BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   4 sailors killed by pirates (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/124946-4-sailors-killed-pirates.html)

HarryK[_8_] February 22nd 11 04:14 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
google the story

jps February 22nd 11 06:46 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story


If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.


They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

HarryK[_8_] February 22nd 11 10:31 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 2/22/2011 4:36 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

Then what?Pirating is 100% of the Somali GNP.

jps February 22nd 11 11:19 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.


They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.


They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.


We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.

[email protected] February 22nd 11 11:23 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.


They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.


They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.


Why don't we use Predators? Seems like it would be a lot for a the
buck. If they carry bombs, well, you know there aren't going to be too
many innocents involved.

[email protected] February 23rd 11 12:14 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:01:47 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:23:12 -0800,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.


Why don't we use Predators? Seems like it would be a lot for a the
buck. If they carry bombs, well, you know there aren't going to be too
many innocents involved.


That is what I was thinking and use a global hawk for the
surveillance.
One advantage of drones is we wouldn't have the problem of taking
prisoners.That seems pretty effective in Afghanistan. Just kill them
all and let god sort them out.

The idea of putting these guys in an American prison as some kind of
deterrent is ridiculous. If you are a Somali pirate, Pelican Bay is a
health spa. Did you see the smile on the face of the guy they took on
the Maersk Alabama while they were hauling him off to prison?
Maybe it is time we brought back "walking the plank" for these
pirates.


I have a feeling Pelican Bay might change is attitude.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 12:20 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 22/02/2011 9:14 AM, HarryK wrote:

google the story


Ya, and they should have just fed the fish with the 13 they caught.

Send out a training carrier. Park it right off Somalia. Drove some
fliers of in Mogadishu to whatever the hole is called. The message
should read, "If you are outside of the 25nm shore limit, we shoot
without notice.

Every few hours an Apache or tomcat takes off and shoots up anything
outside of the 25mn limit it can't identify as friendly.

When pirates cease coming home, they will cease pirating.

To get things on the roll, send in the Delta Force and Special Ops to
clean up and move the 35 shops or so in the ransom queue. If they are
not friendly, shoot.

I really think it is time to nail them hard.
--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 12:21 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 22/02/2011 11:04 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story


If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.


Yep, feed the fish!

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 12:22 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 22/02/2011 3:31 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 2/22/2011 4:36 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

Then what?Pirating is 100% of the Somali GNP.


It isn't, dope is the other part.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 12:25 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 22/02/2011 5:01 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:23:12 -0800,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.


Why don't we use Predators? Seems like it would be a lot for a the
buck. If they carry bombs, well, you know there aren't going to be too
many innocents involved.


That is what I was thinking and use a global hawk for the
surveillance.
One advantage of drones is we wouldn't have the problem of taking
prisoners.That seems pretty effective in Afghanistan. Just kill them
all and let god sort them out.

The idea of putting these guys in an American prison as some kind of
deterrent is ridiculous. If you are a Somali pirate, Pelican Bay is a
health spa. Did you see the smile on the face of the guy they took on
the Maersk Alabama while they were hauling him off to prison?
Maybe it is time we brought back "walking the plank" for these
pirates.


Agreed. Seems stupid to give them club fed.

Slit the wrists and walk the plank is the right thing to do. Worked
rather well in the old days.


--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

mmc February 23rd 11 01:18 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 


wrote in message ...

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story


If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.


They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.


They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.
=======

I think hiring the Russians would be a good solution. When they had a
problem with the pirates, the Russians got the ship back and the pirates
were lost at sea.
Board anything that looks like a mother ship and if there is no legitimate
means of support, put her on the bottom.


BAR[_2_] February 23rd 11 01:45 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
In article ,
says...

On 2/22/2011 4:36 PM,
wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

Then what?Pirating is 100% of the Somali GNP.


Then pirating will just be in South East Asian waters.

Pirates need to be dealt with swiftly and harshly regardless of their
location in the world.

Wayne.B February 23rd 11 02:18 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:44:22 -0500, wrote:

It would be
trivial at that point to separate the freighters and fishermen from
the pirates.


Unfortunately the only difference between Somali fisherman and pirates
is guns and opportunity. Frequently they are one and the same, and
there are a lot of them. Imagine trying to track all of the fishing
boats off the coast of Florida.


[email protected] February 23rd 11 03:08 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:18:59 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:44:22 -0500, wrote:

It would be
trivial at that point to separate the freighters and fishermen from
the pirates.


Unfortunately the only difference between Somali fisherman and pirates
is guns and opportunity. Frequently they are one and the same, and
there are a lot of them. Imagine trying to track all of the fishing
boats off the coast of Florida.


Well, it seems like there is a pattern recognition problem. Perhaps
Watson can sort it out. :)

Wayne.B February 23rd 11 04:03 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:15:39 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:18:59 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:44:22 -0500,
wrote:

It would be
trivial at that point to separate the freighters and fishermen from
the pirates.


Unfortunately the only difference between Somali fisherman and pirates
is guns and opportunity. Frequently they are one and the same, and
there are a lot of them. Imagine trying to track all of the fishing
boats off the coast of Florida.


I bet they can find the mother ships. These are not coastal pirates.


As I understand it the mother ships are more like our local shrimp
boats here, perhaps smaller. Those boats have a surprisingly long
operating range and are not all that large.


John H[_2_] February 23rd 11 02:35 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:01:47 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:23:12 -0800,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.


Why don't we use Predators? Seems like it would be a lot for a the
buck. If they carry bombs, well, you know there aren't going to be too
many innocents involved.


That is what I was thinking and use a global hawk for the
surveillance.
One advantage of drones is we wouldn't have the problem of taking
prisoners.That seems pretty effective in Afghanistan. Just kill them
all and let god sort them out.

The idea of putting these guys in an American prison as some kind of
deterrent is ridiculous. If you are a Somali pirate, Pelican Bay is a
health spa. Did you see the smile on the face of the guy they took on
the Maersk Alabama while they were hauling him off to prison?
Maybe it is time we brought back "walking the plank" for these
pirates.


Great idea, but won't fly. These guys are no worse than terrorists, therefore
they deserve a trial by jury and all the other constitutional rights the
liberals demand for terrorists.

It just can't be any other way.

John H[_2_] February 23rd 11 02:36 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.


They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.


We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.


LOL!

Very liberal of you!


John H[_2_] February 23rd 11 06:29 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.


LOL!

Very liberal of you!


Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.


What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal. It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a trial.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 09:31 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 23/02/2011 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.


LOL!

Very liberal of you!


Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.


Could just let the kids decide what should happen to the killers of
their parents.

I would vote for slit the wrists and walk the plank. No need to waste a
shell or spend money. Ok, use the shell of the don't walk.

But if this is too harsh for liberals, let the liberals pay.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 09:34 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 23/02/2011 11:29 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.

LOL!

Very liberal of you!


Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.


What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal. It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a trial.


Insane really. 3 squares and safety of Club Fed. No wonder there is so
much piracy. Might even get a US law degree for it.

I always wonder how a backwards skiff without rater finds a boat 300km
out. I do suspect they get help in this, inside help that is.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 09:38 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 22/02/2011 7:18 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:44:22 -0500, wrote:

It would be
trivial at that point to separate the freighters and fishermen from
the pirates.


Unfortunately the only difference between Somali fisherman and pirates
is guns and opportunity. Frequently they are one and the same, and
there are a lot of them. Imagine trying to track all of the fishing
boats off the coast of Florida.


I am pretty sure that is done. Why not? USA has satellites up there.
It might not be available to local cops, but somewhere in NSA or CIA...

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

Canuck57[_9_] February 23rd 11 09:42 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 22/02/2011 11:09 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:03:46 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:15:39 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:18:59 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 20:44:22 -0500,
wrote:

It would be
trivial at that point to separate the freighters and fishermen from
the pirates.

Unfortunately the only difference between Somali fisherman and pirates
is guns and opportunity. Frequently they are one and the same, and
there are a lot of them. Imagine trying to track all of the fishing
boats off the coast of Florida.

I bet they can find the mother ships. These are not coastal pirates.


As I understand it the mother ships are more like our local shrimp
boats here, perhaps smaller. Those boats have a surprisingly long
operating range and are not all that large.


Yep but if you are watching them you can tell the difference between a
boat that is fishing and one that is just scouting around looking for
targets.These are cameras that can read the logo on the boat. They can
certainly see if they are dragging nets and pulling in fish.


No need for skiffs in the water leaving the boat area if they are
fishing. See that happen, no ask, just sink.
--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

bpuharic February 24th 11 12:23 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story


i'm a ham radio operator. about 10 years ago i was on the 'maritme'
net when we got a call that a sailboat had been attacked by pirates
off the coast of honduras. a 17 year old boy had been shot. the
honduran navy does not go out at night so there was no relief until
the next day...very touch and go...

[email protected] February 24th 11 07:42 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:38 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.

LOL!

Very liberal of you!


Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.


What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal. It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a trial.


It's hard to believe for people like you, because you don't believe in
Due Process.

HarryK[_8_] February 24th 11 07:55 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 2/24/2011 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:38 -0500, John
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500,
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.
They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.
We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.
LOL!

Very liberal of you!
Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.

What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal. It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a trial.

It's hard to believe for people like you, because you don't believe in
Due Process.

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Boating All Out February 24th 11 08:12 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
In article ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?


Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.

I_am_Tosk February 24th 11 08:57 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?


Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.


Yeah, we know you all a hate that we talk to Tim so much that you all
have been chasing him from group to group trying to embarrass him to
stop.. Shame on you, and oh, it didn't work.. Just ****ed him off. AT
YOU!

Canuck57[_9_] February 24th 11 10:29 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 24/02/2011 12:42 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:38 -0500, John
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500,
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.

LOL!

Very liberal of you!

Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.


What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal. It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a trial.


It's hard to believe for people like you, because you don't believe in
Due Process.


Depends, not if you are in the act of a crime I don't. Should have ****
them right there and then.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

L G[_24_] February 25th 11 12:36 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
HarryK wrote:
On 2/24/2011 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:38 -0500, John
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500,
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the
boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.
They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship
now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor
them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide
pirating is
not worth the risk.
We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.
LOL!

Very liberal of you!
Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.
What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal.
It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a
trial.

It's hard to believe for people like you, because you don't believe in
Due Process.

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Where did you get Jessica? I was sent info indicating Irene.

HarryK[_8_] February 25th 11 12:47 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 2/24/2011 7:36 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 2/24/2011 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:38 -0500, John
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500,
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink
the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.
They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship
now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor
them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide
pirating is
not worth the risk.
We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as
it's
going from parents to children.
LOL!

Very liberal of you!
Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.
What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal.
It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a
trial.
It's hard to believe for people like you, because you don't believe in
Due Process.

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Where did you get Jessica? I was sent info indicating Irene.

Check out rec.boats cruising. And what about Irene. Are there multiple
personalities involved here?

John H[_2_] February 25th 11 01:09 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:57:09 -0500, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?


Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.


Yeah, we know you all a hate that we talk to Tim so much that you all
have been chasing him from group to group trying to embarrass him to
stop.. Shame on you, and oh, it didn't work.. Just ****ed him off. AT
YOU!


This is at least twice, that I've seen, that you've mentioned Tim's alleged
feelings about another in the group.

If Tim has spoken about such to you, then you should consider it privileged
information, just as Tim and I have considered communications between ourselves
and you to be.

I_am_Tosk February 25th 11 01:18 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:57:09 -0500, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.


Yeah, we know you all a hate that we talk to Tim so much that you all
have been chasing him from group to group trying to embarrass him to
stop.. Shame on you, and oh, it didn't work.. Just ****ed him off. AT
YOU!


This is at least twice, that I've seen, that you've mentioned Tim's alleged
feelings about another in the group.

If Tim has spoken about such to you, then you should consider it privileged
information, just as Tim and I have considered communications between ourselves
and you to be.


The problem is John, some of the libs here are chasing him around to try
to axe communication between he and I. This is how the libs here act,
and it's a fact. Tim knows what I am saying here and I am sure he has no
problem with me pointing out the behavior... But you think what you
will.

[email protected] February 25th 11 01:36 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?


Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.


He's just an asshole. Whomever this Jessica person is, she must have a
lot going for her if it creates such venom in people like him.


A.True.Boater[_2_] February 25th 11 01:55 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 2/24/11 8:36 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?


Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.


He's just an asshole. Whomever this Jessica person is, she must have a
lot going for her if it creates such venom in people like him.


Well, I guess you really think Wayne has a lot going for him, because he
always gets you all riled up.

[email protected] February 25th 11 08:12 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:55:20 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/24/11 8:36 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.


He's just an asshole. Whomever this Jessica person is, she must have a
lot going for her if it creates such venom in people like him.


Well, I guess you really think Wayne has a lot going for him, because he
always gets you all riled up.


Well, I think you've got your head firmly embedded in your rear.

A.True.Boater[_2_] February 25th 11 08:36 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 2/25/11 3:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:55:20 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/24/11 8:36 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.

He's just an asshole. Whomever this Jessica person is, she must have a
lot going for her if it creates such venom in people like him.


Well, I guess you really think Wayne has a lot going for him, because he
always gets you all riled up.


Well, I think you've got your head firmly embedded in your rear.


Well since I used EXACTLY the same logic you used in reference to
Jessica, you must have your head firmly embedded in your rear. The
difference is my was obviously a sarcastic comment concerning your
ridiculous statement.

[email protected] February 25th 11 09:39 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:36:40 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/25/11 3:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:55:20 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/24/11 8:36 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.

He's just an asshole. Whomever this Jessica person is, she must have a
lot going for her if it creates such venom in people like him.


Well, I guess you really think Wayne has a lot going for him, because he
always gets you all riled up.


Well, I think you've got your head firmly embedded in your rear.


Well since I used EXACTLY the same logic you used in reference to
Jessica, you must have your head firmly embedded in your rear. The
difference is my was obviously a sarcastic comment concerning your
ridiculous statement.


Don't know who Jessica is, but she is obviously a lot smarter than
you. Do you need a flashlight for your own butt search?

A.True.Boater[_2_] February 25th 11 09:51 PM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On 2/25/11 4:39 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:36:40 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/25/11 3:12 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:55:20 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/24/11 8:36 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.

He's just an asshole. Whomever this Jessica person is, she must have a
lot going for her if it creates such venom in people like him.


Well, I guess you really think Wayne has a lot going for him, because he
always gets you all riled up.

Well, I think you've got your head firmly embedded in your rear.


Well since I used EXACTLY the same logic you used in reference to
Jessica, you must have your head firmly embedded in your rear. The
difference is my was obviously a sarcastic comment concerning your
ridiculous statement.


Don't know who Jessica is, but she is obviously a lot smarter than
you. Do you need a flashlight for your own butt search?


Since you don't have the ability to see how illogical you are, it is
useless to even try to communicate with you.

[email protected] February 26th 11 01:41 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:51:40 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/25/11 4:39 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:36:40 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/25/11 3:12 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:55:20 -0500, "A.True.Boater"
wrote:

On 2/24/11 8:36 PM,
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:12:34 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...

How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Looks like we got us a misogynist here.
Or maybe a pussy-whipped feller.
Worked on a crew with one of the pussy-whipped "guys" once.
He'd come in with a knot on his forehead and tell us his wacky
wife hit him with a serving spoon because he wouldn't finish his peas.
Pretty hilarious. He gave us a lot of laughs.
Either way, a dweeb is a dweeb.
Got a feeling poor Tim has talked to this guy.
All the losers take advantage of Tim's genuine friendliness.
Then they betray him with this kind of conduct.
It's a shame.

He's just an asshole. Whomever this Jessica person is, she must have a
lot going for her if it creates such venom in people like him.


Well, I guess you really think Wayne has a lot going for him, because he
always gets you all riled up.

Well, I think you've got your head firmly embedded in your rear.

Well since I used EXACTLY the same logic you used in reference to
Jessica, you must have your head firmly embedded in your rear. The
difference is my was obviously a sarcastic comment concerning your
ridiculous statement.


Don't know who Jessica is, but she is obviously a lot smarter than
you. Do you need a flashlight for your own butt search?


Since you don't have the ability to see how illogical you are, it is
useless to even try to communicate with you.


So why are you? You and your friends can't seem to help yourselves.

L G[_25_] February 26th 11 02:20 AM

4 sailors killed by pirates
 
HarryK wrote:
On 2/24/2011 7:36 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote:
On 2/24/2011 2:42 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:29:38 -0500, John
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500,
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500,
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink
the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.
They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship
now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come
home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor
them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide
pirating is
not worth the risk.
We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as
it's
going from parents to children.
LOL!

Very liberal of you!
Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.
What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal.
It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a
trial.
It's hard to believe for people like you, because you don't believe in
Due Process.
How the **** do you know that, Jessica?

Where did you get Jessica? I was sent info indicating Irene.

Check out rec.boats cruising. And what about Irene. Are there multiple
personalities involved here?

If your email is valid I can forward it to you.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com