bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:57:05 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400,
wrote:

incidentally you might, as a matter of autodidaction, check this
article...if you are, indeed, capable of being educated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street

Over time, Wall Street became the name of the surrounding geographic
neighborhood[2] and also shorthand (or a metonym) for the "influential
financial interests" of the American financial industry,

---------------

i often say conservatism is a learning disability.

you're the poster boy for that fact


A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.


care to have me humiliate you by digging up more references that
you're too stupid to dig up on your own?

That would require you to humiliate me. You aren't capable of that
since I haven't posted anything I can't back up with facts.

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:28:45 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:57:05 -0400,
wrote:
A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.


care to have me humiliate you by digging up more references that
you're too stupid to dig up on your own?

That would require you to humiliate me. You aren't capable of that
since I haven't posted anything I can't back up with facts.

IOW you havent posted anything

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:28:45 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:57:05 -0400,
wrote:

A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.


care to have me humiliate you by digging up more references that
you're too stupid to dig up on your own?


That would require you to humiliate me. You aren't capable of that
since I haven't posted anything I can't back up with facts.

IOW you havent posted anything




You are dumber than you look, Bob.

On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:10:37 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:28:45 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:57:05 -0400,
wrote:

A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.


care to have me humiliate you by digging up more references that
you're too stupid to dig up on your own?


That would require you to humiliate me. You aren't capable of that
since I haven't posted anything I can't back up with facts.

IOW you havent posted anything




You are dumber than you look, Bob.

coming from a guy who thinks wall street doesn't exist, that's quite a
comment

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:10:37 -0400, Larry
wrote:


You are dumber than you look, Bob.

coming from a guy who thinks wall street doesn't exist, that's quite a
comment

I'm trying to figure out who is dumber.
The dingbat who doesn't know what is meant by "Wall Street."
Or the maniac who thinks he is the only member of the "middle class."
It's going to be a close call.

Jim - It's a strange, strange world.

On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 10:08:36 -0500, Jim wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:10:37 -0400, Larry
wrote:


You are dumber than you look, Bob.

coming from a guy who thinks wall street doesn't exist, that's quite a
comment

I'm trying to figure out who is dumber.
The dingbat who doesn't know what is meant by "Wall Street."
Or the maniac who thinks he is the only member of the "middle class."
It's going to be a close call.

Jim - It's a strange, strange world.

now let's see...i'm one in 100 million

if you are so poor at counting you think 1 is 100M, well, you have
some problems of your own

Jim wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:10:37 -0400, Larry
wrote:

You are dumber than you look, Bob.

coming from a guy who thinks wall street doesn't exist, that's quite a
comment

I'm trying to figure out who is dumber.
The dingbat who doesn't know what is meant by "Wall Street."
Or the maniac who thinks he is the only member of the "middle class."
It's going to be a close call.

Jim - It's a strange, strange world.
I know the implied meaning of "Wall Street". Bob doesn't get it.

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:10:37 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:28:45 -0400,
wrote:



bpuharic wrote:


On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:57:05 -0400,
wrote:


A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.



care to have me humiliate you by digging up more references that
you're too stupid to dig up on your own?



That would require you to humiliate me. You aren't capable of that
since I haven't posted anything I can't back up with facts.


IOW you havent posted anything






You are dumber than you look, Bob.

coming from a guy who thinks wall street doesn't exist, that's quite a
comment

I certainly exists. So does Route 66, Lake Shore Drive, and the PCH.
They are roads, Bob.

On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:51:30 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:10:37 -0400,
wrote:






That would require you to humiliate me. You aren't capable of that
since I haven't posted anything I can't back up with facts.


IOW you havent posted anything






You are dumber than you look, Bob.

coming from a guy who thinks wall street doesn't exist, that's quite a
comment

I certainly exists. So does Route 66, Lake Shore Drive, and the PCH.
They are roads, Bob.

not familiar with english? perhaps you should take some classes.
american english is highly idiiomatic. you seem not to know this.

i dont have the time to explain american english to you. perhaps a
good local english teacher in your village can help