In article f3ef3ae4-ddcb-41f8-9cbc-3609fa5c5064
@a16g2000yqk.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 15, 6:30*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:39:16 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv

Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

Because Wall Street is just as corrupt. They are the one's giving the
stocks to the pols.

You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.
I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

Oh maybe it is because the Park Police and the Capitol Police would
get medieval on their ass.

'Cause this freedom of speech stuff just goes so far. Glad to see Bloomberg finally woke up.

Heard someone say on the news this morniong that freedom of speech
does not give you the right to take over a public area with tents and
sleeping bags. Amen to that!

We attended an event at our state house two weekends ago. It's
National Hospice month, and this event included a service on Friday
night, then more activities all day Saturday. Part of the event was
the placement of hundreds of umbrellas on the lawn, each lit with a
battery powered candle, to commemorate the people that had died while
in hospice care over the last year.

Where were the Occupy people? There were about 20 of them, and they
were over to the left of the front of the capital. Fortunately they
were downwind, because if you walked over in that direction, the smell
hit you in the face! They were going to the bathroom in buckets and
dumping the buckets in the shrubs all around them! During the
service, one of them walked in between the audience and the podium/
stage, picking their nose, and just looking around. Idiot.

Oh, and we had to pick up all the umbrellas and candles for the night,
and then put it all back out again the next morning. The police
wouldn't allow us to leave it out, even if someone stayed with it all
night. The nasty, stinking Occupy people got to stay. Pretty screwed
up.

Most times, dissent isn't pretty. It is needed in this case, however.

On 16/11/2011 9:02 AM, Jack. wrote:

Heard someone say on the news this morniong that freedom of speech
does not give you the right to take over a public area with tents and
sleeping bags. Amen to that!

I will admit, I don't like the vagrants being a nuisance but we need to
be careful here.

What a better way to make protesting looked down on than to get
fleabaggers and vagrants to protest?

Then when you want to protest pending debt-tax slavery, Sylyndra
corruption, Pelshi insider stock trading, the massive tips business
going on.... it makes it easier for the corrupt to clear the streets.

This isn't fiction, it has been documented. The following video is
where government was inciting to discredit the people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St1-WTc1kow

2:20 in the video is where they notice the provocateurs were in fact
policemen at work. Never were prosecuted either, as they were doing
their job to discredit the public and justify excessive police force.

It was later confirmed he was a provincial police officer. And this is
the province noted for the most corruption in Canada, Quebec.

0bama supports the Wall Street protest as he doesn't want people looking
at the real problem in DC. Try tenting at the Whitehouse and see how
long that lasts.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On 15/11/2011 4:30 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:39:16 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

Because Wall Street is just as corrupt. They are the one's giving the
stocks to the pols.


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.
I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

Oh maybe it is because the Park Police and the Capitol Police would
get medieval on their ass.

'Cause this freedom of speech stuff just goes so far. Glad to see Bloomberg finally woke up.

But 0bama wants the wiki truth banned, only getting the 0bama mouth
propaganda.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On 11/16/2011 12:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 15/11/2011 4:30 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:39:16 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-

11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption,
then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

Because Wall Street is just as corrupt. They are the one's giving the
stocks to the pols.


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.
I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

Oh maybe it is because the Park Police and the Capitol Police would
get medieval on their ass.

'Cause this freedom of speech stuff just goes so far. Glad to see
Bloomberg finally woke up.

But 0bama wants the wiki truth banned, only getting the 0bama mouth
propaganda.

But that's the only way progressives can win elections...

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:39:16 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

Because Wall Street is just as corrupt. They are the one's giving the
stocks to the pols.


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.

no conservative...none..supports tighter wall street regulation

I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

On 17/11/2011 1:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:39:16 -0500, wrote:

In ,
says...

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

Because Wall Street is just as corrupt. They are the one's giving the
stocks to the pols.


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.

no conservative...none..supports tighter wall street regulation

I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

If they didn't sting you with taxes, I would agree. Not even sure
really that Americans need Washington DC really.

--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:13:08 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/11/2011 1:44 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:44:14 -0500, wrote:


You have that backwards. If DC was not so corrupt it would be illegal
to bribe them with stocks and the things Wall Street are doing would
be better regulated.

no conservative...none..supports tighter wall street regulation

I agree with Nook, why aren't these guys occupying the park in front
of the Capitol?

because washington is irreleevant

If they didn't sting you with taxes, I would agree. Not even sure
really that Americans need Washington DC really.

they simply do what wall street tells them. no more. no less

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:57:52 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

HAHAHAHAHAH did he REALLY ask this question?

does washington run wall street or vice versa??

what an IDIOT!!

On 17/11/2011 1:43 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:57:52 -0700,
wrote:

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

HAHAHAHAHAH did he REALLY ask this question?

does washington run wall street or vice versa??

what an IDIOT!!

Funny, it is Washington DC printing electronic counterfeit/inflation and
sending corruption moneys to select corrupt Wall Street buddies like
Solyndra, GM and 100's of others.....not the other way around.

Fact is your own government is screwing you good. What a hoot.

Last I checked, politicians were to safe guard against wall stret using
the middle class tax slaves as ATMs.

Guess 0bama be corrupt.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems as government is
the problem.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:12:43 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 17/11/2011 1:43 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:57:52 -0700,
wrote:

On 15/11/2011 11:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


http://xfinitytv.comcast.net/tv/60-M...7/60-Minutes,-
11.13.11/videos?skipTo=136&cmpid=FCST_hero_tv


Oh, bout the title.

If he the Wall Street Squatters are against government corruption, then
why are they on Wall Street and not in Washington DC?

HAHAHAHAHAH did he REALLY ask this question?

does washington run wall street or vice versa??

what an IDIOT!!

Funny, it is Washington DC printing electronic counterfeit/inflation and
sending corruption moneys to select corrupt Wall Street buddies like
Solyndra, GM and 100's of others.....not the other way around.

washington does what wall st tells them to do.

moron.


Fact is your own government is screwing you good. What a hoot.

yep, sure is. and the right loves it


Last I checked, politicians were to safe guard against wall stret using
the middle class tax slaves as ATMs.


yep so they could bankroll their rich buddies