Wow!
 

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:11 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

First time checking in here this year.

Congratulations, group!

Reported to higher authorities as spam related because there was not 'OT' preceding the subject.
However, as you've not been around lately, perhaps a dispensation is in order.

Te absolvo.

Wow!
 

On Jan 23, 7:53*am, Happy John wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:11 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
First time checking in here this year.

Congratulations, group!

Reported to higher authorities as spam related because there was not 'OT' preceding the subject.
However, as you've not been around lately, perhaps a dispensation is in order.

Te absolvo.

There goes Herring again....flashing his pussy !

Wow!
 

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:29:24 -0800 (PST), "*e#c" wrote:

On Jan 23, 7:53*am, Happy John wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:11 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
First time checking in here this year.

Congratulations, group!

Reported to higher authorities as spam related because there was not 'OT' preceding the subject.
However, as you've not been around lately, perhaps a dispensation is in order.

Te absolvo.

There goes Herring again....flashing his pussy !

Straighten up!

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l2...ts/TheBoss.jpg

Wow!
 

On 1/26/12 3:29 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Jan 23, 7:53 am, Happy wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:11 -0500, wrote:
First time checking in here this year.

Congratulations, group!

Reported to higher authorities as spam related because there was not 'OT' preceding the subject.
However, as you've not been around lately, perhaps a dispensation is in order.

Te absolvo.

There goes Herring again....flashing his pussy !

There's no need for those kinds of responses. With a couple of
exceptions, the posters here are trying to be civil. Why be one of the
"odd guys out"?

OT Wow!
 

On 1/26/2012 3:29 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Jan 23, 7:53 am, Happy wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:11 -0500, wrote:
First time checking in here this year.

Congratulations, group!

Reported to higher authorities as spam related because there was not 'OT' preceding the subject.
However, as you've not been around lately, perhaps a dispensation is in order.

Te absolvo.

There goes Herring again....flashing his pussy !

It seems that old yellow teeth won't follow his own request for OT in
the subject line when appropriate.

--
O M G

OT Wow!
 

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:56:56 -0500, Oscar wrote:

On 1/26/2012 3:29 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Jan 23, 7:53 am, Happy wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:11 -0500, wrote:
First time checking in here this year.

Congratulations, group!

Reported to higher authorities as spam related because there was not 'OT' preceding the subject.
However, as you've not been around lately, perhaps a dispensation is in order.

Te absolvo.

There goes Herring again....flashing his pussy !

It seems that old yellow teeth won't follow his own request for OT in
the subject line when appropriate.

It wasn't his thread, and it's no big deal. It's definitely not worth the ****ing name-calling!

OT Wow!
 

On 1/27/12 7:00 AM, Happy John wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:56:56 -0500, wrote:

On 1/26/2012 3:29 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Jan 23, 7:53 am, Happy wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:12:11 -0500, wrote:
First time checking in here this year.

Congratulations, group!

Reported to higher authorities as spam related because there was not 'OT' preceding the subject.
However, as you've not been around lately, perhaps a dispensation is in order.

Te absolvo.

There goes Herring again....flashing his pussy !

It seems that old yellow teeth won't follow his own request for OT in
the subject line when appropriate.

It wasn't his thread, and it's no big deal. It's definitely not worth the ****ing name-calling!


Hey! Watch it with the ****ing language! :)

OT Wow!
 

On 1/27/2012 7:00 AM, Happy John wrote:


It wasn't his thread, and it's no big deal. It's definitely not worth the ****ing name-calling!

Just let them go John, come on... Why even address it. This is what
happens every time. Somebody tolls, and somebody like you, answers...
Just let them troll, it's not a troll if nobody answers...

OT Wow!
 

On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:06:24 -0500, JustWait
wrote:

it's not a troll if nobody answers...

===

Good point.

OT Wow!
 

On 1/27/12 2:34 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:06:24 -0500,
wrote:

it's not a troll if nobody answers...

===

Good point.



George Berkeley would be proud. He's the "if a tree falls in the forest
and no one is there to hear it, does it make a noise" guy.