|
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
In article ,
says... On 11/23/2011 8:45 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/23/11 8:40 AM, North Star wrote: On Nov 23, 9:05 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 11/23/11 7:56 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 22/11/2011 6:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: GOP candidate discussion on foreign policy. According to Herman Cain, Iran has mountains. Found it, a reminder of 0bama's knowledge of USA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws Also checked, Iran has mountains, 5610 meters with year around snow qualify in the fleabagger mind? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mountains_in_Iran Krause steps in it again. Hehehe. Gotta love rec.boats for its moronic righties. Any number of commentators last night were poking fun at Cain's comments about Cain's Iranian mountain statements. "Iran has mountains..." Time magazine had a recap: 47 minutes. We are back with a question from the audience, except there is no question from the audience. An awkward minute or so later, a questioner appears: ?If Israel attacked Iran to prevent Tehran from getting nuclear weapons, would you help Israel launch the attack or support it otherwise?? Cain answers without any answer. ?I would first make sure that they had a credible plan for success, clarity of mission and clarity of success. Remember, when you talk about attacking Iran, it is a very mountainous region.? Imagine President Cain on the phone with the Israeli Prime Minister. ?We will attack at dawn,? says the prime minister. ?Have you considered the mountains?? inquires President Cain. Read mohttp://swampland.time.com/2011/11/23...ile-not-watchi... "Have you considered the mountains..." Heheheh. What a frippin' moron Cain is. He's the perfect candidate for dopers like you, Bertie. The mountains are going to give the Israeli air force problems, Cain apparently thinks. D'oh.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe Cain thinks the Israeli Air Force can't fly that high. Most mountains in Iran are around 14,000 feet, no obstacle for the Israeli air force. And the Iranian nuke facilities are in underground concrete bunkers, so it isn't the mountains that are in the way. Cain is just ignorant and apparently too intellectually lazy to be a serious candidate. And you are too intellectually lazy to participate in a legit conversation... He's too stupid (and Suckling Don is too) to know that there are other obstacles besides elevation. Perfect for hiding anti-aircraft weapons, and there are vast cave systems that are good for hiding troops. Many of them have been upgraded to have food, cooking facilities, sleeping facilities, etc. |
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
|
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
On 23/11/2011 6:45 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/23/11 8:40 AM, North Star wrote: On Nov 23, 9:05 am, X ` Mandump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you- can.com wrote: On 11/23/11 7:56 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 22/11/2011 6:52 PM, X ` Man wrote: GOP candidate discussion on foreign policy. According to Herman Cain, Iran has mountains. Found it, a reminder of 0bama's knowledge of USA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws Also checked, Iran has mountains, 5610 meters with year around snow qualify in the fleabagger mind? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mountains_in_Iran Krause steps in it again. Hehehe. Gotta love rec.boats for its moronic righties. Any number of commentators last night were poking fun at Cain's comments about Cain's Iranian mountain statements. "Iran has mountains..." Time magazine had a recap: 47 minutes. We are back with a question from the audience, except there is no question from the audience. An awkward minute or so later, a questioner appears: “If Israel attacked Iran to prevent Tehran from getting nuclear weapons, would you help Israel launch the attack or support it otherwise?” Cain answers without any answer. “I would first make sure that they had a credible plan for success, clarity of mission and clarity of success. Remember, when you talk about attacking Iran, it is a very mountainous region.” Imagine President Cain on the phone with the Israeli Prime Minister. “We will attack at dawn,” says the prime minister. “Have you considered the mountains?” inquires President Cain. Read mohttp://swampland.time.com/2011/11/23...ile-not-watchi... "Have you considered the mountains..." Heheheh. What a frippin' moron Cain is. He's the perfect candidate for dopers like you, Bertie. The mountains are going to give the Israeli air force problems, Cain apparently thinks. D'oh.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Maybe Cain thinks the Israeli Air Force can't fly that high. Most mountains in Iran are around 14,000 feet, no obstacle for the Israeli air force. And the Iranian nuke facilities are in underground concrete bunkers, so it isn't the mountains that are in the way. Cain is just ignorant and apparently too intellectually lazy to be a serious candidate. Just Liberal media ****ing away valuable time as a diversion from the real issues of debt, government need to shrink etc. Makes good herd fodder. Best for any politician to leave the war analysis to rank and file analysts who can think how mountains affect the equation, and they do. Mountains can to a small extent shield places from nuclear blasts. But that is low level logistics crap a present really shouldn't be bothered with too much. But a nice media knee jerk to avoid reality. USA is bankrupt and looking for war as the exit. If it is not Syria, it is Iran, or Russia or China....everyone is wrong and DC is right mentality. Fact is DC is corrupt and getting increasing desperate to preserve big fat over priced inefficient ineffective huge government we can't afford. -- All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment they think rationally. |
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
On 11/23/11 12:20 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Best for any politician to leave the war analysis to rank and file analysts who can think how mountains affect the equation, and they do. But a nice media knee jerk to avoid reality. USA is bankrupt and looking for war as the exit. If it is not Syria, it is Iran, or Russia or China....everyone is wrong and DC is right mentality. Fact is DC is corrupt and getting increasing desperate to preserve big fat over priced inefficient ineffective huge government we can't afford. Yawn. How many more times today are you going to repeat this bull**** of yours? |
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
On 11/23/11 2:01 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:23:49 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 11/23/11 11:19 AM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:05:17 -0500, X ` Man wrote: The mountains are going to give the Israeli air force problems, Cain apparently thinks. It will present a problem if the facility they are trying to destroy is in the middle of one of these mountains. Our penetrators are pretty good but there is still a limit to what they can punch through. Most if not all of the Iranian nuke facility locations are known, and they are not in the mountains. Think Peenemünde and Nordhausen, with the facilities in underground bunkers. If that is really true, they are going to lose them. The open question is how long that really sets back the program and what the blowback will be. I think it is worthwhile to try to prevent countries ruled by lunatics from having or developing nuclear weapons. Bombing, sabotage and other methods that do not involve massive military effort seem reasonable ways to accomplish that sort of goal. The problem, of course, is that nukes-ready-to-go are available from the weaponry stolen from the former Soviet states and, probably, from Pakistan. Since we don't really patrol our borders or seaports, it seems reasonable one can be "snuck" in to create havoc. When it goes off, I hope it isn't going off in DC. |
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:23:49 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/23/11 11:19 AM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:05:17 -0500, X ` Man wrote: The mountains are going to give the Israeli air force problems, Cain apparently thinks. It will present a problem if the facility they are trying to destroy is in the middle of one of these mountains. Our penetrators are pretty good but there is still a limit to what they can punch through. Most if not all of the Iranian nuke facility locations are known, and they are not in the mountains. Think Peenemünde and Nordhausen, with the facilities in underground bunkers. Harry, you should be working for the CIA. You obviously know more about Iran's nuclear program than they do. |
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
On 11/23/11 3:13 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:23:49 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/23/11 11:19 AM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:05:17 -0500, X ` Man wrote: The mountains are going to give the Israeli air force problems, Cain apparently thinks. It will present a problem if the facility they are trying to destroy is in the middle of one of these mountains. Our penetrators are pretty good but there is still a limit to what they can punch through. Most if not all of the Iranian nuke facility locations are known, and they are not in the mountains. Think Peenemünde and Nordhausen, with the facilities in underground bunkers. Harry, you should be working for the CIA. You obviously know more about Iran's nuclear program than they do. Unfortunately, that wouldn't surprise me. Too much spent on technology and not enough spent on hiring bright liberal arts graduates. -- http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug |
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:17:22 -0500, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/23/11 2:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:23:49 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 11/23/11 11:19 AM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:05:17 -0500, X ` Man wrote: The mountains are going to give the Israeli air force problems, Cain apparently thinks. It will present a problem if the facility they are trying to destroy is in the middle of one of these mountains. Our penetrators are pretty good but there is still a limit to what they can punch through. Most if not all of the Iranian nuke facility locations are known, and they are not in the mountains. Think Peenemünde and Nordhausen, with the facilities in underground bunkers. If that is really true, they are going to lose them. The open question is how long that really sets back the program and what the blowback will be. I think it is worthwhile to try to prevent countries ruled by lunatics from having or developing nuclear weapons. Bombing, sabotage and other methods that do not involve massive military effort seem reasonable ways to accomplish that sort of goal. The problem, of course, is that nukes-ready-to-go are available from the weaponry stolen from the former Soviet states and, probably, from Pakistan. Since we don't really patrol our borders or seaports, it seems reasonable one can be "snuck" in to create havoc. When it goes off, I hope it isn't going off in DC. Adding a few million union jobs to patrol borders and seaports wouldn't stop a small nuke from entering the country. I could carry a SADM in my little Key West and set it off under the Memorial Bridge. Wouldn't have to be in a container on a ship. Of course, we wouldn't expect Pelosi, et al, who want to add millions of 'port inspectors' to understand that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...ition_Munition |
Funniest thing on TV tonight...
On 11/23/11 3:36 PM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:17:22 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/23/11 2:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:23:49 -0500, X ` Man wrote: On 11/23/11 11:19 AM, wrote: On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:05:17 -0500, X ` Man wrote: The mountains are going to give the Israeli air force problems, Cain apparently thinks. It will present a problem if the facility they are trying to destroy is in the middle of one of these mountains. Our penetrators are pretty good but there is still a limit to what they can punch through. Most if not all of the Iranian nuke facility locations are known, and they are not in the mountains. Think Peenemünde and Nordhausen, with the facilities in underground bunkers. If that is really true, they are going to lose them. The open question is how long that really sets back the program and what the blowback will be. I think it is worthwhile to try to prevent countries ruled by lunatics from having or developing nuclear weapons. Bombing, sabotage and other methods that do not involve massive military effort seem reasonable ways to accomplish that sort of goal. The problem, of course, is that nukes-ready-to-go are available from the weaponry stolen from the former Soviet states and, probably, from Pakistan. Since we don't really patrol our borders or seaports, it seems reasonable one can be "snuck" in to create havoc. When it goes off, I hope it isn't going off in DC. Adding a few million union jobs to patrol borders and seaports wouldn't stop a small nuke from entering the country. I could carry a SADM in my little Key West and set it off under the Memorial Bridge. Wouldn't have to be in a container on a ship. Of course, we wouldn't expect Pelosi, et al, who want to add millions of 'port inspectors' to understand that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...ition_Munition Ahh...the GOP approach: let's not do anything because...someone might get a job. -- http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com