| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#32
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
More about the right's new darling:
|
|
#33
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
In article ,
says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:03:56 -0400, Oscar wrote: On 3/31/2012 12:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:53:48 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 3/31/2012 8:10 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, wrote: (CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and could become violent. The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005 from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ... But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped." Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High. How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit? Making up **** again, Harry? I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can understand. What political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? So, it's true, all you have is name calling. Just like the good democrat you are... I'll ask again, what political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? Neither. The liberals have taken up the task of hanging Zimmerman. I, personally, along with all the conservatives I know, want to see the investigation take it's course and justice, whatever it may be, be done. Now, wake the f**k up. YOU are the one that needs to "wake the **** up", Asshole. I've said all along that there was NO INVESTIGATION, and that IS the problem. Ahh, but there is an investigation. Where you been. Ya, I know, sitting in a post hole. Holy ****. It's like talking to a sack of rocks - dull rocks. Well, then, Asshole, do show me. Where are the toxicology reports? Where are the investigative reports that are usually a part of a death by gun crime such as carriers of physical evidence, fingernail scrapings, DNA swabbings, substrate control, did CSI thoroughly document the scene by photographs, sketches and a secondary walk through? Where is the usual video walkthrough? How about blood splatter, trajectory determination, serology and photography? What are the results of the functionality text on the firearm that SHOULD have been done. |
|
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
|
|
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
In article ,
says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:09:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:39:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:36 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: (CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and could become violent. The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005 from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ... But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped." Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High. How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit? Making up **** again, Harry? I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can understand. What political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? So, why has the extreme left found him guilty without a trial? Who, exactly has "found him guilty without a trial"? Why did the extreme left have the incredible audacity to ruin peoples lives by tweeting addresses thought to belong to Zimmerman? Why the hell would the lefties involve and put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman? What thought process other than hate and the desire for "vigilante justice" explain that sort of bizarre behavior. Because of two Hollywood types, you think everyone on the left is like that? I made no comment concerning "Hollywood types." Seems like you have some deep seated issues with prejudice, yourself. No, this particular point in the discussion is about "put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman. It was two Hollywood types that tried to give out Zimmerman's address. They didn't just try and their foolish actions may get innocent people hurt. I still don't know what a "Hollywood type" is. Schwarzenegger? Rivera? Reagan? Puck? John Wayne? Please elucidate. You'd best stop with the big words. The poor boy will be spending the rest of the night with his nose buried in the dictionary, if he owns one. ESAD, Asshole. |
|
#36
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
On 4/1/12 8:44 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:35:37 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:39:45 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:36 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, wrote: (CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and could become violent. The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005 from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ... But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped." Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High. How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit? Making up **** again, Harry? I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can understand. What political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? So, why has the extreme left found him guilty without a trial? Who, exactly has "found him guilty without a trial"? Why did the extreme left have the incredible audacity to ruin peoples lives by tweeting addresses thought to belong to Zimmerman? Why the hell would the lefties involve and put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman? What thought process other than hate and the desire for "vigilante justice" explain that sort of bizarre behavior. Because of two Hollywood types, you think everyone on the left is like that? I made no comment concerning "Hollywood types." Seems like you have some deep seated issues with prejudice, yourself. No, this particular point in the discussion is about "put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman. It was two Hollywood types that tried to give out Zimmerman's address. They didn't just try and their foolish actions may get innocent people hurt. I still don't know what a "Hollywood type" is. Schwarzenegger? Rivera? Reagan? Puck? John Wayne? Then you're not very bright and there's no sense trying to give you sense. Nice, the best you got is argumentum ad hominem. I think iBoater is a moron, and I don't see you as being an iota brighter. You're just an argumentative asshole with nothing to add to the debate. |
|
#37
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
In article , dump-on-
says... On 4/1/12 8:44 AM, wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:35:37 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:39:45 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:36 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, wrote: (CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and could become violent. The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005 from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ... But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped." Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High. How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit? Making up **** again, Harry? I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can understand. What political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? So, why has the extreme left found him guilty without a trial? Who, exactly has "found him guilty without a trial"? Why did the extreme left have the incredible audacity to ruin peoples lives by tweeting addresses thought to belong to Zimmerman? Why the hell would the lefties involve and put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman? What thought process other than hate and the desire for "vigilante justice" explain that sort of bizarre behavior. Because of two Hollywood types, you think everyone on the left is like that? I made no comment concerning "Hollywood types." Seems like you have some deep seated issues with prejudice, yourself. No, this particular point in the discussion is about "put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman. It was two Hollywood types that tried to give out Zimmerman's address. They didn't just try and their foolish actions may get innocent people hurt. I still don't know what a "Hollywood type" is. Schwarzenegger? Rivera? Reagan? Puck? John Wayne? Then you're not very bright and there's no sense trying to give you sense. Nice, the best you got is argumentum ad hominem. I think iBoater is a moron, and I don't see you as being an iota brighter. You're just an argumentative asshole with nothing to add to the debate. iBoater is our old friend Jim. |
|
#38
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
In article , dump-on-
says... On 4/1/12 8:44 AM, wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:35:37 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:39:45 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:36 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, wrote: (CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and could become violent. The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005 from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ... But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped." Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High. How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit? Making up **** again, Harry? I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can understand. What political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? So, why has the extreme left found him guilty without a trial? Who, exactly has "found him guilty without a trial"? Why did the extreme left have the incredible audacity to ruin peoples lives by tweeting addresses thought to belong to Zimmerman? Why the hell would the lefties involve and put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman? What thought process other than hate and the desire for "vigilante justice" explain that sort of bizarre behavior. Because of two Hollywood types, you think everyone on the left is like that? I made no comment concerning "Hollywood types." Seems like you have some deep seated issues with prejudice, yourself. No, this particular point in the discussion is about "put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman. It was two Hollywood types that tried to give out Zimmerman's address. They didn't just try and their foolish actions may get innocent people hurt. I still don't know what a "Hollywood type" is. Schwarzenegger? Rivera? Reagan? Puck? John Wayne? Then you're not very bright and there's no sense trying to give you sense. Nice, the best you got is argumentum ad hominem. I think iBoater is a moron, and I don't see you as being an iota brighter. You're just an argumentative asshole with nothing to add to the debate. Says the argumentative asshole. |
|
#39
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
On 4/1/12 8:56 AM, BAR wrote:
In , dump-on- says... On 4/1/12 8:44 AM, wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:35:37 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:39:45 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:36 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, wrote: (CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and could become violent. The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005 from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ... But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped." Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High. How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit? Making up **** again, Harry? I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can understand. What political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? So, why has the extreme left found him guilty without a trial? Who, exactly has "found him guilty without a trial"? Why did the extreme left have the incredible audacity to ruin peoples lives by tweeting addresses thought to belong to Zimmerman? Why the hell would the lefties involve and put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman? What thought process other than hate and the desire for "vigilante justice" explain that sort of bizarre behavior. Because of two Hollywood types, you think everyone on the left is like that? I made no comment concerning "Hollywood types." Seems like you have some deep seated issues with prejudice, yourself. No, this particular point in the discussion is about "put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman. It was two Hollywood types that tried to give out Zimmerman's address. They didn't just try and their foolish actions may get innocent people hurt. I still don't know what a "Hollywood type" is. Schwarzenegger? Rivera? Reagan? Puck? John Wayne? Then you're not very bright and there's no sense trying to give you sense. Nice, the best you got is argumentum ad hominem. I think iBoater is a moron, and I don't see you as being an iota brighter. You're just an argumentative asshole with nothing to add to the debate. iBoater is our old friend Jim. Jim who? I thought he was the moron who posted here as Loogywhatever. Doesn't make much difference, a pile of dung by any other name still smells like dung. |
|
#40
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
More about the right's new darling:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:56:15 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 4/1/12 8:44 AM, wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:35:37 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:39:45 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:36 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, wrote: (CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and could become violent. The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005 from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ... But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped." Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High. How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit? Making up **** again, Harry? I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can understand. What political party has taken the task of defending Zimmerman? So, why has the extreme left found him guilty without a trial? Who, exactly has "found him guilty without a trial"? Why did the extreme left have the incredible audacity to ruin peoples lives by tweeting addresses thought to belong to Zimmerman? Why the hell would the lefties involve and put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman? What thought process other than hate and the desire for "vigilante justice" explain that sort of bizarre behavior. Because of two Hollywood types, you think everyone on the left is like that? I made no comment concerning "Hollywood types." Seems like you have some deep seated issues with prejudice, yourself. No, this particular point in the discussion is about "put everybody at risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman. It was two Hollywood types that tried to give out Zimmerman's address. They didn't just try and their foolish actions may get innocent people hurt. I still don't know what a "Hollywood type" is. Schwarzenegger? Rivera? Reagan? Puck? John Wayne? Then you're not very bright and there's no sense trying to give you sense. Nice, the best you got is argumentum ad hominem. I think iBoater is a moron, and I don't see you as being an iota brighter. You're just an argumentative asshole with nothing to add to the debate. iBoater is our old friend Jim. Nah, Jim wouldn't threaten a duel for being called 'Kevin'. Besides, even Jim displayed a little sense every now and then. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Darling of the Right, Dick Cheney Gets an Award | General | |||
Linear Mode
