Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/6/2011 7:19 PM, wrote:

You forgot to start it with "Once upon a time".. and you are suppose to
finish with "and they lived happily ever after"...


I carry a concealed weapon. I have since I was a child. Funny, I never
thought of it as anything but a pocket knife. All of my friends did,
too. We never thought of attacking somebody else with a weapon. Issues
of honor were dealt with our fists. Now, I carry a firearm as a
concealed weapon and I often have a long gun in the truck. I have
since I was 21 YO. It has never occurred to me to shoot anybody, but I
AM prepared for the person that it HAS occurred to. Some people have
no honor and they have murderous intent. Capitulation is a way to get
your family murdered, raped, pillaged, and burnt. I'm just not taking
that chance, when I have a viable option. I can't image anyone taking
a different course; or WHY they would.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:29:09 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, jps wrote:


Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.


CUPERTINO, Calif. —

Authorities went door to door with guns drawn Wednesday in search of a
disgruntled employee they say opened fire at a Northern California
limestone quarry, killing three and wounding six, before possibly
wounding another woman in an attempted carjacking.

Schools were on lockdown or closed in the Silicon Valley city of
Cupertino and nearby Los Gatos as SWAT teams sought Shareef Allman,
47.

Allman was at a routine safety meeting at the quarry at about 4:30
a.m. when he became disgruntled and left, Santa Clara County Sheriff's
Lt. Rick Sung said. He then returned with a handgun and rifle and
started shooting people, Sung said.

Sheriff Laurie Smith said two people were pronounced dead at
Permanente Quarry in Cupertino, and a third person died later at the
hospital.

Six others at the quarry were wounded and taken to area hospitals,
Smith said. Some of them remained in critical condition, she said.

If you won't defend yourself and your family, I guess that is your
business. Maybe you are OK with the crazy guy with the weapon making
your hard decisions for you. I don't feel that way, I'll make my own
decisions. If all else fails, I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried
by 6.

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Please explain to me how what you've said has anything to do with this
situation?

Have people just gone ****ing insane? The guy who brought out his
weapon was perfectly sane prior to bringing out his weapon and
shooting the **** out of 9 people.

****, what does it take to get through the thick American skull?


------------------------------------------
Why do you think he was sane? He came there to kill the coworkers. Should
have been fired for careless driving a lot earlier. But probably union
protected his ass. He brought the pistol and another rifle to work. He
set
the rifle outside the door where he could access it quickly. Tells me this
was not fly off the handle shooting. Was like Columbine, planned. And the
cops waited outside Columbine while the shooters killed for at least 45
minutes after the cops arrived. One armed teacher and at least one shooter
dead. Same with this nutcase in California. One armed person and he gets
shot before shooting 10 people.

No one is arguing about the speed at which his insanity took hold. He
was obviously somewhat perturbed and probably planned it but what the
**** are you suggesting? How many people should carry firearms at
work? Is it everybody or only a certain percentage and do those folks
have to submit to a psychological work up beforehand?

The basic bitch that I have is that our society and guns, for whatever
reason, have a hard time mixing.

We're into instant gratification and that can certainly be achieved
with a gun.

There's no good solution. The cat's out of the bag and we're ****ed.
A lot of innocent people are going to die because of graft and
corruption perpetrated by the gun industry, the NRA and those stupid
cocksuckers in Washington who couldn't wait to get their hands on that
campaign cash.

Guns are ****ing everywhere and in the hands of a population that
clearly cannot handle the responsibility.


-------------------------------------------
Alaska is a very polite state. Even the locals tell it like it is. The
fact that about 95% of the people (adult) may be armed at any time, makes
for politeness.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/6/2011 1:08 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:03:53 -0400, wrote:

On 10/6/2011 3:42 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:31:16 -0400, wrote:

On 10/5/2011 5:51 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.

Just think, if the government was not suppressing the peoples right to
keep and bear arms or carry concealed weapons somebody could have shot
they guy before he killed anyone.

We've already established that JPS would stand by and watch his wife and
daughter raped, rather than intervene.

He's scared of guns.

You're a stupid **** and you say stupid things that have no bearing in
reality.

Forgot that thread already, eh?

What man would sit and watch his wife and child harmed without doing
something? You think a gun is the only weapon a man has against
another man, which shows the weakness of your brain.

You did forget that thread.

It's like saying you'd watch your boat sink for lack of a bildge pump.

If a bilge pump could, my chance, fire a bullet, yea, you'd want them
outlawed.

****ing simpleton, you are.

At least I remember the threads I wrote, so I don't look like a fool.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/6/2011 1:10 PM, X ` Man wrote:

Morons like "Jimmy" can't pass the instant check. If he got his hands on
a firearm, he'd shoot himself in the knee by accident.

Why open your mouth and confirm your ignorance?

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/6/2011 2:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:07:45 -0400, wrote:

On 10/6/2011 11:07 AM, jps wrote:

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Who advocates arming "everyone"?

You made that up, didn't you, so you could look good by calling it
"insane logic"?!

Are you the only person fielding arguments in rec.boats?

I suggest you read some of Bertie Poop's fertile insights.

I know it's hard for you parse with comprehension because of your
anti-gun prejudice, but no one was advocating arming criminals.

The fact is that where citizens are armed, and it's known they are
armed, crimes against them are reduced, though not eliminated.

As has been demonstrated before, your agenda is not merely one of
reducing gun related deaths.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/6/2011 4:37 PM, jps wrote:

There's no good solution. The cat's out of the bag and we're ****ed.
A lot of innocent people are going to die because of graft and
corruption perpetrated by the gun industry, the NRA and those stupid
cocksuckers in Washington who couldn't wait to get their hands on that
campaign cash.

"Those stupid cocksuckers" that you voted for "in Washington" send guns
to Mexican drug cartels which ended up being used to kill innocents.
Then your "stupid cocksuckers in Washington" lied about it.

What a disingenuous person you are.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/7/2011 8:54 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/6/2011 4:37 PM, jps wrote:

There's no good solution. The cat's out of the bag and we're ****ed.
A lot of innocent people are going to die because of graft and
corruption perpetrated by the gun industry, the NRA and those stupid
cocksuckers in Washington who couldn't wait to get their hands on that
campaign cash.

"Those stupid cocksuckers" that you voted for "in Washington" send guns
to Mexican drug cartels which ended up being used to kill innocents.
Then your "stupid cocksuckers in Washington" lied about it.

What a disingenuous person you are.

Is he gonna' actually try to put Fast and Furious on the gun lobby. It
was directly from Holder, he is a racist and a liar. But of course, he
will not be held accountable, he is a democrat. He should be tried for
first degree murder, in Texas!

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/7/11 9:16 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/7/2011 8:54 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/6/2011 4:37 PM, jps wrote:

There's no good solution. The cat's out of the bag and we're ****ed.
A lot of innocent people are going to die because of graft and
corruption perpetrated by the gun industry, the NRA and those stupid
cocksuckers in Washington who couldn't wait to get their hands on that
campaign cash.

"Those stupid cocksuckers" that you voted for "in Washington" send guns
to Mexican drug cartels which ended up being used to kill innocents.
Then your "stupid cocksuckers in Washington" lied about it.

What a disingenuous person you are.

Is he gonna' actually try to put Fast and Furious on the gun lobby. It
was directly from Holder, he is a racist and a liar. But of course, he
will not be held accountable, he is a democrat. He should be tried for
first degree murder, in Texas!

Right after the Bush Admin is for lying us into two wars and getting
thousands of Americans killed?

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:19:32 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:29:09 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, jps wrote:


Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.


CUPERTINO, Calif. —

Authorities went door to door with guns drawn Wednesday in search of a
disgruntled employee they say opened fire at a Northern California
limestone quarry, killing three and wounding six, before possibly
wounding another woman in an attempted carjacking.

Schools were on lockdown or closed in the Silicon Valley city of
Cupertino and nearby Los Gatos as SWAT teams sought Shareef Allman,
47.

Allman was at a routine safety meeting at the quarry at about 4:30
a.m. when he became disgruntled and left, Santa Clara County Sheriff's
Lt. Rick Sung said. He then returned with a handgun and rifle and
started shooting people, Sung said.

Sheriff Laurie Smith said two people were pronounced dead at
Permanente Quarry in Cupertino, and a third person died later at the
hospital.

Six others at the quarry were wounded and taken to area hospitals,
Smith said. Some of them remained in critical condition, she said.

If you won't defend yourself and your family, I guess that is your
business. Maybe you are OK with the crazy guy with the weapon making
your hard decisions for you. I don't feel that way, I'll make my own
decisions. If all else fails, I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried
by 6.

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Please explain to me how what you've said has anything to do with this
situation?

Have people just gone ****ing insane? The guy who brought out his
weapon was perfectly sane prior to bringing out his weapon and
shooting the **** out of 9 people.

****, what does it take to get through the thick American skull?


------------------------------------------
Why do you think he was sane? He came there to kill the coworkers. Should
have been fired for careless driving a lot earlier. But probably union
protected his ass. He brought the pistol and another rifle to work. He set
the rifle outside the door where he could access it quickly. Tells me this
was not fly off the handle shooting. Was like Columbine, planned. And the
cops waited outside Columbine while the shooters killed for at least 45
minutes after the cops arrived. One armed teacher and at least one shooter
dead. Same with this nutcase in California. One armed person and he gets
shot before shooting 10 people.

I carry a concealed weapon. I have since I was a child. Funny, I never
thought of it as anything but a pocket knife. All of my friends did,
too. We never thought of attacking somebody else with a weapon. Issues
of honor were dealt with our fists. Now, I carry a firearm as a
concealed weapon and I often have a long gun in the truck. I have
since I was 21 YO. It has never occurred to me to shoot anybody, but I
AM prepared for the person that it HAS occurred to. Some people have
no honor and they have murderous intent. Capitulation is a way to get
your family murdered, raped, pillaged, and burnt. I'm just not taking
that chance, when I have a viable option. I can't image anyone taking
a different course; or WHY they would.

Jesus, danger lurks wherever you are.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:50:25 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 10/6/2011 2:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:07:45 -0400, wrote:

On 10/6/2011 11:07 AM, jps wrote:

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Who advocates arming "everyone"?

You made that up, didn't you, so you could look good by calling it
"insane logic"?!

Are you the only person fielding arguments in rec.boats?

I suggest you read some of Bertie Poop's fertile insights.

I know it's hard for you parse with comprehension because of your
anti-gun prejudice, but no one was advocating arming criminals.

The fact is that where citizens are armed, and it's known they are
armed, crimes against them are reduced, though not eliminated.

As has been demonstrated before, your agenda is not merely one of
reducing gun related deaths.

People with clean records aren't criminals until they are. Did this
guy in Cupertino ever have trouble with the law? Not from what I've
read. He just got fed up and snapped.

Anyone with a brain knows that's possible for any human being, given
the right circumstances. And, in America, we're used to immediate
gratification.

Guns and immediate gratification do not mix well.

For Americans not to recognize the folly in the wide distribution of
firearms is as stupid as not recognizing that Walmart-style globalism
spells the demise of our middle class.

It's past the time that people should have woken up but it's not
happening. Too bad for the USA.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:37:24 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 10/6/2011 1:08 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:03:53 -0400, wrote:

On 10/6/2011 3:42 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:31:16 -0400, wrote:

On 10/5/2011 5:51 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.

Just think, if the government was not suppressing the peoples right to
keep and bear arms or carry concealed weapons somebody could have shot
they guy before he killed anyone.

We've already established that JPS would stand by and watch his wife and
daughter raped, rather than intervene.

He's scared of guns.

You're a stupid **** and you say stupid things that have no bearing in
reality.

Forgot that thread already, eh?

What man would sit and watch his wife and child harmed without doing
something? You think a gun is the only weapon a man has against
another man, which shows the weakness of your brain.

You did forget that thread.

It's like saying you'd watch your boat sink for lack of a bildge pump.

If a bilge pump could, my chance, fire a bullet, yea, you'd want them
outlawed.

****ing simpleton, you are.

At least I remember the threads I wrote, so I don't look like a fool.

Your disingenuous posturing doesn't hunt.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:19:32 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:37:29 -0700, jps wrote:



Guns are ****ing everywhere and in the hands of a population that
clearly cannot handle the responsibility.

Most of your post is a brainless rant, but the above is true. It
always WILL be true because some people don't value you or your life,
though they would gladly take what you have.

You're a simple soul. I guess you're incapable of understanding that
people's brains are mutable, including yours. Given the right
circumstances, I can guarantee that you could be convinced to kill
people who you thought were out to harm you, even tho' they weren't.

You're no different from any other human being that can be manipulated
into violence through vigilantism, retribution, jealousy.

You could be that guy in Cupertino with a clean record and a beef that
turns into mayhem. If you think you couldn't, you have not a ****ing
clue about human nature and the capability of the brain to manufacture
circumstance.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/7/11 3:28 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:19:32 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:37:29 -0700, wrote:



Guns are ****ing everywhere and in the hands of a population that
clearly cannot handle the responsibility.

Most of your post is a brainless rant, but the above is true. It
always WILL be true because some people don't value you or your life,
though they would gladly take what you have.

You're a simple soul. I guess you're incapable of understanding that
people's brains are mutable, including yours. Given the right
circumstances, I can guarantee that you could be convinced to kill
people who you thought were out to harm you, even tho' they weren't.

You're no different from any other human being that can be manipulated
into violence through vigilantism, retribution, jealousy.

You could be that guy in Cupertino with a clean record and a beef that
turns into mayhem. If you think you couldn't, you have not a ****ing
clue about human nature and the capability of the brain to manufacture
circumstance.

We've got a paranoid guy right here in rec.boats who conjures up all
sorts of horrors and then acts on them or says he acts on them. He's
exactly the type that you hear about going out on a shooting spree.


--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:19:32 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:13:25 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, jps wrote:



Have people just gone ****ing insane? The guy who brought out his
weapon was perfectly sane prior to bringing out his weapon and
shooting the **** out of 9 people.

Facts not in evidence. You have no proof that he was sane 5 seconds, 5
minutes, 5 hours or 5 days prior to him committing the crime.


You are missing the logical conclusion of JPS's words. If a person can
be perfectly sane one moment and a crazed murderer the next second, it
stands to reason that we should all carry weapons to protect ourselves
against everybody. Since we are all just a second away from insanity!

I learned to "Be Prepared" in the Boy Scouts. It still serves me and
mine well today.

You could be convinced to kill in the right circumstances, in short
order. Or you could convince yourself just like that guy in
Cupertino. No judge or jury necessary. And you might be right and
you might be wrong.

I'm not comfortable with you or anyone else having that option apart
from those specifically trained to interpret potentially dangerous
situations.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

In article ,
says...

On 10/7/11 3:28 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:19:32 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:37:29 -0700, wrote:



Guns are ****ing everywhere and in the hands of a population that
clearly cannot handle the responsibility.

Most of your post is a brainless rant, but the above is true. It
always WILL be true because some people don't value you or your life,
though they would gladly take what you have.

You're a simple soul. I guess you're incapable of understanding that
people's brains are mutable, including yours. Given the right
circumstances, I can guarantee that you could be convinced to kill
people who you thought were out to harm you, even tho' they weren't.

You're no different from any other human being that can be manipulated
into violence through vigilantism, retribution, jealousy.

You could be that guy in Cupertino with a clean record and a beef that
turns into mayhem. If you think you couldn't, you have not a ****ing
clue about human nature and the capability of the brain to manufacture
circumstance.

We've got a paranoid guy right here in rec.boats who conjures up all
sorts of horrors and then acts on them or says he acts on them. He's
exactly the type that you hear about going out on a shooting spree.

How many guns do you own again, Harry Krause?

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:50:25 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 10/6/2011 2:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:07:45 -0400, wrote:

On 10/6/2011 11:07 AM, jps wrote:

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Who advocates arming "everyone"?

You made that up, didn't you, so you could look good by calling it
"insane logic"?!

Are you the only person fielding arguments in rec.boats?

I suggest you read some of Bertie Poop's fertile insights.

I know it's hard for you parse with comprehension because of your
anti-gun prejudice, but no one was advocating arming criminals.

The fact is that where citizens are armed, and it's known they are
armed, crimes against them are reduced, though not eliminated.

As has been demonstrated before, your agenda is not merely one of
reducing gun related deaths.

People with clean records aren't criminals until they are. Did this
guy in Cupertino ever have trouble with the law? Not from what I've
read. He just got fed up and snapped.

So you believe in prior restraint.

You, jps, could get drunk and drive a car, therefor, we are not going to
allow you to drive cars anymore.

Great logic.

Anyone with a brain knows that's possible for any human being, given
the right circumstances. And, in America, we're used to immediate
gratification.

Guns and immediate gratification do not mix well.

When are you going to outlaw penises?

For Americans not to recognize the folly in the wide distribution of
firearms is as stupid as not recognizing that Walmart-style globalism
spells the demise of our middle class.

It's past the time that people should have woken up but it's not
happening. Too bad for the USA.

The only thing between you and slavery is a gun.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/7/2011 5:54 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
It's past the time that people should have woken up but it's not
happening. Too bad for the USA.

The only thing between you and slavery is a gun.

And therein is the hidden agenda. It's not about the guns at all, it's
about control.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/7/2011 3:30 PM, X ` Man wrote:


We've got a paranoid guy right here in rec.boats who conjures up all
sorts of horrors and then acts on them or says he acts on them. He's
exactly the type that you hear about going out on a shooting spree.



Yeah he is definitely a sick ****er. Threatening to shoot anybody that
comes around, calling out folks all day then daring them to come face
his gun, playing with a gun on the phone to try to impress someone. Yup,
that Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, is a
paranoid ****er, just dying to shoot somebody, anybody.. Hopefully when
he goes on his spree, the cops take him out fast...

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Oct 6, 10:07*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, *wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? *They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 6, 10:07*am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, *wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? *They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:36:39 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 10/7/2011 5:54 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
It's past the time that people should have woken up but it's not
happening. Too bad for the USA.

The only thing between you and slavery is a gun.

And therein is the hidden agenda. It's not about the guns at all, it's
about control.

There are laws against slavery, you might have heard.

It's all about fear. You Pubs have were born with it. You're a bunch
of fraidy cats who scare easy.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

Tim wrote:
On Oct 6, 10:07 am, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X `
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:
Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.
Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.
What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.
merican skull?
If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.
If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...
The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.
Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Well said!

-HB (As seen on TV!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-e4vu_wL-M

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Oct 8, 6:43*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.

hmmm, tie-ins with fast and furious?

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Oct 5, 3:28*pm, jps wrote:
Hell yeah!



You bet! last week, I bagged my 9th groundhog of the year. That's the
one who has been burrowing under my tool shed and causing the
foundation blocks to lean in the South West corner. Now I gotta lift
the corner with a back hoe and repair the foundation. Glad I got it
before the edge collapsed.

Got any more???.

Got any good groundhog recipes. We tried roasting one when I was a kid. Pretty tough. Maybe should
have marinated it in some good red wine for a couple months.

Anyway, let me know if you've got that recipe. I know where a whole herd is located. Golf ball
stealing sons'a bitches, if you ask me.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

On 10/5/2011 4:28 PM, jps wrote:

Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.


CUPERTINO, Calif. —

Authorities went door to door with guns drawn Wednesday in search of a
disgruntled employee they say opened fire at a Northern California
limestone quarry, killing three and wounding six, before possibly
wounding another woman in an attempted carjacking.

Schools were on lockdown or closed in the Silicon Valley city of
Cupertino and nearby Los Gatos as SWAT teams sought Shareef Allman,
47.

Allman was at a routine safety meeting at the quarry at about 4:30
a.m. when he became disgruntled and left, Santa Clara County Sheriff's
Lt. Rick Sung said. He then returned with a handgun and rifle and
started shooting people, Sung said.

Sheriff Laurie Smith said two people were pronounced dead at
Permanente Quarry in Cupertino, and a third person died later at the
hospital.

Six others at the quarry were wounded and taken to area hospitals,
Smith said. Some of them remained in critical condition, she said.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/6/2011 1:10 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/6/11 1:08 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:03:53 -0400, wrote:

On 10/6/2011 3:42 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:31:16 -0400, wrote:

On 10/5/2011 5:51 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal
cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks
human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.

Just think, if the government was not suppressing the peoples
right to
keep and bear arms or carry concealed weapons somebody could have
shot
they guy before he killed anyone.

We've already established that JPS would stand by and watch his
wife and
daughter raped, rather than intervene.

He's scared of guns.

You're a stupid **** and you say stupid things that have no bearing in
reality.

Forgot that thread already, eh?

What man would sit and watch his wife and child harmed without doing
something? You think a gun is the only weapon a man has against
another man, which shows the weakness of your brain.

It's like saying you'd watch your boat sink for lack of a bildge pump.

****ing simpleton, you are.


Morons like "Jimmy" can't pass the instant check. If he got his hands on
a firearm, he'd shoot himself in the knee by accident.


It seems a lot of you are or have adopted the socialist theme that
Citizens can't be trusted with anything even a rusty nail.
their propaganda fear mongering have Soccer Moms and a bunch of others
scared to death of even a picture of a gun. God forbid their children
play Cowboys and Indians and own a cap gun or air rifle or bb gun.
I think all the socialist need to move to California or Chicago or NY
where they are protected from themselves.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:04:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 8, 6:43*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.

hmmm, tie-ins with fast and furious?

Uh, it's been going on a long time. Do you remember hearing anything
about mass murders in Mexico before Obama was elected? Or are you
another who doesn't see blame all around?

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/9/2011 6:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

I am a bad christian, I hate you... But at the same time, you personally
are lucky I am a Christian...

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/9/11 7:23 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 6:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly
upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

I am a bad christian, I hate you... But at the same time, you personally
are lucky I am a Christian...


If you are a christian, it is in name only.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/9/2011 7:35 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 7:23 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 6:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly
upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

I am a bad christian, I hate you... But at the same time, you personally
are lucky I am a Christian...


If you are a christian, it is in name only.


The day I let a worthless parasite like you judge me, will be, well,
never...

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection
they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.


----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! A few high end handguns, but most of the
guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of the
world. We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those take a
background check and a federal tax stamp. You think they are not going to
look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Oct 9, 11:21*pm, "Califbill" wrote:
"jps" *wrote in messagenews:run197tpdjtret3lnpf4cvs4r68bljr7pf@4ax .com....

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, *wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? *They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection
they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.

----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! *A few high end handguns, but most of the
guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of the
world. *We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those take a
background check and a federal tax stamp. *You think they are not going to
look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?

Cuba sends a lot across the gulf as well.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/10/2011 12:21 AM, Califbill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own
protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm
wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or
was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.


----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! A few high end handguns, but most of
the guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of
the world. We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those
take a background check and a federal tax stamp. You think they are not
going to look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?


He won't be able to prove it. Remember, JPS has been caught as many
times as Harry, making up stories to support his fantasy..

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/10/11 7:47 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/10/2011 12:21 AM, Califbill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a
quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the
list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own
protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm
wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or
was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.


----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! A few high end handguns, but most of
the guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of
the world. We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those
take a background check and a federal tax stamp. You think they are not
going to look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?


He won't be able to prove it. Remember, JPS has been caught as many
times as Harry, making up stories to support his fantasy..


You should change the channel on those voices in your head.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/8/2011 7:44 PM, jps wrote:

It's all about fear. You Pubs have were born with it. You're a bunch
of fraidy cats who scare easy.


I'm not afraid of guns, you are.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/9/2011 1:42 PM, Fred wrote:

It seems a lot of you are or have adopted the socialist theme that
Citizens can't be trusted with anything even a rusty nail.
their propaganda fear mongering have Soccer Moms and a bunch of others
scared to death of even a picture of a gun. God forbid their children
play Cowboys and Indians and own a cap gun or air rifle or bb gun.
I think all the socialist need to move to California or Chicago or NY
where they are protected from themselves.

JPS is a soccer Dad.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On 10/9/2011 4:57 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:04:02 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
hmmm, tie-ins with fast and furious?

Uh, it's been going on a long time. Do you remember hearing anything
about mass murders in Mexico before Obama was elected? Or are you
another who doesn't see blame all around?

The current president's regime is responsible for providing weapons to
Mexicans, which have then been used to kill innocents.

Are you ready for some shootings???
 

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:23:09 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 10/9/2011 1:42 PM, Fred wrote:

It seems a lot of you are or have adopted the socialist theme that
Citizens can't be trusted with anything even a rusty nail.
their propaganda fear mongering have Soccer Moms and a bunch of others
scared to death of even a picture of a gun. God forbid their children
play Cowboys and Indians and own a cap gun or air rifle or bb gun.
I think all the socialist need to move to California or Chicago or NY
where they are protected from themselves.

JPS is a soccer Dad.

What are you, other than a government leech that hates the government?