BoatBanter.com - More about the right's new darling:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:56:15 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 4/1/12 8:44 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:35:37 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:39:45 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:52:04 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:10:36 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:36:38 -0400, wrote:

(CBS News) - An anonymous former co-worker of George Zimmerman, the man
who shot and killed unarmed teen Trayvon Martin five weeks ago, told a
newspaper that Zimmerman "loved being in charge ... loved the power" and
could become violent.

The New York Daily News reported Friday that Zimmerman was fired in 2005
from his job as a party security guard for being too aggressive, quoting
a former co-worker as saying that "usually he was just a cool guy. ...
But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped."

Yup. He's guilty as ****. Hang him. High.

How did you get the 'right's new darling' bit?

Making up **** again, Harry?

I'll answer with a question, so even a thick senile asshole like you can
understand. What political party has taken the task of defending
Zimmerman?

So, why has the extreme left found him guilty without a trial?

Who, exactly has "found him guilty without a trial"?

Why did the extreme left have the incredible audacity to ruin peoples
lives by tweeting addresses thought to belong to Zimmerman? Why the
hell would the lefties involve and put everybody at risk that lived at
the same address as Zimmerman? What thought process other than hate
and the desire for "vigilante justice" explain that sort of bizarre
behavior.

Because of two Hollywood types, you think everyone on the left is like
that?

I made no comment concerning "Hollywood types." Seems like you have
some deep seated issues with prejudice, yourself.

No, this particular point in the discussion is about "put everybody at
risk that lived at the same address as Zimmerman. It was two Hollywood
types that tried to give out Zimmerman's address.

They didn't just try and their foolish actions may get innocent people
hurt. I still don't know what a "Hollywood type" is. Schwarzenegger?
Rivera? Reagan? Puck? John Wayne?

Then you're not very bright and there's no sense trying to give you
sense.

Nice, the best you got is argumentum ad hominem.

I think iBoater is a moron, and I don't see you as being an iota
brighter. You're just an argumentative asshole with nothing to add to
the debate.

iBoater is our old friend Jim.

Nah, Jim wouldn't threaten a duel for being called 'Kevin'. Besides, even Jim displayed a little
sense every now and then.

ESAD, racist Asshole.