|
What is worse
On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. |
What is worse
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Nor YukonBound, for that matter. |
What is worse
I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. So, filter him... Filter myself? Silly boy... |
What is worse
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:19:33 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Like I told Scotty, ignore it. -- I hope your day is simply spectacular! John H |
What is worse
|
What is worse
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:03:54 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Doesn't matter anymore... We all have a clean slate, well, except for you now I guess...;) According the the all-knowing, all-powerful Tosk, apparently. -- Nom=de=Plume |
What is worse
On 10/29/10 2:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... In articlewaCdnbuBj8V4HljRnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Doesn't matter anymore... We all have a clean slate, well, except for you now I guess...;) What do you think the intentions are of someone who logs on with that handle and trolls, Tosk? Why encourage them by responding at all? I will see how things go for now... Back to that boat, wtf can it hurt... I mean, who here could snipe at a brand new boat, and if they do.. well, you know where they are coming from. However, if you decide to post some pix (shed some skin for the group) I will join your boycott (shed some skin too)... No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave. |
What is worse
On 10/29/2010 12:59 PM, Hairy Crotch wrote:
In articlewaCdnbuBj8V4HljRnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Well, I just bet you're one of the infamous rec.boats "bad boys." No sense reading any more of your posts; you can join the ID spoofers and two other jerks on the "plonked" list. |
What is worse
On Oct 29, 2:17*pm, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 2:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... In articlewaCdnbuBj8V4HljRnZ2dnUVZ_vudn...@earthlink .com, says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Doesn't matter anymore... We all have a clean slate, well, except for you now I guess...;) What do you think the intentions are of someone who logs on with that handle and trolls, Tosk? Why encourage them by responding at all? I will see how things go for now... Back to that boat, wtf can it hurt... I mean, who here could snipe at a brand new boat, and if they do.. well, you know where they are coming from. However, if you decide to post some pix (shed some skin for the group) I will join your boycott (shed some skin too)... No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fair enough I guess. but I would think you could at least show some closeups of the dash or something that wouldn't leave you too identifyable... |
What is worse
On 10/29/10 2:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Oct 29, 2:17 pm, Secular wrote: However, if you decide to post some pix (shed some skin for the group) I will join your boycott (shed some skin too)... No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fair enough I guess. but I would think you could at least show some closeups of the dash or something that wouldn't leave you too identifyable... I could but I won't. There aren't going to be any photos of our new boat posted here. |
What is worse
On Oct 29, 2:48*pm, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 2:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On Oct 29, 2:17 pm, Secular *wrote: However, if you decide to post some pix (shed some skin for the group) I will join your boycott (shed some skin too)... No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fair enough I guess. but I would think you could at least show some closeups of the dash or something that wouldn't leave you too identifyable... I could but I won't. There aren't going to be any photos of our new boat posted here.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - OK, I guess we wouldn't want to do that to rec.boats... sooooo, how about the motorcycle? I would like to see that. |
What is worse
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque
wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. |
What is worse
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:55:36 -0400, John H
wrote: Pilots and co-pilots have this little ritual of doing a preflight checklist of important things before takeoff. Maybe Mrs H would be willing to take ownership of something like that since wives seem to always take interest in "honey do" lists. See, and here I'm thinking she owns too much already! Trust me, without my saying a word, I'll be asked every time we go out, "Is the battery all charged up, sweetie?" (Underneath will be a tone that says, "You dumb ****!" -- I understand perfectly. It's possible however that if you made it an "official" process, some of the attitude might go away. |
What is worse
On 10/29/10 3:25 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. It's not the only reason. As an example, if I posted I went with a Furuno electronics package instead of a Raymarine package, or an open rather than closed, array radar, or one brand of boat over another, or one sized boat or style of boat over another, et cetera, I'd only be supplying grist for the mills of the ill-wishers who are still here. I experienced a little of that nonsense already with the new boat here. It's the price I am willing to pay to be part of the minority here, politically. So, no photos, no hard details. I will say that I spent a lot of time boat shopping, took at least a dozen demo rides, and visited three factories for real tours before making a decision. My decision was also influenced by the fact that I was able to retain a recommended surveyor near the factory site. He was able to inspect the boat at various stages of construction and act as my agent in certain areas. He influenced wiring, deck core, "plumbing" options and choice of non-engine electronics, among other areas. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave. |
What is worse
On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 2:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... In articlewaCdnbuBj8V4HljRnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Doesn't matter anymore... We all have a clean slate, well, except for you now I guess...;) What do you think the intentions are of someone who logs on with that handle and trolls, Tosk? Why encourage them by responding at all? I will see how things go for now... Back to that boat, wtf can it hurt... I mean, who here could snipe at a brand new boat, and if they do.. well, you know where they are coming from. However, if you decide to post some pix (shed some skin for the group) I will join your boycott (shed some skin too)... No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. |
What is worse
On 10/29/10 4:25 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. For those who think the ID spoofing assholes are now behaving, check the post immediately above. These spoofers have *no* interest in helping reform rec.boats into a decent newsgroup. The referenced post provides the evidence needed to prove my point that I am correct in not posting photos or detailed descriptions of our new boat. It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. |
What is worse
On 10/29/2010 3:47 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 3:25 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. It's not the only reason. As an example, if I posted I went with a Furuno electronics package instead of a Raymarine package, or an open rather than closed, array radar, or one brand of boat over another, or one sized boat or style of boat over another, et cetera, I'd only be supplying grist for the mills of the ill-wishers who are still here. I experienced a little of that nonsense already with the new boat here. I know that I am one who did this relentlessly to others, but I do not wish to be the recipient of it. The whole Parker-low-transom jabbing I endured for months taught me a lesson: Avoid giving any details to others. It's the price I am willing to pay to be part of the minority here, politically. So, no photos, no hard details. Yes, I know I have harangued others to prove they owned a boat. I am now joining them. However, it should be clear to all by now that I don't do as I say. I still believe that we should all use our full names on usenet, not just handles. I haven't changed my mind about that, yet. I will say that I spent a lot of time boat shopping, took at least a dozen demo rides, and visited three factories for real tours before making a decision. My decision was also influenced by the fact that I was able to retain a recommended surveyor near the factory site. He was able to inspect the boat at various stages of construction and act as my agent in certain areas. He influenced wiring, deck core, "plumbing" options and choice of non-engine electronics, among other areas. Let me add that I'm not speaking about a toy boat factory in China. I know that because of the whole lobster-type boat debacle, some of you don't believe me now. Too bad for you. I will not be supplying any more hard details or photos about my boat. |
What is worse
On 10/29/2010 4:32 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. Whoops, sorry, that was inflammatory. My bad. |
What is worse
On 10/29/2010 3:47 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 3:25 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. It's not the only reason. As an example, if I posted I went with a Furuno electronics package instead of a Raymarine package, or an open rather than closed, array radar, or one brand of boat over another, or one sized boat or style of boat over another, et cetera, I'd only be supplying grist for the mills of the ill-wishers who are still here. I experienced a little of that nonsense already with the new boat here. It's the price I am willing to pay to be part of the minority here, politically. So, no photos, no hard details. I will say that I spent a lot of time boat shopping, took at least a dozen demo rides, and visited three factories for real tours before making a decision. My decision was also influenced by the fact that I was able to retain a recommended surveyor near the factory site. He was able to inspect the boat at various stages of construction and act as my agent in certain areas. He influenced wiring, deck core, "plumbing" options and choice of non-engine electronics, among other areas. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave. Wow! I'm in the political minority here, too. I think I shall refrain from posting any boat photos or any really personal information. Jesus. Remember that boat I have up at Lake Zoar? It's actually up at Lake Michigan. And I boat out of Los Angeles, not Branford. i live in Tokyo. :) |
What is worse
On 10/29/2010 4:32 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 4:25 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. For those who think the ID spoofing assholes are now behaving, check the post immediately above. These spoofers have *no* interest in helping reform rec.boats into a decent newsgroup. The referenced post provides the evidence needed to prove my point that I am correct in not posting photos or detailed descriptions of our new boat. It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. I suppose if you changed your handle, the sleazeball ID thief would change his. Nice folks, these. |
What is worse
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:48:39 -0400, "Paul@BYC"
wrote: On 10/29/2010 4:32 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 4:25 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. For those who think the ID spoofing assholes are now behaving, check the post immediately above. These spoofers have *no* interest in helping reform rec.boats into a decent newsgroup. The referenced post provides the evidence needed to prove my point that I am correct in not posting photos or detailed descriptions of our new boat. It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. I suppose if you changed your handle, the sleazeball ID thief would change his. Nice folks, these. You're catching on... |
What is worse
On 10/29/10 5:00 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:48:39 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/29/2010 4:32 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 4:25 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. For those who think the ID spoofing assholes are now behaving, check the post immediately above. These spoofers have *no* interest in helping reform rec.boats into a decent newsgroup. The referenced post provides the evidence needed to prove my point that I am correct in not posting photos or detailed descriptions of our new boat. It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. I suppose if you changed your handle, the sleazeball ID thief would change his. Nice folks, these. You're catching on... It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. |
What is worse
On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. Their true colors are showing...they're still behaving like the assholes they are. And you are playing with them. Why not just give it a rest? |
What is worse
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. This guy seems a little paranoid. |
What is worse
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:50:46 -0400, "Jim" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. This guy seems a little paranoid. What goes around comes around. |
What is worse
On 10/30/10 7:44 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:50:46 -0400, wrote: wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. This guy seems a little paranoid. What goes around comes around. I recall three mentally unbalanced individuals who have posted here and whose level of self-control was so lacking, they each threatened to drive to where I live and "teach me" a lesson. Considering who the posters are, I didn't take the threats seriously, but, you never know, do you? Their behavior is monster of their creation, not mine. Hey, I just noticed...we have a "new" Jim. Right. |
What is worse
On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. |
What is worse
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:23:08 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: We all knew there would be a couple dingleballs hanging on. That's what filters are for.. Yes. |
What is worse
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "YukonBound" wrote in message ... "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. I can see all the good work slipping through our fingers. Of course, if that's your intention, we can't stop you. It's up to you. Peace and tranquility, or the old mud slinging free for all. Well, Donnie has been asked at least a dozen times and it's obvious what he is really here for.. We all knew there would be a couple dingleballs hanging on. That's what filters are for.. -- I'm watching you...closely, dingleball! |
What is worse
|
What is worse
On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. |
What is worse
"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. |
What is worse
"YukonBound" wrote in message ...
"Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. Time to go back to St.Mary's to get re-educated? -- H |
What is worse
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... "YukonBound" wrote in message ... "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. Time to go back to St.Mary's to get re-educated? -- H That you, FlaJim? |
What is worse
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... "YukonBound" wrote in message ... "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. Time to go back to St.Mary's to get re-educated? -- H Nice that you are so interested in my education. Here's the school I went to for my 1st ten years (primary to grade 9). Shot from the playgrounds...smaller kids above, bigger kids below. Looks the same except for the new windows and the tree. No tree when I went there. .....and yes... it was no place for Florida Cupcakes. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/IMG_0108.jpg |
What is worse
On 11/1/10 9:10 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"Ziggy®" wrote in message ... "YukonBound" wrote in message ... "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. Time to go back to St.Mary's to get re-educated? -- H Nice that you are so interested in my education. Here's the school I went to for my 1st ten years (primary to grade 9). Shot from the playgrounds...smaller kids above, bigger kids below. Looks the same except for the new windows and the tree. No tree when I went there. ....and yes... it was no place for Florida Cupcakes. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/IMG_0108.jpg These boys cannot change their stripes, Don. Why bother giving them a response to anything? |
What is worse
On 11/1/2010 8:45 AM, Ziggy® wrote:
wrote in message ... "Secular wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. Time to go back to St.Mary's to get re-educated? Looks like you want to join your alter ego Harry with a registration mark in the plonked bin. Why are you having such a hard time with self control? |
What is worse
On 11/1/2010 11:14 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 11/1/10 9:10 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Secular wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. Time to go back to St.Mary's to get re-educated? -- H Nice that you are so interested in my education. Here's the school I went to for my 1st ten years (primary to grade 9). Shot from the playgrounds...smaller kids above, bigger kids below. Looks the same except for the new windows and the tree. No tree when I went there. ....and yes... it was no place for Florida Cupcakes. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/IMG_0108.jpg These boys cannot change their stripes, Don. Why bother giving them a response to anything? Don has continued the name calling too.. I'm working on him, OK? |
What is worse
On 11/1/10 12:16 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 11/1/2010 11:14 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 11/1/10 9:10 AM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Secular wrote in message ... On 10/30/2010 10:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Secular wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. Agreed. You first. I've shared my 'educated guesses' numerous times. Time to go back to St.Mary's to get re-educated? -- H Nice that you are so interested in my education. Here's the school I went to for my 1st ten years (primary to grade 9). Shot from the playgrounds...smaller kids above, bigger kids below. Looks the same except for the new windows and the tree. No tree when I went there. ....and yes... it was no place for Florida Cupcakes. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...d/IMG_0108.jpg These boys cannot change their stripes, Don. Why bother giving them a response to anything? Don has continued the name calling too.. I'm working on him, OK? Just as I predicted, the ID spoofers have no intention of behaving here, as evidence by the "I'm working on him, OK?" post immediately above. There's really no hope for this newsgroup, not when it is "inhabited" by juvenile delinquents. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com