OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

On Nov 10, 8:50*am, The No Spoof Zone wrote:
On 11/9/10 10:28 PM, Gene wrote:





On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:20:08 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:21:10 -0500, *wrote:

On 11/9/10 7:46 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, * wrote:

The North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, issued a
statement jointly with the U.S. Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, saying
that the contrail was not the result of a foreign military launching a
missile. It provided no further details.

Of course that implies that they know what it was - probably some
classified test.

Or, just as likely, they're clueless. But I agree that it was some sort
of U.S. military "exercise."

NBC is saying this was just a commercial airliner contrail shot from
an angle that made it look like a rocket.

That really sounds far fetched..... I work at an airport and we do
enjoy watching contrails and discussing aerodynamics of same, given
appropriate metrological conditions.....

BUT, even with perfect metrological conditions, mistaking that for a
rocket/missile shot really tries the imagination....

If it was a missile, it was the * S L O W E S T * missile every
launched. * Even the reflection off the object looks like the reflection
off of a plane at sunset. *The optical illusion makes more sense than a
very very slow missile.

--
Spoofers can go to Hell in a handbasket- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The optical illusion could have been how slow it looked because it was
pointed west, down range... Either way NORAD can see me pick my nose
on my boat, they know what it was...

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

On 11/10/10 6:23 AM, W1TEF wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:

Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

That's because it's not a missile - it's a contrail.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/


Maybe.

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

On 11/10/10 9:23 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Nov 10, 8:50 am, The No Spoof wrote:

Either way NORAD can see me pick my nose
on my boat, they know what it was...

Well, I would recommend you stop picking your nose.


--
Spoofers can go to Hell in a handbasket

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, HarryK wrote:


Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

WASHINGTON (A) – The Pentagon said Tuesday it was trying to determine
if a missile was launched Monday off the coast of Southern California
and, if so, who might have fired it.

has sarah palin been playing with grown up toys again?

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:36:10 -0500, Gene
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, HarryK wrote:


Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

Maybe it was this thing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xFh7...eature=related

or this.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTHWB...eature=related

Bob Ryan, our local weatherman, says it's a contrail.

Ergo, it's a contrail. No doubt.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

John H

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, HarryK wrote:


Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

Maybe it was this thing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xFh7...eature=related

or this.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTHWB...eature=related



snip...

Those things are impressive.
Some in this country think Canada would be better off buying pilotless
aircraft instead of the new F-35 planes we are considering.
http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/201...jets-ccpa.html

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

W1TEF wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:


Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

That's because it's not a missile - it's a contrail.

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/

An anti-conspiracy site on the internet. That's unusual.

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:


Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

WASHINGTON (A) – The Pentagon said Tuesday it was trying to determine
if a missile was launched Monday off the coast of Southern California
and, if so, who might have fired it.

has sarah palin been playing with grown up toys again?

That is off-topic Bob.

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

"L G" wrote in message
...
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, wrote:


Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

WASHINGTON (A) – The Pentagon said Tuesday it was trying to determine
if a missile was launched Monday off the coast of Southern California
and, if so, who might have fired it.

has sarah palin been playing with grown up toys again?

That is off-topic Bob.

You're 'off topic' Kruger.
Post when you have something to say about boats.

OK...who has been playing with the buttons?
 

On Nov 10, 8:35*pm, "YukonBound" wrote:
"L G" wrote in message

...

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:20:02 -0500, *wrote:

Pentagon can't explain 'missile' off California

WASHINGTON (A) * The Pentagon said Tuesday it was trying to determine
if a missile was launched Monday off the coast of Southern California
and, if so, who might have fired it.

has sarah palin been playing with grown up toys again?

That is off-topic Bob.

You're 'off topic' Kruger.
Post when you have something to say about boats.

Is this "about boats"?

"Those things are impressive.
Some in this country think Canada would be better off buying
pilotless
aircraft instead of the new F-35 planes we are considering.
http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/201...jets-ccpa.html "

You should practice what you preach, eh?