![]() |
Another Virgina Tech shooting
|
Another Virgina Tech shooting
In article om, .
@..com says... On 12/12/2011 9:57 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 12/12/11 9:53 AM, JustWait wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:51 AM, Drifter wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 12/12/11 9:18 AM, North Star wrote: On Dec 12, 9:29 am, wrote: On 12/12/2011 7:45 AM, BAR wrote: In raweb.com, . @..com says... On 12/11/2011 2:27 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:16:42 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:46:07 -0500, wrote: You seem to be extremely interested in getting Mary Jane legalized. Do you have an appetite for the stuff? The real reason a lot of us want to see this legalized is because the war on drugs has become one of the worst examples of a bloated government program that simply wastes tons of money and returns nothing to the tax payer. The blow back has resulted in some of the worst constitutional assaults (profiling,.warrentless car searches, warrantless aerial surveillance with IR imagery, warrantless wire taps, financial monitoring and the list goes on) Most of the abuses in the patriot act have been SOP for the DEA for years. === In addition to that, the "war on drugs" has become very much like prohibition. The demand is there, the consumers are there, so a huge illicit and illegal industry has sprung up to keep the market supplied. Profits of this industry are artificially inflated because of the illegality, and because of the huge profits, corruption and crime run rampant everywhere the drug trade operates. Like prohibition the supporting criminal supply network is far worse than the original problem. Everyone wanted to make drugs illegal to protect their children but the kids are getting drugs anyway along with the societal problems of the drug industry which have become pervasive. The war on drugs is unwinable. The war on crime is unwinable. The war on terrorism is unwinable. Wars, the way we fight them, are unwinable. Let's abandon those efforts. We should also can all laws and the IRS code in favor of the ten commandments. Then we won't need no steeenkin lawyers no more. Require everyone 18 and over to carry a loaded pistol. Yup. Condition 1. Then see how ****heads like Krause behave. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Would packin' heat make y'all feel like big brave men? Being in the navy didn't... I doubt if navy men would need to strap on heat to take a walk in the Virginia woods, for protection against , get this, dogs. Cowboy Harry doesn't feel safe unless he is surrounded by his guns. He carries for DOGS!?? Holy ****, my 90 year old dad just carried a walking stick for that... What an asshole. All you got to do is wave a stick at most dogs and they will run, but Harry Krause is just dying to see what he can do to flesh with his widdew capguns weather it be a human or now even an innocent dog... asshole... Hehehe. Morons. We're talking about packs of feral dogs loose in the Shenandoah hills and valleys. There were several packs running loose a couple of years ago, and there were attacks on hikers. One hiker and his buddies had just returned from a major trail to a parking area and was attacked and severely bitten by feral dogs. The "expertise" you assholes don't have is just...astonishing. These packs of feral dogs, if they are still around, would love to snack on a greasy little **** like you, iSnotty. One person suffers a dog bite and you strap on heat like Rambo. What kind of pussy are you? He and Don are vying for who's the biggest coward here. It's a toss up. What is funny is how they don't even mind showing everyone here just how cowardly they are! |
Another Virgina Tech shooting
On 12/12/11 10:23 AM, North Star wrote:
On Dec 12, 10:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 12/12/11 9:53 AM, JustWait wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:51 AM, Drifter wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 12/12/11 9:18 AM, North Star wrote: On Dec 12, 9:29 am, wrote: On 12/12/2011 7:45 AM, BAR wrote: In raweb.com, . @..com says... On 12/11/2011 2:27 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:16:42 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:46:07 -0500, wrote: You seem to be extremely interested in getting Mary Jane legalized. Do you have an appetite for the stuff? The real reason a lot of us want to see this legalized is because the war on drugs has become one of the worst examples of a bloated government program that simply wastes tons of money and returns nothing to the tax payer. The blow back has resulted in some of the worst constitutional assaults (profiling,.warrentless car searches, warrantless aerial surveillance with IR imagery, warrantless wire taps, financial monitoring and the list goes on) Most of the abuses in the patriot act have been SOP for the DEA for years. === In addition to that, the "war on drugs" has become very much like prohibition. The demand is there, the consumers are there, so a huge illicit and illegal industry has sprung up to keep the market supplied. Profits of this industry are artificially inflated because of the illegality, and because of the huge profits, corruption and crime run rampant everywhere the drug trade operates. Like prohibition the supporting criminal supply network is far worse than the original problem. Everyone wanted to make drugs illegal to protect their children but the kids are getting drugs anyway along with the societal problems of the drug industry which have become pervasive. The war on drugs is unwinable. The war on crime is unwinable. The war on terrorism is unwinable. Wars, the way we fight them, are unwinable. Let's abandon those efforts. We should also can all laws and the IRS code in favor of the ten commandments. Then we won't need no steeenkin lawyers no more. Require everyone 18 and over to carry a loaded pistol. Yup. Condition 1. Then see how ****heads like Krause behave. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Would packin' heat make y'all feel like big brave men? Being in the navy didn't... I doubt if navy men would need to strap on heat to take a walk in the Virginia woods, for protection against , get this, dogs. Cowboy Harry doesn't feel safe unless he is surrounded by his guns. He carries for DOGS!?? Holy ****, my 90 year old dad just carried a walking stick for that... What an asshole. All you got to do is wave a stick at most dogs and they will run, but Harry Krause is just dying to see what he can do to flesh with his widdew capguns weather it be a human or now even an innocent dog... asshole... Hehehe. Morons. We're talking about packs of feral dogs loose in the Shenandoah hills and valleys. There were several packs running loose a couple of years ago, and there were attacks on hikers. One hiker and his buddies had just returned from a major trail to a parking area and was attacked and severely bitten by feral dogs. The "expertise" you assholes don't have is just...astonishing. These packs of feral dogs, if they are still around, would love to snack on a greasy little **** like you, iSnotty. --http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A young girl Snotty's size got attacked and killed hiking in the Cape Breton Highlands National Park by a pack of coyotes. Not sure if 'carrying a stick' would have saved her. There have been a few bear attacks out there by the Shenandoah, and there have been sightings reported of mountain lions, though those reports haven't been verified by the rangers working the territory. A stick would be enough to ward off an iSnotty, an iLoogy, or an iFlaJim, but certainly not a pack of feral dogs or a ****ed-off bear. Of course, an eight year old girl could ward off an iSnotty with a tennis ball. -- http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug |
Another Virgina Tech shooting
On 12/12/2011 11:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 12/12/11 10:23 AM, North Star wrote: On Dec 12, 10:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 12/12/11 9:53 AM, JustWait wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:51 AM, Drifter wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 12/12/11 9:18 AM, North Star wrote: On Dec 12, 9:29 am, wrote: On 12/12/2011 7:45 AM, BAR wrote: In raweb.com, . @..com says... On 12/11/2011 2:27 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:16:42 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:46:07 -0500, wrote: You seem to be extremely interested in getting Mary Jane legalized. Do you have an appetite for the stuff? The real reason a lot of us want to see this legalized is because the war on drugs has become one of the worst examples of a bloated government program that simply wastes tons of money and returns nothing to the tax payer. The blow back has resulted in some of the worst constitutional assaults (profiling,.warrentless car searches, warrantless aerial surveillance with IR imagery, warrantless wire taps, financial monitoring and the list goes on) Most of the abuses in the patriot act have been SOP for the DEA for years. === In addition to that, the "war on drugs" has become very much like prohibition. The demand is there, the consumers are there, so a huge illicit and illegal industry has sprung up to keep the market supplied. Profits of this industry are artificially inflated because of the illegality, and because of the huge profits, corruption and crime run rampant everywhere the drug trade operates. Like prohibition the supporting criminal supply network is far worse than the original problem. Everyone wanted to make drugs illegal to protect their children but the kids are getting drugs anyway along with the societal problems of the drug industry which have become pervasive. The war on drugs is unwinable. The war on crime is unwinable. The war on terrorism is unwinable. Wars, the way we fight them, are unwinable. Let's abandon those efforts. We should also can all laws and the IRS code in favor of the ten commandments. Then we won't need no steeenkin lawyers no more. Require everyone 18 and over to carry a loaded pistol. Yup. Condition 1. Then see how ****heads like Krause behave. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Would packin' heat make y'all feel like big brave men? Being in the navy didn't... I doubt if navy men would need to strap on heat to take a walk in the Virginia woods, for protection against , get this, dogs. Cowboy Harry doesn't feel safe unless he is surrounded by his guns. He carries for DOGS!?? Holy ****, my 90 year old dad just carried a walking stick for that... What an asshole. All you got to do is wave a stick at most dogs and they will run, but Harry Krause is just dying to see what he can do to flesh with his widdew capguns weather it be a human or now even an innocent dog... asshole... Hehehe. Morons. We're talking about packs of feral dogs loose in the Shenandoah hills and valleys. There were several packs running loose a couple of years ago, and there were attacks on hikers. One hiker and his buddies had just returned from a major trail to a parking area and was attacked and severely bitten by feral dogs. The "expertise" you assholes don't have is just...astonishing. These packs of feral dogs, if they are still around, would love to snack on a greasy little **** like you, iSnotty. --http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A young girl Snotty's size got attacked and killed hiking in the Cape Breton Highlands National Park by a pack of coyotes. Not sure if 'carrying a stick' would have saved her. There have been a few bear attacks out there by the Shenandoah, and there have been sightings reported of mountain lions, though those reports haven't been verified by the rangers working the territory. A stick would be enough to ward off an iSnotty, an iLoogy, or an iFlaJim, but certainly not a pack of feral dogs or a ****ed-off bear. Of course, an eight year old girl could ward off an iSnotty with a tennis ball. We came across a bear crossing the road last Sunday. I had to hit the brakes to avoid hitting it. It didn't occur to me to whip out a gun and shoot it. If you are afraid of the creatures in the forest, Krause, stay out of the forest. It doesn't take a liberal arts student to figure that out. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error |
Another Virgina Tech shooting
On 12/12/2011 11:54 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 12/12/2011 11:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 12/12/11 10:23 AM, North Star wrote: On Dec 12, 10:57 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 12/12/11 9:53 AM, JustWait wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:51 AM, Drifter wrote: On 12/12/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 12/12/11 9:18 AM, North Star wrote: On Dec 12, 9:29 am, wrote: On 12/12/2011 7:45 AM, BAR wrote: In raweb.com, . @..com says... On 12/11/2011 2:27 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:16:42 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:46:07 -0500, wrote: You seem to be extremely interested in getting Mary Jane legalized. Do you have an appetite for the stuff? The real reason a lot of us want to see this legalized is because the war on drugs has become one of the worst examples of a bloated government program that simply wastes tons of money and returns nothing to the tax payer. The blow back has resulted in some of the worst constitutional assaults (profiling,.warrentless car searches, warrantless aerial surveillance with IR imagery, warrantless wire taps, financial monitoring and the list goes on) Most of the abuses in the patriot act have been SOP for the DEA for years. === In addition to that, the "war on drugs" has become very much like prohibition. The demand is there, the consumers are there, so a huge illicit and illegal industry has sprung up to keep the market supplied. Profits of this industry are artificially inflated because of the illegality, and because of the huge profits, corruption and crime run rampant everywhere the drug trade operates. Like prohibition the supporting criminal supply network is far worse than the original problem. Everyone wanted to make drugs illegal to protect their children but the kids are getting drugs anyway along with the societal problems of the drug industry which have become pervasive. The war on drugs is unwinable. The war on crime is unwinable. The war on terrorism is unwinable. Wars, the way we fight them, are unwinable. Let's abandon those efforts. We should also can all laws and the IRS code in favor of the ten commandments. Then we won't need no steeenkin lawyers no more. Require everyone 18 and over to carry a loaded pistol. Yup. Condition 1. Then see how ****heads like Krause behave. -- 1-20-13 The end of an error- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Would packin' heat make y'all feel like big brave men? Being in the navy didn't... I doubt if navy men would need to strap on heat to take a walk in the Virginia woods, for protection against , get this, dogs. Cowboy Harry doesn't feel safe unless he is surrounded by his guns. He carries for DOGS!?? Holy ****, my 90 year old dad just carried a walking stick for that... What an asshole. All you got to do is wave a stick at most dogs and they will run, but Harry Krause is just dying to see what he can do to flesh with his widdew capguns weather it be a human or now even an innocent dog... asshole... Hehehe. Morons. We're talking about packs of feral dogs loose in the Shenandoah hills and valleys. There were several packs running loose a couple of years ago, and there were attacks on hikers. One hiker and his buddies had just returned from a major trail to a parking area and was attacked and severely bitten by feral dogs. The "expertise" you assholes don't have is just...astonishing. These packs of feral dogs, if they are still around, would love to snack on a greasy little **** like you, iSnotty. --http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A young girl Snotty's size got attacked and killed hiking in the Cape Breton Highlands National Park by a pack of coyotes. Not sure if 'carrying a stick' would have saved her. There have been a few bear attacks out there by the Shenandoah, and there have been sightings reported of mountain lions, though those reports haven't been verified by the rangers working the territory. A stick would be enough to ward off an iSnotty, an iLoogy, or an iFlaJim, but certainly not a pack of feral dogs or a ****ed-off bear. Of course, an eight year old girl could ward off an iSnotty with a tennis ball. We came across a bear crossing the road last Sunday. I had to hit the brakes to avoid hitting it. It didn't occur to me to whip out a gun and shoot it. If you are afraid of the creatures in the forest, Krause, stay out of the forest. It doesn't take a liberal arts student to figure that out. Oh, Dr. Karen Grear of American University is just trolling again... |
Another Virgina Tech shooting
|
Another Virgina Tech shooting
|
Another Virgina Tech shooting
On 12/12/11 3:47 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:54:26 -0500, wrote: We came across a bear crossing the road last Sunday. I had to hit the brakes to avoid hitting it. It didn't occur to me to whip out a gun and shoot it. Most pocket handguns (38/9mm) would just **** off a bear. Sort of depends on the bear, eh? Or have you surveyed florida bears? -- http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug |
Another Virgina Tech shooting
On 12/12/11 3:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 12/12/2011 3:47 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:54:26 -0500, wrote: We came across a bear crossing the road last Sunday. I had to hit the brakes to avoid hitting it. It didn't occur to me to whip out a gun and shoot it. Most pocket handguns (38/9mm) would just **** off a bear. Well, like most of his dumb posts, he changed the rules from dogs to bears, to make a point but as usual, he really didn't think it out... Sure I did. I can think, and I have a knowledge base. That is one of the many things that differentiate us. You're stupid, uneducated and don't know anything. -- http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com