![]() |
Hey canuk...
On 28/09/2011 5:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:37:10 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 5:44 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about "options" the parenting is third in the list of options I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality numbers are so bad. People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan. I also think most people know what PP is. Perhaps you just want PP to change their name. Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now" You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers with lots of kids has something to do with the unwed mother rates? I think the rate in DC is about 80% now. Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a mindless conservative. Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them. But you are fine with my tax money going to abortions? Yep, you are a honest to goodness fleabagger for sure. Personally, I'm fine with all of you pro-life folks shouldering all of the expense of unwanted children from cradle to grave. Unfortunately, that isn't the way it works. Isn't that the truth. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Hey canuk...
On 28/09/2011 6:13 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Sep 28, 7:43 pm, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:37:10 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 5:44 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about "options" the parenting is third in the list of options I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality numbers are so bad. People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan. I also think most people know what PP is. Perhaps you just want PP to change their name. Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now" You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers with lots of kids has something to do with the unwed mother rates? I think the rate in DC is about 80% now. Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a mindless conservative. Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them. But you are fine with my tax money going to abortions? Yep, you are a honest to goodness fleabagger for sure. Personally, I'm fine with all of you pro-life folks shouldering all of the expense of unwanted children from cradle to grave. Unfortunately, that isn't the way it works. Yup, typical fleabagger. You want to **** with no accountability, and then you want me to pay your bills... Yep, we get it, oh, and we know who you are but I am not gonna' mention your name till you do mine again, only difference is this time I come back with nukes... That is the fleabagger way, et other people to pay for it. So unwed moms have kids, high probability of being in jail before 25, where taxpayers get the real kick. In fact, when it comes to cost, an abortion is an ounce of prevention to a ton of cure if you can't raise them right. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Hey canuk...
On 28/09/2011 5:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:34:16 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 5:42 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 2:32 PM, John H wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about "options" the parenting is third in the list of options I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality numbers are so bad. People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan. I also think most people know what PP is. Perhaps you just want PP to change their name. Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now" You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers with lots of kids has something to do with the unwed mother rates? I think the rate in DC is about 80% now. Actually, MA did some research on this and stopped paying for addition children to welfare moms. Illegitimate children to welfare moms dropped big time. Yeah, bull****... His example is probably made up bull****, but it is correct that people, no, parents were encouraging their children to become pregnant because, "we can use the money." Where were they schooled in such things (how to beat the system)? Church. Been there, seen it. Actually, it isn't bull****. Part of the Welfare Reform acts of 1995 and 1996 and by 1996 illegitimate welfare births peeked and dropped in subsequent years. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Hey canuk...
On 10/4/2011 9:56 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 5:30 PM, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 5:40 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 10:54 AM, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 12:09 PM, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about "options" the parenting is third in the list of options I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality numbers are so bad. People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan. I also think most people know what PP is. Perhaps you just want PP to change their name. Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now" Maybe they should just present both options with the respect they demand if they are using my money... Like I have said and asked before, who else here has been in one of their facilities with a scared young girl?? I have not, but I have seen the results of bull**** that goes in in them. No pushy bull**** should be allowed to go on. If I was in an institution and saw someone do the pushy strong arm demeaning crap, there would be violence on my part. Well then, you should certainly not walk into a planned abortionhood office because you would either get violent with them, or prove you are a fleabagger..., because they push only one thing, very hard... If a woman goes to an abortion clinic or asks for an abortion, she has already made here decision and should have it respected. She shouldn't have discuss anything with those she does not want to. What if she just wants open minded information.. Then she will ask someone she trusts and use the Internet. No need for the Salem types. But you won't fund the other side.. even if they are not the "salem types" you see behind any corner... |
Hey canuk...
On 10/4/2011 9:57 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 28/09/2011 5:37 PM, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 5:44 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/28/11 4:32 PM, John H wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:09:36 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about "options" the parenting is third in the list of options I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality numbers are so bad. People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan. I also think most people know what PP is. Perhaps you just want PP to change their name. Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now" You don't think the amount of welfare money given to unwed mothers with lots of kids has something to do with the unwed mother rates? I think the rate in DC is about 80% now. Let's see...you are anti-abortion and you are anti-supporting the kids that result when abortion isn't readily available. That makes you...a mindless conservative. Hey, maybe the pro-lifers need a tax just for them to support unwed mothers and mothers where the dad buggers off. Yep, register the pro-lifers with a surtax to go to support them. But you are fine with my tax money going to abortions? Yep, you are a honest to goodness fleabagger for sure. Tax money goes to queers, corruption, bailouts, waste, Michelle's 50+ personal staff maids too....don't see you complaining. Try reading some of my posts then, the more **** you make up, the less credibility you have here... |
Hey canuk...
On 04/10/2011 11:32 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/4/2011 9:56 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 5:30 PM, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 5:40 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 10:54 AM, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 12:09 PM, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about "options" the parenting is third in the list of options I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality numbers are so bad. People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan. I also think most people know what PP is. Perhaps you just want PP to change their name. Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now" Maybe they should just present both options with the respect they demand if they are using my money... Like I have said and asked before, who else here has been in one of their facilities with a scared young girl?? I have not, but I have seen the results of bull**** that goes in in them. No pushy bull**** should be allowed to go on. If I was in an institution and saw someone do the pushy strong arm demeaning crap, there would be violence on my part. Well then, you should certainly not walk into a planned abortionhood office because you would either get violent with them, or prove you are a fleabagger..., because they push only one thing, very hard... If a woman goes to an abortion clinic or asks for an abortion, she has already made here decision and should have it respected. She shouldn't have discuss anything with those she does not want to. What if she just wants open minded information.. Then she will ask someone she trusts and use the Internet. No need for the Salem types. But you won't fund the other side.. even if they are not the "salem types" you see behind any corner... No need to fund anyone really, other than the doctor. Religious **** ants can pay for their own crap. Called freedom of choice. No need for others to pay for their rant. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
Hey canuk...
On 10/5/2011 5:31 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 04/10/2011 11:32 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/4/2011 9:56 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 5:30 PM, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 5:40 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/09/2011 10:54 AM, JustWait wrote: On 9/28/2011 12:09 PM, wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:15:03 -0400, JustWait wrote: So, notice in the paragraph where they actually start talking about "options" the parenting is third in the list of options I think everyone knows keeping the baby and raising it is the default option, what happens if you do nothing. That is the choice made by lots of young girls and why the US is at the top of the list in unwed teenaged mothers in the industrial world and why infant mortality numbers are so bad. People would not even be going to PP if that was their plan. I also think most people know what PP is. Perhaps you just want PP to change their name. Maybe "Plan to not be a parent right now" Maybe they should just present both options with the respect they demand if they are using my money... Like I have said and asked before, who else here has been in one of their facilities with a scared young girl?? I have not, but I have seen the results of bull**** that goes in in them. No pushy bull**** should be allowed to go on. If I was in an institution and saw someone do the pushy strong arm demeaning crap, there would be violence on my part. Well then, you should certainly not walk into a planned abortionhood office because you would either get violent with them, or prove you are a fleabagger..., because they push only one thing, very hard... If a woman goes to an abortion clinic or asks for an abortion, she has already made here decision and should have it respected. She shouldn't have discuss anything with those she does not want to. What if she just wants open minded information.. Then she will ask someone she trusts and use the Internet. No need for the Salem types. But you won't fund the other side.. even if they are not the "salem types" you see behind any corner... No need to fund anyone really, other than the doctor. Religious **** ants can pay for their own crap. Called freedom of choice. No need for others to pay for their rant. Well, how about the haters and hypocrites on your side of the argument, can they pay for themselves too?? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com