On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, jps wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

On 11/1/11 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

You would have been happy as an Aryan in Germany between 1935 and 1945...

On Nov 1, 5:42*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 11/1/11 4:37 PM, John H wrote:





On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, *wrote:

Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.

A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

You would have been happy as an Aryan in Germany between 1935 and 1945...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you sure he wasn't?

In article 8a33ea9c-7074-4588-8ac5-dbcd181e2913
@g1g2000vbd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 1, 5:42*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 11/1/11 4:37 PM, John H wrote:





On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, *wrote:

Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.

A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted ?Occupy Nashville? demonstrators? ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

?The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,? said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. ?Today?s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators? free speech rights.?

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

You would have been happy as an Aryan in Germany between 1935 and 1945...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Are you sure he wasn't?

That's a very stupid question, Suckling Don. Hey, I notice after I've
found Harry's little consulting company and therefore can see if his
clients might have some services I may need that you two calmed right
down! I wonder if I talk to them about our buddy Harry if I'd get a
discount on services??

On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da
bond, eh?
By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:38:30 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da
bond, eh?
By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting?

The government. I'm speaking of the one headed by BamBam.

On 11/2/2011 5:33 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:38:30 -0400, wrote:

On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da
bond, eh?
By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting?

The government. I'm speaking of the one headed by BamBam.

Bam who?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On 02/11/2011 3:42 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 11/2/2011 5:33 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:38:30 -0400, wrote:

On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted “Occupy Nashville” demonstrators’ ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

“The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,” said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. “Today’s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators’ free speech rights.”

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da
bond, eh?
By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting?

The government. I'm speaking of the one headed by BamBam.

Bam who?

Mr Blow America's Money, 0bama.


--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:38:30 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted ?Occupy Nashville? demonstrators? ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

?The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,? said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. ?Today?s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators? free speech rights.?

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da
bond, eh?
By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting?

The government. I'm speaking of the one headed by BamBam.

John's so narrow minded and one sided that he can't bring himself to
spell Obama correctly. Notice you never heard him call Bush any
demeaning nicknames.

On 11/3/2011 8:52 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:38:30 -0400, wrote:

On 11/1/2011 4:37 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:14:04 -0700, wrote:


Looks like some judges may still be interested in protecting people's
constitutional rights...

Wonder if that'll filter up to the SCOTUS.


A federal judge Monday afternoon ordered Tennessee to stop enforcing
new rules that restricted ?Occupy Nashville? demonstrators? ability to
protest in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties
Union of Tennessee (ACLU-TN).

?The state cannot arbitrarily create restrictive policies just because
it does not like how people are using a public space,? said ACLU-TN
Legal Director Tricia Herzfeld. ?Today?s decision is the first step in
restoring demonstrators? free speech rights.?

The protesters had been camped at Legislative Plaza in downtown
Nashville to protest the economic and political consolidation of power
since October 9.

But on October 27, Tennessee enacted new rules without any public
review process that eliminated their right to gather after 4:00 p.m.
and implemented a 10:00 pm curfew on the plaza. The state also
required protesters to pay use and security fees and to obtain
$1,000,000 in liability insurance coverage prior to engaging in any
assembly activity.

Those rules make damn good sense.

Shouldn't be any bitchin' about 'em either!

A miliun dollas? I supose there goin ta ask there parunts to post da
bond, eh?
By the way, Have you heard specifically, what they are protesting?

The government. I'm speaking of the one headed by BamBam.

John's so narrow minded and one sided that he can't bring himself to
spell Obama correctly. Notice you never heard him call Bush any
demeaning nicknames.

Often rulers and dictators are given cute nick names to humanize them.
Don't you like "bam bam"?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error