|
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
On 4/23/12 9:18 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/23/2012 9:10 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/23/2012 8:45 AM, JustWait wrote: On 4/23/2012 8:21 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/23/12 6:16 AM, JustWait wrote: On 4/22/2012 12:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. That is an outright lie. Your credibility is at stake here. Sh/it's creditability has been gone for quite a long time. Uh, he certainly DID cast him off as not relevant. Here is what he said, misspelling and all. Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Notice, "He is making the story up". Because, he *is* making the story up... He said he was watching throught a window, then he said he was walking.. Go ahead, listen to your own link... One thing I've noticed...you'd never get through the voir dire process to sit on a jury being selected for a criminal case. Says the resident stooge...snerk Harry would have to perjor himself to even try it. It would be tough for me to serve in a criminal case because I would take a civilians word over a cop, any day... That's not typically the sort of question asked in voir dire. |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
On 4/23/2012 9:29 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 4/23/12 9:18 AM, JustWait wrote: On 4/23/2012 9:10 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/23/2012 8:45 AM, JustWait wrote: On 4/23/2012 8:21 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 4/23/12 6:16 AM, JustWait wrote: On 4/22/2012 12:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. That is an outright lie. Your credibility is at stake here. Sh/it's creditability has been gone for quite a long time. Uh, he certainly DID cast him off as not relevant. Here is what he said, misspelling and all. Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Notice, "He is making the story up". Because, he *is* making the story up... He said he was watching throught a window, then he said he was walking.. Go ahead, listen to your own link... One thing I've noticed...you'd never get through the voir dire process to sit on a jury being selected for a criminal case. Says the resident stooge...snerk Harry would have to perjor himself to even try it. It would be tough for me to serve in a criminal case because I would take a civilians word over a cop, any day... That's not typically the sort of question asked in voir dire. They do ask if you have any reason you shouldn't be on the case. The case I was on was a civil action, no cops, no problem... |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
On 4/23/2012 9:21 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 4/23/2012 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. No, I write him off because he told two different stories, he is lying... Kind of like you! Show me what I've lied about. Or apologize. Betcha he meant to say you misstate the facts. I wouldn't go so far as to accuse you of lying about the facts. After all, you don't know the facts. Admit it. Exactly.... |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
In article , says...
On 4/23/2012 9:21 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/23/2012 8:49 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. No, I write him off because he told two different stories, he is lying... Kind of like you! Show me what I've lied about. Or apologize. Betcha he meant to say you misstate the facts. I wouldn't go so far as to accuse you of lying about the facts. After all, you don't know the facts. Admit it. Exactly.... cite? |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
In article , says...
On 4/23/2012 8:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/22/2012 12:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. That is an outright lie. Your credibility is at stake here. Sh/it's creditability has been gone for quite a long time. Uh, he certainly DID cast him off as not relevant. Here is what he said, misspelling and all. Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Notice, "He is making the story up". Because, he *is* making the story up... He said he was watching throught a window, then he said he was walking.. Go ahead, listen to your own link... I did, never heard the word "throught". Well, if you are too dumb to take the meaning from context, or so insecure you need to pick on spelling errors, well... You calling someone else dumb.... priceless! |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 4/23/2012 8:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/22/2012 12:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. That is an outright lie. Your credibility is at stake here. Sh/it's creditability has been gone for quite a long time. Uh, he certainly DID cast him off as not relevant. Here is what he said, misspelling and all. Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Notice, "He is making the story up". Because, he *is* making the story up... He said he was watching throught a window, then he said he was walking.. Go ahead, listen to your own link... I did, never heard the word "throught". Well, if you are too dumb to take the meaning from context, or so insecure you need to pick on spelling errors, well... You calling someone else dumb.... priceless! You are the very definition of dumb, little toady. If you look up dumb on Google, a photo of you pops up. -- Sent from my Apple iPad |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
On 4/24/2012 8:16 AM, x`man wrote:
wrote: In , says... On 4/23/2012 8:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/22/2012 12:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. That is an outright lie. Your credibility is at stake here. Sh/it's creditability has been gone for quite a long time. Uh, he certainly DID cast him off as not relevant. Here is what he said, misspelling and all. Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Notice, "He is making the story up". Because, he *is* making the story up... He said he was watching throught a window, then he said he was walking.. Go ahead, listen to your own link... I did, never heard the word "throught". Well, if you are too dumb to take the meaning from context, or so insecure you need to pick on spelling errors, well... You calling someone else dumb.... priceless! You are the very definition of dumb, little toady. If you look up dumb on Google, a photo of you pops up. Wow, that's the dumbest put down I ever heard... |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
On 4/24/2012 8:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/24/2012 8:16 AM, x`man wrote: wrote: In , says... On 4/23/2012 8:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/22/2012 12:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. That is an outright lie. Your credibility is at stake here. Sh/it's creditability has been gone for quite a long time. Uh, he certainly DID cast him off as not relevant. Here is what he said, misspelling and all. Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Notice, "He is making the story up". Because, he *is* making the story up... He said he was watching throught a window, then he said he was walking.. Go ahead, listen to your own link... I did, never heard the word "throught". Well, if you are too dumb to take the meaning from context, or so insecure you need to pick on spelling errors, well... You calling someone else dumb.... priceless! You are the very definition of dumb, little toady. If you look up dumb on Google, a photo of you pops up. Wow, that's the dumbest put down I ever heard... Harry perceives himself as superior to you. He thinks he's safe taking lame derogatory swipes at you. But the only thing he's doing is showing what a cowardly bully and liar he is. |
For those who think Zimmerman didn't persue Martin
On 4/24/12 8:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/24/2012 8:16 AM, x`man wrote: wrote: In , says... On 4/23/2012 8:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/22/2012 12:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... In raweb.com, 5@ 5.com says... On 4/22/2012 9:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 5:43 PM, wrote: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 14:14:39 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 11:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 4/21/2012 9:55 AM, Oscar wrote: On 4/21/2012 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUqUGJ9a3yk Funny thing is that the lady who's back yard was where Martin got shot has tried to talk to the authorities about this and they haven't responded..... Oh, and Hmmmm..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYf2x...eature=related Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Yeah, sure. You do realize that the prosecutor has already interviewed him, don't you? Really??? He *interviewed* him! HOLY CRAP, IT'S ALL OVER! LOL! For him that is, especially if the defense has seen this video. And I am sure they have. If he wasn't relevant as you say, then why would the prosecution bother with interviewing him? I see your problem, you are such a FOXite that you have these huge blinders on and can't see the big picture about ANYTHING. Oh, and I thought you said you were done...... Everybody gets interviewed, even idiots. Whether this guy is credible in court is up to the jury. Giving status to somebody because they got an interview is just idiotic. exactly. But YOU have already cast him off as not relevant because FOX told you to. That is an outright lie. Your credibility is at stake here. Sh/it's creditability has been gone for quite a long time. Uh, he certainly DID cast him off as not relevant. Here is what he said, misspelling and all. Guranteed this guy won't be in court. First he said he was in his house, then he says later "from where I was walking"... He is making the story up... Notice, "He is making the story up". Because, he *is* making the story up... He said he was watching throught a window, then he said he was walking.. Go ahead, listen to your own link... I did, never heard the word "throught". Well, if you are too dumb to take the meaning from context, or so insecure you need to pick on spelling errors, well... You calling someone else dumb.... priceless! You are the very definition of dumb, little toady. If you look up dumb on Google, a photo of you pops up. Wow, that's the dumbest put down I ever heard... Yawn. You're such a little bitty man with a little bitty brain. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com