On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:09:58 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article , payer3389
says...

On 2/14/11 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

From what I heard immediately after the Breitbart "exposé,"
"co-workers, business associates, friends and acquaintances" were on
her side.

If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Oh, please. Breitbart is a scumbag. It's telling that you are sticking
up for him.

Bertie seems to be slipping ever further toward the edge of sanity.


Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.

Have you ever noticed how most (not all, mind you) liberals resort to
name-calling and personal insults when they see they're on the losing end of a
discussion?

Just an observation, mind you.

On 2/14/11 10:10 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:09:58 -0500, wrote:

In articlehpKdndk0H9duusTQnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/14/11 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

From what I heard immediately after the Breitbart "exposé,"
"co-workers, business associates, friends and acquaintances" were on
her side.

If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Oh, please. Breitbart is a scumbag. It's telling that you are sticking
up for him.

Bertie seems to be slipping ever further toward the edge of sanity.


Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.

Have you ever noticed how most (not all, mind you) liberals resort to
name-calling and personal insults when they see they're on the losing end of a
discussion?

Just an observation, mind you.


Losing end of a discussion? Oh, I forgot...you support Breitbart, too.
Goes along with your "fanship" of Glenn Beck, I guess.

Asshole.

Just an observation, mind you.

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:55:10 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 2/14/11 10:10 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:09:58 -0500, wrote:

In articlehpKdndk0H9duusTQnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/14/11 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

From what I heard immediately after the Breitbart "exposé,"
"co-workers, business associates, friends and acquaintances" were on
her side.

If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Oh, please. Breitbart is a scumbag. It's telling that you are sticking
up for him.

Bertie seems to be slipping ever further toward the edge of sanity.


Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.

Have you ever noticed how most (not all, mind you) liberals resort to
name-calling and personal insults when they see they're on the losing end of a
discussion?

Just an observation, mind you.


Losing end of a discussion? Oh, I forgot...you support Breitbart, too.
Goes along with your "fanship" of Glenn Beck, I guess.

Asshole.

Just an observation, mind you.

Losing end of a discussion? Herring is as dense as Bertie. Do they
both think that Breitbart has the right to puposefully edit footage in
a way that intends to destroy the credibility of a person with
impunity based on the 1st Amendment?

The first Amendment may give rights to free speech, it does not give
rights to construct falsehoods that intend to destroy a person's
credibility.

This is going to cost him plenty, I would hope his freedom but
probably just a ****load of money. Maybe she can shut him down like
they shut the assholes down in Idaho. Bankruptcy tends to make these
sorts of projects difficult to mount.

"A.True.Boater" wrote in message
...
On 2/14/11 8:09 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlehpKdndk0H9duusTQnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.

There is a difference between a news media making an editorial comment and
presenting news that would be considered libelous. It will be interesting
to see how this plays out, but if it is shown that the publisher of the
report was aware that the edited video did not accurately reflect her
comments and that the report was published with malice intent, his defense
time will have the their hands full to minimize the damage.

I am all for news media being held accountable for libel. Every time I
read the tabloid headlines at the supermarket, I wish more people sued
their asses off.


Trust me, we will read more about this as it progresses.


Why no mention of the turd that actually fired her. Seems like he might have
jumped the gun a little.

--
Ziggy®

On 2/14/11 11:37 AM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:55:10 -0500,
wrote:

On 2/14/11 10:10 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:09:58 -0500, wrote:

In articlehpKdndk0H9duusTQnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/14/11 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

From what I heard immediately after the Breitbart "exposé,"
"co-workers, business associates, friends and acquaintances" were on
her side.

If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Oh, please. Breitbart is a scumbag. It's telling that you are sticking
up for him.

Bertie seems to be slipping ever further toward the edge of sanity.


Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.

Have you ever noticed how most (not all, mind you) liberals resort to
name-calling and personal insults when they see they're on the losing end of a
discussion?

Just an observation, mind you.


Losing end of a discussion? Oh, I forgot...you support Breitbart, too.
Goes along with your "fanship" of Glenn Beck, I guess.

Asshole.

Just an observation, mind you.

Losing end of a discussion? Herring is as dense as Bertie. Do they
both think that Breitbart has the right to puposefully edit footage in
a way that intends to destroy the credibility of a person with
impunity based on the 1st Amendment?

The first Amendment may give rights to free speech, it does not give
rights to construct falsehoods that intend to destroy a person's
credibility.

This is going to cost him plenty, I would hope his freedom but
probably just a ****load of money. Maybe she can shut him down like
they shut the assholes down in Idaho. Bankruptcy tends to make these
sorts of projects difficult to mount.


Herring used to tout Glenn Beck here. Bertie is a birther.
Sophisticates, both of them.

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:20:03 -0500, Harryk wrote:

On 2/14/11 11:37 AM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:55:10 -0500,
wrote:

On 2/14/11 10:10 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:09:58 -0500, wrote:

In articlehpKdndk0H9duusTQnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/14/11 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

From what I heard immediately after the Breitbart "exposé,"
"co-workers, business associates, friends and acquaintances" were on
her side.

If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Oh, please. Breitbart is a scumbag. It's telling that you are sticking
up for him.

Bertie seems to be slipping ever further toward the edge of sanity.


Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.

Have you ever noticed how most (not all, mind you) liberals resort to
name-calling and personal insults when they see they're on the losing end of a
discussion?

Just an observation, mind you.


Losing end of a discussion? Oh, I forgot...you support Breitbart, too.
Goes along with your "fanship" of Glenn Beck, I guess.

Asshole.

Just an observation, mind you.

Losing end of a discussion? Herring is as dense as Bertie. Do they
both think that Breitbart has the right to puposefully edit footage in
a way that intends to destroy the credibility of a person with
impunity based on the 1st Amendment?

The first Amendment may give rights to free speech, it does not give
rights to construct falsehoods that intend to destroy a person's
credibility.

This is going to cost him plenty, I would hope his freedom but
probably just a ****load of money. Maybe she can shut him down like
they shut the assholes down in Idaho. Bankruptcy tends to make these
sorts of projects difficult to mount.


Herring used to tout Glenn Beck here. Bertie is a birther.
Sophisticates, both of them.


Q.E.D.

In article ,
says...

On 2/14/11 8:09 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlehpKdndk0H9duusTQnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/14/11 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

From what I heard immediately after the Breitbart "exposé,"
"co-workers, business associates, friends and acquaintances" were on
her side.

If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Oh, please. Breitbart is a scumbag. It's telling that you are sticking
up for him.

Bertie seems to be slipping ever further toward the edge of sanity.


Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.


Bertie-Birther: high school graduate and expert on first amendment and
libel laws.

snerk

Care to wager on the outcome of the case? A direct wager, no
intermediaries.

In article ,
says...
The mainstream media does it all of the time.

There is a difference between a news media making an editorial comment and
presenting news that would be considered libelous. It will be interesting
to see how this plays out, but if it is shown that the publisher of the
report was aware that the edited video did not accurately reflect her
comments and that the report was published with malice intent, his defense
time will have the their hands full to minimize the damage.

I am all for news media being held accountable for libel. Every time I
read the tabloid headlines at the supermarket, I wish more people sued
their asses off.


Trust me, we will read more about this as it progresses.


Why no mention of the turd that actually fired her. Seems like he might have
jumped the gun a little.

Everybody seems to have forgotten about that part.

On 2/14/11 6:09 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/14/11 8:09 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlehpKdndk0H9duusTQnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/14/11 7:51 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

From what I heard immediately after the Breitbart "exposé,"
"co-workers, business associates, friends and acquaintances" were on
her side.

If they stick to their original story, as I heard it, Breitbart will
be convicted of yelling, "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.... and his
right of free speech defense won't hold water....

All you need is someone with a conscious and the rest of them are up on
a threat of a perjury charge. How many of your co-workers are you
willing to become a convicted felon for.


Oh, please. Breitbart is a scumbag. It's telling that you are sticking
up for him.

Bertie seems to be slipping ever further toward the edge of sanity.


Supporting the first amdendmenet is a problem for you?

So, you think there is a first amendment right to knowingly and
deliberately publish a falsified "news report" that destroys someone's
professional reputation without having to face the consequences?

Breitbart published that crap with malice aforethought. I hope the woman
gets a multi-million-dollar award or settlement out of his hide.

The mainstream media does it all of the time.


Bertie-Birther: high school graduate and expert on first amendment and
libel laws.

snerk

Care to wager on the outcome of the case? A direct wager, no
intermediaries.


Sure, Bertie-Birther. I'll bet you a US dollar that Breitbart settles or
loses in DC court.

"BAR" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
says...
The mainstream media does it all of the time.

There is a difference between a news media making an editorial comment
and
presenting news that would be considered libelous. It will be
interesting
to see how this plays out, but if it is shown that the publisher of the
report was aware that the edited video did not accurately reflect her
comments and that the report was published with malice intent, his
defense
time will have the their hands full to minimize the damage.

I am all for news media being held accountable for libel. Every time I
read the tabloid headlines at the supermarket, I wish more people sued
their asses off.


Trust me, we will read more about this as it progresses.


Why no mention of the turd that actually fired her. Seems like he might
have
jumped the gun a little.

Everybody seems to have forgotten about that part.



I recall that the big cheese himself may have taken part in making the
decision to fire her

--
Ziggy®