What do you assholes
think this has to do with boating? Take this where it belongs.
|
What do you people
There is something deliciously ironic about posting an item that has nothing
to do with boating targeting the people who post items that have nothing to do with boating. Mmmmm, delicious irony. "Nace" wrote in message m... think this has to do with boating? Take this where it belongs. |
What do you assholes
think this has to do with boating?
What? This thread you started? Nothing. Take this where it belongs. flushing sound Another NG cop. Oh boy. |
What do you people
Not really.
Yeah, really. |
What do you people
"WaIIy" wrote in message Not really. This group is nothing but a Krause/Gould propagandafest. It is? You must have missed all those helpful and intersting posts about trailering, new boat suggestions, boating reports, boat stories in the news, depth finders, installing various equipment, etc., etc., etc., It's all what you look for. |
What do you people
WaIIy wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:11:56 GMT, "Paul" wrote: There is something deliciously ironic about posting an item that has nothing to do with boating targeting the people who post items that have nothing to do with boating. Mmmmm, delicious irony. "Nace" wrote in message . com... think this has to do with boating? Take this where it belongs. Not really. This group is nothing but a Krause/Gould propagandafest. You haven't send in your membership dollar yet, Wally. |
What do you people
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:11:56 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
There is something deliciously ironic about posting an item that has nothing to do with boating targeting the people who post items that have nothing to do with boating. Mmmmm, delicious irony. "Nace" wrote in message om... think this has to do with boating? Take this where it belongs. Although the term "asshole" probably didn't win any friends, a comment about the content of the group IS on-topic. Far more so than all the OT nonsense that goes on here. The delicious irony is that you are wrong, at least in general netiquette. For those that have difficulty understanding, "topics" were established to define the area of discussion. The fact that individuals choose to ignore the topic doesn't justify the action. ....carry on. noah To email me, please remove the "FISH" from the net. |
What do you assholes
|
What do you assholes
WaIIy wrote:
On 6 Oct 2003 21:18:28 -0500, noah wrote: The fact that more than 50% of the posts here are OT doesn't make it right. That's the same mentality that encourages "bad boating". Everybody wants to do what they want to do, and without respect for guidelines and convention. Yes, the former hippies are catching up. They can do whatever the hell they want and we can deal with the result. You couldn't deal a game of solitaire, Wally. |
What do you people
Hehe, you guys are hilarious. So addicted to proving the other guy wrong.
For anyone who cares, I was simply pointing out irony. The post may or may not be on topic, the poster may be right or wrong, it doesn't matter, the irony still exists. Irony isn't a fancy way of saying someone is wrong. I thought highlighting the irony would make someone smile (I even threw in a Simpsons reference). My bad. And to pre-empt the inevitable post that points out that the post was actually not technically ironic then I will pre-concede to that as I am not an English major. But is smelled like irony. That is all, you may resume bickering now. "noah" wrote in message ... On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:11:56 GMT, "Paul" wrote: There is something deliciously ironic about posting an item that has nothing to do with boating targeting the people who post items that have nothing to do with boating. Mmmmm, delicious irony. "Nace" wrote in message om... think this has to do with boating? Take this where it belongs. Although the term "asshole" probably didn't win any friends, a comment about the content of the group IS on-topic. Far more so than all the OT nonsense that goes on here. The delicious irony is that you are wrong, at least in general netiquette. For those that have difficulty understanding, "topics" were established to define the area of discussion. The fact that individuals choose to ignore the topic doesn't justify the action. ...carry on. noah To email me, please remove the "FISH" from the net. |
What do you assholes
Yes, the former hippies are catching up.
Hippies. There's a myth for you. Just another stereotype that's easy for those who feel compelled to categorize everybody all the time. Never existed. It was a term invented by the press. In the late 60's my travels took me, briefly, to a communal farm in Davenport, WA. Nobody there even used the word. Some pals and I split school for a few weeks to go to the Haight- none there, either. The very same people who the press would have said epitomized "hippism" would never define themselves as such. The only people I ever met in the 60's who said "look at me, I'm a hippie!" were goofy junior high kids from the suburbs who bought plastic peace symbols and pop beads at Sears. Best line on the subject I can remember from those days was a reply to a newspaper reporter. I can't remember who said it. A reporter asked somebody who was fairly high profile in the anti-war movement, "What's it like to be a hippie?" The answer was brilliant: "I'm not a hippie, I'm a human being." Right on, man. :-) |
What do you assholes
In New Mexico where I was raised we certainly knew who and what hippies were
and we had a bunch of them. I never met one that I didn't like. They were easy to catagorize by dress, language, mannerisms, life style, and drug use. I suppose there were no beatnicks? Butch Gould wrote: Hippies. There's a myth for you. Just another stereotype that's easy for those who feel compelled to categorize everybody all the time. Never existed. It was a term invented by the press. In the late 60's my travels took me, briefly, to a communal farm in Davenport, WA. Nobody there even used the word. Some pals and I split school for a few weeks to go to the Haight- none there, either. The very same people who the press would have said epitomized "hippism" would never define themselves as such. The only people I ever met in the 60's who said "look at me, I'm a hippie!" were goofy junior high kids from the suburbs who bought plastic peace symbols and pop beads at Sears. Best line on the subject I can remember from those days was a reply to a newspaper reporter. I can't remember who said it. A reporter asked somebody who was fairly high profile in the anti-war movement, "What's it like to be a hippie?" The answer was brilliant: "I'm not a hippie, I'm a human being." Right on, man. :-) |
What do you assholes
Up here in NH we had them. Yes the word was coined, but we all know what it means after the fact. I know an old hippie when I see one. -W "JDavis1277" wrote in message ... In New Mexico where I was raised we certainly knew who and what hippies were and we had a bunch of them. I never met one that I didn't like. They were easy to catagorize by dress, language, mannerisms, life style, and drug use. I suppose there were no beatnicks? Butch Gould wrote: Hippies. There's a myth for you. Just another stereotype that's easy for those who feel compelled to categorize everybody all the time. Never existed. It was a term invented by the press. In the late 60's my travels took me, briefly, to a communal farm in Davenport, WA. Nobody there even used the word. Some pals and I split school for a few weeks to go to the Haight- none there, either. The very same people who the press would have said epitomized "hippism" would never define themselves as such. The only people I ever met in the 60's who said "look at me, I'm a hippie!" were goofy junior high kids from the suburbs who bought plastic peace symbols and pop beads at Sears. Best line on the subject I can remember from those days was a reply to a newspaper reporter. I can't remember who said it. A reporter asked somebody who was fairly high profile in the anti-war movement, "What's it like to be a hippie?" The answer was brilliant: "I'm not a hippie, I'm a human being." Right on, man. :-) |
What do you assholes
Not very - I'm near the border to the Peoples Republic of Taxxachusets -W "Gene Kearns" wrote in message Clams, how close to Berlin, NH are you? |
What do you assholes
I'm about 3 hours away.
-W "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:20:06 GMT, "Clams Canino" wrote: Not very - I'm near the border to the Peoples Republic of Taxxachusets -W "Gene Kearns" wrote in message Clams, how close to Berlin, NH are you? Oh... geeze.... sympathies! I have a couple of brothers-in-law there in Boston..... I may be forced to wander up toward the Berlin area.... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC. http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located. http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide |
What do you people
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:41:46 GMT, "Paul" wrote:
Hehe, you guys are hilarious. So addicted to proving the other guy wrong. For anyone who cares, I was simply pointing out irony. The post may or may not be on topic, the poster may be right or wrong, it doesn't matter, the irony still exists. Irony isn't a fancy way of saying someone is wrong. I thought highlighting the irony would make someone smile (I even threw in a Simpsons reference). My bad. And to pre-empt the inevitable post that points out that the post was actually not technically ironic then I will pre-concede to that as I am not an English major. But is smelled like irony. That is all, you may resume bickering now. Paul, bickering is one of my least favorite activities. Below that is "proving somebody wrong". Just slightly below that is plucking a wet chicken. I admit that I missed the "Mmmmm" reference the first time around. "My bad." The poster used some strong language, but he is not the only one that is frustrated with the nonsensical, pointless, misplaced, political-bashing OT posts. I have no problem with the occasional "non-boating" post. What is happening here is not the occasional excursion, but the insistance of a few "man-child" people to occupy the group and throw their tantrums. I've smelled some unfortunate things in my life, but WTF does irony smell like? :o) Regards, ....carry on. noah To email me, please remove the "FISH" from the net. |
What do you assholes
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On 07 Oct 2003 20:28:37 GMT, (JDavis1277) wrote: In New Mexico where I was raised we certainly knew who and what hippies were and we had a bunch of them. I never met one that I didn't like. They were easy to catagorize by dress, language, mannerisms, life style, and drug use. I suppose there were no beatnicks? Butch To illustrate how goofy this can get...... using dress, language, mannerisms, life style, and drug use as a predictor, how would you categorize Rush Limbaugh? Thirty-five years ago most "Hippies" called themselves "freaks" because of the way people who were quick to "categorize" looked at them.... If I understand you correctly, then we agree. Just because a person had long hair and wore ragged jeans did not mean they were a bad person. Unfortunately though, some chose to see it that way. Even today kids rebel against society. It can be in the way they dress, the music they listen to or the way they wear their hair. In the end the vast majority grow out of it, become part of the society they protest against and go to lead constructive lives. Such is the case with the beatniks, the greasers, the hippies and the head bangers of today. |
What do you assholes
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:36:08 GMT, WaIIy wrote: On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:19:41 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: Thirty-five years ago most "Hippies" called themselves "freaks" because of the way people who were quick to "categorize" looked at them.... No they didn't. Is this an invitation to partake in a childish argument or do you have any factual information to refute my statement? What were you doing in 1968? Celebrating a safe return from a trip to SE Asia. |
What do you assholes
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 23:19:12 GMT, "Jim -" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message . .. On 07 Oct 2003 20:28:37 GMT, (JDavis1277) wrote: In New Mexico where I was raised we certainly knew who and what hippies were and we had a bunch of them. I never met one that I didn't like. They were easy to catagorize by dress, language, mannerisms, life style, and drug use. I suppose there were no beatnicks? Butch To illustrate how goofy this can get...... using dress, language, mannerisms, life style, and drug use as a predictor, how would you categorize Rush Limbaugh? Thirty-five years ago most "Hippies" called themselves "freaks" because of the way people who were quick to "categorize" looked at them.... If I understand you correctly, then we agree. Just because a person had long hair and wore ragged jeans did not mean they were a bad person. Unfortunately though, some chose to see it that way. Even today kids rebel against society. It can be in the way they dress, the music they listen to or the way they wear their hair. In the end the vast majority grow out of it, become part of the society they protest against and go to lead constructive lives. Such is the case with the beatniks, the greasers, the hippies and the head bangers of today. As a old gray haired balding guy..... it makes perfect sense to me that my son should want to grow hair down to his ass..... which is what I did when I was his age and had any... Noooooo...... now these rotten kids want to *shave* their heads..... what perverts.... ...and piercings..... this kid had walked from the beach up to a service station where I was waiting to gas up..... waiting on a guy that was filling up his boat (see that on-topic segue?) ding-ding-ding and this young kid walks by with some big horseshoe shaped studs in his NIPPLES! The guy filling up with gas (about my age) remarks, "Man, that's got to really hurt!" and I shot back (crippling the guy with laughter), "Yeah, and my Dad thought *I* did some stoopid ****." He replied, "yeah, I had long hair...." Somehow, I am sure, since the beginning of time, it has been the assigned duty of every succeeding generation to find that special something which befuddles, mystifies, and enrages the preceding generation. You know what? Time and generations march on... and status quo, though appearing quite differently..... marches on as well. Approaching the age of a grandfather, I think I can finally begin to put aside most of the trappings of appearance that seem so strange and see the person for who and what they really are...... but, DAMN, that's STILL got to HURT!!!!! Come to think of it.... wonder what having a girlfriend with a large stud in her tongue would be like? I think I'll ask my wife...... Uh, if I don't get back to you tonight..... I'm O..K.. I'll be O.. K... Hey, hon....... Heck, Gene...you look like an aging hippie... |
What do you assholes
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:08:44 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote: Heck, Gene...you look like an aging hippie.. With a big lathe, :-) |
What do you assholes
Up here in Halifax a lot of school kids were 'wannabe hippies'
Funny..I loved the style of jeans the girls wore back then..low hip huggers that really complimented their butts. Now the style has come around again and I'm too old to take advantage of it....d'oh! .. Gene Kearns wrote in message They were easy to catagorize by dress, language, mannerisms, life style, and drug use. |
What do you assholes
"Don White" wrote in message ... Up here in Halifax a lot of school kids were 'wannabe hippies' Funny..I loved the style of jeans the girls wore back then..low hip huggers that really complimented their butts. Now the style has come around again and I'm too old to take advantage of it....d'oh! OK...all in favor of questioning Don further on this revelation.... |
What do you assholes
God, I remember those........... closes eyes
-W I think I just felt it move. "Gene Kearns" wrote in message The REAL THING wore *really-really-really* short short cut-off ragged jean shorts and a black body suit.... |
What do you assholes
I take that back.
Charlie's girlfriend (the one that didn't put oil in the gas) dressed like that too. (kinda ruined the moment) -W "Clams Canino" wrote in message news:rRJgb.701339$Ho3.153653@sccrnsc03... God, I remember those........... closes eyes -W I think I just felt it move. "Gene Kearns" wrote in message The REAL THING wore *really-really-really* short short cut-off ragged jean shorts and a black body suit.... |
What do you assholes
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:24:24 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote: Geeze...... you guys...... let's try this one-more-time....... I am an aging "freak" and *this* is the BIG lathe..... http://tinyurl.com/q40r ========================== Yeppers, that's a big un alright. What do you make with it? |
What do you assholes
Glad to see you can join in a discussion without having to resort to insults Harry.
Keep it up. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... Up here in Halifax a lot of school kids were 'wannabe hippies' Funny..I loved the style of jeans the girls wore back then..low hip huggers that really complimented their butts. Now the style has come around again and I'm too old to take advantage of it....d'oh! OK...all in favor of questioning Don further on this revelation.... |
What do you assholes
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
... Geeze...... you guys...... let's try this one-more-time....... I am an aging "freak" and *this* is the BIG lathe..... Damn Gene, you are freakin' cool lookin' |
What do you assholes
Geeze...... you guys...... let's try this one-more-time....... I am
an aging "freak" and *this* is the BIG lathe..... http://tinyurl.com/q40r Day-um!!!! That is a monster sized lathe! I have my dad's old Atlas/Craftsman lathe from around 1978 that still works great for small stuff. http://members.aol.com/ammonc/10100-lathe.jpg Butch Ammon |
What do you assholes
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
... On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:36:40 -0700, "jps" wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message .. . Geeze...... you guys...... let's try this one-more-time....... I am an aging "freak" and *this* is the BIG lathe..... Damn Gene, you are freakin' cool lookin' jps, you worry me....... Thanks, but that doesn't alter the fact that I think you're a cool lookin' dude. R Crumb would approve. |
What do you assholes
"WaIIy" wrote in message ... On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:52:57 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:36:08 GMT, WaIIy wrote: On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:19:41 -0400, Gene Kearns wrote: Thirty-five years ago most "Hippies" called themselves "freaks" because of the way people who were quick to "categorize" looked at them.... No they didn't. Is this an invitation to partake in a childish argument or do you have any factual information to refute my statement? How in the world would you lnow what "most" "hippies" called themselves in 1968? What were you doing in 1968? Flunking out of college. Too bad. If you had been a Bush boy, the fix would have been in and you would have graduated. |
What do you assholes
I'd better qualify my comments.
Up here it's fairly conservative and most people would raise eyebrows if they saw a 54 year old man ogling young ladies. Physically...all parts still work on occasion. Harry Krause wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... Up here in Halifax a lot of school kids were 'wannabe hippies' Funny..I loved the style of jeans the girls wore back then..low hip huggers that really complimented their butts. Now the style has come around again and I'm too old to take advantage of it....d'oh! OK...all in favor of questioning Don further on this revelation.... |
What do you assholes
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:50:38 GMT, "Don White"
wrote: I'd better qualify my comments. Up here it's fairly conservative and most people would raise eyebrows if they saw a 54 year old man ogling young ladies. Physically...all parts still work on occasion. Harry Krause wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote in message ... Up here in Halifax a lot of school kids were 'wannabe hippies' Funny..I loved the style of jeans the girls wore back then..low hip huggers that really complimented their butts. Now the style has come around again and I'm too old to take advantage of it....d'oh! OK...all in favor of questioning Don further on this revelation.... Hell, I'm older than you are, and I oogle any good-looking female who I perceive to be "of age." I don't grope them, as Arnold does, but, then, I'm not a Californian. |
What do you assholes
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:50:38 GMT, "Don White"
wrote: Up here it's fairly conservative and most people would raise eyebrows if they saw a 54 year old man ogling young ladies. ============================ Does this mean I can't go to Canada any more? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com