|
I think I'll watch...
....the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****.
:) |
I think I'll watch...
|
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? I'm just here to watch it happen, Bertie. The boys who want to do it are back in charge. |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/2010 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Yes. I have stated that several times. |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/2010 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? You're replying to the ID spoofer. |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/10 1:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleXM2dnTOtYsxG9mPRnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Well Harry, I was really hoping you would use your filters and show more control. Now you are attacking half the group again because you can't help yourself... To use a hackneyed phrase, I'm simply calling a spade a spade and in this case, a spade who has been digging at my heels for years with his flaccid insults. Bert is not a boater and as far back as I care to remember has expressed no serious interest in boating. Therefore, he is a troll, and no different than "Ziggy," "Crotch," the ID spoofer and, for the most part, Shapechanging Krueger. Now, I do have the first three buried deeply in my usenet filters. I'll consider putting him in there but, really, these assholes shouldn't be tolerated by anyone. |
I think I'll watch...
"HarryK" wrote in message m...
On 12/7/10 1:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleXM2dnTOtYsxG9mPRnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Well Harry, I was really hoping you would use your filters and show more control. Now you are attacking half the group again because you can't help yourself... To use a hackneyed phrase, I'm simply calling a spade a spade and in this case, a spade who has been digging at my heels for years with his flaccid insults. Bert is not a boater and as far back as I care to remember has expressed no serious interest in boating. Therefore, he is a troll, and no different than "Ziggy," "Crotch," the ID spoofer and, for the most part, Shapechanging Krueger. Now, I do have the first three buried deeply in my usenet filters. I'll consider putting him in there but, really, these assholes shouldn't be tolerated by anyone. As far as I can tell, BAR has traumatized you significantly. Go Bert! -- Ziggy® |
I think I'll watch...
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:26:09 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? I'm just here to watch it happen, Bertie. The boys who want to do it are back in charge. For one who repeatedly claims to be 'just watching', you sure post a lot. |
I think I'll watch...
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:33:29 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/7/2010 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? You're replying to the ID spoofer. Since HarryK said he's only 'watching' from now on, should we assume any posts from 'HarryK's are from the spoofer? |
I think I'll watch...
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:16:11 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Why don't you stop the ridiculous spoofing. Pretending to attack conservatives while doing so is pretty friggin' sick. |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/10 2:59 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleO8WdnXpiAKdt4mPRnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 1:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleXM2dnTOtYsxG9mPRnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Well Harry, I was really hoping you would use your filters and show more control. Now you are attacking half the group again because you can't help yourself... To use a hackneyed phrase, I'm simply calling a spade a spade and in this case, a spade who has been digging at my heels for years with his flaccid insults. Bert is not a boater and as far back as I care to remember has expressed no serious interest in boating. Therefore, he is a troll, and no different than "Ziggy," "Crotch," the ID spoofer and, for the most part, Shapechanging Krueger. Now, I do have the first three buried deeply in my usenet filters. I'll consider putting him in there but, really, these assholes shouldn't be tolerated by anyone. Not the issue, the issue is you attacking Christians and two Women on purely partisan lines... It was and is uncalled for, and you know what you are doing. You seem to be getting a pretty wide berth here so far, but we were hoping you wouldn't us it to slip slowly back to your old ways... which so far you have been doing, although slowly, steadily... I'm only aware of one christian, meaning (to me) a follower of the teachings of jesus, who posts here, and I get along with him just fine. Which christians do you think I am attacking? I merely target religious hypocrisy. By the way, I'm not an atheist. I'm a strong agnostic. While I have little use for "organized" religion, I have no argument with those who believe in a deity. I have no interest in selling them on my agnosticism and I wish they would disdain from trying to sell me their religion. As for palin and o'donnell, the two women to whom I believe you are referring, my disdain for them is based upon their ignorance and stupidity and intellectual laziness, not on their politics. There are several nationally known female Republican politicians I think are pretty sharp, even though I do not agree with their politically. |
I think I'll watch...
"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/7/10 2:59 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleO8WdnXpiAKdt4mPRnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 1:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleXM2dnTOtYsxG9mPRnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Well Harry, I was really hoping you would use your filters and show more control. Now you are attacking half the group again because you can't help yourself... To use a hackneyed phrase, I'm simply calling a spade a spade and in this case, a spade who has been digging at my heels for years with his flaccid insults. Bert is not a boater and as far back as I care to remember has expressed no serious interest in boating. Therefore, he is a troll, and no different than "Ziggy," "Crotch," the ID spoofer and, for the most part, Shapechanging Krueger. Now, I do have the first three buried deeply in my usenet filters. I'll consider putting him in there but, really, these assholes shouldn't be tolerated by anyone. Not the issue, the issue is you attacking Christians and two Women on purely partisan lines... It was and is uncalled for, and you know what you are doing. You seem to be getting a pretty wide berth here so far, but we were hoping you wouldn't us it to slip slowly back to your old ways... which so far you have been doing, although slowly, steadily... I'm only aware of one christian, meaning (to me) a follower of the teachings of jesus, who posts here, and I get along with him just fine. Which christians do you think I am attacking? I merely target religious hypocrisy. By the way, I'm not an atheist. I'm a strong agnostic. While I have little use for "organized" religion, I have no argument with those who believe in a deity. I have no interest in selling them on my agnosticism and I wish they would disdain from trying to sell me their religion. As for palin and o'donnell, the two women to whom I believe you are referring, my disdain for them is based upon their ignorance and stupidity and intellectual laziness, not on their politics. There are several nationally known female Republican politicians I think are pretty sharp, even though I do not agree with their politically. Wait just a flippin minute. Earlier today you declared yourself an atheist. Now you say you are agnostic. Make up your mind for pity sake. Or is it just that you don't have the balls to stand up for what you believe. -- Ziggy® |
I think I'll watch...
On 06/12/2010 6:35 PM, HarryK wrote:
...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Here is one for ya: Maybe we should callt he Whitehouse the Blackhouse as everyone is supposed to be kept in the dark. -- Wikileaks Follower -- Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing. |
I think I'll watch...
Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/7/10 2:59 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleO8WdnXpiAKdt4mPRnZ2dnUVZ_oSdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 1:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleXM2dnTOtYsxG9mPRnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Well Harry, I was really hoping you would use your filters and show more control. Now you are attacking half the group again because you can't help yourself... To use a hackneyed phrase, I'm simply calling a spade a spade and in this case, a spade who has been digging at my heels for years with his flaccid insults. Bert is not a boater and as far back as I care to remember has expressed no serious interest in boating. Therefore, he is a troll, and no different than "Ziggy," "Crotch," the ID spoofer and, for the most part, Shapechanging Krueger. Now, I do have the first three buried deeply in my usenet filters. I'll consider putting him in there but, really, these assholes shouldn't be tolerated by anyone. Not the issue, the issue is you attacking Christians and two Women on purely partisan lines... It was and is uncalled for, and you know what you are doing. You seem to be getting a pretty wide berth here so far, but we were hoping you wouldn't us it to slip slowly back to your old ways... which so far you have been doing, although slowly, steadily... I'm only aware of one christian, meaning (to me) a follower of the teachings of jesus, who posts here, and I get along with him just fine. Which christians do you think I am attacking? I merely target religious hypocrisy. By the way, I'm not an atheist. I'm a strong agnostic. While I have little use for "organized" religion, I have no argument with those who believe in a deity. I have no interest in selling them on my agnosticism and I wish they would disdain from trying to sell me their religion. As for palin and o'donnell, the two women to whom I believe you are referring, my disdain for them is based upon their ignorance and stupidity and intellectual laziness, not on their politics. There are several nationally known female Republican politicians I think are pretty sharp, even though I do not agree with their politically. Wait just a flippin minute. Earlier today you declared yourself an atheist. Now you say you are agnostic. Make up your mind for pity sake. Or is it just that you don't have the balls to stand up for what you believe. He lies profusely. Hell, today he was leaving, and then "watching", and now he won't shut up. |
I think I'll watch...
|
I think I'll watch...
In article , payer33859
@mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Why don't you whine about the ID spoofer some more? |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/2010 2:46 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:26:09 -0500, wrote: On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? I'm just here to watch it happen, Bertie. The boys who want to do it are back in charge. For one who repeatedly claims to be 'just watching', you sure post a lot. I can't help myself. I'm being attacked from all sides, and only Paul is defending me. |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/7/2010 8:10 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleXM2dnTOtYsxG9mPRnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Why don't you whine about the ID spoofer some more? OK, I will. You are replying to the ID spoofer, again. |
I think I'll watch...
In article , payer33859
@mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 1:28 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In articleXM2dnTOtYsxG9mPRnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859 @mypacks.net says... On 12/7/10 8:08 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) Hasn't that been your goal all along? Nope. What's your goal here? I mean, you don't have a boat, you haven't had one for many years if you ever had one, you aren't interested in boating and most of your posts are little more than flaccid attempts to "attack" me or others who do not fit into your conservative christian world of those who admire the mindlessness of Sarah Palin or Christine O'Donnell. So, why are you here, really? Well Harry, I was really hoping you would use your filters and show more control. Now you are attacking half the group again because you can't help yourself... To use a hackneyed phrase, I'm simply calling a spade a spade and in this case, a spade who has been digging at my heels for years with his flaccid insults. Bert is not a boater and as far back as I care to remember has expressed no serious interest in boating. Therefore, he is a troll, and no different than "Ziggy," "Crotch," the ID spoofer and, for the most part, Shapechanging Krueger. Now, I do have the first three buried deeply in my usenet filters. I'll consider putting him in there but, really, these assholes shouldn't be tolerated by anyone. Nice insulting! That should help with the group harmony. |
I think I'll watch...
"HarryK" wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators & irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators & irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse: ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :) They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy. |
I think I'll watch...
|
I think I'll watch...
In article , payer33859
@mypacks.net says... On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators & irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse: ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :) They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy. Nice name calling and insulting! That should help with the group harmony. |
I think I'll watch...
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:43 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote: "HarryK" wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators & irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse: ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :) They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy. Well, if they're so damn easy to block, why do you keep responding to them? |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/9/10 2:12 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:43 -0500, wrote: On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators& irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse: ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :) They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy. Well, if they're so damn easy to block, why do you keep responding to them? I don't respond *to* them. Like a couple of others here, I am hopeful we'll get some new blood in rec.boats. As others have pointed out, as long as they are active and pushing their agenda, upon seeing their inane crap, most newbies will push off for a better clime. You don't seem to understand that. When you have morons like Ziggy, Crotchrot, the spoofers and LG running amok, the atmosphere stinks and you will not get decent new posters. |
I think I'll watch...
|
I think I'll watch...
On 12/9/2010 2:37 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/9/10 2:12 PM, John H wrote: On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:43 -0500, wrote: On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators& irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse: ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :) They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy. Well, if they're so damn easy to block, why do you keep responding to them? I don't respond *to* them. Like a couple of others here, I am hopeful we'll get some new blood in rec.boats. As others have pointed out, as long as they are active and pushing their agenda, upon seeing their inane crap, most newbies will push off for a better clime. You don't seem to understand that. When you have morons like Ziggy, Crotchrot, the spoofers and LG running amok, the atmosphere stinks and you will not get decent new posters. And before you accuse me of chasing newbies away, let me say I've never done that, no, not once. |
I think I'll watch...
YukonBound wrote:
"HarryK" wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators & irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. You really are delusional, dummy. |
I think I'll watch...
John H wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:43 -0500, wrote: On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators& irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse: ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :) They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy. Well, if they're so damn easy to block, why do you keep responding to them? He can't help it. He's a narcissist. It's a sad affliction but, at least, it allows him to fantasize about boating. |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/9/10 8:06 PM, L G wrote:
....the same old ****, but he changed his email addy...again. Bye, bye, krueger. |
I think I'll watch...
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:37:03 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 12/9/10 2:12 PM, John H wrote: On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:43 -0500, wrote: On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... ...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****. :) They are predictable, if nothing else. I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators& irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make it worthwhile signing in. The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse: ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :) They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy. Well, if they're so damn easy to block, why do you keep responding to them? I don't respond *to* them. Like a couple of others here, I am hopeful we'll get some new blood in rec.boats. As others have pointed out, as long as they are active and pushing their agenda, upon seeing their inane crap, most newbies will push off for a better clime. You don't seem to understand that. When you have morons like Ziggy, Crotchrot, the spoofers and LG running amok, the atmosphere stinks and you will not get decent new posters. It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it? Harry, heal thyself. Jeeees! |
I think I'll watch...
On 12/9/10 8:48 PM, John H wrote:
It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it? Harry, heal thyself. Jeeees! Your points ring hollow. You tolerate and even facilitate the Ziggy, Crotchrot, Spoofer, LG trash. And it isn't how *I* define the word to. It's how the dictionary defines it. I do not respond *to* the comments the four assholes make; I do on occasion point out that they are disruptive assholes. |
I think I'll watch...
|
I think I'll watch...
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:24:54 -0500, Don Won wrote:
In article , says... On 12/9/10 8:48 PM, John H wrote: It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it? Harry, heal thyself. Jeeees! Your points ring hollow. You tolerate and even facilitate the Ziggy, Crotchrot, Spoofer, LG trash. And it isn't how *I* define the word to. It's how the dictionary defines it. I do not respond *to* the comments the four assholes make; I do on occasion point out that they are disruptive assholes. Nice name calling and insulting. That should help with the group harmony! It's hard to determine which is the worst, your post or the one to which you responded. I wish you'd both cease and desist. |
I think I'll watch...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:24:54 -0500, Don Won wrote: In article , says... On 12/9/10 8:48 PM, John H wrote: It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it? Harry, heal thyself. Jeeees! Your points ring hollow. You tolerate and even facilitate the Ziggy, Crotchrot, Spoofer, LG trash. And it isn't how *I* define the word to. It's how the dictionary defines it. I do not respond *to* the comments the four assholes make; I do on occasion point out that they are disruptive assholes. Nice name calling and insulting. That should help with the group harmony! It's hard to determine which is the worst, your post or the one to which you responded. I wish you'd both cease and desist. I'll pass, but thanks for the input! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com