On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:49:08 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:01:05 -0400,
wrote:




ever hear of morgan stanley?




Sure, but they aren't "Wall Street".


why? did he work in botswana?


HE? Do you think there is/was a guy named Morgan Stanley that is
relevant to your tirade?

says the guy who thinks wall street is the center of the universe

You can't get any dumber with that statement. You dwell on this "Wall
Street" thing yet you have no idea what you are talking about.

gee. the WSJ would disagree

bpuharic wrote:



Gee. They cover everything including world events. Care to try again?
I'm interested in who/what you are blaming with your overuse/misuse of
the term "Wall Street".


now THIS answer says alot about the right wing

he believes WALL STREET is the entire world....

couldnt have said it better myself



No, you are too stupid to read. The WSJ covers world events. Your
statement was wrong. You are correct that there isn't anything you
could say better yourself.

let's see...it's not the WORLD street journal

it's the WALLSTREET journal

anybody with a brain could figure out that means something.

and that explains why you can't


I'll explain it again, just for you Bob.

This is their HOME PAGE, dumbass. What is the first option on the left?

http://online.wsj.com/home-page

The hard copy, if you can afford one, is no different in their depth of
reporting.

Your rationale in this simple debate would also mean that KFC doesn't
exist outside of Kentucky and a GMC Acadia can't be purchased outside of
Maine.

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:



Gee. They cover everything including world events. Care to try again?
I'm interested in who/what you are blaming with your overuse/misuse of
the term "Wall Street".


now THIS answer says alot about the right wing

he believes WALL STREET is the entire world....

couldnt have said it better myself



No, you are too stupid to read. The WSJ covers world events. Your
statement was wrong. You are correct that there isn't anything you
could say better yourself.

let's see...it's not the WORLD street journal

it's the WALLSTREET journal

anybody with a brain could figure out that means something.

and that explains why you can't


I'll explain it again, just for you Bob.

This is their HOME PAGE, dumbass. What is the first option on the left?

so you're denying the WALL STREET JOURNAL has anything to do with wall
street??

there's nothing to report on wall street. they just picked the name of
the paper because it sounded cool?

is that what the current rush mantra is? even denying the existence of
wall street?

you guys are as dense as a neutron star.

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400, Larry
wrote:

incidentally you might, as a matter of autodidaction, check this
article...if you are, indeed, capable of being educated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street

Over time, Wall Street became the name of the surrounding geographic
neighborhood[2] and also shorthand (or a metonym) for the "influential
financial interests" of the American financial industry,

---------------

i often say conservatism is a learning disability.

you're the poster boy for that fact

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:





Gee. They cover everything including world events. Care to try again?
I'm interested in who/what you are blaming with your overuse/misuse of
the term "Wall Street".



now THIS answer says alot about the right wing

he believes WALL STREET is the entire world....

couldnt have said it better myself




No, you are too stupid to read. The WSJ covers world events. Your
statement was wrong. You are correct that there isn't anything you
could say better yourself.


let's see...it's not the WORLD street journal

it's the WALLSTREET journal

anybody with a brain could figure out that means something.

and that explains why you can't



I'll explain it again, just for you Bob.

This is their HOME PAGE, dumbass. What is the first option on the left?

so you're denying the WALL STREET JOURNAL has anything to do with wall
street??

there's nothing to report on wall street. they just picked the name of
the paper because it sounded cool?

is that what the current rush mantra is? even denying the existence of
wall street?

you guys are as dense as a neutron star.

It's a marketing tool. Sure they report on the market, economics, etc.
but they are hardly limited to that. Read one issue and you will
actually learn something. Your point is not valid.

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400,
wrote:

incidentally you might, as a matter of autodidaction, check this
article...if you are, indeed, capable of being educated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street

Over time, Wall Street became the name of the surrounding geographic
neighborhood[2] and also shorthand (or a metonym) for the "influential
financial interests" of the American financial industry,

---------------

i often say conservatism is a learning disability.

you're the poster boy for that fact

A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.

On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:53:37 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:




This is their HOME PAGE, dumbass. What is the first option on the left?

so you're denying the WALL STREET JOURNAL has anything to do with wall
street??

there's nothing to report on wall street. they just picked the name of
the paper because it sounded cool?

is that what the current rush mantra is? even denying the existence of
wall street?

you guys are as dense as a neutron star.

It's a marketing tool. Sure they report on the market, economics, etc.
but they are hardly limited to that. Read one issue and you will
actually learn something. Your point is not valid.

ROFLMAO!! so you say they dont report on WALL street??

On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:57:05 -0400, Larry
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400,
wrote:

incidentally you might, as a matter of autodidaction, check this
article...if you are, indeed, capable of being educated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street

Over time, Wall Street became the name of the surrounding geographic
neighborhood[2] and also shorthand (or a metonym) for the "influential
financial interests" of the American financial industry,

---------------

i often say conservatism is a learning disability.

you're the poster boy for that fact

A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.


care to have me humiliate you by digging up more references that
you're too stupid to dig up on your own?

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:53:37 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400,
wrote:



bpuharic wrote:





This is their HOME PAGE, dumbass. What is the first option on the left?


so you're denying the WALL STREET JOURNAL has anything to do with wall
street??

there's nothing to report on wall street. they just picked the name of
the paper because it sounded cool?

is that what the current rush mantra is? even denying the existence of
wall street?

you guys are as dense as a neutron star.


It's a marketing tool. Sure they report on the market, economics, etc.
but they are hardly limited to that. Read one issue and you will
actually learn something. Your point is not valid.

ROFLMAO!! so you say they dont report on WALL street??



The asphalt on a street in NY?

If you are referring to the markets, most newspapers report on that.

So who are these people, that you call Wall Street, that a ruining your
life?

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:57:05 -0400,
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:31:31 -0400,
wrote:

incidentally you might, as a matter of autodidaction, check this
article...if you are, indeed, capable of being educated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street

Over time, Wall Street became the name of the surrounding geographic
neighborhood[2] and also shorthand (or a metonym) for the "influential
financial interests" of the American financial industry,

---------------

i often say conservatism is a learning disability.

you're the poster boy for that fact


A Wikipedia cite? Nice! You could have authored that.


care to have me humiliate you by digging up more references that
you're too stupid to dig up on your own?

That would require you to humiliate me. You aren't capable of that
since I haven't posted anything I can't back up with facts.