house,
and the men of her city shall stone her to death because she has
committed an act of folly in Israel, by playing the harlot in her
father?s house; thus you shall purge the evil from among you," (Deut.
22:13-21).

OT (mosaic) law.

And your point?

Virginity was highly overrated then...and now.

Why?

Don't you understand this is just more of harry and loogie hate speech?

IF by chance you are talking about what *I* posted, it's direct from the
bible, so if you want to call it "hate speech" so be it!

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

On 5/21/2012 9:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 5/20/2012 6:01 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 9:10 am, wrote:


If you take a wife and she's not a virgin, you're supposed to kill her.
Says so right in the Bible!


OT (mosaic) law.

And your point?

Nobody has been paying attention to him and harry, so now they are
attacking you personally with their hate speech...

Hey, by the way, you accused me of calling Zimmerman a "murderer".
Please show me where I EVER called him that, or apologize.


Case and point...LOL!

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

On 5/21/12 8:57 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:08 AM, Oscar wrote:


And your point?

Virginity was highly overrated then...and now.

Spoken by a man who has never deflowered one.

OH wait, didn't you hear his story about the fat, pimple faced, redhead

No one wants to hear about your sex life.

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

On 5/21/12 8:59 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/20/2012 7:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/20/12 7:27 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 5:22 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/20/12 6:00 PM, Tim wrote:

On May 20, 8:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:

Virginity was highly overrated then...and now.

Why?

It's bit of a simple-minded way to judge the "purity" or
"righteousness"
or whatever of a partner, among other things.


Very simple indeed Harry, I thought you were above that.


I don't see the connection between virginity and anything but virginity
in most people over the age of 14.

But you said before you thought it was ok to rape a 10 year old and
spirit them over the state border for an abortion to avoid the legal
ramifications...

No, I didn't, little ****.

It's Sunday, the day to...
 

On 5/21/2012 10:20 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/21/12 8:59 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 5/20/2012 7:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 5/20/12 7:27 PM, Tim wrote:
On May 20, 5:22 pm, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 5/20/12 6:00 PM, Tim wrote:

On May 20, 8:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:

Virginity was highly overrated then...and now.

Why?

It's bit of a simple-minded way to judge the "purity" or
"righteousness"
or whatever of a partner, among other things.


Very simple indeed Harry, I thought you were above that.


I don't see the connection between virginity and anything but virginity
in most people over the age of 14.

But you said before you thought it was ok to rape a 10 year old and
spirit them over the state border for an abortion to avoid the legal
ramifications...

No, I didn't, little ****.

Sure you did. I asked if ten was too young to spirit over state lines
without parental consent or even notification, and you answered with a
definitive *no it is not too young"... Period.... NAMBLA boy...