I'll bet you can't
 

On Sep 3, 9:40*am, BeachBum "not a wrote:
On 9/3/2011 9:33 AM, wrote:









On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:54:10 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
*wrote:

On Sep 1, 8:28 pm, BeachBum"not a *wrote:
On 9/1/2011 7:17 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:53:45 -0400, BeachBum"not a
* *wrote:

Fold a piece *of paper in half 8 times. We'll let Plume cheat. She can
use legal size paper.

You would lose.

Please go back to the link and carefully examine the big-ass picture.
She has eyes, too, but I bet you don't remember seeing them, either.
http://pomonahistorical.org/12times.htm

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle. ;-)

Well, if you notice, there is nothing there that shows any of this.
She is selling a book for 10 dollars that is supposed to have the
solution in it.. Either way, tricks and symantics aside, to fold
opposite over opposite can't be done more than 7 times..

The paper she is resting on seems to have quite high rag content.

It's not paper... Still say, it can't be done with paper. That is,
opposite folds, more than seven times...

I'll bet you can't
 

On 9/3/11 10:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Sep 3, 9:40 am, BeachBum"not a wrote:
On 9/3/2011 9:33 AM, wrote:









On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:54:10 -0700 (PDT), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

On Sep 1, 8:28 pm, BeachBum"not a wrote:
On 9/1/2011 7:17 PM, wrote:

On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:53:45 -0400, BeachBum"not a
wrote:

Fold a piece of paper in half 8 times. We'll let Plume cheat. She can
use legal size paper.

You would lose.

Please go back to the link and carefully examine the big-ass picture.
She has eyes, too, but I bet you don't remember seeing them, either.
http://pomonahistorical.org/12times.htm

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle. ;-)

Well, if you notice, there is nothing there that shows any of this.
She is selling a book for 10 dollars that is supposed to have the
solution in it.. Either way, tricks and symantics aside, to fold
opposite over opposite can't be done more than 7 times..

The paper she is resting on seems to have quite high rag content.

It's not paper... Still say, it can't be done with paper. That is,
opposite folds, more than seven times...

The article did state it was paper, why can't it be paper?