|
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
|
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
Harry  wrote:
...in rec.boats: http://tinyurl.com/25nrv5d Thank goodness for "mark newsgroup read." Say what? You post twice as often and you have two boats, right liar? |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Larry" wrote in message
... Harry ? wrote: ...in rec.boats: http://tinyurl.com/25nrv5d Thank goodness for "mark newsgroup read." Say what? You post twice as often and you have two boats, right liar? Actually my brother posted every hour but the noon hour today, starting at AM. He must have got his boating in on his lunch hour. -- Me |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Harry ?" wrote in message
... "Larry" wrote in message ... Harry ? wrote: ...in rec.boats: http://tinyurl.com/25nrv5d Thank goodness for "mark newsgroup read." Say what? You post twice as often and you have two boats, right liar? Actually my brother posted every hour but the noon hour today, starting at 6AM. He must have got his boating in on his lunch hour. -- Me |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Larry" wrote in message ... Harry ? wrote: ...in rec.boats: http://tinyurl.com/25nrv5d Thank goodness for "mark newsgroup read." Say what? You post twice as often and you have two boats, right liar? Actually my brother posted every hour but the noon hour today, starting at 6AM. He must have got his boating in on his lunch hour. -- Me - stupid |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
... "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Harry ?" wrote in message ... "Larry" wrote in message ... Harry ? wrote: ...in rec.boats: http://tinyurl.com/25nrv5d Thank goodness for "mark newsgroup read." Say what? You post twice as often and you have two boats, right liar? Actually my brother posted every hour but the noon hour today, starting at 6AM. He must have got his boating in on his lunch hour. -- Me - stupid Yes you are. -- Me |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
Harry ? wrote:
wrote in message ... Harry ? wrote: ...in rec.boats: http://tinyurl.com/25nrv5d Thank goodness for "mark newsgroup read." Say what? You post twice as often and you have two boats, right liar? Actually my brother posted every hour but the noon hour today, starting at AM. He must have got his boating in on his lunch hour. That's typical of WAFA. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 30-Jul-2010, ?B?SGFycnkg76O/?= wrote: The most disgusting thing you will ever see... Saw worse - apparently some hedge fund kid married Howdy Doody in a dress yesterday. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 30-Jul-2010, ?B?SGFycnkg76O/?= wrote: The most disgusting thing you will ever see... Saw worse - apparently some hedge fund kid married Howdy Doody in a dress yesterday. You sound really jealous. I'm sorry, but even Palin wouldn't have you. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 1-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: The most disgusting thing you will ever see... Saw worse - apparently some hedge fund kid married Howdy Doody in a dress yesterday. You sound really jealous. I'm sorry, but even Palin wouldn't have you. Hahahahahahahahahahhaa - that's it, I've always dreamed of The Clinton Skank and Slick Willy as my inlaws! You think the hedge fund kid was Howdy's first choice, or did she blow it?? |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 1-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: The most disgusting thing you will ever see... Saw worse - apparently some hedge fund kid married Howdy Doody in a dress yesterday. You sound really jealous. I'm sorry, but even Palin wouldn't have you. Hahahahahahahahahahhaa - that's it, I've always dreamed of The Clinton Skank and Slick Willy as my inlaws! You think the hedge fund kid was Howdy's first choice, or did she blow it?? Was your choice dumb or dumber or moron or racist? |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 1-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Hahahahahahahahahahhaa - that's it, I've always dreamed of The Clinton Skank and Slick Willy as my inlaws! You think the hedge fund kid was Howdy's first choice, or did she blow it?? Was your choice dumb or dumber or moron or racist? You should spend far less time watching Saturday morning TV |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 1-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Hahahahahahahahahahhaa - that's it, I've always dreamed of The Clinton Skank and Slick Willy as my inlaws! You think the hedge fund kid was Howdy's first choice, or did she blow it?? Was your choice dumb or dumber or moron or racist? You should spend far less time watching Saturday morning TV Whoooo... really got your panties in a twist didn't I. Sorry for you. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 1-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Hahahahahahahahahahhaa - that's it, I've always dreamed of The Clinton Skank and Slick Willy as my inlaws! You think the hedge fund kid was Howdy's first choice, or did she blow it?? Was your choice dumb or dumber or moron or racist? You should spend far less time watching Saturday morning TV Whoooo... really got your panties in a twist didn't I. Sorry for you. I very much liked dumb and dumber, a moron is the current and 2 previous administrations, but with the gross ignorance of the inhabitants of the former U.S., racist has become nothing more than TV show gibberish. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 1-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Hahahahahahahahahahhaa - that's it, I've always dreamed of The Clinton Skank and Slick Willy as my inlaws! You think the hedge fund kid was Howdy's first choice, or did she blow it?? Was your choice dumb or dumber or moron or racist? You should spend far less time watching Saturday morning TV Whoooo... really got your panties in a twist didn't I. Sorry for you. I very much liked dumb and dumber, a moron is the current and 2 previous administrations, but with the gross ignorance of the inhabitants of the former U.S., racist has become nothing more than TV show gibberish. Sorry, but Obama is incredibly smart. I know that must hurt you somehow. Bush was a true idiot. Clinton was a consummate politician and a Rhodes Scholar. The only thing that's gibberish on the subject of racism on TV is from the moron right-wingnuts. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I very much liked dumb and dumber, a moron is the current and 2 previous administrations, but with the gross ignorance of the inhabitants of the former U.S., racist has become nothing more than TV show gibberish. Sorry, but Obama is incredibly smart. I know that must hurt you somehow. Bush was a true idiot. Clinton was a consummate politician and a Rhodes Scholar. The only thing that's gibberish on the subject of racism on TV is from the moron right-wingnuts. Obama has the capability to learn, reason, deduct, but is way out of league in experience with anything but rah rah fraternity style promotion. I almost feel sorry for him, but not his blind followers. UNDERSTAND that I was not a sycophant for Mr. Magoo either, but the fact that the corrupt ruling parties gave the average schlub those two choices is alone grounds for serious doubt about the population's ability to think. Neither of these fools should have even been on the mock ballot. As long as you suffer the right vs left vs republican vs democrat crap, you remain part of the problem. The corrupt political syndicates and their lackeys WANT you to think that way to keep you from paying attention to what is going on, and what is right and wrong. They are doing it successfully, including getting entertainment TV (called "news") to subscribe to their empty rhetoric. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: I very much liked dumb and dumber, a moron is the current and 2 previous administrations, but with the gross ignorance of the inhabitants of the former U.S., racist has become nothing more than TV show gibberish. Sorry, but Obama is incredibly smart. I know that must hurt you somehow. Bush was a true idiot. Clinton was a consummate politician and a Rhodes Scholar. The only thing that's gibberish on the subject of racism on TV is from the moron right-wingnuts. Obama has the capability to learn, reason, deduct, but is way out of league in experience with anything but rah rah fraternity style promotion. I almost feel sorry for him, but not his blind followers. UNDERSTAND that I was not a sycophant for Mr. Magoo either, but the fact that the corrupt ruling parties gave the average schlub those two choices is alone grounds for serious doubt about the population's ability to think. Neither of these fools should have even been on the mock ballot. You're wrong. Obama is an amazing intellect. Experience isn't the end all and be all of being President. Bush was out of his league intellectually, and he had very little experience. The two party system works, mostly. It would be interesting to have a viable third party, but so far nothing seems likely. Yes, both parties have corrupt elements, but they are not in and of themselves corrupt. As long as you suffer the right vs left vs republican vs democrat crap, you remain part of the problem. The corrupt political syndicates and their lackeys WANT you to think that way to keep you from paying attention to what is going on, and what is right and wrong. I'm only interested in a candidate who can actually make a difference, including getting elected. McCain, in the last election, was not viable for a host of reasons. Obama certainly isn't perfect, but there are very few who qualify as perfect. The only way to pay attention is to try and find as unbiased a source as possible, and listen and evaluate all information sources (not necessarily equally - it's called judgment, so comparing Faux to NPR isn't a reasonable comparison). Who decides what's important? In some respects it's the media (an entity mentioned in the Constitution), and in other respects it's one's own due diligence. They are doing it successfully, including getting entertainment TV (called "news") to subscribe to their empty rhetoric. Faux isn't news, although they would like you to believe they are. MSNBC is mostly entertainment and what I would call insightful commentary with some news mixed in. The major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) are trying to find a balance between corporate interest, news, and entertainment - unsuccessfully in my opinion). NPR is pretty balanced, but only part of the story. The foreign press has advantages and disadvantages. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: As long as you suffer the right vs left vs republican vs democrat crap, you remain part of the problem. The corrupt political syndicates and their lackeys WANT you to think that way to keep you from paying attention to what is going on, and what is right and wrong. I'm only interested in a candidate who can actually make a difference, including getting elected. McCain, in the last election, was not viable for a host of reasons. Obama certainly isn't perfect, but there are very few who qualify as perfect. The only way to pay attention is to try and find as unbiased a source as possible, and listen and evaluate all information sources (not necessarily equally - it's called judgment, so comparing Faux to NPR isn't a reasonable comparison). Who decides what's important? In some respects it's the media (an entity mentioned in the Constitution), and in other respects it's one's own due diligence. They are doing it successfully, including getting entertainment TV (called "news") to subscribe to their empty rhetoric. Faux isn't news, although they would like you to believe they are. MSNBC is mostly entertainment and what I would call insightful commentary with some news mixed in. The major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) are trying to find a balance between corporate interest, news, and entertainment - unsuccessfully in my opinion). NPR is pretty balanced, but only part of the story. The foreign press has advantages and disadvantages. You are expounding on maintaining the status quo. Same old structure, but we'll do better next time. That's been said since the 18th century. Then, however, there was a chance. I don't need a TV show, a politician, or nonsensical speech maker tell me what I need (I'll take care of that) what they can give you (nothing unless it's first confiscated) and I know perfectly well what establishes a productive economy. Obama and the slime in congress do not. NO elected liar could tell me different, not the current facade, or most of the previous. The core fault of the United States is that politicians have learned that if they can convince a small minority (only possibly 10% of the population adhere to either ruling parties blather) that they will be cared for, they get elected. The facts of the matter is that is literally impossible. The tactic isn't new. At some point enough is confiscated from those nasty entrepreneurs where they must leave; the coffers still need to rise to meet the promised payment, then the P/L is beyond repair. The "system" of two syndicates convincing the masses to side with them is the problem. No non ruling class individual seems to be able to make a decision without endorsement by someone (politician) who is getting paid out of your pocket. If the confiscation keeps you in business to support the non productive, the trend must advance. Two corrupt political syndicates can only survive with the endorsement of marginally equal wailing groups. The result is destructive, as evidenced by the eminent crash of the entire country. Change underwear (parties) in November - that's moronic and a waste of energy, but some of the public will expound on that. NOTHING in the U.S. ever changes except its rate of decimation. Do you bother voting D or R? If so, you are part of the problem. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: As long as you suffer the right vs left vs republican vs democrat crap, you remain part of the problem. The corrupt political syndicates and their lackeys WANT you to think that way to keep you from paying attention to what is going on, and what is right and wrong. I'm only interested in a candidate who can actually make a difference, including getting elected. McCain, in the last election, was not viable for a host of reasons. Obama certainly isn't perfect, but there are very few who qualify as perfect. The only way to pay attention is to try and find as unbiased a source as possible, and listen and evaluate all information sources (not necessarily equally - it's called judgment, so comparing Faux to NPR isn't a reasonable comparison). Who decides what's important? In some respects it's the media (an entity mentioned in the Constitution), and in other respects it's one's own due diligence. They are doing it successfully, including getting entertainment TV (called "news") to subscribe to their empty rhetoric. Faux isn't news, although they would like you to believe they are. MSNBC is mostly entertainment and what I would call insightful commentary with some news mixed in. The major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) are trying to find a balance between corporate interest, news, and entertainment - unsuccessfully in my opinion). NPR is pretty balanced, but only part of the story. The foreign press has advantages and disadvantages. You are expounding on maintaining the status quo. Same old structure, but we'll do better next time. That's been said since the 18th century. Then, however, there was a chance. Nope. I'm saying that I need to see a viable alternative before agreeing to trash a system that's pretty much worked. I don't need a TV show, a politician, or nonsensical speech maker tell me what I need (I'll take care of that) what they can give you (nothing unless it's first confiscated) and I know perfectly well what establishes a productive economy. Obama and the slime in congress do not. NO elected liar could tell me different, not the current facade, or most of the previous. The core fault of the United States is that politicians have learned that if they can convince a small minority (only possibly 10% of the population adhere to either ruling parties blather) that they will be cared for, they get elected. The facts of the matter is that is literally impossible. The tactic isn't new. At some point enough is confiscated from those nasty entrepreneurs where they must leave; the coffers still need to rise to meet the promised payment, then the P/L is beyond repair. The "system" of two syndicates convincing the masses to side with them is the problem. No non ruling class individual seems to be able to make a decision without endorsement by someone (politician) who is getting paid out of your pocket. If the confiscation keeps you in business to support the non productive, the trend must advance. Two corrupt political syndicates can only survive with the endorsement of marginally equal wailing groups. The result is destructive, as evidenced by the eminent crash of the entire country. Change underwear (parties) in November - that's moronic and a waste of energy, but some of the public will expound on that. NOTHING in the U.S. ever changes except its rate of decimation. Do you bother voting D or R? If so, you are part of the problem. This sounds like an angry rant. I vote for the best person. These days, that tends to be Ds. I'm still waiting for a rational alternative. So far, you have not indicated you have such an alternative. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Do you bother voting D or R? If so, you are part of the problem. This sounds like an angry rant. I vote for the best person. These days, that tends to be Ds. I'm still waiting for a rational alternative. So far, you have not indicated you have such an alternative. With those "thoughts" you've simply become livestock being harvested. It's your choice if you cannot get beyond the corrupt tyranny. That mindset is behind the root causes of the failure of the U.S. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Do you bother voting D or R? If so, you are part of the problem. This sounds like an angry rant. I vote for the best person. These days, that tends to be Ds. I'm still waiting for a rational alternative. So far, you have not indicated you have such an alternative. With those "thoughts" you've simply become livestock being harvested. It's your choice if you cannot get beyond the corrupt tyranny. That mindset is behind the root causes of the failure of the U.S. Uh huh... and, your solution is...... basically nada... just a rant about how bad things are. The US has not failed. That's just your rant. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: This sounds like an angry rant. I vote for the best person. These days, that tends to be Ds. I'm still waiting for a rational alternative. So far, you have not indicated you have such an alternative. With those "thoughts" you've simply become livestock being harvested. It's your choice if you cannot get beyond the corrupt tyranny. That mindset is behind the root causes of the failure of the U.S. Uh huh... and, your solution is...... basically nada... just a rant about how bad things are. The US has not failed. That's just your rant. The U.S. isn't going away; it's gone. There is no criterion for a country that still exists relevant for the U.S. It's not a big deal, it was fun while it lasted. Go vote for the dominate syndicates; it interrupts your grazing the aisles at Walmart to send you wages overseas. I don't rant, I don't care, I no longer produce in the U.S. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: This sounds like an angry rant. I vote for the best person. These days, that tends to be Ds. I'm still waiting for a rational alternative. So far, you have not indicated you have such an alternative. With those "thoughts" you've simply become livestock being harvested. It's your choice if you cannot get beyond the corrupt tyranny. That mindset is behind the root causes of the failure of the U.S. Uh huh... and, your solution is...... basically nada... just a rant about how bad things are. The US has not failed. That's just your rant. The U.S. isn't going away; it's gone. There is no criterion for a country that still exists relevant for the U.S. It's not a big deal, it was fun while it lasted. Go vote for the dominate syndicates; it interrupts your grazing the aisles at Walmart to send you wages overseas. I don't rant, I don't care, I no longer produce in the U.S. Sure. Whatever. The last middle third of the last sentence pretty much says it all. _You_ don't care. We get it. You contribute nothing. But, you like to rant and rant about how terrible the US is. Feel free to either leave or never come here. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Sure. Whatever. The last middle third of the last sentence pretty much says it all. _You_ don't care. We get it. You contribute nothing. But, you like to rant and rant about how terrible the US is. Feel free to either leave or never come here. I produced machinery and products for 25 years in the U.S.; it's no longer needed. My company and thousands of others have fled to be able to compete with the foreign junk you clowns spend your money on. Adios. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Sure. Whatever. The last middle third of the last sentence pretty much says it all. _You_ don't care. We get it. You contribute nothing. But, you like to rant and rant about how terrible the US is. Feel free to either leave or never come here. I produced machinery and products for 25 years in the U.S.; it's no longer needed. My company and thousands of others have fled to be able to compete with the foreign junk you clowns spend your money on. Adios. Sure. Whatever you say. Don't let the door hit you on the way out... |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:08:49 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Sure. Whatever. The last middle third of the last sentence pretty much says it all. _You_ don't care. We get it. You contribute nothing. But, you like to rant and rant about how terrible the US is. Feel free to either leave or never come here. I produced machinery and products for 25 years in the U.S.; it's no longer needed. My company and thousands of others have fled to be able to compete with the foreign junk you clowns spend your money on. Adios. Sure. Whatever you say. Don't let the door hit you on the way out... Interesting how prices have gone way up in the face of cheap Asian labor...those corps manufacturing overseas are doing well at our expense. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 3-Aug-2010, Harry wrote: Sure. Whatever you say. Don't let the door hit you on the way out... Interesting how prices have gone way up in the face of cheap Asian labor...those corps manufacturing overseas are doing well at our expense. Cost to produce and market price are unrelated, always. If market consumer prices reflected cost of production, Walmart's prices would be 1/3 of what they are now, but the waddling masses happily pay slightly less than other marketing companies charge while acquiring really shoddy merchandise. Ignorance can be cured; stupidity cannot. Cost is never related to price, ever. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message ... On 3-Aug-2010, Harry wrote: Sure. Whatever you say. Don't let the door hit you on the way out... Interesting how prices have gone way up in the face of cheap Asian labor...those corps manufacturing overseas are doing well at our expense. Cost to produce and market price are unrelated, always. If market consumer prices reflected cost of production, Walmart's prices would be 1/3 of what they are now, but the waddling masses happily pay slightly less than other marketing companies charge while acquiring really shoddy merchandise. Ignorance can be cured; stupidity cannot. Cost is never related to price, ever. WHAT?? Completely wrong. Consumer prices MUST reflect some of the cost of production. If they didn't, a company could not stay in business. If it costs 10 to make something and "consumer price" is 5, you can't sell at 5 for very long. If cost is 5 and market price is greater, then the two are less related but are still relevant. I have NO IDEA what you mean by "other marketing companies," at least in this context, since Wal-Mart isn't in the marketing business. They're in the retail sales business. |
The most disgusting thing you will ever see...
On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote: prices reflected cost of production, Walmart's prices would be 1/3 of what they are now, but the waddling masses happily pay slightly less than other marketing companies charge while acquiring really shoddy merchandise. Ignorance can be cured; stupidity cannot. Cost is never related to price, ever. WHAT?? Completely wrong. Consumer prices MUST reflect some of the cost of production. If they didn't, a company could not stay in business. If it costs 10 to make something and "consumer price" is 5, you can't sell at 5 for very long. If cost is 5 and market price is greater, then the two are less related but are still relevant. I have NO IDEA what you mean by "other marketing companies," at least in this context, since Wal-Mart isn't in the marketing business. They're in the retail sales business. Glad to help, and partially, you are correct. If it costs "10" to produce a product and the market (you) is only willing to pay "5," costs have to be reduced or the product goes away (or is farmed out to red China) My point (fact) is that price is unrelated to cost. Of course you cannot sell under cost, but the price of anything is what the buyers are willing to pay. Always. When a company goes into business with an idea of a product, they first consider what it could be sold for, then figure out how they can produce the product for less than that to make production worthwhile. If the cost rises for any reason (or decreases), the price does not change. If the price CAN be raised, it was underpriced to begin with. One of the most stupid things you here on "news" (outside of political lies) is when a new safety feature is announced that "the government" might mandate. A TV nitwit will state "but that will raise the price of a new car $600.00." That's completely false. If it is possible to raise the price, it would happen regardless of whether the new trinket were installed or not. Every product is priced to a point as high as possible but just under where people would stop buying. Walmart is a retailer, but first a marketing company. Most companies are, certainly all retailers. They produce nothing. They decide to sell something, decide on the publics willingness to buy the product and what they can get for it, then buy the production and sell it to the masses. That's what marketing is. Selling is convincing someone to buy the product. Walmart hardly does that, advertising that their prices are low (not compared to value) is marketing and about al they do. Advertising is promotions, and part of marketing. Marketing is deciding what is sold and how to get it to the market. Walmart has no staff that "sells" anything; the majority of their employees are lucky they don't have their pants on backwards. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com