|
I won't resign
On Jun 8, 1:37*am, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:19:45 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:47:54 -0700, wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .. . He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. *Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. * *Why?* *escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. Question: Where were all these guys calling for Sanford, Ensign and Vitter to step down? I don't recall any of them speaking out. *Is there a double standard? Exactly. Ensign was screwing his employee's wife, who was also an employee. Vitter was screwing prostitutes, after running on family values. Sanford used taxpayer funds to engage in an extra-marital affair. They all lied their asses off, for months or years. They all remained in office with the support of fellow Republicans. Weiner sent some lewd photos. And who are these bozos asking to resign, the guy who sent photos. It's Obama's fault, apparently. Good, D'Plume. You are catching on. |
I won't resign
|
I won't resign
On 6/8/2011 12:19 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:47:54 -0700, wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, wrote: wrote in message ... He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. *Why?* escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. Question: Where were all these guys calling for Sanford, Ensign and Vitter to step down? I don't recall any of them speaking out. Is there a double standard? Ensign was screwing his employee's wife, who was also an employee. Vitter was screwing prostitutes, after running on family values. Sanford used taxpayer funds to engage in an extra-marital affair. They all lied their asses off, for months or years. They all remained in office with the support of fellow Republicans. Weiner sent some lewd photos. And who are these bozos asking to resign, the guy who sent photos. I guess you think posting photos of his package should win him votes. Deplume and you are the only one who fell for that ploy. |
I won't resign
On 6/8/2011 2:37 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:19:45 -0700, wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:47:54 -0700, wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, wrote: wrote in message ... He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. *Why?* escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. Question: Where were all these guys calling for Sanford, Ensign and Vitter to step down? I don't recall any of them speaking out. Is there a double standard? Exactly. Ensign was screwing his employee's wife, who was also an employee. Vitter was screwing prostitutes, after running on family values. Sanford used taxpayer funds to engage in an extra-marital affair. They all lied their asses off, for months or years. They all remained in office with the support of fellow Republicans. Weiner sent some lewd photos. And who are these bozos asking to resign, the guy who sent photos. It's Obama's fault, apparently. Why do you think that. Are you saying that he is a cock teaser? |
I won't resign
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:10 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .. . He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. *Why?* escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. Did they encourage others to lie in order to hid their activities? In some cases, yes. Like Ensign? Remember him? I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. I don't have to change the Wiki, there are other sources on the net, such as government sites, that support Palin's version. You're a major stupid force in the universe if you believe that. Prove it. |
I won't resign
In article ,
says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:10 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .. . He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. *Why?* escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. Did they encourage others to lie in order to hid their activities? In some cases, yes. Like Ensign? Remember him? I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. I don't have to change the Wiki, there are other sources on the net, such as government sites, that support Palin's version. You're a major stupid force in the universe if you believe that. Prove it. You are too easy. http://www.hanford.gov/oci/ci_spy.cfm?dossier=54 |
I won't resign
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:14:28 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:10 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .. . He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. *Why?* escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. Did they encourage others to lie in order to hid their activities? In some cases, yes. Like Ensign? Remember him? I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. I don't have to change the Wiki, there are other sources on the net, such as government sites, that support Palin's version. You're a major stupid force in the universe if you believe that. Prove it. You are too easy. http://www.hanford.gov/oci/ci_spy.cfm?dossier=54 You're too stupid. Show me where Revere rode around ringing bells. The one inside your and Palin's head don't count. Try reading it again for content. |
I won't resign
In article ,
says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:14:28 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:10 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .. . He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. *Why?* escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. Did they encourage others to lie in order to hid their activities? In some cases, yes. Like Ensign? Remember him? I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. I don't have to change the Wiki, there are other sources on the net, such as government sites, that support Palin's version. You're a major stupid force in the universe if you believe that. Prove it. You are too easy. http://www.hanford.gov/oci/ci_spy.cfm?dossier=54 You're too stupid. Show me where Revere rode around ringing bells. The one inside your and Palin's head don't count. Try reading it again for content. Do I have to prove he was wearing stockings vs. socks too? |
I won't resign
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:15:39 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:14:28 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:10 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:44:05 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 14:02:59 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .. . He also admitted he lied and will fully cooperate with the ethics committee when Pelosi asked for an investigation. Not too many Republicans willing to do that. He admitted he lied because he felt the noose tightening around his neck. Only then did he give a teary-eyed confession and apology. Took a week. He has no choice but to fully cooperate with the ethics committee. He's trying desperately to keep his job. *Why?* escapes me. Why is this so important to you? Did you have the same public outrage when Foley, Haggard, Craig, Allen, Murphy, Ensign, Vitter, Lee, Duvall, Sanford, Fossella, Boutin, Gingrich, Sherwood, West, LaTourette, Giuliani, Hyde, Chenoweth-Hage, Livingston, Packwood, or Calvert (and there are others) lied, cheated, and refused to tell the truth for weeks, months, years, and some never? I suppose you were saying that it wasn't that bad and they should be able to stay in office. I'm saying that they did far worse than Weiner and fought to stay in office, all the while denying what they'd done for months and some still to this day. Did they encourage others to lie in order to hid their activities? In some cases, yes. Like Ensign? Remember him? I'm saying that you're a right wing reactionary, who seems to take what people like Palin say seriously. Why don't you try and change the wiki on Revere like some of your buddies. Yeah, some right wingers tried to change history to match Palin's lunatic version. I don't have to change the Wiki, there are other sources on the net, such as government sites, that support Palin's version. You're a major stupid force in the universe if you believe that. Prove it. You are too easy. http://www.hanford.gov/oci/ci_spy.cfm?dossier=54 You're too stupid. Show me where Revere rode around ringing bells. The one inside your and Palin's head don't count. Try reading it again for content. Do I have to prove he was wearing stockings vs. socks too? You don't have to prove anything. Read the link. Show us where he was ringing bells: "He who warned uh, the British that they weren't gonna be takin' away our arms, uh by ringing those bells, and um, makin' sure as he's riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be sure and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed." Revere never said anything to the British about "takin' away our arms" by "ringing those bells. You're just as dumb as she is. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com