|
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... There is no jobs bill, there is another union buy off bill... You can call a ****storm a rose, but it's still a ****storm... |
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 3:47 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:38 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 19/10/2011 10:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. Right answer. Why saddle the taxpayer with just more debt-tax slavery for your grand kids? Hell, that i insanely greedy and corrupt for "...just more debt." **** up of a president. They went bankrupt anyway, just saddled more debt-tax slavery onto the kids for obama greed of debt and bailout. Fact is bailouts are corruption. Not to mention it was Nancy Pelozi who coined the phrase "do nothing congress" in respect to the way they were going to shut down the Bush admin in congress, and they did. Now they passed more unconstitutional rules to keep the republicans (who have come up with several jobs bills, deemed "dead in the water" by Obama and Reid) from bringing up any bills, or amendments. But they know the MSM will never say that so they are willing to **** the country, to get some re-election propoganda.... Same can be said wholly of Bush and his cronies, right? No, Bush and the republicans didn't filibuster any jobs bills while they were in charge. Right. |
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... On 10/19/2011 3:47 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:38 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 19/10/2011 10:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. Right answer. Why saddle the taxpayer with just more debt-tax slavery for your grand kids? Hell, that i insanely greedy and corrupt for "...just more debt." **** up of a president. They went bankrupt anyway, just saddled more debt-tax slavery onto the kids for obama greed of debt and bailout. Fact is bailouts are corruption. Not to mention it was Nancy Pelozi who coined the phrase "do nothing congress" in respect to the way they were going to shut down the Bush admin in congress, and they did. Now they passed more unconstitutional rules to keep the republicans (who have come up with several jobs bills, deemed "dead in the water" by Obama and Reid) from bringing up any bills, or amendments. But they know the MSM will never say that so they are willing to **** the country, to get some re-election propoganda.... Same can be said wholly of Bush and his cronies, right? No, Bush and the republicans didn't filibuster any jobs bills while they were in charge. Right. Gee, kind of reminds you of the way the republicans are working so well with Obama, eh? |
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... On 10/19/2011 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... There is no jobs bill, there is another union buy off bill... You can call a ****storm a rose, but it's still a ****storm... Oh, man, sorry, you are too crazy to try to carry on a conversation with! Have you read the bill? I can't possibly figure out how someone could possibly call it a union buy off!! |
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/11 4:00 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/19/2011 3:48 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... There is no jobs bill, there is another union buy off bill... You can call a ****storm a rose, but it's still a ****storm... Obvious you haven't read it, so the answer is... Scotty doesn't know. |
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 5:06 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/19/2011 3:47 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:38 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 19/10/2011 10:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. Right answer. Why saddle the taxpayer with just more debt-tax slavery for your grand kids? Hell, that i insanely greedy and corrupt for "...just more debt." **** up of a president. They went bankrupt anyway, just saddled more debt-tax slavery onto the kids for obama greed of debt and bailout. Fact is bailouts are corruption. Not to mention it was Nancy Pelozi who coined the phrase "do nothing congress" in respect to the way they were going to shut down the Bush admin in congress, and they did. Now they passed more unconstitutional rules to keep the republicans (who have come up with several jobs bills, deemed "dead in the water" by Obama and Reid) from bringing up any bills, or amendments. But they know the MSM will never say that so they are willing to **** the country, to get some re-election propoganda.... Same can be said wholly of Bush and his cronies, right? No, Bush and the republicans didn't filibuster any jobs bills while they were in charge. Right. Gee, kind of reminds you of the way the republicans are working so well with Obama, eh? They tried, but all they got was "elections have concequences", and "dead on arrival"... |
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... In article , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. The Democrat controlled Senate failed to pass Obama's Jobs Bill. |
More failed "policy"...
In article ,
says... In article , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... The title may say "Jobs Bill" but the content is an election year ear mark. You do know that the "Jobs Bill" only pays for one years worth of jobs and then the responsibility of continued funding of those jobs falls onto the state and local governments. Just more unfunded mandates. This is suspiciously like Clinton's 100,000 more police officers which only lasted for 1 year. |
More failed "policy"...
On 10/19/2011 7:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In , says... In , says... On 10/19/2011 2:33 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 1:59 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 12:43 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... http://blogs.knoxnews.com/humphrey/2...4000-stim.html Too bad the guy made us wait three years (and one summer vacation) to come up with another stimulus bill (still no jobs bill) before starting his re-election campaign which seems to be taking priority over any Presidential duties like leading the country..... There is a jobs bill, but like everything else, the Republicans think they should just do.... nothing. This is no jobs bill.. If it was, why did the democrats vote it down? Do they not want jobs? You are going crazy!!!! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...se-pushes-for- passage-job-bill-in-face-likely-senate-defeat/ They couldn't come up with enough democratic votes to pass it, period... No republican voted on it? Oh, wait, before you said there is no jobs bill. So just what did the democrats vote on? Another stimulus bill, expecting different results this time. Even the democrats knew that, that's why they killed it. Remember, the republicans are the ones who wanted to vote on it weeks ago until Reid pulled the "nuclear option" to stop them from bringing it up. Have you read the bill? It's a JOBS bill, not a stimulus bill. How could a jobs bill not cost money? But wait, you said there was no bill..... The title may say "Jobs Bill" but the content is an election year ear mark. You do know that the "Jobs Bill" only pays for one years worth of jobs and then the responsibility of continued funding of those jobs falls onto the state and local governments. Just more unfunded mandates. This is suspiciously like Clinton's 100,000 more police officers which only lasted for 1 year. Not to mention about 17% of the moneys put aside for "teachers" actyally went to teachers. The rest went to buying IPods for students and "administrative" costs... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com