|
Due Process???
On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Due Process???
On 05/10/2011 7:17 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/5/11 9:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. That's right...Canada is civilized...it has done away with executions. America, the land of Christianity, has not. Don't make me laugh. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Due Process???
On 04/10/2011 11:45 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/4/2011 11:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 01/10/2011 10:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. Actually not. It is leased from Cuba. Cuba soil, American run. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. Perhaps. But none would you want running loose if you were sane. Lt them go and count the days for Americans and others to die. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Funny, al Queda and the Taliban as many others, they would just cut your head off, burn you or if lucky a shot in the forehead. And not water boarding, they would torture you with missing fingers, limbs and other hard to imagine things. You woud want death in their hands. Have you seen the video of Saddams soldiers pushing guys off the third story onto pavement? Oh yeah, the guys were blindfolded, and hogtied... Can't say I have, but did see the one with people on meat hooks. My guess is Saddam experimented with various methods. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Due Process???
On 10/5/11 4:48 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 05/10/2011 5:58 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect? We would be rightfully ****ed. Just tell the RCMP who you want and why, we deport. Unlike Pakistan, Yemen, Behrain, Saudi -- we don't lip service it. You are as ignorant of your country's laws as you are of ours. It's interesting that you share that attribute with a shorter, ponytailed doppelganger of yours. Of course, there is no requirement that you have any knowledge of anything you post, but in your case your ignorance makes you look just like the fool you are. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Due Process???
On 05/10/2011 5:11 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/4/2011 10:54 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/09/2011 5:14 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar AL-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. The world is better off without Gitmo detainees. If they need more room, just execute a bunch. What happens in Gitmo should stay in gitmo. No need to give Harry sock puppets, and those of similar mind, more to carp about. Expect more murders of the, Anwar AL-Awlaki sort, in the months to come before the election. Yep, sacrifices for Islam in Obama's mind, he is doing Allah's work. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Due Process???
|
Due Process???
|
Due Process???
|
Due Process???
On 05/10/2011 2:55 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/5/11 4:48 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 05/10/2011 5:58 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect? We would be rightfully ****ed. Just tell the RCMP who you want and why, we deport. Unlike Pakistan, Yemen, Behrain, Saudi -- we don't lip service it. You are as ignorant of your country's laws as you are of ours. It's interesting that you share that attribute with a shorter, ponytailed doppelganger of yours. Of course, there is no requirement that you have any knowledge of anything you post, but in your case your ignorance makes you look just like the fool you are. Canada deports them all the time. You are just ignorant of you largest border. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Due Process???
On 10/5/11 6:49 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 05/10/2011 2:55 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/5/11 4:48 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 05/10/2011 5:58 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect? We would be rightfully ****ed. Just tell the RCMP who you want and why, we deport. Unlike Pakistan, Yemen, Behrain, Saudi -- we don't lip service it. You are as ignorant of your country's laws as you are of ours. It's interesting that you share that attribute with a shorter, ponytailed doppelganger of yours. Of course, there is no requirement that you have any knowledge of anything you post, but in your case your ignorance makes you look just like the fool you are. Canada deports them all the time. You are just ignorant of you largest border. Canada extradites accused who face capital punishment? -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Due Process???
On 05/10/2011 5:02 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/5/11 6:49 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 05/10/2011 2:55 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/5/11 4:48 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 05/10/2011 5:58 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect? We would be rightfully ****ed. Just tell the RCMP who you want and why, we deport. Unlike Pakistan, Yemen, Behrain, Saudi -- we don't lip service it. You are as ignorant of your country's laws as you are of ours. It's interesting that you share that attribute with a shorter, ponytailed doppelganger of yours. Of course, there is no requirement that you have any knowledge of anything you post, but in your case your ignorance makes you look just like the fool you are. Canada deports them all the time. You are just ignorant of you largest border. Canada extradites accused who face capital punishment? Nope, the stupid liberal justices we have make the US promise not to execute and then deport. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Due Process???
|
Due Process???
On 10/5/2011 4:48 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 05/10/2011 5:58 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect? We would be rightfully ****ed. Just tell the RCMP who you want and why, we deport. Unlike Pakistan, Yemen, Behrain, Saudi -- we don't lip service it. Well, unless it's Mark "the Narc" Emery making millions of tax free money for them;) It's political mixed with arrogance when it comes to the Canadians... I only agree with it here as 1) he knew he was wanted and ignored it and 2) Arabs don't deport Islam terrorists. So go get them... |
Due Process???
On 10/5/2011 10:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/5/2011 9:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/4/2011 11:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 01/10/2011 10:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. Actually not. It is leased from Cuba. Cuba soil, American run. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. Perhaps. But none would you want running loose if you were sane. Lt them go and count the days for Americans and others to die. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Funny, al Queda and the Taliban as many others, they would just cut your head off, burn you or if lucky a shot in the forehead. And not water boarding, they would torture you with missing fingers, limbs and other hard to imagine things. You woud want death in their hands. Have you seen the video of Saddams soldiers pushing guys off the third story onto pavement? Oh yeah, the guys were blindfolded, and hogtied... No I haven't, could you provide a link? I will look for it tonight.. It was hard to watch. Two guys were sitting on the edge of the building, hands and feet tied, blindfolded. Sadams soldiers were screaming at them and then they just pushed one guy off, then the other.. It hit me hard as I am afraid of heights, thinking what those guys were thinking going down, hands and feet tied, blindfolded with no way to protect themselves or even brace for impact... still makes my stomach turn. But for the sake of playing your game of twister once again, I will see if I can find it. I am sure you can if you want, it's a case of weather you want to inform yourself, have me inform you, or remain uninformed... really... Yeah..... I suspect you are sarcastically calling me a liar.. Yeah, I wouldn't lie about something like that, especially when the internet is right here to check my story. I am not a ****ing retard like your boy in Maryland with the fake degrees and imaginary boats. Either way, if you don't trust me to have a sensible debate fine.. go inform yourself, or actually, stay stupid for all I care... It's almost 2 am and I just got in, started my day at 6 am. I have more important things to do.. If you want to continue this, find the video yourself, and then come talk to me. Otherwise I suppose you think I am a liar, to that I say, what kind of a moron would discuss such serious stuff with a liar? You would have to either be a troll, or a fool... So which is it? ( I suspect I know who you really are, if I am right, you will twist, but not answer questions anyway) Later.. |
Due Process???
On 10/5/2011 10:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says... On 10/5/2011 9:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/4/2011 11:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 01/10/2011 10:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. Actually not. It is leased from Cuba. Cuba soil, American run. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. Perhaps. But none would you want running loose if you were sane. Lt them go and count the days for Americans and others to die. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Funny, al Queda and the Taliban as many others, they would just cut your head off, burn you or if lucky a shot in the forehead. And not water boarding, they would torture you with missing fingers, limbs and other hard to imagine things. You woud want death in their hands. Have you seen the video of Saddams soldiers pushing guys off the third story onto pavement? Oh yeah, the guys were blindfolded, and hogtied... No I haven't, could you provide a link? I will look for it tonight.. It was hard to watch. Two guys were sitting on the edge of the building, hands and feet tied, blindfolded. Sadams soldiers were screaming at them and then they just pushed one guy off, then the other.. It hit me hard as I am afraid of heights, thinking what those guys were thinking going down, hands and feet tied, blindfolded with no way to protect themselves or even brace for impact... still makes my stomach turn. But for the sake of playing your game of twister once again, I will see if I can find it. I am sure you can if you want, it's a case of weather you want to inform yourself, have me inform you, or remain uninformed... really... Yeah..... Uh, yeah.. Look at the clip at 4:29, then go **** yourself, troll... |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 2:26 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/5/2011 10:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/5/2011 9:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/4/2011 11:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 01/10/2011 10:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. Actually not. It is leased from Cuba. Cuba soil, American run. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. Perhaps. But none would you want running loose if you were sane. Lt them go and count the days for Americans and others to die. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Funny, al Queda and the Taliban as many others, they would just cut your head off, burn you or if lucky a shot in the forehead. And not water boarding, they would torture you with missing fingers, limbs and other hard to imagine things. You woud want death in their hands. Have you seen the video of Saddams soldiers pushing guys off the third story onto pavement? Oh yeah, the guys were blindfolded, and hogtied... No I haven't, could you provide a link? I will look for it tonight.. It was hard to watch. Two guys were sitting on the edge of the building, hands and feet tied, blindfolded. Sadams soldiers were screaming at them and then they just pushed one guy off, then the other.. It hit me hard as I am afraid of heights, thinking what those guys were thinking going down, hands and feet tied, blindfolded with no way to protect themselves or even brace for impact... still makes my stomach turn. But for the sake of playing your game of twister once again, I will see if I can find it. I am sure you can if you want, it's a case of weather you want to inform yourself, have me inform you, or remain uninformed... really... Yeah..... I suspect you are sarcastically calling me a liar.. Yeah, I wouldn't lie about something like that, especially when the internet is right here to check my story. I am not a ****ing retard like your boy in Maryland with the fake degrees and imaginary boats. Either way, if you don't trust me to have a sensible debate fine.. go inform yourself, or actually, stay stupid for all I care... It's almost 2 am and I just got in, started my day at 6 am. I have more important things to do.. If you want to continue this, find the video yourself, and then come talk to me. Otherwise I suppose you think I am a liar, to that I say, what kind of a moron would discuss such serious stuff with a liar? You would have to either be a troll, or a fool... So which is it? ( I suspect I know who you really are, if I am right, you will twist, but not answer questions anyway) Later.. What could be more important than chatting with one of Krause's sock puppets? |
Due Process???
On Oct 6, 3:14*am, JustWait wrote:
On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, * wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" * * wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait * * wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. *America does not rule the world. *Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. *Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. *Just liberal judges fu-king the process. *All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? *If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. |
Due Process???
In article f5314b9f-5adc-4369-a039-
, says... On Oct 6, 3:14*am, JustWait wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, * wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" * * wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait * * wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. *America does not rule the world. *Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. *Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. *Just liberal judges fu-king the process. *All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? *If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Suckling Don, are you really so stupid that you can't understand it even though there is a typo? |
Due Process???
On Oct 6, 12:16*pm, Drifter wrote:
On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, *wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, * * wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" * * * wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait * * * wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. *America does not rule the world. *Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. *Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. *Just liberal judges fu-king the process. *All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? *If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey Stinky One...your fellow countrymen could have used your flannel shirts here today. Five cruise ships are in with about 10K passengers..... and the temp this morning was 40 F. I saw them all bundled up.. hoodies & all when I came back from running the dog. Too bad..starting tomorrow we're back into the low 70's with bright sunshine for the long Thanksgiving weekend. http://www.novascotiawebcams.com/halifax/pier-21.html |
Due Process???
|
Due Process???
On Oct 6, 1:15*pm, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, says... On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, *wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says.... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, * * wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" * * * wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait * * * wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. *America does not rule the world. *Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. *Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. *Just liberal judges fu-king the process. *All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? *If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. Harry's little suckling will bite at any typo except the ones he and Harry make. It's all the cowardly little man slut has.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bite at this TypoBoy! |
Due Process???
|
Due Process???
On 10/6/11 12:57 PM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 6, 1:15 pm, wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. Harry's little suckling will bite at any typo except the ones he and Harry make. It's all the cowardly little man slut has.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bite at this TypoBoy! It's sort of funny in a pathetic way that dweebs like iboaterloogybitch, flajim, and the rest of the "anonymous" morons in reality add nothing to this discussion board beyond their idiotic posts about those here they don't like. That's why I don't read their posts...they are totally devoid of interesting comments. And, of course, they are so cowardly that anything even mildly revealing about themselves is kept a deep, dark secret. The loogy wannabe might live in a cardboard box and flajim's only boat probably is a rubber ducky in his bathtub. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 1:04 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/6/11 12:57 PM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 1:15 pm, wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. Harry's little suckling will bite at any typo except the ones he and Harry make. It's all the cowardly little man slut has.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bite at this TypoBoy! It's sort of funny in a pathetic way that dweebs like iboaterloogybitch, flajim, and the rest of the "anonymous" morons in reality add nothing to this discussion board beyond their idiotic posts about those here they don't like. That's why I don't read their posts...they are totally devoid of interesting comments. And, of course, they are so cowardly that anything even mildly revealing about themselves is kept a deep, dark secret. The loogy wannabe might live in a cardboard box and flajim's only boat probably is a rubber ducky in his bathtub. Cowardly is hustling your fat ass into the first college that would accept you post HS. Smart is not giving you squat to play with. Stupid is asking dumb questions in the wrong place. Example- *"I wonder, are 1/2 inch thick conductors enough to pump 100A into my house from a 20KW generator?* |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote:
On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Uh, probably a spelling error stupid. |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 11:16 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. Did he really put stars around it? Guy acts like a little girl... |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 1:04 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/6/11 12:57 PM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 1:15 pm, wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. Harry's little suckling will bite at any typo except the ones he and Harry make. It's all the cowardly little man slut has.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bite at this TypoBoy! It's sort of funny in a pathetic way that dweebs like iboaterloogybitch, flajim, and the rest of the "anonymous" morons in reality add nothing to this discussion board beyond their idiotic posts about those here they don't like. That's why I don't read their posts...they are totally devoid of interesting comments. And, of course, they are so cowardly that anything even mildly revealing about themselves is kept a deep, dark secret. The loogy wannabe might live in a cardboard box and flajim's only boat probably is a rubber ducky in his bathtub. I am sure "those folks" will get a real kick out of this one.. it's very telling especially if framed with the drivel he has been posting the last few days.. snerk |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 2:18 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/6/2011 1:04 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/6/11 12:57 PM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 1:15 pm, wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. Harry's little suckling will bite at any typo except the ones he and Harry make. It's all the cowardly little man slut has.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bite at this TypoBoy! It's sort of funny in a pathetic way that dweebs like iboaterloogybitch, flajim, and the rest of the "anonymous" morons in reality add nothing to this discussion board beyond their idiotic posts about those here they don't like. That's why I don't read their posts...they are totally devoid of interesting comments. And, of course, they are so cowardly that anything even mildly revealing about themselves is kept a deep, dark secret. The loogy wannabe might live in a cardboard box and flajim's only boat probably is a rubber ducky in his bathtub. Cowardly is hustling your fat ass into the first college that would accept you post HS. Smart is not giving you squat to play with. Stupid is asking dumb questions in the wrong place. Example- *"I wonder, are 1/2 inch thick conductors enough to pump 100A into my house from a 20KW generator?* It must have been comical.. "Please daddy, buy me into some **** ass college even though my grades suck, I don't want to go serve my country, I am afraid daddy"... |
Due Process???
On 10/6/2011 12:14 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In articlef5314b9f-5adc-4369-a039- , says... On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Suckling Don, are you really so stupid that you can't understand it even though there is a typo? ....he is... |
Due Process???
On 10/6/11 7:27 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/6/2011 2:18 PM, Drifter wrote: On 10/6/2011 1:04 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/6/11 12:57 PM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 1:15 pm, wrote: In aweb.com, says... On 10/6/2011 10:35 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 6, 3:14 am, wrote: On 10/5/2011 5:48 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 05/10/2011 7:15 AM, North Star wrote: On Oct 5, 8:58 am, wrote: In , says... On 01/10/2011 11:00 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 12:47:25 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!" wrote: On Oct 1, 11:09 am, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:55:57 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 10/1/2011 10:50 AM, wrote: On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:26:18 -0400, John wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:14:57 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:41:01 -0400, John wrote: Anwar al-Awlaki's killing was absolutely justified, but it shows the absolute hypocrisy of the Obama administration and liberals who cried about the terrorists in Guantanamo. No, it doesn't. al Awlaki was guilty. Guantanamo held innocent people as young as 13 years old, which were detained for a ridiculous amount of time and then released because they were guilty of nothing. Even Bush couldn't bring to trial a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time. From the guilty, tons of bogus information was obtained. Few of them really guilty got what was coming to them. Guantanamo was a huge mess, legally and politically. Guilty based on what? And, your boy promised to fix Guantanamo. Remember? More bull**** from Obama, who can do no wrong. I really don't have a problem with killing these guys but I also didn't have a huge problem with Gitmo. I do wonder why killing everyone in that convoy is any different than arresting and detaining everyone who was in a suspected terrorist hideout. These people keep ignoring the fact that we also killed a couple drivers and whomever else was in the cars. Yeah, that's what happens when you declare war on the US I guess... As to the drivers, etc.. They knew damn well they were at war, and decided to stay in the fight, they lost, get over it... I just want them to stop whining about the Gitmo people if that is how we feel.. I have no problem with Gitmo... The problem with Gitmo is that it is American soil. We either have laws on American soil or we don't. If we do, we compromised all of those cases when they finally come to trial. I personally think it is a problem that it was used as a dumping ground for a bunch of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time, too. I have no problem with holding perps and defending America, but using the same methods as the perps makes us no better than them. Are you implying our laws shouldn't apply on soil that isn't 'American'? How silly. Not at all. America does not rule the world. Although I am sure some arrogant dumb****s think so. If an American kills an American on Canadian soil whose laws are in effect?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Canadian of course. Even if it was an American criminal who did the deed on 'merican soil...and escaped up here.. we won't send him back unless you agree not to execute him. And that is stupid. Just liberal judges fu-king the process. All we should be concerned with loosely defined did they break a similar law to what we have, and get a fair trial? If so, deportation should be immediate. I don't understand why Canada and France want to harbor murderers, ok alledged murderer. Pfffttt. Canada sends out invitations to terrorists;) Oh, and they sell a lot of pot here in the us, cause they are just such upstanding *nieghbors*..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What the *ell is a "nieghbors"?? Just a neighborly way of referring to our plaid flannel shirted friends to the north. Harry's little suckling will bite at any typo except the ones he and Harry make. It's all the cowardly little man slut has.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bite at this TypoBoy! It's sort of funny in a pathetic way that dweebs like iboaterloogybitch, flajim, and the rest of the "anonymous" morons in reality add nothing to this discussion board beyond their idiotic posts about those here they don't like. That's why I don't read their posts...they are totally devoid of interesting comments. And, of course, they are so cowardly that anything even mildly revealing about themselves is kept a deep, dark secret. The loogy wannabe might live in a cardboard box and flajim's only boat probably is a rubber ducky in his bathtub. Cowardly is hustling your fat ass into the first college that would accept you post HS. Smart is not giving you squat to play with. Stupid is asking dumb questions in the wrong place. Example- *"I wonder, are 1/2 inch thick conductors enough to pump 100A into my house from a 20KW generator?* It must have been comical.. "Please daddy, buy me into some **** ass college even though my grades suck, I don't want to go serve my country, I am afraid daddy"... Neither of you could get into an open admissions community college. -- I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com