BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Anyone have these on your boat? (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/139151-anyone-have-these-your-boat.html)

Honey Badger[_8_] September 28th 11 12:35 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php

Does it work as advertised?

-HB

Wayne B September 28th 11 04:41 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php


============

Probably works but not for everyone. There are different types of
stabilization systems. We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:

http://www.naiad.com/

The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective.

The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.


Tim September 28th 11 04:51 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
On Sep 27, 10:41*pm, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger

wrote:
http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php


============

Probably works but not for everyone. *There are different types of
stabilization systems. *We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:

http://www.naiad.com/

The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective. *

The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. *You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.


I belive you're right, Wayne. Seeing the craft isn't made for it, it
would need quite a bit of re-structure work. And yeah, what's their
idea of 'very little power'? probably different than mine.

X ` Man September 28th 11 12:40 PM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
On 9/27/11 11:51 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sep 27, 10:41 pm, Wayne wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger

wrote:
http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php


============

Probably works but not for everyone. There are different types of
stabilization systems. We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:

http://www.naiad.com/

The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective.

The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.


I belive you're right, Wayne. Seeing the craft isn't made for it, it
would need quite a bit of re-structure work. And yeah, what's their
idea of 'very little power'? probably different than mine.



ScummyBadger, aka Dan Krueger, has two little boats, one an aluminum
fishing boat of about 17 feet, and the other a fiberglass center console
not much larger. Either stabilizer would suit him perfectly, of course. :)


--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

North Star September 28th 11 01:37 PM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
On Sep 28, 8:40*am, X ` Man wrote:
On 9/27/11 11:51 PM, Tim wrote:





On Sep 27, 10:41 pm, Wayne *wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger


*wrote:
http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php


============


Probably works but not for everyone. *There are different types of
stabilization systems. *We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:


http://www.naiad.com/


The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective.


The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. *You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.


I belive you're right, Wayne. Seeing the craft isn't made for it, it
would need quite a bit of re-structure work. And yeah, what's their
idea of 'very little power'? probably different than mine.


ScummyBadger, aka Dan Krueger, has two little boats, one an aluminum
fishing boat of about 17 feet, and the other a fiberglass center console
not much larger. Either stabilizer would suit him perfectly, of course. :)

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Better for him to stabilize his head... and then worry about his
little boats.

Honey Badger[_8_] September 29th 11 01:26 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php

============

Probably works but not for everyone. There are different types of
stabilization systems. We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:

http://www.naiad.com/

The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective.

The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.

They do look like they take up a lot of space but they come in different
sizes for different applications. On paper they are amazing!

Thanks,

-HB

Honey Badger[_8_] September 29th 11 01:28 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
Tim wrote:
On Sep 27, 10:41 pm, Wayne wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger

wrote:
http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php

============

Probably works but not for everyone. There are different types of
stabilization systems. We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:

http://www.naiad.com/

The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective.

The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.

I belive you're right, Wayne. Seeing the craft isn't made for it, it
would need quite a bit of re-structure work. And yeah, what's their
idea of 'very little power'? probably different than mine.

IIRC 3kW for start up. After that - not sure from what I've read.

-HB

Honey Badger[_8_] September 29th 11 01:30 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
X ` Man wrote:
On 9/27/11 11:51 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sep 27, 10:41 pm, Wayne wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger

wrote:
http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php

============

Probably works but not for everyone. There are different types of
stabilization systems. We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:

http://www.naiad.com/

The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective.

The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.


I belive you're right, Wayne. Seeing the craft isn't made for it, it
would need quite a bit of re-structure work. And yeah, what's their
idea of 'very little power'? probably different than mine.



ScummyBadger, aka Dan Krueger, has two little boats, one an aluminum
fishing boat of about 17 feet, and the other a fiberglass center
console not much larger. Either stabilizer would suit him perfectly,
of course. :)


You and your boy love this ****, don't you? You know nothing about me.

-HB

Honey Badger[_8_] September 29th 11 01:32 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:41:37 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:35:27 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

http://www.seakeeper.com/downloads_latestvideo.php
============

Probably works but not for everyone. There are different types of
stabilization systems. We have Naiad hydraulically actuated fins on
our trawler and they work very well:

http://www.naiad.com/

The drawback is that the boat has to be moving at least 6 to 7 knots
for the system to become effective.

The type with a massive gyroscope works at slow speeds and at anchor
but the gyro takes up a lot of space, consumes quite a bit of power,
and the vessel structure has to be designed around the loads produced
by the gyro, which are considerable. You can't just drop one in to an
existing boat.

I am not sure how a big gyro would work unless it was just a servo to
control some other stabilizer. When you try to alter the orientation
of a gyro, the force is translated (precessed) into an equal force 90
degrees offset in the direction of rotation. If you had a fore and aft
motion, it would translate into a roll.
We had a big honking gyro (washing machine sized) as a stable element
for the fire control system and it only controlled a servo sensor the
size of a table fan motor..

The demo on the site makes it look much simpler than that. Of course
they are trying to sell them, too!

-HB

Wayne B September 29th 11 03:01 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:26:54 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

On paper they are amazing!


Then you realize that you have to keep a generator running 24/7 to
keep the gyro spinning.

There is a system called an "Anti Roll Tank" that some people have had
success with on pleasure boats in the 40 to 60 ft range. It requires
a custom design unique to each boat however. It usually requires no
power at all, and is effective at slow speeds and at anchor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiroll_Tanks

For a discussion of all types of stabilization systems, take a look at
the following:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_stability


Honey Badger[_8_] September 30th 11 01:14 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
Wayne B wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:26:54 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

On paper they are amazing!

Then you realize that you have to keep a generator running 24/7 to
keep the gyro spinning.

There is a system called an "Anti Roll Tank" that some people have had
success with on pleasure boats in the 40 to 60 ft range. It requires
a custom design unique to each boat however. It usually requires no
power at all, and is effective at slow speeds and at anchor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiroll_Tanks

For a discussion of all types of stabilization systems, take a look at
the following:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_stability

The goal is to stabilize a 50' power catamaran at rest in rough seas for
more comfortable fishing and mooring. The anti-roll tanks would
probably add a lot of weight.

-HB

Wayne B October 1st 11 11:04 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:14:03 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

The goal is to stabilize a 50' power catamaran at rest in rough seas for
more comfortable fishing and mooring. The anti-roll tanks would
probably add a lot of weight.


=========

Anti-roll tanks do add weight but they can be emptied out when not
needed.

Most power cats need very little stabilization compared to a round
bottom displacement hull. That is one of their strong points. It is
impossible to eliminate all motion. What the stabilization systems
are good at is damping down the amplitude of the initial roll and
eliminating recurrence of the "roll back" oscillation. Multi hulls
tend to be self damping and usually have very little roll back motion.


Honey Badger[_8_] October 2nd 11 02:23 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:14:03 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

The goal is to stabilize a 50' power catamaran at rest in rough seas for
more comfortable fishing and mooring. The anti-roll tanks would
probably add a lot of weight.

=========

Anti-roll tanks do add weight but they can be emptied out when not
needed.

Most power cats need very little stabilization compared to a round
bottom displacement hull. That is one of their strong points. It is
impossible to eliminate all motion. What the stabilization systems
are good at is damping down the amplitude of the initial roll and
eliminating recurrence of the "roll back" oscillation. Multi hulls
tend to be self damping and usually have very little roll back motion.


The vessel has a 22' beam so, at rest, there can be considerable roll
from side-to-side depending on the seas and the wind direction. It is
very comfortable underway.

-HB

Wayne B October 2nd 11 03:42 AM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:23:57 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:14:03 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

The goal is to stabilize a 50' power catamaran at rest in rough seas for
more comfortable fishing and mooring. The anti-roll tanks would
probably add a lot of weight.

=========

Anti-roll tanks do add weight but they can be emptied out when not
needed.

Most power cats need very little stabilization compared to a round
bottom displacement hull. That is one of their strong points. It is
impossible to eliminate all motion. What the stabilization systems
are good at is damping down the amplitude of the initial roll and
eliminating recurrence of the "roll back" oscillation. Multi hulls
tend to be self damping and usually have very little roll back motion.


The vessel has a 22' beam so, at rest, there can be considerable roll
from side-to-side depending on the seas and the wind direction. It is
very comfortable underway.

=================

Commercial fishing boats almost universally use paravanes hung from
outriggers. The outriggers are heavily stressed and require a great
deal of supporting structure. They also increase air draft when
retracted, and not everyone considers them to be aesthetically
appealing.


BAR[_2_] October 2nd 11 01:22 PM

Anyone have these on your boat?
 
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:23:57 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:14:03 -0400, Honey Badger
wrote:

The goal is to stabilize a 50' power catamaran at rest in rough seas for
more comfortable fishing and mooring. The anti-roll tanks would
probably add a lot of weight.
=========

Anti-roll tanks do add weight but they can be emptied out when not
needed.

Most power cats need very little stabilization compared to a round
bottom displacement hull. That is one of their strong points. It is
impossible to eliminate all motion. What the stabilization systems
are good at is damping down the amplitude of the initial roll and
eliminating recurrence of the "roll back" oscillation. Multi hulls
tend to be self damping and usually have very little roll back motion.


The vessel has a 22' beam so, at rest, there can be considerable roll
from side-to-side depending on the seas and the wind direction. It is
very comfortable underway.

=================

Commercial fishing boats almost universally use paravanes hung from
outriggers. The outriggers are heavily stressed and require a great
deal of supporting structure. They also increase air draft when
retracted, and not everyone considers them to be aesthetically
appealing.


Function over form.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com