Let's Be Straight up Here
 

It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:38:51 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.




I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

In article ,
says...


I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

That won't last. The cock photos are getting passed around.
Even the kids will start finding them and bring them home.
"Ma, look what I found."
Then maybe some birds/bees talk or maybe not.
Maybe the kid will say, "Whose pee pee is it?"
And ma will say, "That's your Congressman, son."
"Who took the picture of his pee pee?"
"He took it himself, son."
About that time even a Weiner supporter starts thinking, "I want this
joker COMPLETELY out of my life."
That's without worse photos coming out, showing his hand on his cock.
"What's this man doing, mommy? Who is he?"
It goes on and on and will only get worse, even if some of it is trumped
up.
No recovery from photos of your hard cock being distributed.
That's what I think.
BTW, I liked Weiner before I knew he was a perv.
But now I hear other things about him, like he doesn't work hard, just
takes credit for others' work, abuses his staff, etc.
So it's good the ******* outed himself.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

In article ,
says...

It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.



I think that the worst part of the story is that 56 percent of his
constituents, the hypocrite media, etc. don't give a **** simply because
he has a D behind his name...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:53:38 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

That won't last. The cock photos are getting passed around.
Even the kids will start finding them and bring them home.
"Ma, look what I found."
Then maybe some birds/bees talk or maybe not.
Maybe the kid will say, "Whose pee pee is it?"
And ma will say, "That's your Congressman, son."
"Who took the picture of his pee pee?"
"He took it himself, son."
About that time even a Weiner supporter starts thinking, "I want this
joker COMPLETELY out of my life."
That's without worse photos coming out, showing his hand on his cock.
"What's this man doing, mommy? Who is he?"
It goes on and on and will only get worse, even if some of it is trumped
up.
No recovery from photos of your hard cock being distributed.
That's what I think.
BTW, I liked Weiner before I knew he was a perv.
But now I hear other things about him, like he doesn't work hard, just
takes credit for others' work, abuses his staff, etc.
So it's good the ******* outed himself.


Well, in any case, I think it's up to his constituents. He's up for
election every two years. Why not let them decide? It's not like he's
a Senator who could be there potentially for six years.

I don't have a strong feeling about it either way, despite his
positions, which I agree with mostly, or with the sexting.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 6/12/2011 10:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:38:51 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.




I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

Because he's a pervert. It's time to start weeding the sleaze out of
government.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 6/12/2011 11:34 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:53:38 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...


I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

That won't last. The cock photos are getting passed around.
Even the kids will start finding them and bring them home.
"Ma, look what I found."
Then maybe some birds/bees talk or maybe not.
Maybe the kid will say, "Whose pee pee is it?"
And ma will say, "That's your Congressman, son."
"Who took the picture of his pee pee?"
"He took it himself, son."
About that time even a Weiner supporter starts thinking, "I want this
joker COMPLETELY out of my life."
That's without worse photos coming out, showing his hand on his cock.
"What's this man doing, mommy? Who is he?"
It goes on and on and will only get worse, even if some of it is trumped
up.
No recovery from photos of your hard cock being distributed.
That's what I think.
BTW, I liked Weiner before I knew he was a perv.
But now I hear other things about him, like he doesn't work hard, just
takes credit for others' work, abuses his staff, etc.
So it's good the ******* outed himself.


Well, in any case, I think it's up to his constituents. He's up for
election every two years. Why not let them decide? It's not like he's
a Senator who could be there potentially for six years.

I don't have a strong feeling about it either way, despite his
positions, which I agree with mostly, or with the sexting.

Have you been corresponding with the scumbag?

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 6/12/2011 10:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

You're loving all this cock talk, aren't you?

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 12/06/2011 9:34 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:53:38 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...


I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

That won't last. The cock photos are getting passed around.
Even the kids will start finding them and bring them home.
"Ma, look what I found."
Then maybe some birds/bees talk or maybe not.
Maybe the kid will say, "Whose pee pee is it?"
And ma will say, "That's your Congressman, son."
"Who took the picture of his pee pee?"
"He took it himself, son."
About that time even a Weiner supporter starts thinking, "I want this
joker COMPLETELY out of my life."
That's without worse photos coming out, showing his hand on his cock.
"What's this man doing, mommy? Who is he?"
It goes on and on and will only get worse, even if some of it is trumped
up.
No recovery from photos of your hard cock being distributed.
That's what I think.
BTW, I liked Weiner before I knew he was a perv.
But now I hear other things about him, like he doesn't work hard, just
takes credit for others' work, abuses his staff, etc.
So it's good the ******* outed himself.


Well, in any case, I think it's up to his constituents. He's up for
election every two years. Why not let them decide? It's not like he's
a Senator who could be there potentially for six years.

I don't have a strong feeling about it either way, despite his
positions, which I agree with mostly, or with the sexting.

To me, it isn't the sexting, it is the lying about it. Hypocrit
democrat POS needs to quit.

Will admit, Clinton got away with his abuse of power with Monica, but a
desperate Obama Muslim, Muslim/Saudi raised wife with connections, the
Hilary boot - need I say more? The man is dead politically.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 12/06/2011 10:04 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:53:38 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

That won't last.

That is true. Most damning was when the pictures taken inside the
Rayburn office building gym came out. His whole argument that this was
all done away from the capitol fell apart. It will be Pelosi, D.
W/Shultz and Hoyer who push him out.

It sure gives the term "dicking around at work" a new spin.

Or work'in with Dick...

What a Weiner.



--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 13/06/2011 1:17 AM, Jay wrote:
On 6/12/2011 10:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:38:51 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.




I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

Because he's a pervert. It's time to start weeding the sleaze out of
government.

Hey, if he dicks around at work and lies about it, maybe he would sell
out the USA?

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 12/06/2011 9:10 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.



I think that the worst part of the story is that 56 percent of his
constituents, the hypocrite media, etc. don't give a **** simply because
he has a D behind his name...

Hank Johnson comes to mind. A good example of how stupid you can get,
and still be elected as a democrat.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:45:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 9:34 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:53:38 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...


I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, but
the public in his own district are saying otherwise. Why should he
resign if he still has support from the public?

That won't last. The cock photos are getting passed around.
Even the kids will start finding them and bring them home.
"Ma, look what I found."
Then maybe some birds/bees talk or maybe not.
Maybe the kid will say, "Whose pee pee is it?"
And ma will say, "That's your Congressman, son."
"Who took the picture of his pee pee?"
"He took it himself, son."
About that time even a Weiner supporter starts thinking, "I want this
joker COMPLETELY out of my life."
That's without worse photos coming out, showing his hand on his cock.
"What's this man doing, mommy? Who is he?"
It goes on and on and will only get worse, even if some of it is trumped
up.
No recovery from photos of your hard cock being distributed.
That's what I think.
BTW, I liked Weiner before I knew he was a perv.
But now I hear other things about him, like he doesn't work hard, just
takes credit for others' work, abuses his staff, etc.
So it's good the ******* outed himself.


Well, in any case, I think it's up to his constituents. He's up for
election every two years. Why not let them decide? It's not like he's
a Senator who could be there potentially for six years.

I don't have a strong feeling about it either way, despite his
positions, which I agree with mostly, or with the sexting.

To me, it isn't the sexting, it is the lying about it. Hypocrit
democrat POS needs to quit.

Will admit, Clinton got away with his abuse of power with Monica, but a
desperate Obama Muslim, Muslim/Saudi raised wife with connections, the
Hilary boot - need I say more? The man is dead politically.

Need I say more... you're a racist scumbag.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. I mean a real women, not skanks like you.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:53:38 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, bu
So it's good the ******* outed himself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQVws...eature=related

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:56:32 -0700, Eddie
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:53:38 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


I think what he did was reprehensible. Perhaps he should resign, bu
So it's good the ******* outed himself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQVws...eature=related

Heh...

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Jun 13, 7:18*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:









On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. *Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos..
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. *I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. *I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Not getting any lately, D'Plume?

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On 13/06/2011 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Bet you want a 16" cock....8" of pleasure and 8" to get by the fat.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:46 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers.
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Bet you want a 16" cock....8" of pleasure and 8" to get by the fat.

If I did, I certainly wouldn't look to you. You're all of what...
about 2 flaccid inches.

Let's Be Straight up Here
 

On Jun 15, 4:08*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:46 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:









On 13/06/2011 6:18 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:58:08 -0600,
wrote:

On 13/06/2011 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:41:44 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 8:18 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:11:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 7:38 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
It ain't about legit flesh and blood sex.
And it ain't about lying about sex.
Guys like Vitter, Clinton, et al get hammered by charges of hypocrisy,
and lying.
They survive after showing contrition, real or feigned.
What was written about their "sins" fades away.
But they don't photograph their private parts and send the pics to
strangers.
Photos are forever.
The NY Rep Congressman who posted a shirtless picture to a Craigslist
hooker knew that, and quickly got out of town.
And that was just a silly "beefcake" type photo.
But sometimes stupid knows stupidity.

Anybody got a picture of Vitter's or Clinton's hard prick?
Of course not.
Hell, they're passing out photos of Weiner's hard cock at protest
rallies.
Was it a spy cam or private eye sneaking around to get the photo?
Nope. *Weiner took his own pictures and sent them to strangers..
He's a bonafide pervert.
Besides being incredibly stupid.
But pervs are always stupid, and can't control themselves.
Anybody who defends this guy and thinks he can continue being a
Congressman is nuts.
The photos won't go away.
Never.
Every time somebody looks at this guy they'll think of cock photos.
I still stay the crowning glory of this whole matter is the dope didn't
even get any pussy.
What the hell was the point?
If he can't get at least that much done, what good is he?
Just a jackoff.

Yep, like Clinton, lied about it.

Not like you. You're too small, apparently.

Getting all worked up are ya?

You're the small guy whacking off in front of your computer.

I leave that for you. *I prefer more conventional man and woman
relationship. *I mean a real women, not skanks like you.

You'd prefer a conventional relationship, but since you can't perform,
it really doesn't matter what you'd "prefer." Basically, you're a
little man with little or no performance. Evidence: Your fixation on
men's genitalia.

Bet you want a 16" cock....8" of pleasure and 8" to get by the fat.

If I did, I certainly wouldn't look to you. You're all of what...
about 2 flaccid inches.

"If [you] did" D'Plume? We're sure you do, and you would.