Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

WICHITA, Kan. – Two women testified at a military hearing Tuesday that
they would not have had sex with an airman had they known he was HIV
positive, and one said she believed him when he said he wasn't because
he was in the Air Force.

Tech Sgt. David Gutierrez has been charged with violating military law
by having unprotected sex with at least 11 people without telling them
he was infected.

The two women who testified Tuesday detailed numerous encounters where
they had unprotected sex with Gutierrez, including at several so-called
swinger parties in the Wichita area. Some of their sexual encounters
were videotaped by the 43-year-old airman's wife, they said.

One woman, from Topeka, testified she asked Gutierrez whether he had any
sexually transmitted diseases and believed him when he assured her he
didn't.

Asked why she believed him, she tearfully replied, "Because he is Air
Force. They have integrity. I trusted him."


Well, *that* was stupid, considering the known and documented loose
sexual behavior patterns of military personnel, especially those
stationed overseas

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:56:27 -0400, Secular Humoresque wrote:

WICHITA, Kan. – Two women testified at a military hearing Tuesday that
they would not have had sex with an airman had they known he was HIV
positive, and one said she believed him when he said he wasn't because
he was in the Air Force.

Tech Sgt. David Gutierrez has been charged with violating military law
by having unprotected sex with at least 11 people without telling them
he was infected.

The two women who testified Tuesday detailed numerous encounters where
they had unprotected sex with Gutierrez, including at several so-called
swinger parties in the Wichita area. Some of their sexual encounters
were videotaped by the 43-year-old airman's wife, they said.

One woman, from Topeka, testified she asked Gutierrez whether he had any
sexually transmitted diseases and believed him when he assured her he
didn't.

Asked why she believed him, she tearfully replied, "Because he is Air
Force. They have integrity. I trusted him."


Well, *that* was stupid, considering the known and documented loose
sexual behavior patterns of military personnel, especially those
stationed overseas

Let's see...a stupid post displaying rampant stupidity by both sexes. Now who
would post such a thing?
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/6/10 2:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:56:27 -0400, Secular wrote:

WICHITA, Kan. – Two women testified at a military hearing Tuesday that
they would not have had sex with an airman had they known he was HIV
positive, and one said she believed him when he said he wasn't because
he was in the Air Force.

Tech Sgt. David Gutierrez has been charged with violating military law
by having unprotected sex with at least 11 people without telling them
he was infected.

The two women who testified Tuesday detailed numerous encounters where
they had unprotected sex with Gutierrez, including at several so-called
swinger parties in the Wichita area. Some of their sexual encounters
were videotaped by the 43-year-old airman's wife, they said.

One woman, from Topeka, testified she asked Gutierrez whether he had any
sexually transmitted diseases and believed him when he assured her he
didn't.

Asked why she believed him, she tearfully replied, "Because he is Air
Force. They have integrity. I trusted him."


Well, *that* was stupid, considering the known and documented loose
sexual behavior patterns of military personnel, especially those
stationed overseas

Let's see...a stupid post displaying rampant stupidity by both sexes. Now who
would post such a thing?


When we need the opinions of a white racist who hates blacks and
latinos, we'll be sure to call on you.

--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

In article , says...

On 10/6/10 2:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:56:27 -0400, Secular wrote:

WICHITA, Kan. ? Two women testified at a military hearing Tuesday that
they would not have had sex with an airman had they known he was HIV
positive, and one said she believed him when he said he wasn't because
he was in the Air Force.

Tech Sgt. David Gutierrez has been charged with violating military law
by having unprotected sex with at least 11 people without telling them
he was infected.

The two women who testified Tuesday detailed numerous encounters where
they had unprotected sex with Gutierrez, including at several so-called
swinger parties in the Wichita area. Some of their sexual encounters
were videotaped by the 43-year-old airman's wife, they said.

One woman, from Topeka, testified she asked Gutierrez whether he had any
sexually transmitted diseases and believed him when he assured her he
didn't.

Asked why she believed him, she tearfully replied, "Because he is Air
Force. They have integrity. I trusted him."


Well, *that* was stupid, considering the known and documented loose
sexual behavior patterns of military personnel, especially those
stationed overseas

Let's see...a stupid post displaying rampant stupidity by both sexes. Now who
would post such a thing?


When we need the opinions of a white racist who hates blacks and
latinos, we'll be sure to call on you.

Spoofer, when we need the opinions of a white bigot who hates
southerners and christians, we'll be sure to call on you.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/6/2010 3:49 PM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In , says...

On 10/6/10 2:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:56:27 -0400, Secular wrote:

WICHITA, Kan. ? Two women testified at a military hearing Tuesday that
they would not have had sex with an airman had they known he was HIV
positive, and one said she believed him when he said he wasn't because
he was in the Air Force.

Tech Sgt. David Gutierrez has been charged with violating military law
by having unprotected sex with at least 11 people without telling them
he was infected.

The two women who testified Tuesday detailed numerous encounters where
they had unprotected sex with Gutierrez, including at several so-called
swinger parties in the Wichita area. Some of their sexual encounters
were videotaped by the 43-year-old airman's wife, they said.

One woman, from Topeka, testified she asked Gutierrez whether he had any
sexually transmitted diseases and believed him when he assured her he
didn't.

Asked why she believed him, she tearfully replied, "Because he is Air
Force. They have integrity. I trusted him."


Well, *that* was stupid, considering the known and documented loose
sexual behavior patterns of military personnel, especially those
stationed overseas

Let's see...a stupid post displaying rampant stupidity by both sexes. Now who
would post such a thing?


When we need the opinions of a white racist who hates blacks and
latinos, we'll be sure to call on you.

Spoofer, when we need the opinions of a white bigot who hates
southerners and christians, we'll be sure to call on you.



Wow. You sure have everyone convinced you're not Ingersoll, florida jim
or loogy. Right.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/6/10 4:07 PM, Jim wrote:
On 10/6/2010 3:49 PM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In , says...

On 10/6/10 2:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:56:27 -0400, Secular
wrote:

WICHITA, Kan. ? Two women testified at a military hearing Tuesday that
they would not have had sex with an airman had they known he was HIV
positive, and one said she believed him when he said he wasn't because
he was in the Air Force.

Tech Sgt. David Gutierrez has been charged with violating military law
by having unprotected sex with at least 11 people without telling them
he was infected.

The two women who testified Tuesday detailed numerous encounters where
they had unprotected sex with Gutierrez, including at several
so-called
swinger parties in the Wichita area. Some of their sexual encounters
were videotaped by the 43-year-old airman's wife, they said.

One woman, from Topeka, testified she asked Gutierrez whether he
had any
sexually transmitted diseases and believed him when he assured her he
didn't.

Asked why she believed him, she tearfully replied, "Because he is Air
Force. They have integrity. I trusted him."


Well, *that* was stupid, considering the known and documented loose
sexual behavior patterns of military personnel, especially those
stationed overseas

Let's see...a stupid post displaying rampant stupidity by both
sexes. Now who
would post such a thing?


When we need the opinions of a white racist who hates blacks and
latinos, we'll be sure to call on you.

Spoofer, when we need the opinions of a white bigot who hates
southerners and christians, we'll be sure to call on you.



Wow. You sure have everyone convinced you're not Ingersoll, florida jim
or loogy. Right.


Gee, you're not fooled either, hey?

:)



--
Republicans are the Party of No:
No Leaders / No Ideas / No Morals

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:39:05 GMT, "A.Boater"
wrote:


On 6-Oct-2010, John H wrote:

Let's see...a stupid post displaying rampant stupidity by both sexes. Now
who would post such a thing?

Maybe the better question is, "Who would respond to it?"

I'd like to know if the airman is a Republican since they're so
responsible, personally.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

In article , says...

On 10/6/2010 3:49 PM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In , says...

On 10/6/10 2:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:56:27 -0400, Secular wrote:

WICHITA, Kan. ? Two women testified at a military hearing Tuesday that
they would not have had sex with an airman had they known he was HIV
positive, and one said she believed him when he said he wasn't because
he was in the Air Force.

Tech Sgt. David Gutierrez has been charged with violating military law
by having unprotected sex with at least 11 people without telling them
he was infected.

The two women who testified Tuesday detailed numerous encounters where
they had unprotected sex with Gutierrez, including at several so-called
swinger parties in the Wichita area. Some of their sexual encounters
were videotaped by the 43-year-old airman's wife, they said.

One woman, from Topeka, testified she asked Gutierrez whether he had any
sexually transmitted diseases and believed him when he assured her he
didn't.

Asked why she believed him, she tearfully replied, "Because he is Air
Force. They have integrity. I trusted him."


Well, *that* was stupid, considering the known and documented loose
sexual behavior patterns of military personnel, especially those
stationed overseas

Let's see...a stupid post displaying rampant stupidity by both sexes. Now who
would post such a thing?


When we need the opinions of a white racist who hates blacks and
latinos, we'll be sure to call on you.

Spoofer, when we need the opinions of a white bigot who hates
southerners and christians, we'll be sure to call on you.



Wow. You sure have everyone convinced you're not Ingersoll, florida jim
or loogy. Right.

I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

"Jim" wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.
5. If you believe all that, I have a bridge to sell you.


So who are you, funny man?

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID.

The magnificent Boatless Harry

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

In article , says...

On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

You sure are ****ty at guessing then. Are you the only "Jim" on usenet?

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/7/2010 10:25 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In , says...

On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

You sure are ****ty at guessing then. Are you the only "Jim" on usenet?

Jim happens to be my first name. You are using the ID handle of someone
else.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

In article , says...

On 10/7/2010 10:25 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In , says...

On 10/7/2010 9:13 AM, Harry® wrote:
wrote in message ...
On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.


So who are you, funny man?



Me?

I'm not Rappaport.

You can call me Jim.

It is obvious you are just another ID spoofer. You'd do better here I
think if you would drop the ID spoofing. You're not Harry. The guess is
you are loogy, flajim or worse scott ingersoll. If you are I can
appreciate why you would not want to be identified as any of those three.

Why not pick a new unused ID for yourself and stick with it? If you did,
you might find more posters engaging you.

You sure are ****ty at guessing then. Are you the only "Jim" on usenet?

Jim happens to be my first name. You are using the ID handle of someone
else.

Of course! Only a fool would use their real name in usenet.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, Jim wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

They don't call them 'dopers' for nothing.

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

In article ,
says...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

They don't call them 'dopers' for nothing.

Who is "they"?

Straight Military Personnel with HIV...
 

On 10/8/10 4:08 PM, Secular Humoresque wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...
On 10/8/2010 12:51 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:47:41 -0400, wrote:

On 10/7/2010 8:42 AM, Secular Humoresque wrote:


I'm not. I'm Secular Humoresque. You though, are Hertvik, the one who
ran his son off to the Marines and then called a poster's wife and
threatened to molest her.

So sorry, poseur, but:

1. I am not now nor have I ever been "Hertvik."
2. I do not have a son who is or was in the Marines.
3. I've never called the wife of any present or former poster here.
4. I've never threatened to molest anyone.

Whoever this dweeb is that you've engaged is another of the wingers
with boogieman delusions.

As far as he's concerned, you're Hertvik. Nothing you can say or do
will convince him otherwise. He's patiently waiting for trickle down,
supply side economics to start working.


There seems to be a general dimwittedness among these ID copiers.

They don't call them 'dopers' for nothing.

Who is "they"?

Duhhhhh. Harry and Don are they.



--
Dr. Karen Grear
Harry's Landlord