|
America wasn't built on Welfare
This is going around the web sites. Since fleabaggers have only whiner
and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and pizza, then get a job. Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.” Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem. If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:
This is going around the web sites. Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and pizza, then get a job. Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.” Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem. If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. You're hired. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:
This is going around the web sites. Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. by: Alfred W Evans 1SG, USA(Ret) Gatesville, Texas ---- Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and pizza, then get a job. Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.” Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem. If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Jun 5, 5:06*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
This is going around the web sites. *Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. *If you want steak and pizza, then get a *job. Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. *Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. *If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. *Ever live in a military barracks? *You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. *Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. *If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. *It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. *We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.” Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. *If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem. If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. *The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! *Yes that is correct. *For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. *You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. *If you want to vote, then get a job. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. What a total asshole you are. Run for it...I need a laugh. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Jun 5, 6:46*pm, John H wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: This is going around the web sites. *Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. *If you want steak and pizza, then get a *job. Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. *Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. *If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. *Ever live in a military barracks? *You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. *Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. *If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. *It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. *We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.” Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. *If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem. If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. *The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! *Yes that is correct. *For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. *You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. *If you want to vote, then get a job. You're hired.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And you're living off of the Government teat....so you dont get to vote, Herring. Acording to that idiot Canadian. Want to vote? Get a job!! |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Jun 5, 6:06*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
This is going around the web sites. *Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- snip.. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! *Yes that is correct. *For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. *You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. *If you want to vote, then get a job. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Jun 6, 8:35*pm, L G wrote:
North Star wrote: On Jun 5, 6:06 pm, *wrote: This is going around the web sites. *Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- snip.. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! *Yes that is correct. *For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. *You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. *If you want to vote, then get a job. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. *You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. *Why not add the lazy welfare to the list?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because after that they might single out ditzy countermen. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
North Star wrote:
On Jun 6, 8:35 pm, L wrote: North Star wrote: On Jun 5, 6:06 pm, wrote: This is going around the web sites. Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- snip.. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because after that they might single out ditzy countermen. No one ever said you were bright, or clever, dummy. So who are the "countermen"? |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. notice what's missing? the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street. the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring the billions we give the rich. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
|
America wasn't built on Welfare
On 05/06/2011 8:37 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Jun 5, 6:46 pm, John wrote: On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, wrote: This is going around the web sites. Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and pizza, then get a job. Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.” Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem. If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. You're hired.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And you're living off of the Government teat....so you dont get to vote, Herring. Acording to that idiot Canadian. Want to vote? Get a job!! Paid up retirees get a vote as do vets. Welfare/workfare don't. Including those that haven't files taxes in 3 years or more. Even a null no income return is good, but file or no vote. Personally, welfare should be replaced with drug tests and workfare. No money for nothing. Retired, vets or truly disabled get to vote. And disability does not include 400 pounds over weight, drugs, slept in because we parties to 4am, hangovers, and a night in jail. Even give them sick days and vacation days if they show up enough to earn the credits. Time to stop subsidizing dysfunction, tardiness, whining and the lethargic. Hunger is a motivator. Workfare might even include a soup kitchen. Want to stay home an lay on your back, fine, no money. Was it MA that said no more welfare for new kids born in welfare and a rapid drop of illegitimate babies in dysfunctional homes was the result. Need more of that kind of engineering. Too many parasites on the taxpayers asses. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On 05/06/2011 8:35 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Jun 5, 5:06 pm, wrote: This is going around the web sites. Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and pizza, then get a job. Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job. Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place. In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.” Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem. If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. What a total asshole you are. Run for it...I need a laugh. Send green card and point me to the state wanting real changes friendly to their pocket book. I would prefer the south, warmer winters. But sad fact is, most Americans have yet to realize be it corruption at the top, or dysfunctional lazy asses at the bottom, the system has to stop catering to the whiners and criminals if you want the real America back. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On 07/06/2011 5:50 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, wrote: AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. notice what's missing? the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street. the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring the billions we give the rich. Hey, make me president and I would cancel that real fast. And if corrupt senate or congress tried to jam it, I would veto it. Does not mater be it corporate, state, civic, country or personal welfare, it is history. And if a banker called me, the FBI will be recording. I would even go as far as to try to bait one in jail as an example. For truly poor, workfare is the only social assistance left. I don't consider earned pensions, vets and truly disabled as welfare/workfare. Wall Street isn't the problem, corruption is. I would be so hard on corruption, people would be going underground. Banks forging notry publics and mortgage documents? My response is who is going to jail and getting the 7 digit plus fine...go get them. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On 07/06/2011 9:59 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, wrote: AND While you are on Gov?t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov?t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. notice what's missing? the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street. the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring the billions we give the rich. You think we don't spend more on public assistance? Might not mater. Obama not worried about double-dip recession http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...12-503544.html Maybe Obama is just going to default? Hey, US DC is broke. Cutting $60B was a flipping joke from congress. Even Bernanke looks liek he knows he is toast. I get a kick out of Bernanke, he says the no-value fraud money he creates never sees circulation, he is full of crap. Dripping wet bu11****. Don't want to be in cash when the big default really hits. Gold and oil will do real well that day. $400/barrel? -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
|
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:59:02 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: AND While you are on Gov?t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov?t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. notice what's missing? the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street. the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring the billions we give the rich. You think we don't spend more on public assistance? nope. http://www.flickr.com/photos/91971372@N00/4720255544/ about 100 billion on the poor 5 trillion per year on the rich we'd have to spend for 50 years to equal what we just blew on wall street |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:15:44 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 07/06/2011 5:50 PM, wf3h wrote: On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, wrote: AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. notice what's missing? the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street. the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring the billions we give the rich. Hey, make me president and I would cancel that real fast. And if corrupt senate or congress tried to jam it, I would veto it. Does not mater be it corporate, state, civic, country or personal welfare, it is history. they tried that in 29 ummm...how'd it work out, right winger? Wall Street isn't the problem, corruption is. there is no 'corruption' on wall street. the rich have the deck stacked so nothing they do is illegal. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
wf3h wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: North Star wrote: On Jun 5, 6:06 pm, wrote: This is going around the web sites. Since fleabaggers have only whiner and not winners....reproduced here. A good writer. ---- snip.. AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. Most on welfare are lazy, OK? Once you define exactly who "Wall Street" is, then it might be worth a discussion. How's your boat? |
America wasn't built on Welfare
|
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:58:02 -0400, L G
wrote: wf3h wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. Most on welfare are lazy, OK? so is wall street. but they get welfare and the right says they need more money How's your boat? fine. be there this weekend |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:08 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L G wrote: Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? I say they are lazy proof? oh. none. and wall street? they just sucked 10 trillion out of our economy. how's that working out for us? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. They provide jobs and capital. Welfare recipients do not produce anything. really? where are the jobs? if they provide jobs where are they? if they provide capital where is it? more right wing bull**** |
America wasn't built on Welfare
wf3h wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:58:02 -0400, L wrote: wf3h wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. Most on welfare are lazy, OK? so is wall street. but they get welfare and the right says they need more money How's your boat? fine. be there this weekend So you are blind, can't capitalize properly, yet you can conveniently edit my post to fit your agenda? |
America wasn't built on Welfare
In article ,
says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:08 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L G wrote: Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? I say they are lazy proof? oh. none. and wall street? they just sucked 10 trillion out of our economy. how's that working out for us? I just sucked some money out of Wall St. too. It is going to be invested because earning 1% in a bank account isn't going to make me rich. and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. They provide jobs and capital. Welfare recipients do not produce anything. really? How many jobs have welfare recipients created in the past week? where are the jobs? if they provide jobs I am occupying one. where are they? All across the country. www.monster.com, www.dice.com, ... if they provide capital Sitting in there accounts waiting for an environment that will enable them to profit from their investment. where is it? more right wing bull**** Nothing like your left wing fear mongering. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:29:04 -0400, L G
wrote: wf3h wrote: On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:58:02 -0400, L wrote: wf3h wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: How's your boat? fine. be there this weekend So you are blind, can't capitalize properly, yet you can conveniently edit my post to fit your agenda? cant help your grammar obsession, dude. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:21:46 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:08 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... and wall street? they just sucked 10 trillion out of our economy. how's that working out for us? I just sucked some money out of Wall St. too. It is going to be invested because earning 1% in a bank account isn't going to make me rich. and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. They provide jobs and capital. Welfare recipients do not produce anything. really? How many jobs have welfare recipients created in the past week? HAHAHAH answer: MORE THAN WALL STREET DID!! where are the jobs? if they provide jobs I am occupying one. where are they? All across the country. www.monster.com, www.dice.com, ... really? we at full employment? economy doing OK? we adding 400,000 jobs a month like the right wing said we would with tax cuts? oh. we're not if they provide capital Sitting in there accounts waiting for an environment that will enable them to profit from their investment. IOW for another bubble and another scheme to rape the middle class... IOW a GOP win. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On 08/06/2011 3:48 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:15:44 -0600, wrote: On 07/06/2011 5:50 PM, wf3h wrote: On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, wrote: AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. notice what's missing? the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street. the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring the billions we give the rich. Hey, make me president and I would cancel that real fast. And if corrupt senate or congress tried to jam it, I would veto it. Does not mater be it corporate, state, civic, country or personal welfare, it is history. they tried that in 29 ummm...how'd it work out, right winger? Wall Street isn't the problem, corruption is. there is no 'corruption' on wall street. the rich have the deck stacked so nothing they do is illegal. Actuality 1933 after the second crash in 1932, not 1929. 1929 they tried the debt-spend thing and it didn't work then either. You really should read some real economics books. Not the liberal-fraud kinds either, they are written to suck in the gullible. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:05:23 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 08/06/2011 7:00 PM, wf3h wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:08 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? I say they are lazy proof? oh. none. and wall street? they just sucked 10 trillion out of our economy. how's that working out for us? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. They provide jobs and capital. Welfare recipients do not produce anything. really? where are the jobs? if they provide jobs where are they? if they provide capital where is it? more right wing bull**** You really need to get a job. That is, if you are employable. You need to also. The difference is that nobody will hire you. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:11:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 08/06/2011 3:48 PM, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:15:44 -0600, wrote: On 07/06/2011 5:50 PM, wf3h wrote: On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, wrote: AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job. notice what's missing? the ten TRILLION we just spent on welfare for wall street. the right wing focuses on the pennies we give the poor while ignoring the billions we give the rich. Hey, make me president and I would cancel that real fast. And if corrupt senate or congress tried to jam it, I would veto it. Does not mater be it corporate, state, civic, country or personal welfare, it is history. they tried that in 29 ummm...how'd it work out, right winger? Wall Street isn't the problem, corruption is. there is no 'corruption' on wall street. the rich have the deck stacked so nothing they do is illegal. Actuality 1933 after the second crash in 1932, not 1929. 1929 they tried the debt-spend thing and it didn't work then either. You really should read some real economics books. Not the liberal-fraud kinds either, they are written to suck in the gullible. You don't know anything about economics. You know a lot about being stupid and ill-informed. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:03:51 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 11/06/2011 11:44 AM, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:05:23 -0600, wrote: On 08/06/2011 7:00 PM, wf3h wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:08 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? I say they are lazy proof? oh. none. and wall street? they just sucked 10 trillion out of our economy. how's that working out for us? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. They provide jobs and capital. Welfare recipients do not produce anything. really? where are the jobs? if they provide jobs where are they? if they provide capital where is it? more right wing bull**** You really need to get a job. That is, if you are employable. You need to also. The difference is that nobody will hire you. I don't need to idiot, equitably semi-retired. Bull. You're on the dole and can't find work. You don't realize why a CEO gets a big check until you become wealthy. I admit, I don't have the "political" connections to get a $500K or more job... but for the savvy, your personal wealth can get to a point where regular work for regular wages makes no sense at all. You don't have the mental connections. And you can become a multimillionaire without the big salaries. As my grandfather said, save a little often and invest in yourself and business. I know this is a problem you do not have, nor ever will. But for far too many they fall in the fleabagger whiner rut. You're right. I don't have a problem with money. You have many problems, most of which are obvious. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:05:23 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 08/06/2011 7:00 PM, wf3h wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:08 -0400, wrote: and wall street? they just sucked 10 trillion out of our economy. how's that working out for us? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. They provide jobs and capital. Welfare recipients do not produce anything. really? where are the jobs? if they provide jobs where are they? if they provide capital where is it? more right wing bull**** You really need to get a job. That is, if you are employable. if you cant answer the facts, then, by all means, invent whatever myth makes you feel comfortable |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:03:51 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 11/06/2011 11:44 AM, wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:05:23 -0600, wrote: You really need to get a job. That is, if you are employable. You need to also. The difference is that nobody will hire you. I don't need to idiot, equitably semi-retired. You don't realize why a CEO gets a big check until you become wealthy. HAHAHAHA biggest paychecks in the past fiew years goldman sacks AIG lehman bros how'd those work out?? the biggest paychecks went to those who destroyed the US right wing bull**** |
America wasn't built on Welfare
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:11:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 08/06/2011 3:48 PM, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:15:44 -0600, wrote: On 07/06/2011 5:50 PM, wf3h wrote: On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:06:06 -0600, wrote: they tried that in 29 ummm...how'd it work out, right winger? Wall Street isn't the problem, corruption is. there is no 'corruption' on wall street. the rich have the deck stacked so nothing they do is illegal. Actuality 1933 after the second crash in 1932, not 1929. 1929 they tried the debt-spend thing and it didn't work then either. You really should read some real economics books. Not the liberal-fraud kinds either, they are written to suck in the gullible. says the guy who insists we do the same thing they did in 29. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:29:04 -0400, L wrote: wf3h wrote: On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:58:02 -0400, L wrote: wf3h wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: How's your boat? fine. be there this weekend So you are blind, can't capitalize properly, yet you can conveniently edit my post to fit your agenda? cant help your grammar obsession, dude. Nice diversion, but you failed. You edited my post, moron, and you lack more that lousy grammar. You can't post with proper capitalization or punctuation either. |
America wasn't built on Welfare
Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/06/2011 7:00 PM, wf3h wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:20:08 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:35:10 -0400, L wrote: Good luck with taking the vote away from American or Canadian citizens. You'd better have a private airplane ready to whisk you away to South America. Felons already can't vote in the US, dummy. Why not add the lazy welfare to the list? who said people on welfare are lazy? I say they are lazy proof? oh. none. and wall street? they just sucked 10 trillion out of our economy. how's that working out for us? and what about wall street? why should THEY be allowed to vote after destroying the country. They provide jobs and capital. Welfare recipients do not produce anything. really? where are the jobs? if they provide jobs where are they? if they provide capital where is it? more right wing bull**** You really need to get a job. That is, if you are employable. He's blind and lazy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com