LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default You Will be forced to use 15% ethanol

On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 12:30:29 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 07:59:47 -0800,
wrote:

More than "a few problems." I'm happy to entertain the notion of
fixing the problems with fracking. Perhaps they can start by
disclosing the chemical mix they use.

The problems I have heard are mostly because they were fracking too
close to the surface and in residential areas.


You mean that left up to the companies, who by the way deny
everything, we shouldn't have any gov't oversight because there aren't
any problems..



Did I say that? This fracking is done under a federal permit from MMS.


Yes, and we all know how much oversight happened with that agency. I
hear Obama broke it up into different agencies..

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/05...gen-72654.html



Do you know of anything that doesn't affect someone?

Sure. If my cat pees on a bush and I don't know about it, I suspect
nobody is affected. Is that an equivalency attempt you're trying to
make?

I am trying to say "energy" is never going to be free of costs or even
dangers.

I agree. How about nuclear? France seems to be doing it safely. Oh
wait, the French can't be trusted... lol

I am OK with nuclear but the waste is still a problem.


Yes, it's a problem, but there's got to be a trade-off.


It is interesting how cavalier you are with fission products that have
a huge potential for harm on a global scale for 10,000 years but you
wring your hands because a few hundred people have had problems with
their wells.


Cavalier? It needs careful thought and regulation, but should be part
of the solution. You think otherwise?


I agree nuclear is probably our best hope for long term energy
independence but the challenges are huge. I don't think we have a
plant here in the US that has paid for itself yet and they get
decommissioned, still in the red. These piles of high level waste are
also very attractive targets for terrorists.
Even a very modest dirty bomb in an urban center could make that place
unusable for 1000 years. It would make Love Canal look like a dog
knocking over your garbage can.


I doubt the latter part of what you're saying. It's pretty well
protected, esp. here in the US. In other countries.... well, the
Republicans wanted to block the treaty, so I guess they thought all
was cool.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Forced Back Into Sailing in Toronto BeeRich Cruising 17 April 10th 08 05:45 PM
When USA Forced Injections Regimes Comes, Run Away From Them Kurt Brown General 0 August 6th 07 08:33 PM
FDR: Internment Camps and Forced Labor Bob Crantz ASA 6 December 12th 05 08:57 PM
GM Forced to Lay Off Thousands Skipper General 98 November 25th 05 11:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017