![]() |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99 @n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. Sure hoss. We believe you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs FUD sells. Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace? Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce. But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that sells with fleabaggers. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 8/28/2011 7:49 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Yup, all part of the plan... Remember, Obama said he would raise the gas prices to ten dollars a gallon if it would help General Electri.. ooops, I mean, the "green" movement... ;) History will not be kind to President Obama.. the worst President in US history... |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. i love it. he knew **** about oil or chemistry but he's right wing so the destruction of fishing jobs is OK because BP got rich |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:18:33 -0400, JustWait
wrote: On 8/28/2011 7:49 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Yup, all part of the plan... Remember, Obama said he would raise the gas prices to ten dollars a gallon if it would help General Electri.. ooops, I mean, the "green" movement... ;) History will not be kind to President Obama.. the worst President in US history... and he's BLACK!! |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:15:02 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article cb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99 , says... Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. Sure hoss. We believe you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs Idiots like Froggy and Knuckles only believe in what Palin says. Or, if they've got their radios on, Rush. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:56 -0600, wrote: On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99 @n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. Sure hoss. We believe you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs FUD sells. Yes, it does. and Faux news in the premier disseminator. Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace? They were, but, what do you do? The Japs **** where they eat and being great conservatives, enjoy it because that is the way things are (at least for them). What is Greenpeace going to do, ram the goddam island? Are you nuts? Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce. Kyoto liberal. Right. That is sort of like saying Rushbo is more liberal than Beck or whatever. What a nonsense statement you made. But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that sells with fleabaggers. Obama is probably toast and should be, too. Your feeble attempt to associate him with BP is lame. Funny, compare how BP was handled to Exxon and tell me why the difference? Might I suggest one was an American company and one was not? Plus if your out to destroy a nation like Obama is, why not curtail a main source of energy development making USA weaker and more dependent on Saudi oil? I am sure the Saudi like that. Lets hope people wake up nd toast Obama in 2012. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
|
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_812398.html http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201...ear_later.html and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pits and the sky didn't fall. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:20:05 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:56 -0600, wrote: On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99 @n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. Sure hoss. We believe you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs FUD sells. Yes, it does. and Faux news in the premier disseminator. Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace? They were, but, what do you do? The Japs **** where they eat and being great conservatives, enjoy it because that is the way things are (at least for them). What is Greenpeace going to do, ram the goddam island? Are you nuts? Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce. Kyoto liberal. Right. That is sort of like saying Rushbo is more liberal than Beck or whatever. What a nonsense statement you made. But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that sells with fleabaggers. Obama is probably toast and should be, too. Your feeble attempt to associate him with BP is lame. Funny, compare how BP was handled to Exxon and tell me why the difference? Might I suggest one was an American company and one was not? Plus if your out to destroy a nation like Obama is, why not curtail a main source of energy development making USA weaker and more dependent on Saudi oil? I am sure the Saudi like that. Lets hope people wake up nd toast Obama in 2012. You are amazingly stupid! Thanks for the reminder. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_812398.html http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201...ear_later.html and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pits and the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Aug 30, 11:07*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239.... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late.... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:35:24 -0700 (PDT), North Star
wrote: On Aug 30, 11:07*pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Maybe he should use Irish Spring! |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 30/08/2011 8:35 PM, North Star wrote:
On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Yep. When natives used to make their own boats and not use aluminum onces from Lund, they used to heat it up and use it to seal the birch bark canoes and skiffs. deplume must have been ripped off with that liberal schooling. Don't they teach north American history? Or maybe she was in the dumb class. -- If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the same and expecting different results? |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 8/31/2011 1:37 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/08/2011 8:35 PM, North Star wrote: On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Yep. When natives used to make their own boats and not use aluminum onces from Lund, they used to heat it up and use it to seal the birch bark canoes and skiffs. deplume must have been ripped off with that liberal schooling. Don't they teach north American history? Or maybe she was in the dumb class. Deplume was proud to ride the short bus. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 8/30/2011 10:43 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:35:24 -0700 (PDT), North Star wrote: On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Maybe he should use Irish Spring! And this concludes DePlumes evening as she settles in to a drug induced coma. Nitey nite dummy. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Aug 31, 6:45*am, BeachBum "not a wrote:
On 8/31/2011 1:37 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 8:35 PM, North Star wrote: On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthe sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Yep. When natives used to make their own boats and not use aluminum onces from Lund, they used to heat it up and use it to seal the birch bark canoes and skiffs. deplume must have been ripped off with that liberal schooling. Don't they teach north American history? Or maybe she was in the dumb class. Deplume was proud to ride the short bus. And still is, and still does. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Aug 31, 7:02*am, BeachBum "not a wrote:
On 8/30/2011 10:43 PM, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:35:24 -0700 (PDT), North Star *wrote: On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch * *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthe sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Maybe he should use Irish Spring! And this concludes DePlumes evening as she settles in to a drug induced coma. Nitey nite dummy. "All we are saying...is give peace a chance...." |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
In article 5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc-
, says... On Aug 30, 11:07*pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Aug 31, 10:34*am, iBoatMore wrote:
In article 5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07*pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthe sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
In article 430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3
@h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34*am, iBoatMore wrote: In article 5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07*pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthe sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don? |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Aug 31, 12:01*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article 430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34*am, iBoatMore wrote: In article 5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07*pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthesky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther & farther away thanks to you and your ilk. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 8/31/11 11:16 AM, North Star wrote:
On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, wrote: I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& farther away thanks to you and your ilk. Hehehehe. Good luck, friend Don. I think you should pick a new handle to suit your quest... Don Quixote. :?) And that's my contribution to wrecked.boats for the day. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
In article b323f337-d98c-4bf0-9337-
, says... On Aug 31, 12:01*pm, iBoatMore wrote: In article 430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34*am, iBoatMore wrote: In article 5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07*pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthesky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther & farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So, do tell, how does your CONSTANT name calling and insulting help in the "civility" of rec.boats? |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
|
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:37:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/08/2011 8:35 PM, North Star wrote: On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Yep. When natives used to make their own boats and not use aluminum onces from Lund, they used to heat it up and use it to seal the birch bark canoes and skiffs. deplume must have been ripped off with that liberal schooling. Don't they teach north American history? Or maybe she was in the dumb class. There's no maybe that you're stupid. Idiots are offended when you're compared to them. Imbeciles get huffy. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On 8/31/2011 11:53 AM, iBoatMore wrote:
In articleb323f337-d98c-4bf0-9337- , says... On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, wrote: In article430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34 am, wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthesky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So, do tell, how does your CONSTANT name calling and insulting help in the "civility" of rec.boats? She has bats in her belfry and they often short circuit her brain. I wish there were something we could do to help her. It's a shame to see someone as wasted as she is. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
North Star wrote:
On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239.... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late.... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsand the sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. You're a funny little bitch! -HB http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_831278.html |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
North Star wrote:
On Aug 31, 10:34 am, wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthe sky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. It's obvious from your posts. -HB http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_831278.html |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
North Star wrote:
On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, wrote: In article430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34 am, wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthesky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So what else have you failed at in life, stupid? -HB http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_831278.html |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Aug 31, 8:58*pm, Honey Badger wrote:
North Star wrote: On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, *wrote: In article430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34 am, *wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch * *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandtheskydidn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing *to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& *farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So what else have you failed at in life, stupid? -HB http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...care_n_831...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You sure do sound like that jackass, Ditzy Dan. Any relation?? |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Aug 31, 12:25*pm, BeachBum "not a wrote:
On 8/31/2011 11:53 AM, iBoatMore wrote: In articleb323f337-d98c-4bf0-9337- , says... On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, *wrote: In article430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34 am, *wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch * *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandtheskydidn't fall.. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing *to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& *farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So, do tell, how does your CONSTANT name calling and insulting help in the "civility" of rec.boats? She has bats in her belfry and they often short circuit her brain. I wish there were something we could do to help her. It's a shame to see someone as wasted as she is. She enjoys the buzz. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
In article ,
says... North Star wrote: On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, wrote: In article430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34 am, wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandthesky didn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So what else have you failed at in life, stupid? -HB http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_831278.html Cleaning up his yard. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
In article 91e29962-efc3-4f6d-8b24-
, says... On Aug 31, 8:58*pm, Honey Badger wrote: North Star wrote: On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, *wrote: In article430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34 am, *wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch * *wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. *I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. *I was correct. *Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. *The effects on beaches is almost nothing. *Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. *There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. *The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. *We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. *Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. *Do they drink seawater? *How did it really get in their system? *I mean really get there? *How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? *Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. *But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. *Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. *Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. *Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandtheskydidn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing *to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& *farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So what else have you failed at in life, stupid? -HB http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...care_n_831...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You sure do sound like that jackass, Ditzy Dan. Any relation?? Oh, boy, here goes Don again trying to guess who someone is and failing miserably, again. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:17:57 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:20:05 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:56 -0600, wrote: On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99 @n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says... Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. Sure hoss. We believe you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs FUD sells. Yes, it does. and Faux news in the premier disseminator. Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace? They were, but, what do you do? The Japs **** where they eat and being great conservatives, enjoy it because that is the way things are (at least for them). What is Greenpeace going to do, ram the goddam island? Are you nuts? Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce. Kyoto liberal. Right. That is sort of like saying Rushbo is more liberal than Beck or whatever. What a nonsense statement you made. But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that sells with fleabaggers. Obama is probably toast and should be, too. Your feeble attempt to associate him with BP is lame. Funny, compare how BP was handled to Exxon and tell me why the difference? Might I suggest one was an American company and one was not? Plus if your out to destroy a nation like Obama is, why not curtail a main source of energy development making USA weaker and more dependent on Saudi oil? I am sure the Saudi like that. Lets hope people wake up nd toast Obama in 2012. Your simple mindedness is duly noted. I've corrected your typo. |
Gulf Oil Spill, Fantasy and reality
North Star wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:58 pm, Honey wrote: North Star wrote: On Aug 31, 12:01 pm, wrote: In article430ef104-d425-49a7-8cbc-69fad35a56c3 @h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Aug 31, 10:34 am, wrote: In article5860ba74-b7da-4881-9afc- , says... On Aug 30, 11:07 pm, wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:30:00 -0600, wrote: On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote: On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro- armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and eaten by critters to nearly nothing. The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill. Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up. Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...-blood_n_81239... http://oilspill.skytruth.org/ http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201..._one_year_late... and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary. One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to an auto mechanic? As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation, confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for 1/2 the population before BP? Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it. I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy even find bones carbon dating before man. La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pitsandtheskydidn't fall. Yes, you're stupid. I think you want to live in the Tar Pits, but alas, they won't let you into the country.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He has his own Tar Pits in Alberta. Hey, Don, I thought, like Harry you can't stand this place and it's regulars. Why are you here then? I'm expecting Harry's stupid excuse..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm on a mission to clean up this newsgroup and get it back to civility. Why do you come here and do nothing but call names and insult then, Don?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No one said the task would be easy or that I wouldn't get my hands dirty from time to time. The thing to keep in mind is the long range goal....... which seems to keep moving farther& farther away thanks to you and your ilk. So what else have you failed at in life, stupid? -HB http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0...care_n_831...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You sure do sound like that jackass, Ditzy Dan. Any relation?? Does he read the Huffington Post? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com