|
Obama endorses slavery
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:40:23 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... yeah the right wing is pretty stupid uh...what happens to a bill the pres doesnt like, genius? any idea?? VETO the ****er!!! Then Congress has to show how bad they are to override the veto. Bush signed almost all the spending bills he received and those he should have vetoed he signed with some statement of memorandum. He was almost as F'ed up as Obama. I am giving the most F'ed award to Obama, as he came in saying he was going to fix the problems. Got us in to another couple wars, did not get us out of wars he said he would, and has been a cheerleader for overspending. he HAS ended our role in iraq. less than 50K soldiers there...about as many as in germany. it took 11 years to end the depression of 29. even obama cant end the damage the right did to the US in 2 years. and he's involved us in no wars. sorry |
Obama endorses slavery
In article ,
says... On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:52:58 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:41:25 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:55:51 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:44:35 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:32:46 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Reply: The deficits are being driven up by overspending the fact is the deficits are being driven up by bush's tax cuts. THEY are the largest components of the deficit your cliche is mindless babbling REPLY: Your racist cliché and Bush blame cliché is nothing but a cliché. really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best thing that's ever happened to the US. well, there's always this: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1 aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it? you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right? We as a country are spending $1.60 for every tax dollar collected. How much did Bush cut the tax collection? Double the amount of Personal Income Tax collected and we could still not balance the budget. Explain why it is all Bush's fault. No ****ing cliché. A reasoned response. If another cliché, forget about ever being considered as have a brain and not just a waste of oxygen. it's bush's fault because 1. he cut taxes especially on the rich 2. he increased spending by an unfunded drug program added to medicare 3. he increased spending by spending a trillion in iraq 4. he deregulated the markets so that wall street blew up the economy and yet the right still blames the black guy Reply: You are still stupid. Obama has been President long enough to have started his reelection quest. Why did he not cut spending? Not increase it. Why did he make Wall Street to big to fail house bigger? Why has he accepted all the debt from those financial houses now paying Billions of bucks in bonus money so they could pay those bonus bucks? Why has he not implemented a tax of 110% on all bonus money over say 1 million bucks? You are so shallow. It is always some racist or Right Winger that is the problem. You are a racist in you are like Jessie Jackson. Blame all on race. You must be one crappy engineer, or at least have no creative ability, as you have no real though processes. For someone who claims someone else is stupid, you're the one who thinks Obama is the one who cuts spending. Last I checked its Congress' job. You are not part of the problem... you are the problem. So when Bush was in office HE spent the money but now when Obama is in office it is congress spending the money. It is stupid statements like this that show how mindlessly partisan you are. Screw you. Bush pushed us into a war we didn't need nor could afford. He was the one who pushed tax cuts when none were needed. Sounds to me you're the partisan, stupid one. Sounds like you are getting somewhat frustrated with the facts hitting you in the face. You are indeed as partisan as harry and the rest here. Mindlessly blaming Bush for things that happened in the last 40 years while democrats pretty much ran congress as a majority. -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
Obama endorses slavery
In article ,
says... On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:41:25 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:55:51 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best thing that's ever happened to the US. well, there's always this: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1 aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it? you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right? For someone who claims someone else is stupid, you're the one who thinks Obama is the one who cuts spending. Last I checked its Congress' job. You are not part of the problem... you are the problem. yeah the right wing is pretty stupid uh...what happens to a bill the pres doesnt like, genius? any idea?? The idea that you would suggest that it is as simple as that, shows how stupid you really are... Tell us what happens if a president doesn't like the law? Are you going to say he vetos's it? Is that your big argument??? If so, again, you are stupid. A veto is a lot more complicated than that, especially if the other side of the political spectrum holds both the house and senate... You guys are so partisan, you can't even ask a simple question.... -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
Obama endorses slavery
In article ,
says... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:41:25 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:55:51 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message . .. really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best thing that's ever happened to the US. well, there's always this: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1 aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it? you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right? For someone who claims someone else is stupid, you're the one who thinks Obama is the one who cuts spending. Last I checked its Congress' job. You are not part of the problem... you are the problem. yeah the right wing is pretty stupid uh...what happens to a bill the pres doesnt like, genius? any idea?? VETO the ****er!!! Then Congress has to show how bad they are to override the veto. Bush signed almost all the spending bills he received and those he should have vetoed he signed with some statement of memorandum. He was almost as F'ed up as Obama. I am giving the most F'ed award to Obama, as he came in saying he was going to fix the problems. Got us in to another couple wars, did not get us out of wars he said he would, and has been a cheerleader for overspending. The racists here only support him because he is black... Anyone with a brain can see that... -- Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life! |
Obama endorses slavery
I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articleR7KdnRQPSsSweSHQnZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@earthlink .com, says... "wf3h" wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:41:25 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:55:51 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best thing that's ever happened to the US. well, there's always this: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1 aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it? you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right? For someone who claims someone else is stupid, you're the one who thinks Obama is the one who cuts spending. Last I checked its Congress' job. You are not part of the problem... you are the problem. yeah the right wing is pretty stupid uh...what happens to a bill the pres doesnt like, genius? any idea?? VETO the ****er!!! Then Congress has to show how bad they are to override the veto. Bush signed almost all the spending bills he received and those he should have vetoed he signed with some statement of memorandum. He was almost as F'ed up as Obama. I am giving the most F'ed award to Obama, as he came in saying he was going to fix the problems. Got us in to another couple wars, did not get us out of wars he said he would, and has been a cheerleader for overspending. The racists here only support him because he is black... Anyone with a brain can see that... You sure play fast and loose with your misinterpretation of terms, little pile of dog ****. |
Obama endorses slavery
On Sun, 1 May 2011 08:43:45 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... gee. i notice the RIGHT was doing this before the LEFT did. AND the GOP has had congress now for4 months and hasnt done ****. hasnt cut a dollar. not one. so your statement is a meanigless cliche The fact you fail to note it that the Democrats have basically "had congress" for almost 50 years.. and most of the damage was done by the GOP with the feckless democrats paralyzed by the class war the GOP is waging. so the GOP is MUCH more effective at THEIR program of destroying america than the dems are at saving it. .. But you only want to blame it on the republicans because they have had one of three parts of the leadership triangle for four months.. The fact is, the democrats have been in charge during the whole destruction of our economy. the GOP had the congress for almost ALL of clinton's term and almost ALL of bush' term and now has it in obama's gee. you kind of ignored that didnt you? and the GDP increases FASTER under the dems than under th GOP: http://www.eriposte.com/economy/other/demovsrep.htm so enough with the right wing bull****, OK? it's all wrong |
Obama endorses slavery
On Sun, 1 May 2011 08:54:18 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:41:25 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:55:51 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "wf3h" wrote in message ... really? oh. i forgot. you right wingers have your myths and you dont let evidence interfere with your delusions that the rich are the best thing that's ever happened to the US. well, there's always this: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...36&emailView=1 aw, damn, it shows the bush tax cuts are driving the deficit that's a shame, right wnger, isn't it? you say 'overspending' 'cuz you heard that on rush. it doesnt mean anything but he said it so it MUST be true, right? For someone who claims someone else is stupid, you're the one who thinks Obama is the one who cuts spending. Last I checked its Congress' job. You are not part of the problem... you are the problem. yeah the right wing is pretty stupid uh...what happens to a bill the pres doesnt like, genius? any idea?? The idea that you would suggest that it is as simple as that, shows how stupid you really are... Tell us what happens if a president doesn't like the law? Are you going to say he vetos's it? Is that your big argument??? If so, again, you are stupid. A veto is a lot more complicated than that, especially if the other side of the political spectrum holds both the house and senate... You guys are so partisan, you can't even ask a simple question.... uh, no it 's not 'more complicated' and you haven't presented any info to say why it IS try again. |
Obama endorses slavery
|
Obama endorses slavery
wrote:
On Sun, 01 May 2011 12:11:26 -0400, wrote: wrote: On Sun, 01 May 2011 01:17:19 -0400, wrote: he HAS ended our role in iraq. less than 50K soldiers there...about as many as in germany. How many road side bombs do they have in Germany? Granted we are down to one or two dead GIs in Iraq every month but that is one or two too many. What about Afghanistan? The ironic thing is Iraq will probably be seen as the successful war. We may actually come out of that one with a functional government. In 50 years Afghanistan will still be a corrupt collection of war lords and tribal areas. Iraq may be annexed by Iran. If a Republican is back in the White House, he might take the proceeds and give them to the contras. That might be an issue if they were both Sunni or Shi'a but it would be a civil war if the Shi'a tried to take over Iraq. BTW I was wrong about the current death toll in Iraq. It was 9 in April as of the 28th. "Combat troops" is a meaningless term when the main cause of death is the road side bomb. What? Another civil war? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com