| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
more govt job killing
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:22:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 31/08/2011 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 31, 11:48 am, wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...mpany-you-cann... Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals surprised? Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually work. Look at this: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...avis-Bacon.htm even the govt is finding their own regs are a barrier to green jobs creation. Best solution, every department, every law, every stupid government regulation needs to be review for effectiveness, rationality and bet 80% of it is bull****. Cut 60% of government. Yep, deforest the dead weight. Watched a documentary the other night on 9/11 where government is so big they have turf wars between the departments that indirectly lead to Al Queda getting the chance to pull off 9/11. Some dumb democrat ambassador in Yemen booted out a FBI investigator that almost tripped ont he 9/11 plots. Fighting her own government for her own political bull****. Simply put, need a president that fires such idiots routinely. But it is what happens when government gets too big for the good of the people. That is why we have a depression. Preserving big fat government is more important than the people. Print money for big government debt, to keep government big and dysfunctional. New debt is inflationary, unemploying people as less goods are needed. That means less taxes and more debt...more money print and destroys the US economy with DEBT and FRAUD. All to keep government big, fat an ineffective. Unfortunately for you, that's already underway and has been since 2009, depending on the department and the issue. http://blogs.cgdev.org/mca-monitor/2...ent-policy.php http://ipolitics.ca/budget2011/2011/...-to-cut-costs/ Of course, you hate Obama, so it doesn't matter. |
more govt job killing
On 31/08/2011 2:06 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Aug 31, 2:56 pm, BeachBum"not a wrote: On 8/31/2011 2:47 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Aug 31, 1:29 pm, wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:36:32 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 31, 11:48 am, wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...mpany-you-cann... Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals surprised? Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually work. Look at this: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal.../201108301734/... even the govt is finding their own regs are a barrier to green jobs creation. So, because of some problems, all labor unions are evil. Of course, you'd rather rely on the "job creators" who've done nothing with all their tax breaks and will continue to do nothing with all the new ones proposed by the right-wing.. well, except line their own pockets and build up vast amounts of cash. Yeah, and what have they done with the billions given them with the Obama stimulus package, cause it didn't create any jobs either... So, you are complaining because the Job creators didn't do anything with the millions the "right wing" proposed, but you are not critical of the BILLIONS given them by the "left wing". Yup, shouldn't be allowed to vote... She, like Harry, is smitten with Obama. KKK take note. OMG, check this out:http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Solyndra- Shutting-Down-128802718.html Another fed boondoggle, half a billion dollars thrown int the sewer of "green jobs". A study in Spain found that for every green job created, 2.2 other jobs were lost. Their "green power" is so costly that businesses are closing there to move to where there is cheaper power. The Spanish govt is subsidizing "green Power" so much that it has bankrupted them. The only thing government does efficiently is waste taxpayers wealth. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? |
more govt job killing
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:49:43 -0700, wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:22:22 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 31/08/2011 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 31, 11:48 am, wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...mpany-you-cann... Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals surprised? Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually work. Look at this: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...avis-Bacon.htm even the govt is finding their own regs are a barrier to green jobs creation. Best solution, every department, every law, every stupid government regulation needs to be review for effectiveness, rationality and bet 80% of it is bull****. Cut 60% of government. Yep, deforest the dead weight. Watched a documentary the other night on 9/11 where government is so big they have turf wars between the departments that indirectly lead to Al Queda getting the chance to pull off 9/11. Some dumb democrat ambassador in Yemen booted out a FBI investigator that almost tripped ont he 9/11 plots. Fighting her own government for her own political bull****. Simply put, need a president that fires such idiots routinely. But it is what happens when government gets too big for the good of the people. That is why we have a depression. Preserving big fat government is more important than the people. Print money for big government debt, to keep government big and dysfunctional. New debt is inflationary, unemploying people as less goods are needed. That means less taxes and more debt...more money print and destroys the US economy with DEBT and FRAUD. All to keep government big, fat an ineffective. Unfortunately for you, that's already underway and has been since 2009, depending on the department and the issue. http://blogs.cgdev.org/mca-monitor/2...ent-policy.php http://ipolitics.ca/budget2011/2011/...-to-cut-costs/ Of course, you hate Obama, so it doesn't matter. Here's the WSJ article about it... note the second link above is what's happening in your country, socialist though it may be... LOL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...252904032.html |
more govt job killing
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:52:50 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 31/08/2011 11:29 AM, wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:36:32 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 31, 11:48 am, wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...mpany-you-cann... Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals surprised? Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually work. Look at this: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...avis-Bacon.htm even the govt is finding their own regs are a barrier to green jobs creation. So, because of some problems, all labor unions are evil. Of course, you'd rather rely on the "job creators" who've done nothing with all their tax breaks and will continue to do nothing with all the new ones proposed by the right-wing.. well, except line their own pockets and build up vast amounts of cash. Why should unions be tax deductable or tax free, fact is unions are in the business of discontent for cash flow. Unions love governemtns because they can screw taxpayers. http://nlpc.org/union-corruption-upd...ruption-update Fact is that you're stupid. |
more govt job killing
On Aug 31, 12:29*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:36:32 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: On Aug 31, 11:48*am, wrote: On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...mpany-you-cann.... Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. *Why are only liberals surprised? Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually work. Look at this: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal.../201108301734/... even the govt is finding their own regs are a barrier to green jobs creation. So, because of some problems, all labor unions are evil. Of course, you'd rather rely on the "job creators" who've done nothing with all their tax breaks and will continue to do nothing with all the new ones proposed by the right-wing.. well, except line their own pockets and build up vast amounts of cash. "Why am I surprised that you don't have a clue how things actually work. " |
more govt job killing
"Canuck57" wrote in message ...
On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals surprised? This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a byzantine **** up. This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business because they couldn't fire the drunk. But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? =========================== reply: The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving, and the BAC is much lower for a commercial license. |
more govt job killing
On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals surprised? This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a byzantine **** up. This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business because they couldn't fire the drunk. But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? =========================== reply: The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving, and the BAC is much lower for a commercial license. Well then the company went above and beyond already. My guess, some senator or congress people indirectly or directly own his competition and the idea is to lean on him. Was looking over net worth history of some politicians the other day. And notices how many seem to be able to consistently pick names you never heard of that take off in the markets. Almost as if they get a regular feed of good inside tips for favors. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? |
more govt job killing
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:34:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 01/09/2011 11:35 PM, Califbill wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 31/08/2011 8:39 AM, Frogwatch wrote: http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/30/...medium=twitter Accumulated policies like this and other job killing regulations have resulted in our huge unemployment rate. Why are only liberals surprised? This is so typical of a government that has gotten so big they become a byzantine **** up. This company firing the drunk is trying to preserve American jobs. Does no good if the drunk hits a school bus, they get sued out of business because they couldn't fire the drunk. But it is an Obamanation. Making everyone suffer for fleabaggers. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? =========================== reply: The company did not fire the drunk. Just said they would never get a driving position. He may be a warehouseman, etc. The Fed's complained about the drunk not driving. Any Class A license will be lifted for one drunk driving arrest. Even in a car, not related to for hire driving, and the BAC is much lower for a commercial license. Well then the company went above and beyond already. My guess, some senator or congress people indirectly or directly own his competition and the idea is to lean on him. Was looking over net worth history of some politicians the other day. And notices how many seem to be able to consistently pick names you never heard of that take off in the markets. Almost as if they get a regular feed of good inside tips for favors. You "guess" a lot, but mostly, you just spout Rush's garbage. You're 100% stupid. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com