|
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:53:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted political? I think not. Is this political: http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx I think not. I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is political either. Why do you imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'? CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period. Just as much as the Washington Post is nothing but left-wing political. Period. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:55:44 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 8:33 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:59:59 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. Harry, do you agree with the activities of the Muslims in Paris and the failure of the police to stop it? I'm concerned about the crazy christian conservatives who want to turn the united states into a theocracy. I'll let the french handle their own problems. Question unanswered. Can you not simply carry on a conversation? The post had nothing to do with conservatives versus Muslims. I respect beliefs of Muslims as much as those of Christians, Jews, Buddhists, etc. The post had to do with the violations of rights by folks exercising a belief. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:13:43 -0500, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 8:55 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 8:33 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:59:59 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. Harry, do you agree with the activities of the Muslims in Paris and the failure of the police to stop it? I'm concerned about the crazy christian conservatives who want to turn the united states into a theocracy. I'll let the french handle their own problems. Can you name one of those Crazy Conservatives... Cause the Muslims are really making changes over there, taking land, occupying and subverting the laws... I will wait for you to show me the CC doing that here? Don't let Harry make it a Christian versus Muslim issue. It's not. It's a rights issue. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? That suggestion about Santorm is just more DNC hyper-bull**** spread by the MSM... |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:10:23 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 9:03 AM, BAR wrote: In b.com, says... On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:20:04 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 8:15 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted political? I think not. Is this political: http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx I think not. I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is political either. Why do you imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'? CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period. Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because of the source? Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN? The odds are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's scam broadcasting operation. When was the 1st amendment repealed? The question, mr. undereducated, was whether the scammy pat robertson christian broadcasting network had credibility, not whether it could broadcast the crap it does. Go back to school and learn how to read for content. I see Harry is back in his personal attack and insult mode. He doesn't seem to have any self restraint Harry is too easy. Harry thinks that you don't understand what you read and therefore often jump in with an "argument" that has nothing to do with the subject under discussion. Harry, if you'll go back and look at this thread, you'll see that you've just described yourself to a 'T'. Congratulations. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 9:02 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? Try telling a joke about Catholics, then tell the same one about Muslims here and you will see... |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. It's raw fear... |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 8:15 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted political? I think not. Is this political: http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx I think not. I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is political either. Why do you imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'? CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period. Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because of the source? Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN? The odds are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's scam broadcasting operation. When was the 1st amendment repealed? Jan 21, 2008.. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 8:29 AM, oscar wrote:
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:20:04 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 8:15 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted political? I think not. Is this political: http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx I think not. I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is political either. Why do you imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'? CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period. Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because of the source? Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN? The odds are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's scam broadcasting operation. When was the 1st amendment repealed? The question, mr. undereducated, was whether the scammy pat robertson christian broadcasting network had credibility, not whether it could broadcast the crap it does. Go back to school and learn how to read for content. I see Harry is back in his personal attack and insult mode. He doesn't seem to have any self restraint well, we all knew he would have to crank it up for election season. Too bad really, but he stated scant days after the agreement began... |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , dump-on-
says... On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politic...etterhead-2nd% 20hearing.pdf "When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard." "Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that?s practically an entire summer?s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn?t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn?t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn?t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice." Ms. Fluke needs to understand that her employer or school is not responsible for the cost of her birth control pills. Nor is that employer responsible for the cost of condoms. If she doesn't want to get pregnant she can stopping ****ing guys and start studying. It is her choice and she should be responsible for paying for her choices. If Ms. Fluke doesn't like the policies of Georgetown University than she is free to attend another school. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article m,
says... On 3/2/2012 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:30:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. Can,t get the link to work. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/29ghyhx Got it. And the cops were ordered to do nothing? That's the french for you. Cheese eating surrender monkeys. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 10:47 AM, BAR wrote:
In article0cOdnXcYyP1yqc_SnZ2dnUVZ_qadnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politic...etterhead-2nd% 20hearing.pdf "When I look around my campus, I see the faces of the women affected, and I have heard more and more of their stories. . On a daily basis, I hear from yet another woman from Georgetown or other schools or who works for a religiously affiliated employer who has suffered financial, emotional, and medical burdens because of this lack of contraceptive coverage. And so, I am here to share their voices and I thank you for allowing them to be heard." "Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that?s practically an entire summer?s salary. Forty percent of female students at Georgetown Law report struggling financially as a result of this policy. One told us of how embarrassed and powerless she felt when she was standing at the pharmacy counter, learning for the first time that contraception wasn?t covered, and had to walk away because she couldn?t afford it. Women like her have no choice but to go without contraception. Just last week, a married female student told me she had to stop using contraception because she couldn?t afford it any longer. Women employed in low wage jobs without contraceptive coverage face the same choice." Ms. Fluke needs to understand that her employer or school is not responsible for the cost of her birth control pills. Nor is that employer responsible for the cost of condoms. If she doesn't want to get pregnant she can stopping ****ing guys and start studying. It is her choice and she should be responsible for paying for her choices. If Ms. Fluke doesn't like the policies of Georgetown University than she is free to attend another school. Her insurer is responsible. Don't like it? Move to a religious state. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 10:48 AM, BAR wrote:
In aweb.com, says... On 3/2/2012 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:30:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. Can,t get the link to work. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/29ghyhx Got it. And the cops were ordered to do nothing? That's the french for you. Cheese eating surrender monkeys. The United States hasn't won a serious shooting war against a serious opponent since World War II, and that war required many allies. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , dump-on-
says... On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. What does the 1st amendment state? I'll help you and post it here for you. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 11:10 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleTMadnbDP1J8G3M_SnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. What does the 1st amendment state? I'll help you and post it here for you. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Hehehe. So, we do have spoken aloud group prayer each morning in the public schools, eh? If we did, it would be "establishment" of religion. Sorry, you lose. Again. *You* can exercise your religion. Your public school system cannot. Do you understand the difference? |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 10:48 AM, BAR wrote:
In aweb.com, says... On 3/2/2012 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:30:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. Can,t get the link to work. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/29ghyhx Got it. And the cops were ordered to do nothing? That's the french for you. Cheese eating surrender monkeys. Well, the link I posted shows exactly the same thing. The Judge let the Muslim break the law, because he and the defendant are Muslim... |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:09:50 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: On 3/3/12 10:48 AM, BAR wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 3/2/2012 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:30:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. Can,t get the link to work. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/29ghyhx Got it. And the cops were ordered to do nothing? That's the french for you. Cheese eating surrender monkeys. The United States hasn't won a serious shooting war against a serious opponent since World War II, and that war required many allies. I take it you object to the use of the word monkey. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 11:30 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/3/2012 11:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 11:10 AM, BAR wrote: In articleTMadnbDP1J8G3M_SnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. What does the 1st amendment state? I'll help you and post it here for you. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Hehehe. So, we do have spoken aloud group prayer each morning in the public schools, eh? If we did, it would be "establishment" of religion. Sorry, you lose. Again. *You* can exercise your religion. Your public school system cannot. Do you understand the difference? Facts are facts. Weather you believe in Religion or not, the law says you can't tell me how to celebrate my faith, No one is telling you you cannot pray in a public school. Go right ahead, as an individual. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/2012 2:18 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 11:30 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 11:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 11:10 AM, BAR wrote: In articleTMadnbDP1J8G3M_SnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. What does the 1st amendment state? I'll help you and post it here for you. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Hehehe. So, we do have spoken aloud group prayer each morning in the public schools, eh? If we did, it would be "establishment" of religion. Sorry, you lose. Again. *You* can exercise your religion. Your public school system cannot. Do you understand the difference? Facts are facts. Weather you believe in Religion or not, the law says you can't tell me how to celebrate my faith, No one is telling you you cannot pray in a public school. Go right ahead, as an individual. You are telling me I have to provide services that are against my religion and conscience. And don't tell me "the insurance company pays". You and I, and everyone else knows the insurance company will take that into consideration when putting together the package for the religious employer, and charge them more for the group plan, based on the anticipation of more services, which is of course how insurance companies work... |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 1:16 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. I'm hoping the young lady who Limbaugh slandered big time will initiate a massive lawsuit against him. She is a private citizen and Limbaugh the Pig will not be able to hide behind a claim that she was a public figure when she testified before Congress. The woman should have all the help she needs from her faculty and fellow students at Georgetown Law. I'm also pleased to read that at least a handful of Limbaugh the Pig's advertisers have decided to part ways with him. There's no real civil penalty in most cases for insulting a public figure on the airways. There are for what Limbaugh the Pig did. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On 3/3/12 2:31 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/3/2012 2:18 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 11:30 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 11:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 11:10 AM, BAR wrote: In articleTMadnbDP1J8G3M_SnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. What does the 1st amendment state? I'll help you and post it here for you. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Hehehe. So, we do have spoken aloud group prayer each morning in the public schools, eh? If we did, it would be "establishment" of religion. Sorry, you lose. Again. *You* can exercise your religion. Your public school system cannot. Do you understand the difference? Facts are facts. Weather you believe in Religion or not, the law says you can't tell me how to celebrate my faith, No one is telling you you cannot pray in a public school. Go right ahead, as an individual. You are telling me I have to provide services that are against my religion and conscience. And don't tell me "the insurance company pays". You and I, and everyone else knows the insurance company will take that into consideration when putting together the package for the religious employer, and charge them more for the group plan, based on the anticipation of more services, which is of course how insurance companies work... Lots of us pay taxes that go for "services" that are against our conscience. That's the way it is in a complex society. No one is forcing you or yours to use contraception or get an abortion. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:05 AM, BAR wrote: In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. So... because she doesn't need birth control pills for reproductive health means that no other woman needs it for that purpose as well? Typical. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. Bull****! Ever hear of this: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" And if you really want to delve into the matter, go he http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...uotations.html |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. Oh, no, no joke to me! But, those are BARS words, nothing to do with the constitution. If you want to get into the subject go he http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...uotations.html |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article ,
says... In article , dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. What does the 1st amendment state? I'll help you and post it here for you. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Here, go WAY beyond that to get to the real truth about how our founding fathers felt about the subject: http://www.infidels.org/library/mode...uotations.html |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , dump-on-
says... On 3/3/12 11:30 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 11:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 11:10 AM, BAR wrote: In articleTMadnbDP1J8G3M_SnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 10:32 AM, JustWait wrote: On 3/3/2012 10:13 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 10:10 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? Neither. And neither did our founding fathers. Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief there is not separation of church and state. snerk Yeah, we know the constitution is a joke to you.. We get it.. No, silly...I'm giggling at the Santorumism, that we live in a theocracy...and there *is* separation of church and state. What does the 1st amendment state? I'll help you and post it here for you. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Hehehe. So, we do have spoken aloud group prayer each morning in the public schools, eh? If we did, it would be "establishment" of religion. Sorry, you lose. Again. *You* can exercise your religion. Your public school system cannot. Do you understand the difference? Facts are facts. Weather you believe in Religion or not, the law says you can't tell me how to celebrate my faith, No one is telling you you cannot pray in a public school. Go right ahead, as an individual. Just don't force MY child to. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? That suggestion about Santorm is just more DNC hyper-bull**** spread by the MSM... Holy ****, have you ever actually LISTENED to the guy? "We were put on this Earth as creatures of God to have dominion over the Earth." "The radical feminists succeeded in undermining the traditional family and convincing women that professional accomplishments are the key to happiness." This is not a political war at all. This is not a cultural war. This is a spiritual war." http://santorumexposed.com/?p=710 |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 9:02 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? Try telling a joke about Catholics, then tell the same one about Muslims here and you will see... I have a Muslim friend and I can say anything I want to him about his religion because he's knows I'm intelligent enough to know that the few terrorists that are seen on TV aren't the real Muslims. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 9:05 AM, BAR wrote: In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... In , says... In , says... On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. It has already started he http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have Muslims here. Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie. What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind and those with a political axe to grind. Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy just like that. Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. It's raw fear... That's just plain stupid. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 8:15 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted political? I think not. Is this political: http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx I think not. I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is political either. Why do you imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'? CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period. Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because of the source? Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN? The odds are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's scam broadcasting operation. When was the 1st amendment repealed? Jan 21, 2008.. That's stupid. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 8:29 AM, oscar wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:20:04 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/3/12 8:15 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted political? I think not. Is this political: http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx I think not. I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is political either. Why do you imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'? CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period. Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because of the source? Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN? The odds are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's scam broadcasting operation. When was the 1st amendment repealed? The question, mr. undereducated, was whether the scammy pat robertson christian broadcasting network had credibility, not whether it could broadcast the crap it does. Go back to school and learn how to read for content. I see Harry is back in his personal attack and insult mode. He doesn't seem to have any self restraint well, we all knew he would have to crank it up for election season. Too bad really, but he stated scant days after the agreement began... You seem to be doing quite a good job yourself. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
In article , says...
On 3/3/2012 10:48 AM, BAR wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 3/2/2012 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:30:49 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote: I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary. http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933 From CBN and it's not political? Hehehe. Right. Can,t get the link to work. Try this: http://tinyurl.com/29ghyhx Got it. And the cops were ordered to do nothing? That's the french for you. Cheese eating surrender monkeys. Well, the link I posted shows exactly the same thing. The Judge let the Muslim break the law, because he and the defendant are Muslim... Bull****. |
OT (very) - This is somewhat scary.
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:31:28 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 1:16 PM, Happy John wrote: On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:47 -0500, X ` wrote: On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote: In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on- says... Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy? What's the difference? The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you freak out. Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic 'shrooms. Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others. As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history of slaughter in the name of the faith. Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow lefty's action's belie your words. My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense. I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian" political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health issues. We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will. Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means. Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest" (http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms. When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship, she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country. Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her testimony. Lights out. Good night. Her testimony was recorded. She wanted $3000 for birth control pills. I'm hoping the young lady who Limbaugh slandered big time will initiate a massive lawsuit against him. She is a private citizen and Limbaugh the Pig will not be able to hide behind a claim that she was a public figure when she testified before Congress. The woman should have all the help she needs from her faculty and fellow students at Georgetown Law. I'm also pleased to read that at least a handful of Limbaugh the Pig's advertisers have decided to part ways with him. There's no real civil penalty in most cases for insulting a public figure on the airways. There are for what Limbaugh the Pig did. Harry, you keep describing yourself to a 't'. You've proven you can't keep a lid on yourself. I've noticed you've disregarded the questions that are pertinent. Adios. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com