![]() |
A Soap Opera......
On Nov 8, 9:49*am, HarryK wrote:
On 11/8/10 9:46 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 11/8/10 9:03 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 11/8/10 8:42 AM, *e#c wrote: ...and you say who wont quit? My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories. And you playing with the most vulgar, nastiest poster on the group is not helping either, rather see the spoofers than that... Thank you for your concern. I will give your opinion the consideration I think it deserves. As always, have a nice day. So, another words... now that you are not getting pounded by the spoofers anymore, you will be right up to your old tricks... Got it... I suggest you read the words I posted as I posted them, and not try to spin them through your interpretation mill, eh? I will give your opinion the consideration I think it deserves. If that offends you in some way, that is your problem, not mine. And, as always, have a nice day.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes, we do get it... You will always be a troll.... |
A Soap Opera......
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:51:39 -0800 (PST), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote: Yes, we do get it... Scott, this belongs in the "Acrimony" therad, if at all. |
A Soap Opera......
On 11/8/2010 9:46 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 11/8/10 9:03 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 11/8/10 8:42 AM, *e#c wrote: ...and you say who wont quit? My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories. And you playing with the most vulgar, nastiest poster on the group is not helping either, rather see the spoofers than that... Thank you for your concern. I will give your opinion the consideration I think it deserves. As always, have a nice day. So, another words... now that you are not getting pounded by the spoofers anymore, you will be right up to your old tricks... Got it... The guy said he would give your opinion the consideration he thinks it deserves. He didn't say he wouldn't consider your opinion. That's usually enough in discourse. Why are you pushing when you have already gotten an answer? |
A Soap Opera......
On 11/8/2010 8:42 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Nov 7, 11:57 am, Crotchedy wrote: In , says... "L wrote in message ... YukonBound wrote: "L wrote in message ... Wayne B wrote: On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:22:08 -0700 (PDT), wrote: rec boats now resembles a Soap Opera of stupidity, and name calling. It's your group also. Make it into something better. He is unwilling and incapable of that. It is best to ignore him. Funny... I've heard the same (& worse ) said of you. So you approve of Slammer's posts? Funny... I disapprove of you! Nice insulting, Don. I can only hope that Harry reprimands you for this. ...and you say who wont quit? Why not just stop and see what happens? |
A Soap Opera......
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... And you playing with the most vulgar, nastiest poster on the group is not helping either, rather see the spoofers than that... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - Pain is temporary, Glory is forever! I suppose you would.............. since you are their biggest cheerleader and enabler. |
A Soap Opera......
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:44:10 -0500, HarryK wrote:
On 11/8/10 8:42 AM, *e#c wrote: On Nov 7, 11:57 am, Crotchedy wrote: In , says... "L wrote in message ... YukonBound wrote: "L wrote in message ... Wayne B wrote: On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:22:08 -0700 (PDT), wrote: rec boats now resembles a Soap Opera of stupidity, and name calling. It's your group also. Make it into something better. He is unwilling and incapable of that. It is best to ignore him. Funny... I've heard the same (& worse ) said of you. So you approve of Slammer's posts? Funny... I disapprove of you! Nice insulting, Don. I can only hope that Harry reprimands you for this. ...and you say who wont quit? My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories. An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending to be you, or anyone else that I can think of. Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense. Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable? Wowser. -- Hope you're having a great day! John H |
A Soap Opera......
On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:
My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories. An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending to be you, or anyone else that I can think of. Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense. Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable? Wowser. There's little doubt he's a "former spoofer," *and* someone whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Oh, and the Harry spoofer is active again, and there's a good chance "he" is this fellow, or the Ziggy fellow. Note I said "good chance." Have a nice day. |
A Soap Opera......
"HarryK" wrote in message
... On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote: My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories. An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending to be you, or anyone else that I can think of. Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense. Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable? Wowser. There's little doubt he's a "former spoofer," *and* someone whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Oh, and the Harry spoofer is active again, and there's a good chance "he" is this fellow, or the Ziggy fellow. Note I said "good chance." Have a nice day. Don't be accusin Ziggy of no shennanegins unless you can prove something, Bozo. |
A Soap Opera......
On 11/8/10 4:35 PM, John H wrote:
My advice is to pay no attention to the former spoofers or those whose only interest here is to see what they can stir up. Anyone who posts here under the username Crotchedy Harry falls into those categories. An ID spoofer is one who pretends to be another. CH is definitely not pretending to be you, or anyone else that I can think of. Granted, from your perspective he is probably most disagreeable. From my perspective he seems to desire prolonging conflicts. But, your responses suggesting slammer disregard him make little sense. Are you saying you find slammer's posts here more acceptable? Wowser. Oh...I've sent several emails to "slammer," asking him to go with the better flow here. Whether he does is up to him, not me. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com