![]() |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
This is intentional.
Think, the next seaweed you pull out of the props might have cesium, plutonium or some other nasty in it. Tuna, salmon, squid, shrimp too.... Really, if Obama had balls he would say no damned way. Clean up the water first. But Obama does not have guts, just a balloon buffoon sized ego. Hey, the Pacific supplies a huge amount of food for the world and they are poluting it with radioactivity. Unacceptable. Criminal in fact. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...into-the-ocean |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On 04/04/2011 6:43 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... This is intentional. Think, the next seaweed you pull out of the props might have cesium, plutonium or some other nasty in it. Tuna, salmon, squid, shrimp too.... Really, if Obama had balls he would say no damned way. Clean up the water first. But Obama does not have guts, just a balloon buffoon sized ego. Hey, the Pacific supplies a huge amount of food for the world and they are poluting it with radioactivity. Unacceptable. Criminal in fact. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...into-the-ocean Obama is just hiding on vacation while the world falls apart. The lying son of a bitch is all over the map on, well, everything... No one will ever compare Obama to Action Jackson. Obama be all mouth no bite. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:11:24 -0600, wrote: This is intentional. Think, the next seaweed you pull out of the props might have cesium, plutonium or some other nasty in it. Tuna, salmon, squid, shrimp too.... Really, if Obama had balls he would say no damned way. Clean up the water first. But Obama does not have guts, just a balloon buffoon sized ego. Hey, the Pacific supplies a huge amount of food for the world and they are poluting it with radioactivity. Unacceptable. Criminal in fact. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...into-the-ocean You really need to rethink eating Asian shrimp. That is probably the biggest export that we see here although tuna is also an issue. That oil soaked Gulf shrimp is looking better every day. The only thing saving the Thai shrimp business might be that they don't sell a lot of wild caught shrimp. Again, who would think the "grown in a septic tank" shrimp they farm would be "the good stuff"? SE Asia also benefits from the way the Pacific current flows. It will swing by California before it rides the equator back to Asia. I'm surprised you're not touting the benefits, from the corporate point of view, of irradiating the shrimp. Doesn't the radiation kill coliform bacteria? :) Where's Wayne on this issue? Isn't there a way to turn a corporate buck out of this mess? :) |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:11:24 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: This is intentional. Think, the next seaweed you pull out of the props might have cesium, plutonium or some other nasty in it. Tuna, salmon, squid, shrimp too.... Really, if Obama had balls he would say no damned way. Clean up the water first. But Obama does not have guts, just a balloon buffoon sized ego. Hey, the Pacific supplies a huge amount of food for the world and they are poluting it with radioactivity. Unacceptable. Criminal in fact. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...into-the-ocean oh brother. there are the equivalent of 300 trillion swimming pools in the pacific the japanese are going to put 5 swimming pools of water what a racist idiot... |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 20:43:16 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... This is intentional. Think, the next seaweed you pull out of the props might have cesium, plutonium or some other nasty in it. Tuna, salmon, squid, shrimp too.... Really, if Obama had balls he would say no damned way. Clean up the water first. But Obama does not have guts, just a balloon buffoon sized ego. Hey, the Pacific supplies a huge amount of food for the world and they are poluting it with radioactivity. Unacceptable. Criminal in fact. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...into-the-ocean Obama is just hiding on vacation while the world falls apart. The lying son of a bitch is all over the map on, well, everything... whatsamatter, kluxer? |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 04/04/2011 6:43 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... This is intentional. Think, the next seaweed you pull out of the props might have cesium, plutonium or some other nasty in it. Tuna, salmon, squid, shrimp too.... Really, if Obama had balls he would say no damned way. Clean up the water first. But Obama does not have guts, just a balloon buffoon sized ego. Hey, the Pacific supplies a huge amount of food for the world and they are poluting it with radioactivity. Unacceptable. Criminal in fact. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...into-the-ocean Obama is just hiding on vacation while the world falls apart. The lying son of a bitch is all over the map on, well, everything... No one will ever compare Obama to Action Jackson. Obama be all mouth no bite. well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: On 04/04/2011 6:43 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... This is intentional. Think, the next seaweed you pull out of the props might have cesium, plutonium or some other nasty in it. Tuna, salmon, squid, shrimp too.... Really, if Obama had balls he would say no damned way. Clean up the water first. But Obama does not have guts, just a balloon buffoon sized ego. Hey, the Pacific supplies a huge amount of food for the world and they are poluting it with radioactivity. Unacceptable. Criminal in fact. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/04...into-the-ocean Obama is just hiding on vacation while the world falls apart. The lying son of a bitch is all over the map on, well, everything... No one will ever compare Obama to Action Jackson. Obama be all mouth no bite. well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, bob wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, Canuck57 wrote: On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
|
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
|
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 06:28:42 -0400, Harryk
wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. and they'll believe the right wing rhetoric that it's their fault they're not rich and will continue to vote GOP |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
bob wrote:
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 06:28:42 -0400, wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. and they'll believe the right wing rhetoric that it's their fault they're not rich and will continue to vote GOP Now that the 2012 GOP budget proposal is public, I'm hoping the Dems nail them at every opportunity for the Republican plan to kill Medicare and replace it with "free market" theories. Perhaps some day the public will realize that if you are not rich, the GOP wants you to bend over so they can continue to shove it up your butt. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 06:48:29 -0400, Harryk
wrote: bob wrote: On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 06:28:42 -0400, wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. and they'll believe the right wing rhetoric that it's their fault they're not rich and will continue to vote GOP Now that the 2012 GOP budget proposal is public, I'm hoping the Dems nail them at every opportunity for the Republican plan to kill Medicare and replace it with "free market" theories. AND give a 30% tax cut to the rich, paid for by america's senior citizens. as the nobel prize winner paul krugman said to the seniors who voted GOP this last election: SUCKERS!!! |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
|
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L G
wrote: Harryk wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. Typical liberalspeak. Pure bull****. really? wonder if there any economists who agree with harry. oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
In article ,
says... On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L G wrote: Harryk wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. Typical liberalspeak. Pure bull****. really? wonder if there any economists who agree with harry. oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong "Nobel", really?? After the last decade do you really think anybody looks at Nobel as any more than the "Oscars" for liberals?? -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:33:11 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote: In article , says... really? wonder if there any economists who agree with harry. oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong "Nobel", really?? After the last decade do you really think anybody looks at Nobel as any more than the "Oscars" for liberals?? now let's see...who else won a nobel in economics? well there's milton friedman...the doyen of FREE MARKET economics oh. i suppose he's a commie too!! |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On 4/6/2011 10:33 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L wrote: Harryk wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. Typical liberalspeak. Pure bull****. really? wonder if there any economists who agree with harry. oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong "Nobel", really?? After the last decade do you really think anybody looks at Nobel as any more than the "Oscars" for liberals?? Spoken like the true anti-intellectual you are. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
paul@byc wrote:
On 4/6/2011 10:33 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote: In , says... On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L wrote: Harryk wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. Typical liberalspeak. Pure bull****. really? wonder if there any economists who agree with harry. oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong "Nobel", really?? After the last decade do you really think anybody looks at Nobel as any more than the "Oscars" for liberals?? Spoken like the true anti-intellectual you are. The far-right, exemplified here by posters like Snotty, fears education and intellectualism. That's why righties are so susceptible to the demagoguery of the tea party and morons like Glenn Beck, Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On 4/7/2011 7:36 AM, Harryk wrote:
paul@byc wrote: Spoken like the true anti-intellectual you are. The far-right, exemplified here by posters like Snotty, fears education and intellectualism. That's why righties are so susceptible to the demagoguery of the tea party and morons like Glenn Beck, Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin. Can you stop replying to your sock puppet? We all get it. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
bob wrote:
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L wrote: Harryk wrote: wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:39:07 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:39:34 -0600, wrote: On 05/04/2011 4:35 PM, bob wrote: On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:11:25 -0600, wrote: well he COULD get us into a 5 year war with a middle eastern country that had no end...spend a trillion...get 4400 US troops killed.... but, bush already did that. but he was white Obama promised an end too. How come your not only there but at least in one more country? number of US troops in iraq when bush was pres? 150,000 today? less than 50K Obama is a liar. Two faced bold liar. how can you tell? to you, all blacks look alike Duhh... he was supposed to snap his fingers and fix the mess Bush made over 8 years. Don't you get it? Tens of millions of Americans will be paying the price for Bush's mess for generations, and the middle and lower income groups probably will never recover. Typical liberalspeak. Pure bull****. really? wonder if there any economists who agree with harry. oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong So did Obama. The prestige of the Nobel Prize will be tainted forever. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:03:57 -0400, L G
wrote: bob wrote: On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L wrote: oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong So did Obama. The prestige of the Nobel Prize will be tainted forever. the nobel PEACE prize has ZIP to do with the nobel ECONOMICS prize. they're awarded by two COMPLETELY different organizations AND CONSERVATIVES have won just as many as LIBERALS but, go ahead. ignore the evidence. that's what makes the right wing right wing |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
bob wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:03:57 -0400, L wrote: bob wrote: On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L wrote: oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong So did Obama. The prestige of the Nobel Prize will be tainted forever. the nobel PEACE prize has ZIP to do with the nobel ECONOMICS prize. they're awarded by two COMPLETELY different organizations AND CONSERVATIVES have won just as many as LIBERALS but, go ahead. ignore the evidence. that's what makes the right wing right wing I never referred to the Nobel Peace Prize - just the Nobel Prizes in general. Get new glasses, Bob. |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:40:49 -0400, L G
wrote: bob wrote: On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:03:57 -0400, L wrote: bob wrote: On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L wrote: oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong So did Obama. The prestige of the Nobel Prize will be tainted forever. the nobel PEACE prize has ZIP to do with the nobel ECONOMICS prize. they're awarded by two COMPLETELY different organizations AND CONSERVATIVES have won just as many as LIBERALS but, go ahead. ignore the evidence. that's what makes the right wing right wing I never referred to the Nobel Peace Prize - just the Nobel Prizes in general. Get new glasses, Bob. now THERE'S a meaningless comment we chemists and physicists consider those nobels to be pretty significant. and the nobels in economics are as well but you right wngers just cant handle evidence |
Japan deliberatly poluting the ocean with radioactivity
bob wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:40:49 -0400, L wrote: bob wrote: On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:03:57 -0400, L wrote: bob wrote: On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 20:32:00 -0400, L wrote: oh...there are. joseph stiglitz...who, by the by, won a nobel prize http://www.vanityfair.com/society/fe...wpisrc=nl_wonk watch, ladies and gents, as the right spins the evidence to make it appear there's nothing wrong So did Obama. The prestige of the Nobel Prize will be tainted forever. the nobel PEACE prize has ZIP to do with the nobel ECONOMICS prize. they're awarded by two COMPLETELY different organizations AND CONSERVATIVES have won just as many as LIBERALS but, go ahead. ignore the evidence. that's what makes the right wing right wing I never referred to the Nobel Peace Prize - just the Nobel Prizes in general. Get new glasses, Bob. now THERE'S a meaningless comment we chemists and physicists consider those nobels to be pretty significant. and the nobels in economics are as well but you right wngers just cant handle evidence Get some acid in your eyes? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com