| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hypocrisy
|
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypocrisy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different. Too bad you don't know anything about history. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypocrisy
On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600, wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different. Too bad you don't know anything about history. So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say, politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypocrisy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600, wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different. Too bad you don't know anything about history. So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say, politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types. You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypocrisy
On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600, wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600, wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different. Too bad you don't know anything about history. So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say, politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types. You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform. You would follow Obama to hell. Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen and Behrain.... Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypocrisy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:21 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600, wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600, wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different. Too bad you don't know anything about history. So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say, politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types. You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform. You would follow Obama to hell. Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen and Behrain.... Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment. You're so stupid, even Hell wouldn't let you in, no less the US. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypocrisy
In article ,
says... In article f17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Apparently you can't answer the question either.. It is a tough one for a liberal... |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hypocrisy
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article f17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Apparently you can't answer the question either.. It is a tough one for a liberal... You're the pussy lib. You got a problem going after Gaddafi? Justify it. Or just throw in with the traitor O'hara. Same goes for you what I said about about the hick O'hara. Your cracker pal Herring only served because they drafted his ass then he became a lifer because he was afraid of life outside the barracks. Now he bites the hand that feeds him. He's not needed. You never served your country in the military or elsewhere. You just sucked up unemployment, welfare, and food stamps. Typical lib conduct. So who gives a **** what you, Herring or O'hara think? There's decent patriotic Americans here who support our troops. We don't need traitorous **** from the likes of you. Now go **** up one of your little motor bikes. Leave the fighting to the French. You're not needed. And take off that American flag pin. It don't work on you. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Oh the hypocrisy!!!! | ASA | |||
| Race, IQ, and liberal hypocrisy. | General | |||
| OT the newest hypocrisy | ASA | |||
| OT--Hypocrisy is contagious | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
