I think I'll watch...
 

John H wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:43 -0500, wrote:


On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...

...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****.

:)

They are predictable, if nothing else.
I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming
majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with
their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators&
irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach
reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the
problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make
it worthwhile signing in.

The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse:

ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :)

They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and
crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of
his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy.




Well, if they're so damn easy to block, why do you keep responding to them?

He can't help it. He's a narcissist. It's a sad affliction but, at
least, it allows him to fantasize about boating.

I think I'll watch...
 

On 12/9/10 8:06 PM, L G wrote:

....the same old ****, but he changed his email addy...again.

Bye, bye, krueger.

I think I'll watch...
 

On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:37:03 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/9/10 2:12 PM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:13:43 -0500, wrote:

On 12/9/10 7:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
...the righties turn this newsgroup back into a pile of ****.

:)

They are predictable, if nothing else.
I'm surprised the group has lasted this long with the overwhelming
majority being a motley combination of lost causes and spoofers, with
their aiders and abettors, apologists for same, agitators, instigators&
irritators... and worse of all the hypocrites such as Scotty who preach
reconciliation out of one side of their mouths and contribute to the
problems out of the other. Thank God for the handful of members who make
it worthwhile signing in.

The four horsemen of the usenet apocalypse:

ziggy, the hk spoofer, crotch-rot and lg krueger :)

They're easy enough to block, especially since ziggy, the spoofer, and
crotch-rot *probably* are one person, a person that seems to go out of
his way to be a clone of flajim and loogy.




Well, if they're so damn easy to block, why do you keep responding to them?

I don't respond *to* them. Like a couple of others here, I am hopeful
we'll get some new blood in rec.boats. As others have pointed out, as
long as they are active and pushing their agenda, upon seeing their
inane crap, most newbies will push off for a better clime.

You don't seem to understand that. When you have morons like Ziggy,
Crotchrot, the spoofers and LG running amok, the atmosphere stinks and
you will not get decent new posters.

It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it?

Harry, heal thyself.

Jeeees!

I think I'll watch...
 

On 12/9/10 8:48 PM, John H wrote:


It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it?

Harry, heal thyself.

Jeeees!


Your points ring hollow. You tolerate and even facilitate the Ziggy,
Crotchrot, Spoofer, LG trash.

And it isn't how *I* define the word to. It's how the dictionary defines
it. I do not respond *to* the comments the four assholes make; I do on
occasion point out that they are disruptive assholes.

I think I'll watch...
 

In article ,
says...

On 12/9/10 8:48 PM, John H wrote:


It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it?

Harry, heal thyself.

Jeeees!


Your points ring hollow. You tolerate and even facilitate the Ziggy,
Crotchrot, Spoofer, LG trash.

And it isn't how *I* define the word to. It's how the dictionary defines
it. I do not respond *to* the comments the four assholes make; I do on
occasion point out that they are disruptive assholes.

Nice name calling and insulting. That should help with the group
harmony!

I think I'll watch...
 

On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:24:54 -0500, Don Won wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 12/9/10 8:48 PM, John H wrote:


It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it?

Harry, heal thyself.

Jeeees!


Your points ring hollow. You tolerate and even facilitate the Ziggy,
Crotchrot, Spoofer, LG trash.

And it isn't how *I* define the word to. It's how the dictionary defines
it. I do not respond *to* the comments the four assholes make; I do on
occasion point out that they are disruptive assholes.

Nice name calling and insulting. That should help with the group
harmony!

It's hard to determine which is the worst, your post or the one to which you
responded.

I wish you'd both cease and desist.

I think I'll watch...
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:24:54 -0500, Don Won wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 12/9/10 8:48 PM, John H wrote:


It's all in how you define 'to' isn't it?

Harry, heal thyself.

Jeeees!


Your points ring hollow. You tolerate and even facilitate the Ziggy,
Crotchrot, Spoofer, LG trash.

And it isn't how *I* define the word to. It's how the dictionary defines
it. I do not respond *to* the comments the four assholes make; I do on
occasion point out that they are disruptive assholes.

Nice name calling and insulting. That should help with the group
harmony!

It's hard to determine which is the worst, your post or the one to which you
responded.

I wish you'd both cease and desist.

I'll pass, but thanks for the input!