| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Gun Safety Course
On 10/14/2011 2:06 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/14/11 2:03 PM, North Star wrote: On Oct 14, 12:59 pm, wrote: On 10/14/2011 9:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote: He and his butt plug would have to elevate themselves to crawl under a rock.- Hide quoted text - Oh... you mean that kind of insulting and name calling! Looney Freak... you really are a pathetic loser. Go back to your drugs and leave the boaters alone. Hey...I renamed the little ****... he's now officially iLoogy Your butt plug smeared a loogie on his glasses and now everyone looks like a loogie to him. |
Gun Safety Course
|
I have to say something
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:39:49 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/14/11 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/14/2011 8:58 AM, Drifter wrote: On 10/14/2011 8:07 AM, Danny wrote: On 10/13/2011 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote: You do realize I can do the same to you as you are doing, but I don't play that sort of dirty pool. My, your hands are so clean. Krause invented dirty pool. His intent here has been clear for over a decade. He uses this place to spew his particular form of political hate, and attacks anybody who questions his hyperbole with the intent of silencing them. It's right from the DNC playbook, just ask, Bachmann, Palin, Cain, Delay.... the list goes on for pages and pages... It's a nasty game, and Obama is falling right into place with it as expected. You're piling bull**** on your bull****. The hate in your political posts is unsurpassed. I don't attack "anybody" who disagrees with me politically. In fact, I don't read most of their posts. Bachmann, Palin, Cain, DeLay...the Four Horse's Asses of the Apocalypse. No wonder you like them. Those first three are dunderheads, the last one is an evil cockroach. |
I have to say something
On 10/14/11 3:54 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:39:49 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/14/11 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/14/2011 8:58 AM, Drifter wrote: On 10/14/2011 8:07 AM, Danny wrote: On 10/13/2011 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote: You do realize I can do the same to you as you are doing, but I don't play that sort of dirty pool. My, your hands are so clean. Krause invented dirty pool. His intent here has been clear for over a decade. He uses this place to spew his particular form of political hate, and attacks anybody who questions his hyperbole with the intent of silencing them. It's right from the DNC playbook, just ask, Bachmann, Palin, Cain, Delay.... the list goes on for pages and pages... It's a nasty game, and Obama is falling right into place with it as expected. You're piling bull**** on your bull****. The hate in your political posts is unsurpassed. I don't attack "anybody" who disagrees with me politically. In fact, I don't read most of their posts. Bachmann, Palin, Cain, DeLay...the Four Horse's Asses of the Apocalypse. No wonder you like them. Those first three are dunderheads, the last one is an evil cockroach. It's good that Cain's moronic 9-9-9 proposal finally is getting scrutiny. In essence, it raises taxes on the poor and middle class so the rich can pay less. |
I have to say something
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:10:39 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/14/11 3:54 PM, jps wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:39:49 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/14/11 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/14/2011 8:58 AM, Drifter wrote: On 10/14/2011 8:07 AM, Danny wrote: On 10/13/2011 8:02 PM, X ` Man wrote: You do realize I can do the same to you as you are doing, but I don't play that sort of dirty pool. My, your hands are so clean. Krause invented dirty pool. His intent here has been clear for over a decade. He uses this place to spew his particular form of political hate, and attacks anybody who questions his hyperbole with the intent of silencing them. It's right from the DNC playbook, just ask, Bachmann, Palin, Cain, Delay.... the list goes on for pages and pages... It's a nasty game, and Obama is falling right into place with it as expected. You're piling bull**** on your bull****. The hate in your political posts is unsurpassed. I don't attack "anybody" who disagrees with me politically. In fact, I don't read most of their posts. Bachmann, Palin, Cain, DeLay...the Four Horse's Asses of the Apocalypse. No wonder you like them. Those first three are dunderheads, the last one is an evil cockroach. It's good that Cain's moronic 9-9-9 proposal finally is getting scrutiny. In essence, it raises taxes on the poor and middle class so the rich can pay less. Bachmann made a joke about turning it upside down. All that Jesus and Satan stuff resonates with her moronic audience. |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/16/2011 2:01 AM, jps wrote:
Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. You just have to admire the intellectual prowess of JPS. |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/17/2011 8:07 AM, Danny wrote:
On 10/16/2011 2:01 AM, jps wrote: Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. You just have to admire the intellectual prowess of JPS. So, I wonder what the numbers come up to.. How many cars are out there, and how many have killed someone, how many bullets are out there, and how many have killed people... cause most folks I know who have guns seldom shoot them, and the ones who do, shoot targets for fun... In fact, I would imagine most guns are not purchased with the intent of killing at all.. But JPS doesn't have the capacity to see that, or the integrity to admit it if he did... Remember, he freely admits he gets his news mainly from Jon Stewart and Cobert... What do you expect? |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/18/2011 7:00 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not to mention he suggestion that guns have a singular purpose proves he is not nearly informed or honest enough to have an opinion on anything here... |
Gun Safety Course
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, jps wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, jps wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts, not saying stupid **** like "everyone who buys a gun buys if for one reason". That is just daft, why would anybody "debate" that, we are just laughing at you because you are so stupid and childish... |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/18/2011 9:56 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. my point is to debate with two of the most narrow minded, dishonest folks in the group (you and JPS), is just silly... |
Gun Safety Course
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:56:34 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. The Freak lives with the delusion that facts are what he parrots. |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/19/2011 12:14 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:56:34 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. The Freak lives with the delusion that facts are what he parrots. and you live with facts you made up... |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/18/11 10:04 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/18/2011 9:56 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. my point is to debate with two of the most narrow minded, dishonest folks in the group (you and JPS), is just silly... I haven't seen *you* debate anyone in here. You don't debate, you argue. |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/19/2011 7:59 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/18/11 10:04 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 9:56 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. my point is to debate with two of the most narrow minded, dishonest folks in the group (you and JPS), is just silly... I haven't seen *you* debate anyone in here. You don't debate, you argue. Come to think of it, you haven't EVER participated in a debate here. Your pattern is consistent. After one or two counter points, you give up and start name calling and insulting. Your weak, lazy mind is never able to follow through in your side of a debate. There are some fine minds here that are capable of participating in a rousing debate but they wont engage you because you are just a ****ing asshole. |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/19/2011 12:14 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:56:34 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. The Freak lives with the delusion that facts are what he parrots. Things get really clear to you after you take a hit off that bong of yours, eh? |
Gun Safety Course
|
Gun Safety Course
In article om,
says... On 10/19/2011 7:59 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 10:04 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 9:56 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I?ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other?s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. my point is to debate with two of the most narrow minded, dishonest folks in the group (you and JPS), is just silly... I haven't seen *you* debate anyone in here. You don't debate, you argue. Come to think of it, you haven't EVER participated in a debate here. Your pattern is consistent. After one or two counter points, you give up and start name calling and insulting. Your weak, lazy mind is never able to follow through in your side of a debate. There are some fine minds here that are capable of participating in a rousing debate but they wont engage you because you are just a ****ing asshole. You've pegged him perfectly!! But don't forget, once he ****es someone off enough, the cowardly fat ass ****es his pants and calls the cops! |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/19/2011 8:24 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/19/2011 7:59 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 10:04 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 9:56 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 9:46 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/18/2011 8:48 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. What debate. A debate is two folks arguing facts... Uh, no, that is not a debate. That is an argument. my point is to debate with two of the most narrow minded, dishonest folks in the group (you and JPS), is just silly... I haven't seen *you* debate anyone in here. You don't debate, you argue. Come to think of it, you haven't EVER participated in a debate here. Your pattern is consistent. After one or two counter points, you give up and start name calling and insulting. Your weak, lazy mind is never able to follow through in your side of a debate. There are some fine minds here that are capable of participating in a rousing debate but they wont engage you because you are just a ****ing asshole. And don't forget, he is a habitual liar... He said his dad crossed the Atlantic to a Fireboat welcome in NYC, that never happened, he said he graduated Yale, it never happened, he said he has had boats, cars, etc, that he never owned... That's just a start... |
Gun Safety Course
On 10/19/2011 8:48 AM, Danny wrote:
On 10/18/2011 7:00 PM, wrote: I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? That someday you will kill someone. LOL... another Harry sock puppet... |
Gun Safety Course
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:16:35 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:48:36 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, jps wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, jps wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. Maybe there is hope for you, yet. Now, would you like to revisit the abjectly foolish position that the only purpose of guns is to kill? That is, since we are considering correlation and causation? And you think the profuse number of weapons available has nothing to do with their use as weapons of aggression or tools of vigilantaism and retribution? You would be a fool to disagree, but I'm sure you will. |
Gun Safety Course
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:32:02 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:23 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:16:35 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:48:36 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, jps wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, jps wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. Maybe there is hope for you, yet. Now, would you like to revisit the abjectly foolish position that the only purpose of guns is to kill? That is, since we are considering correlation and causation? And you think the profuse number of weapons available has nothing to do with their use as weapons of aggression or tools of vigilantaism and retribution? You would be a fool to disagree, but I'm sure you will. I probably would be, but there is no point, since I've found it imprudent to argue with a fool. It seems they always drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. Having drunk the kool-aid, believe what you will. Ahhhhh, but you have engaged in argument and you are therefore a fool. I see the news about innocent people being shot and killed every day by people who others "never thought capable" but I'm the one who's drinking the kool-aid. You betcha. We call that willful ignorance. You know the truth and you can't abide because you've bought into excuse making bull****. Just like the 1% who think they're special because they need to rationalize their existence. It's okay, we all do it. You go on, it's your life. |
Gun Safety Course
On Oct 20, 8:01*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:32:02 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:23 -0700, jps wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:16:35 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:48:36 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:00:12 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:01:08 -0700, jps wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:34:15 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:50:14 -0700, jps wrote: Just like it should be, father to son. Police: Gun safety lesson goes awry when dad accidentally shoots son A father accidently shot his son in the thigh/buttocks area during a gun safety lesson yesterday in his apartment in the 900 block of North 96th Street, according to the Seattle Police Department. I’ll let the SPD take it from here, as I think they really nail the irony in the incident: They were showing each other their handguns and explaining to each other the proper way to safely load/unload and disassemble the different makes and models of each other’s handguns. The father had just finished showing his son how to properly make his gun safe and was about to hand the gun to the son when the father pulled the trigger. The son was transported to Harborview Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries. According to police, it was reported the son had shot himself in the initial 911 call. So, using that logic, this: http://tinyurl.com/3qdqfme proves that cars and especially 4-wheel-drives should be outlawed. Cars singular purpose is not to kill, unlike guns. I have more guns than I have cars. I have never killed anybody. So, what does that prove? Not a friggin' thing! *But it does prove that you have no skill in determining the value or equivalency of debate points. You need a remedial course in how correlation and causation do and don't relate. Maybe there is hope for you, yet. Now, would you like to revisit the abjectly foolish position that the only purpose of guns is to kill? That is, since we are considering correlation and causation? And you think the profuse number of weapons available has nothing to do with their use as weapons of aggression or tools of vigilantaism and retribution? You would be a fool to disagree, but I'm sure you will. I probably would be, but there is no point, since I've found it imprudent to argue with a fool. It seems they always drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. Having drunk the kool-aid, believe what you will. Ahhhhh, but you have engaged in argument and you are therefore a fool. You are correct, JPS. He did engage an argument with you.... fool. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com