reducing the Federal deficit
The Republicans are not interested, apparently.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...1&vote =00072 Keep voting for them! You get what you pay for. |
reducing the Federal deficit
On 6/16/11 3:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 16/06/2011 12:50 PM, wrote: The Republicans are not interested, apparently. http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...1&vote =00072 Keep voting for them! You get what you pay for. If it had passed, you would pay more for anything involving oil which is about everything. Loopholes in this case is fleabagger talk, oil already pays a huge amount of taxes. Good part is I can afford $8/gallon, can you? I had a feeling you glugged a lot of really cheap wine. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
reducing the Federal deficit
On 16/06/2011 1:11 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 6/16/11 3:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 16/06/2011 12:50 PM, wrote: The Republicans are not interested, apparently. http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...1&vote =00072 Keep voting for them! You get what you pay for. If it had passed, you would pay more for anything involving oil which is about everything. Loopholes in this case is fleabagger talk, oil already pays a huge amount of taxes. Good part is I can afford $8/gallon, can you? I had a feeling you glugged a lot of really cheap wine. Given time, you will pay $8 gallon. Question is how soon. I remember as a kid getting gas for 49 cents a gallon. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
reducing the Federal deficit
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:55:42 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 16/06/2011 1:11 PM, Harryk wrote: On 6/16/11 3:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 16/06/2011 12:50 PM, wrote: The Republicans are not interested, apparently. http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...1&vote =00072 Keep voting for them! You get what you pay for. If it had passed, you would pay more for anything involving oil which is about everything. Loopholes in this case is fleabagger talk, oil already pays a huge amount of taxes. Good part is I can afford $8/gallon, can you? I had a feeling you glugged a lot of really cheap wine. Given time, you will pay $8 gallon. Question is how soon. I remember as a kid getting gas for 49 cents a gallon. I'm sure you're still getting a lot of gas. You sure stink this place up! But, we don't have to worry about the safety of our food. The Republicans cut money for safety inspections, so it must be just fine. |
reducing the Federal deficit
In article ,
says... On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:55:42 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 16/06/2011 1:11 PM, Harryk wrote: On 6/16/11 3:07 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 16/06/2011 12:50 PM, wrote: The Republicans are not interested, apparently. http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...1&vote =00072 Keep voting for them! You get what you pay for. If it had passed, you would pay more for anything involving oil which is about everything. Loopholes in this case is fleabagger talk, oil already pays a huge amount of taxes. Good part is I can afford $8/gallon, can you? I had a feeling you glugged a lot of really cheap wine. Given time, you will pay $8 gallon. Question is how soon. I remember as a kid getting gas for 49 cents a gallon. I'm sure you're still getting a lot of gas. You sure stink this place up! But, we don't have to worry about the safety of our food. The Republicans cut money for safety inspections, so it must be just fine. You forgot to call him a moron and racist. You're slipping. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com