|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
....that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:
"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Whoops! I know you'll want to read the whole article. http://tinyurl.com/683mgt8 |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: Y-a-w-n. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 3/30/2011 3:40 PM, Harryk wrote:
John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: Y-a-w-n. Yawning is a sign of lack of oxygen to the brain. I bet you didn't know that, Harry. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John H
wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet, you have no problem following Bush without question. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense, it would almost make sense. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400, Harryk
wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there?s a despotic regime that?s terrorizing its people?and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don?t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don?t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don?t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Do you have any facts to support your assertion? |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:09:06 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , payer3389 says... Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there?s a despotic regime that?s terrorizing its people?and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don?t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don?t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don?t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Do you have any facts to support your assertion? Listen to the news... no not Fox. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...82-503544.html |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:26:49 -0400, Harryk
wrote: wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:09:06 -0400, wrote: In articlelPmdnWE_G_WoNA7QnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there?s a despotic regime that?s terrorizing its people?and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don?t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don?t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don?t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Do you have any facts to support your assertion? Listen to the news... no not Fox. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...82-503544.html Why bother trying to educate a birther like bertie? I'm an optimistic person. It is rather foolish in this case... |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:26:49 -0400, wrote: wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:09:06 -0400, wrote: In articlelPmdnWE_G_WoNA7QnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there?s a despotic regime that?s terrorizing its people?and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don?t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don?t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don?t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Do you have any facts to support your assertion? Listen to the news... no not Fox. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_1...82-503544.html Why bother trying to educate a birther like bertie? I'm an optimistic person. It is rather foolish in this case... He's just another right-wing deadhead, no offense to G.D. fans. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 30/03/2011 4:05 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Funny, you would support Obama if he sprouted two horns and breathed fire. Left usually can't justify their position. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 3/30/2011 6:05 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. One year ago in your huffington post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wajaha..._b_460900.html And the news is even more grim today http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/...-Time-Low.html Sorry Obama. You are on the way out. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:32:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:05 PM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Funny, you would support Obama if he sprouted two horns and breathed fire. Left usually can't justify their position. Funny, you're ignorant. You hate Obama because he's black. He doesn't look like you or sound like you. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense, it would almost make sense. Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation -- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma where to stuff it. He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other than what he made up to suit him. Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business. Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for UN-France colonialism and money. Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to eventually make sense. If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation. Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him. You're an idiot. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 3/30/2011 11:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400, wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG. Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you males aspiring al Qaeda types. Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up. The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot. You can't defend Obama so you lash out at his detractors. Brilliant strategy De Plume. You are so childlike in your constant name calling. You're as bad as Harry in that respect. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 30/03/2011 8:25 PM, OmDeFlume wrote:
On 3/30/2011 6:05 PM, Harryk wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. One year ago in your huffington post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wajaha..._b_460900.html And the news is even more grim today http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/...-Time-Low.html Sorry Obama. You are on the way out. Yep, skid marks and all. One term botch job. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 30/03/2011 9:13 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense, it would almost make sense. Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation -- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma where to stuff it. He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other than what he made up to suit him. Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business. Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for UN-France colonialism and money. Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to eventually make sense. If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation. Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him. You're an idiot. Dream on, normalized relations with Libya are approaching 4 decades. As for Bush, still think it is all Bush's fault? My god, your robably 60 years old and blaming your mother too. Suck it up, it is now Obama's issue of his own making. Obama couldn't even get the assassination attempt right. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 30/03/2011 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400, wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG. Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you males aspiring al Qaeda types. Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up. The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot. You are so stupid, you don't realize how stupid you really are. Just an Obama bend over butt kiss. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Mar 30, 4:13*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet, you have no problem following Bush without question. Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized that? WAFDS! |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
John H wrote:
On Mar 30, 4:13 pm, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet, you have no problem following Bush without question. Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized that? WAFDS! We'll be cleaning up after moron Bush for generations. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:32:39 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote: On Mar 30, 4:13*pm, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet, you have no problem following Bush without question. Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized that? WAFDS! His gone, but his legacy remains. Have you not yet realized that? |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:35:39 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/03/2011 9:07 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400, wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG. Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you males aspiring al Qaeda types. Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up. The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot. You are so stupid, you don't realize how stupid you really are. Just an Obama bend over butt kiss. As I said, you're an idiot with no stake in this great country. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:11:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/03/2011 9:13 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense, it would almost make sense. Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation -- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma where to stuff it. He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other than what he made up to suit him. Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business. Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for UN-France colonialism and money. Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to eventually make sense. If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation. Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him. You're an idiot. Dream on, normalized relations with Libya are approaching 4 decades. As for Bush, still think it is all Bush's fault? My god, your robably 60 years old and blaming your mother too. Suck it up, it is now Obama's issue of his own making. Obama couldn't even get the assassination attempt right. You're completely stupid. Even your buddies here must be realizing it at this point. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 31/03/2011 11:32 AM, John H wrote:
On Mar 30, 4:13 pm, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet, you have no problem following Bush without question. Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized that? WAFDS! Fleabaggers are still in denial. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 31/03/2011 11:45 AM, Harryk wrote:
John H wrote: On Mar 30, 4:13 pm, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet, you have no problem following Bush without question. Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized that? WAFDS! We'll be cleaning up after moron Bush for generations. So I guess than a few centuries for Obama. All Obama did was make it a whole lot worse. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
|
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 31/03/2011 11:53 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:35:39 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 9:07 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400, wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG. Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you males aspiring al Qaeda types. Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up. The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot. You are so stupid, you don't realize how stupid you really are. Just an Obama bend over butt kiss. As I said, you're an idiot with no stake in this great country. At teh rate Obama be going, will not be so great going forward. It does appear though you are part of the problem and not the solution. Obama needs a leash, at minimum. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 3/31/2011 1:54 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:11:18 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 9:13 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense, it would almost make sense. Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation -- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma where to stuff it. He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other than what he made up to suit him. Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business. Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for UN-France colonialism and money. Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to eventually make sense. If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation. Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him. You're an idiot. Dream on, normalized relations with Libya are approaching 4 decades. As for Bush, still think it is all Bush's fault? My god, your robably 60 years old and blaming your mother too. Suck it up, it is now Obama's issue of his own making. Obama couldn't even get the assassination attempt right. You're completely stupid. Even your buddies here must be realizing it at this point. You can't believe everything you read on the girls room walls dear. Is that where your off the wall comments originate? You need to do better. |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On 3/31/2011 3:08 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 31/03/2011 11:53 AM, wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:35:39 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 9:07 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400, wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG. Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you males aspiring al Qaeda types. Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up. The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot. You are so stupid, you don't realize how stupid you really are. Just an Obama bend over butt kiss. As I said, you're an idiot with no stake in this great country. At teh rate Obama be going, will not be so great going forward. It does appear though you are part of the problem and not the solution. Obama needs a leash, at minimum. You're kidding,right? Do you really think she could be influential enough to be part of a problem? |
A Couple More Great Quotes...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:08:18 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 31/03/2011 11:53 AM, wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:35:39 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 9:07 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600, wrote: On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400, wrote: Canuck57 wrote: On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote: ...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed: "The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important, neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy - and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today." --Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302. 'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent." - Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011 Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust. Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him consistent. Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration. Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG. Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you males aspiring al Qaeda types. Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up. The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot. You are so stupid, you don't realize how stupid you really are. Just an Obama bend over butt kiss. As I said, you're an idiot with no stake in this great country. At teh rate Obama be going, will not be so great going forward. It does appear though you are part of the problem and not the solution. Obama needs a leash, at minimum. You need someone to wash your mouth out with soap. You're a racist pig. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com