Shut'er down
 

On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:51:16 -0700 (PDT), "*e#c"
wrote:

On Apr 8, 6:16*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/04/2011 3:06 PM, bob wrote:





On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:04:57 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
*wrote:

Hear all that screaming? *It is the silence of the public's concern
for the govt shutdown. *Be serious, we had a Dem congress that was too
cowardly to pass a budget for this year and they they are essential to
our lives, pure delusion. *The dems refused to do their jobs and we
should keep em on? *No way. *If'n I hear any screaming I'll assume its
the fight to see who can reach the "Off" switch first.

the dems refused to do their jobs??

uh...the GOP controls the house. the house controls the budget

the GOP is about to wreck america

again

Hardly, Belgium feds has been largely shut down for over 300 days and
they are talking about making it permanent. *People feel better off with
much less big fat over spending debt mongering dysfunctional government.

I think it is time to try it. *Shut'er'down. *And lets hope this happens
in Canada too. *The debt addicts need to go through withdrawal to get
the economy better for real.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Our Banking System, and Government is in far beter shape, you idiot.
God, I wish you would emigrate to another country, you're a total
****ing retard.

AND it's in better shape precisely BECAUSE you guys dont have the free
market fundamentalists on the right like we do

Shut'er down
 

On 08/04/2011 7:51 PM, *e#c wrote:
On Apr 8, 6:16 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2011 3:06 PM, bob wrote:





On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:04:57 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Hear all that screaming? It is the silence of the public's concern
for the govt shutdown. Be serious, we had a Dem congress that was too
cowardly to pass a budget for this year and they they are essential to
our lives, pure delusion. The dems refused to do their jobs and we
should keep em on? No way. If'n I hear any screaming I'll assume its
the fight to see who can reach the "Off" switch first.

the dems refused to do their jobs??

uh...the GOP controls the house. the house controls the budget

the GOP is about to wreck america

again

Hardly, Belgium feds has been largely shut down for over 300 days and
they are talking about making it permanent. People feel better off with
much less big fat over spending debt mongering dysfunctional government.

I think it is time to try it. Shut'er'down. And lets hope this happens
in Canada too. The debt addicts need to go through withdrawal to get
the economy better for real.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Our Banking System, and Government is in far beter shape, you idiot.
God, I wish you would emigrate to another country, you're a total
****ing retard.

So are you on welfare? Yep, Ottawa forked out $125B, $75B to start.
Yep, our bankers got that fat juicy bonuses on the public dime.

Best part if I move is I will not have to pay for your care.

Shut'er down
 

On 08/04/2011 7:55 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:51:16 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Apr 8, 6:16 pm, wrote:
On 08/04/2011 3:06 PM, bob wrote:





On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:04:57 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Hear all that screaming? It is the silence of the public's concern
for the govt shutdown. Be serious, we had a Dem congress that was too
cowardly to pass a budget for this year and they they are essential to
our lives, pure delusion. The dems refused to do their jobs and we
should keep em on? No way. If'n I hear any screaming I'll assume its
the fight to see who can reach the "Off" switch first.

the dems refused to do their jobs??

uh...the GOP controls the house. the house controls the budget

the GOP is about to wreck america

again

Hardly, Belgium feds has been largely shut down for over 300 days and
they are talking about making it permanent. People feel better off with
much less big fat over spending debt mongering dysfunctional government.

I think it is time to try it. Shut'er'down. And lets hope this happens
in Canada too. The debt addicts need to go through withdrawal to get
the economy better for real.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Our Banking System, and Government is in far beter shape, you idiot.
God, I wish you would emigrate to another country, you're a total
****ing retard.

AND it's in better shape precisely BECAUSE you guys dont have the free
market fundamentalists on the right like we do

Why bail out banks at all? Pay the $250K account guarantee and let the
billionaires deposit fry in debt court? A bank that screws up that bad
with their cash flow is certainly corrupt.

Hell, we even had a MP (congress equivalent) do it.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...ank-shory.html

Shut'er down
 

On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:57:58 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 7:55 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:51:16 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
I think it is time to try it. Shut'er'down. And lets hope this happens
in Canada too. The debt addicts need to go through withdrawal to get
the economy better for real.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Our Banking System, and Government is in far beter shape, you idiot.
God, I wish you would emigrate to another country, you're a total
****ing retard.

AND it's in better shape precisely BECAUSE you guys dont have the free
market fundamentalists on the right like we do

Why bail out banks at all? Pay the $250K account guarantee and let the
billionaires deposit fry in debt court? A bank that screws up that bad
with their cash flow is certainly corrupt.

because we TRIED that in 1929. didnt work out at all

those of us who know history know your view is a DISASTER

Shut'er down
 

On 09/04/2011 4:45 AM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:57:58 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/04/2011 7:55 PM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:51:16 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
I think it is time to try it. Shut'er'down. And lets hope this happens
in Canada too. The debt addicts need to go through withdrawal to get
the economy better for real.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Our Banking System, and Government is in far beter shape, you idiot.
God, I wish you would emigrate to another country, you're a total
****ing retard.

AND it's in better shape precisely BECAUSE you guys dont have the free
market fundamentalists on the right like we do

Why bail out banks at all? Pay the $250K account guarantee and let the
billionaires deposit fry in debt court? A bank that screws up that bad
with their cash flow is certainly corrupt.

because we TRIED that in 1929. didnt work out at all

those of us who know history know your view is a DISASTER

No, 1929 they tried the debt-spend and it failed in 1932 where it
collapsed with inflation from the debt spend. Broke, and taxing, the
economy didn't really recover for almost a decade. Not much unlike now
being early 1932.

Помогу убрать проблему. Человек может пропасть безвести, имитация несчастного случая или простое устранение.
Полная анонимность. Дорого. Пишите на serzhkro@gmail(точка)com на форумах нет возможности отвечать.

Shut'er down
 

On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:58:32 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/04/2011 4:45 AM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:57:58 -0600,
wrote:

Why bail out banks at all? Pay the $250K account guarantee and let the
billionaires deposit fry in debt court? A bank that screws up that bad
with their cash flow is certainly corrupt.

because we TRIED that in 1929. didnt work out at all

those of us who know history know your view is a DISASTER

No, 1929 they tried the debt-spend

really? proof? because that's what they DIDNT do. what they DID do is
what YOU suggest:

let the banks fail. that's WHY there was a bank crisis in 29; they let
the banks fail. just like you suggest

how'd that work out??

and it failed in 1932 where it
collapsed with inflation from the debt spend. Broke, and taxing, the
economy didn't really recover for almost a decade. Not much unlike now
being early 1932.

yep it recovered

in 1940....and what was happening in 1940?

massive govt spending...in preparation for a little event that would
start, for the US, on dec 7 1941.

Shut'er down
 

On 10/04/2011 6:35 AM, bob wrote:
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:58:32 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/04/2011 4:45 AM, bob wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:57:58 -0600,
wrote:

Why bail out banks at all? Pay the $250K account guarantee and let the
billionaires deposit fry in debt court? A bank that screws up that bad
with their cash flow is certainly corrupt.

because we TRIED that in 1929. didnt work out at all

those of us who know history know your view is a DISASTER

No, 1929 they tried the debt-spend

really? proof? because that's what they DIDNT do. what they DID do is
what YOU suggest:

let the banks fail. that's WHY there was a bank crisis in 29; they let
the banks fail. just like you suggest

how'd that work out??

Didn't change a damn thing. Bailing out banks was the wrong thing to
do. Just let billionaires off the hook at the taxpayers expense. Banks
should have taken the write offs.

and it failed in 1932 where it
collapsed with inflation from the debt spend. Broke, and taxing, the
economy didn't really recover for almost a decade. Not much unlike now
being early 1932.

yep it recovered

in 1940....and what was happening in 1940?

WW II. But USA was more or less out of it already. People were
hoarding money at the time. Lending it for war bonds put it into
circulation.

massive govt spending...in preparation for a little event that would
start, for the US, on dec 7 1941.

Yep, and unlike Pearl Harbor screw ups who got caught with their pants
down, todays economic Pearl Harbor will not be as easy to fix.

$113 / barrel and climbing.
--
I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with
fleabagger debt.