![]() |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T
in 10 years all the while getting billions in tax credits and subsidies. Of course, Ryan wants to end Medicare on the backs of the middle class, but doesn't have much interest in ending the tax credits or subsidies for Big Oil. Maybe our elected officials from both parties need to hear from you? http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=4899 |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
On Apr 28, 4:55*pm, wrote:
You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T in 10 years all the while getting billions in tax credits and subsidies. Of course, Ryan wants to end Medicare on the backs of the middle class, but doesn't have much interest in ending the tax credits or subsidies for Big Oil. Maybe our elected officials from both parties need to hear from you? http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=4899 Sounds like pay-offs to me..... " Money talks, Bull**** walks" |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
In article ,
says... You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T in 10 years all the while getting billions in tax credits and subsidies. Of course, Ryan wants to end Medicare on the backs of the middle class, but doesn't have much interest in ending the tax credits or subsidies for Big Oil. Maybe our elected officials from both parties need to hear from you? http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=4899 Maybe you should compare that with what the government made on the same oil...? Oh wait, the numbers wouldn't sound so extraordinary if you did that... snerk -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
|
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:32:40 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:55:18 -0700, wrote: You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T in 10 years Next time you fill up your car/truck/boat/whatever, you should thank them for investing countless billions of dollars in exploration and drilling. that would drive prices down, not up It's a high stakes, very risky business and expensive oil is a lot better than no oil at all. Think about it. After you get done complaining about prices here, do some traveling in Europe. and they get 4B from US taxpayers every year while we're talking about cutting food stamps, military pay and medicare |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:55:36 -0400, wf3h wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:32:40 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:55:18 -0700, wrote: You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T in 10 years Next time you fill up your car/truck/boat/whatever, you should thank them for investing countless billions of dollars in exploration and drilling. that would drive prices down, not up You'd think so wouldn't you? There's only one problem - they are discovering less new oil than they are selling. The fact that they are spending huge amounts of money on exploration and drilling is a matter of public record. You can look it up as Casey Stengel used to say. Every new barrel of oil that is discovered and developed costs a great deal more than the oil that it replaces. Here's a good start if you're interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocarbon_exploration |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:32:40 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:55:18 -0700, wrote: You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T in 10 years Next time you fill up your car/truck/boat/whatever, you should thank them for investing countless billions of dollars in exploration and drilling. It's a high stakes, very risky business and expensive oil is a lot better than no oil at all. Think about it. After you get done complaining about prices here, do some traveling in Europe. Please show me where I complained about the cost of gasoline. I didn't. They made money and didn't pay taxes on it. You seem to feel they should continue to get a subsidy, apparently. |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:40:34 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:55:36 -0400, wf3h wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:32:40 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:55:18 -0700, wrote: You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T in 10 years Next time you fill up your car/truck/boat/whatever, you should thank them for investing countless billions of dollars in exploration and drilling. that would drive prices down, not up You'd think so wouldn't you? There's only one problem - they are discovering less new oil than they are selling. The fact that they are spending huge amounts of money on exploration and drilling is a matter of public record. You can look it up as Casey Stengel used to say. Every new barrel of oil that is discovered and developed costs a great deal more than the oil that it replaces. Here's a good start if you're interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocarbon_exploration And yet... they made $18B and didn't pay their fair share in taxes, plus they got gov't subsidies... sounds like they're doing just fine. |
$18 billion in three months, $1 trillion in 10 years
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:26:18 -0700, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:40:34 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:55:36 -0400, wf3h wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:32:40 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:55:18 -0700, wrote: You read it right... Big Oil made $18B in three months and nearly $1T in 10 years Next time you fill up your car/truck/boat/whatever, you should thank them for investing countless billions of dollars in exploration and drilling. that would drive prices down, not up You'd think so wouldn't you? There's only one problem - they are discovering less new oil than they are selling. The fact that they are spending huge amounts of money on exploration and drilling is a matter of public record. You can look it up as Casey Stengel used to say. Every new barrel of oil that is discovered and developed costs a great deal more than the oil that it replaces. Here's a good start if you're interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocarbon_exploration And yet... they made $18B and didn't pay their fair share in taxes, plus they got gov't subsidies... sounds like they're doing just fine. That's a little subjective don't you think? What is their "fair share" and how much are they under paying in your opinion? You do realize that increasing their taxes would increase costs and that would get passed along as higher prices? Quoting profit numbers is meaningless unless it is framed in the context of sales and investments. If you made $18B on $990B in sales, that is not unreasonable at all, just big numbers. They don't really get a subsidy as such, not like farmers who get direct payments. People and corporations who produce oil get something called a depletion allowance which is a partial credit against their exploration and production costs. It has a long history, nothing new. The concept is somewhat similar to the depreciation allowance for purchased assets which I'm sure you are familiar with. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com