Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 11:09 am, wrote:
In ,
says...





On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. He
must be proud.


Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On Aug 3, 11:27Â*am, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 11:09 am, Â*wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry Â* Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! Â*The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. Â*You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. Â*A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. Â*A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. Â*No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. Â*And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. Â*He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Why? Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message news:i38c78

So, instead of Breitbart being the instigator, it's somehow morphed into
the entire fault of those who over-reacted?

I don't think that Breitbart could have possibly imagined that his blog
could incite the administration to take such irresponsible action without
doing some investigating on their own. Does the media run this country? If
so, lets can Buckwheat and put Brian Williams in charge.
This silly debate of yours has gone on too long. Stop it, ya heah.

I'll save you the bother. Yup I'm a moron and proud of it.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 11:09 am, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Why? Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya


You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs, tee-shirts,
and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork and phrases on
them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history when we were
plagued by the "know nothings."


You did two walk bys and saw a few signs that you didn't approve of. Proves
nothing. Rallies like that are attended by a variety of people with
different agendas. You truly are a dumb ****.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 12:12 PM, Harry wrote:
"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


You did two walk bys and saw a few signs that you didn't approve of.
Proves nothing. Rallies like that are attended by a variety of people
with different agendas. You truly are a dumb ****.


Gosh...which of the two harry ID spoofers are you...since there are
either two of you active now, or one using two different posting facilities.

It's too bad you don't have the balls to post with your own ID. But I
guess you prove the rule that righties are pussies.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Harry " wrote in message
m...


But I support him, nonetheless. And I'm trying to figure out how to match
up one of my grandsons with one of Obama's kids, when all of them are old
enough. :)

I'm sure your grandsons wouldn't meet any of the criteria Obama would
require of any prospective mate to one of his lovely children. Sorry to
burst your bubble.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 11:09 am, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates
from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of
your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least
one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency.
Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch
region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Why? Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

--
Actually Jack, since I'm not welcome in S.C. or most anywhere else for that
matter, I'm considering moving my lucrative writing business to Costa Rica,
where the women are fast, loose, hot and slightly chunky. (Not like the bag
of bones on the beach I posted a picture of)

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 12:12 PM, Harry wrote:
"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


You did two walk bys and saw a few signs that you didn't approve of.
Proves nothing. Rallies like that are attended by a variety of people
with different agendas. You truly are a dumb ****.


Gosh...which of the two harry ID spoofers are you...since there are either
two of you active now, or one using two different posting facilities.

It's too bad you don't have the balls to post with your own ID. But I
guess you prove the rule that righties are pussies.


Spoken like a true dumb ****.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On Aug 3, 12:07Â*pm, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:09 am, Â* Â*wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry Â* Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry Â* Â* Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! Â*The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. Â*You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. Â*A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. Â*A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. Â*No matter how your little mind perceives it..

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself..

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. Â*And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. Â*He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. Â*I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Â*Why? Â*Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

You're a lying sack of ****, krause. You don't drive or cruise, you
always fly. Remember?

But hey, if I'm irritating left-wing lying nutjobs like you, then I'm
feeling pretty good. I suggest you keep your windows rolled up on
your imaginary trip through SC. Wouldn't want any of that stench
leaking out of your car.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 1:05 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 12:07 pm, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:09 am, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Why? Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

You're a lying sack of ****, krause. You don't drive or cruise, you
always fly. Remember?

But hey, if I'm irritating left-wing lying nutjobs like you, then I'm
feeling pretty good. I suggest you keep your windows rolled up on
your imaginary trip through SC. Wouldn't want any of that stench
leaking out of your car.


You think you are irritating me? I don't take piles of **** like you
seriously.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On Aug 3, 1:17Â*pm, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 1:05 PM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 12:07 pm, Harry Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:09 am, Â* Â* Â*wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry Â* Â* Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! Â*The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. Â*You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. Â*A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. Â*A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. Â*No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency.. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. Â*And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. Â*He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. Â*I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Â*Why? Â*Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

You're a lying sack of ****, krause. Â*You don't drive or cruise, you
always fly. Â*Remember?

But hey, if I'm irritating left-wing lying nutjobs like you, then I'm
feeling pretty good. Â*I suggest you keep your windows rolled up on
your imaginary trip through SC. Â*Wouldn't want any of that stench
leaking out of your car.

You think you are irritating me? I don't take piles of **** like you
seriously.

About a dozen replies by you this morning shows otherwise. Maybe you
should turn on that trashbin you used to be so proud of, eh? :-

HK = liar, bigot, racist, and liberal nutjob extraordinaire.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 1:23 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 1:17 pm, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 1:05 PM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 12:07 pm, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:40 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:27 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 11:13 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 11:09 am, wrote:
In ,
says...

On 8/3/10 10:56 AM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:

On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.

Actually, no...but how many teaparty pigs have the cojones to come out
and say what they really think about a black president? After all, not
many are from the banjo-playing albino refrigerator on the porch region
of your state.

Spoofer alert! I'm certainly not bigoted like that.

He's a bigot, racist and liar. And lives in the backwater state of
MD, which hosts the KKK HQ, and the US's most polluted waters. He
must be proud.

Wow...and this from someone in south carolina, considered by enlightened
people as the 21st century successor to the old racist states of
mississippi and alabama, and the state that ranks among the lowest in
many of the measures that matter. And you don't even live near the coast.

If I lived in south carolina and couldn't live in charleston or hilton
head, i'd move to a better place...like the Dominican Republic.

Awe.. poor harold. I live in a beautiful part of my state, next to a
wonderful lake, keep my boat in a slip and use it several times a
week, have easy access to both Charleston and Hilton Head (was in
Charleston IN MY BOAT last weekend), and we have a record number of
people moving here from all over the US. Why? Because it beats where
you live hands down.

But it's time to close our borders to trash like you.

cya

You're a petty little dip****, jackoff. You are more than welcome to
your state full of white racists. When we drive to florida, we make an
effort to not spend a dime in south carolina.

You're a lying sack of ****, krause. You don't drive or cruise, you
always fly. Remember?

But hey, if I'm irritating left-wing lying nutjobs like you, then I'm
feeling pretty good. I suggest you keep your windows rolled up on
your imaginary trip through SC. Wouldn't want any of that stench
leaking out of your car.

You think you are irritating me? I don't take piles of **** like you
seriously.

About a dozen replies by you this morning shows otherwise. Maybe you
should turn on that trashbin you used to be so proud of, eh? :-

HK = liar, bigot, racist, and liberal nutjob extraordinaire.


No, it doesn't mean you think it means, jackoff. It just means that I
like twiddling with you and calling you by the name your mama gave you.

I see you suffer from the usual rightie syndrome...you believe usenet
responses to your posts have some meaning for those who respond.

Ta-ta, Jackoff.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 2, 9:58 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...





On Aug 2, 7:11 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...

On Aug 2, 6:06 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

. ..

On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:33:32 -0400, Harry ?

wrote:

You really are working extra hard trying to rationalize and
excuse
the
behavior of Breitbart.

I am just addressing the reality
It is fun to think he will get his comeuppance but it is not
likely.

We won't know anything until/unless a suit is filed.

I just think it will be better for all concerned if this just
goes
away. I am sure Obama would not want this to be dominating the
news
cycle during the elections.
We certainly have far more important issues.

I totally disagree. I think it should go forward and be addressed.
This
bs
about racism supposedly perpetrated by the NAACP and other minority
organizations needs to see the light of day disinfectant.

It already has. Didn't you hear the audience cheering?

You're a right-wingnut moron.

Weak, childish taunts are all you have?

What about the fact that the NAACP members were cheering her
description of how she was a racist? Are you really so blind as to
think that rasism doesn't exist in the NAACP?

You're the child. Why don't you listen to some more Rush/Palin/Breitbart.
I'm sure you would be better informed than the rest of us.

There you go again.

No. You're the one who keeps claiming things that are false. That would be
the R/P/B crowd.

Obviously there's racism in most organizations. There are always going to
be
people who can't put aside the fact that people look differently or act
differently.

And now you may be coming around...
There *are* racist people around us. They are in the Tea Party, the
Democratic Party, and in the NAACP.

You and those like you seem to think that because a few people
are prejudice that means it's an entire organization.

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org. You've reasoned it out for
yourself. Now talk to the others that think like you and explain it
to them.

cya

Moron. I never said the teepee was a racist organization. If anything, I
said there were a bunch of racists in it, and it's fairly monocolor...
white. They're not the American Nazi Party, unless you're going to claim
that they're not a racist organization either?

If your father was lynched by a black crowd, do you think you might be a bit
hesitant to "help" blacks? That's what happened to Sherrod .. her father was
murdered and no one was prosecuted. Yet, she overcame her prejudice.
Breithart mis-represented her journey through her prejudicial feelings.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs, tee-shirts,
and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork and phrases
on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history when we were
plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not fully
endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts,
and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork and phrases
on
them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history when we were
plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully
endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.



Uh, it was Harry that said he went by rallies in Washington and saw
signs? Well, there you go, you know it's a lie, why bother... Just like
the lies the DNC told about racial slurs on the steps of the congress,
it's all a big setup..

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

Again with the lies. There were certainly instances of people hurling slurs
and spitting on Congressman. It's a documented fact.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 9:57 am, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 9:48 AM, Jack wrote:



On Aug 3, 7:42 am, Harry wrote:
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them.

Two big problems with the paragraph above:

1. You are one of those that beleives that anything that deviates from
your beliefs is somehow wrong. You demonstrate that here on a daily
basis. A white person holding a sign that says "We want our country
back!" is not racist. A sign with Obama made to look like the Joker
is not racist. No matter how your little mind perceives it.

2. You lie.

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.

"Translations", no doubt, given by lying liberals such as yourself.




You must be pretty insulated to not know racism when you see or hear it.

Would $10 million do it?
 

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:16:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:55:45 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:03:41 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

defamation was not by Breitbart anyway. He is just the one who
posted
the excerpts of the tape on his blog. The first thing they have to
prove is that he saw the whole tape. I have not heard that he was
the
one who selected the excerpts, only that he posted them.

Nope. Don't have to prove he saw the whole tape. They have to prove he
willfully misrepresented her words.

If that is the test, Vilsack belongs in the dock too.

?? Vilsack didn't publish the lie.

What lie? It sounds more like an opinion by a prejudiced person.
This was simply an edited tape. There WERE her words. She admits she
used to be a racist and then says she is reformed.

Come on. Breitbart knew it was misleading, but he promoted it as the
truth.

The first thing someone would have to prove is that Breitbart actually
saw the unedited tape and knew that she says she was reformed. Then
you have to prove he believed it. He can always say, in his opinion,
the reformation was a lie.

In your opinion. Fortunately, you're not an attorney!

Then you would have to prove he did not have the right to publish his
OPINION about it.

In your opinion.

It was very easy for liberal democrats to jump to the wrong
conclusion. It would even be easier to think a right winger could have
tunnel vision when they viewed the tape, even if they saw it all.

So, instead of Breitbart being the instigator, it's somehow morphed into
the
entire fault of those who over-reacted?

Nice try, but that doesn't cut it. I suspect Breitbart is going to settle
as
fast as possible or try to. She didn't impress me as someone who's afraid
of
a fight.




That is the point of our legal system. You can get an attorney to
represent any opinion. You have taken one side. There are tens of
thousands of very qualified attorneys capable of taking the other
side.



You're not an attorney. If what an attorney says in court is nonsense,
expresses an opinion, or foists an opinion in the middle of a trial, which
is what you're proposing, the judge will silence her immediately. You can't
express opinions in the middle of a trial (opening and closing only
typically).

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.



Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.

Yup. I'm a moron.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:16:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:55:45 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
om...
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:03:41 -0700, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:

defamation was not by Breitbart anyway. He is just the one who
posted
the excerpts of the tape on his blog. The first thing they have to
prove is that he saw the whole tape. I have not heard that he was
the
one who selected the excerpts, only that he posted them.

Nope. Don't have to prove he saw the whole tape. They have to prove
he
willfully misrepresented her words.

If that is the test, Vilsack belongs in the dock too.

?? Vilsack didn't publish the lie.

What lie? It sounds more like an opinion by a prejudiced person.
This was simply an edited tape. There WERE her words. She admits she
used to be a racist and then says she is reformed.

Come on. Breitbart knew it was misleading, but he promoted it as the
truth.

The first thing someone would have to prove is that Breitbart actually
saw the unedited tape and knew that she says she was reformed. Then
you have to prove he believed it. He can always say, in his opinion,
the reformation was a lie.

In your opinion. Fortunately, you're not an attorney!

Then you would have to prove he did not have the right to publish his
OPINION about it.

In your opinion.

It was very easy for liberal democrats to jump to the wrong
conclusion. It would even be easier to think a right winger could have
tunnel vision when they viewed the tape, even if they saw it all.

So, instead of Breitbart being the instigator, it's somehow morphed into
the
entire fault of those who over-reacted?

Nice try, but that doesn't cut it. I suspect Breitbart is going to settle
as
fast as possible or try to. She didn't impress me as someone who's afraid
of
a fight.




That is the point of our legal system. You can get an attorney to
represent any opinion. You have taken one side. There are tens of
thousands of very qualified attorneys capable of taking the other
side.



You're not an attorney. If what an attorney says in court is nonsense,
expresses an opinion, or foists an opinion in the middle of a trial, which
is what you're proposing, the judge will silence her immediately. You
can't express opinions in the middle of a trial (opening and closing only
typically).



Ahhh. So we have 4 not so real lawyers arguing legal protocol. Better make
another batch of popcorn.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On Aug 3, 1:27Â*pm, Harry  wrote:
On 8/3/10 1:23 PM, Jack wrote:

About a dozen replies by you this morning shows otherwise. Â*Maybe you
should turn on that trashbin you used to be so proud of, eh? Â*:-

HK = liar, bigot, racist, and liberal nutjob extraordinaire.

No, it doesn't mean you think it means, jackoff. It just means that I
like twiddling with you and calling you by the name your mama gave you.

"No, it doesn't mean you think it means" WHAT? You're so worked up
you can't even form sentences. You used to be able to turn a decent
phrase, but your advanced age has left you snarly and incapable.

you believe usenet
responses to your posts have some meaning for those who respond.

One thing is for sure... your post here had no discernible meaning.

HK = liar, bigot, racist, and liberal nutjob extraordinaire. And
about to pop a vein. ~snerk~

Would $10 million do it?
 

On Aug 3, 2:11Â*pm, "Harry" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Charles C." wrote in message
...

"Harry " wrote in message
news:JumdnSVoya8JncXRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink. com...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! Â*The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Â*Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts Â*and count the number of times you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 2:11 pm, "Harry" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Charles C." wrote in message
...

"Harry " wrote in message
news:JumdnSVoya8JncXRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink. com...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S.
history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.


She/it spends too much time in front of the mirror.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 4:11 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 2:11 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...





"Charles wrote in message
...

"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.

Plenty of examples in your state to see racism and ethnic hatred. How
about the recent gubernatorial contest, in which Republican
gubernatorial candidate John M. "Jake" Knotts Jr., called GOP
frontrunner Nikki Haley, a converted Christian of Sikh Indian descent, a
"raghead". I'd bet you high-fived Knotts.

--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 4:13 PM, Harry wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 2:11 pm, "Harry" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Charles C." wrote in message
...

"Harry " wrote in message
news:JumdnSVoya8JncXRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink. com...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S.
history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times
you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.


She/it spends too much time in front of the mirror.

Your wife, if you actually have one, probably has the mirrors in your
place draped in black crepe.



--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get.

Would $10 million do it?
 

In article ,
says...

On 8/3/10 4:13 PM, Harry wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 2:11 pm, "Harry" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Charles C." wrote in message
...

"Harry ?" wrote in message
news:JumdnSVoya8JncXRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink. com...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S.
history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times
you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.


She/it spends too much time in front of the mirror.

Your wife, if you actually have one, probably has the mirrors in your
place draped in black crepe.

Spoofer alert! I've told everyone here that I'd never, ever say anything
about someone else's family members and never have.

--
Republicans: they have absolutely no hearts and absolutely no brains,
which is a quirky miracle of the universe, since they still manage to
remain a life form.

Would $10 million do it?
 

In article ,
says...

On 8/3/10 4:11 PM, Jack wrote:
On Aug 3, 2:11 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...





"Charles wrote in message
...

"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.

Plenty of examples in your state to see racism and ethnic hatred. How
about the recent gubernatorial contest, in which Republican
gubernatorial candidate John M. "Jake" Knotts Jr., called GOP
frontrunner Nikki Haley, a converted Christian of Sikh Indian descent, a
"raghead". I'd bet you high-fived Knotts.

So.....if someone is from a state, say, Maryland, and something racist
happens there, then you are guilty of racism is you live in Maryland?

--
Republicans: they have absolutely no hearts and absolutely no brains,
which is a quirky miracle of the universe, since they still manage to
remain a life form.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 4:13 PM, Harry wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 2:11 pm, "Harry" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Charles C." wrote in message
...

"Harry " wrote in message
news:JumdnSVoya8JncXRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink. com...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S.
history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times
you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.


She/it spends too much time in front of the mirror.

Your wife, if you actually have one, probably has the mirrors in your
place draped in black crepe.



--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get.


There's no question that I am married to the loveliest southern belle on the
planet with the whitest skin.
Black is not her color. She prefers white, as evidenced by my albino-like
skin tone. Any day now she plans to change her surname to the proud name of
Krause. So, as always, you are full of ****.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Aug 3, 2:11 pm, "Harry" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Charles C." wrote in message
...

"Harry " wrote in message
news:JumdnSVoya8JncXRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthlink. com...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S.
history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.

Easily done. Look at your last 100 posts and count the number of times
you
called someone racist.
I bet you'll need all your fingers and toes to count on.


It's a parrot. It's been taught to see racism everywhere it looks.

You're a moron. You can't be taught.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Harry " wrote in message
...

Well, jackoff, you are wrong, as usual, in the first part of your
response, and as to the second part, there have been several
"translations" given for "We want our country back," and at least one of
them is that the signholder wants a white man in the presidency. Code
language, as it were.


Harry has a secret decoder ring.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist artwork
and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in U.S. history
when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.




I don't have to try hard. Let me see. Let's start with the signature
favored lately by one of this newsgroup's frequent liberal posters:

"The Republican Party is racist, and so is its base, which forms the bulk
of the tea party."

Would $10 million do it?
 

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:08:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

That is the point of our legal system. You can get an attorney to
represent any opinion. You have taken one side. There are tens of
thousands of very qualified attorneys capable of taking the other
side.



You're not an attorney. If what an attorney says in court is nonsense,
expresses an opinion, or foists an opinion in the middle of a trial, which
is what you're proposing, the judge will silence her immediately. You
can't
express opinions in the middle of a trial (opening and closing only
typically).


Perhaps I should not have used the word opinion. The defense lawyer
would simply present facts.
The woman did admit she was once a racist. The words on the video were
hers. The part that was opinion was whether she was actually reformed.
She gave an example of something that supported that claim later in
the tape. The open question is whether you could find someone who had
evidence that she did other things that refuted that reformation.
As Carville said during the Clinton debacle, "Drag a hundred-dollar
bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find". If they
turn up a few disgruntled USDA employees who have bad things to say
about Sherrod this whole thing could blow up in her face.

We still have not established that simply pulling actual excerpts out
of a longer recording and representing it as the truth can be called
slander/libel. If so, virtually every news outlet is guilty. They all
edit their raw tape to get the clips that support the agenda they are
presenting with their story. In a lot of cases they make the people on
the tape look like deadbeats or criminals even when there is no
evidence to support it.

I think, when push comes to shove, the other networks would circle the
wagons. The would condemn what Breitbart said but they would defend
his right to say it.

"Sue the *******" is not the answer to everything, no matter what the
ambulance chasing bottom feeders try to tell us on TV. The part they
leave out is your whole life can be laid bare in that court room.

Well, you're not an attorney, so your "opinion" and/or your representation
of the facts needs to be taken with a big grain of salt.

The defense attorney is supposed to supply a rebuttal of the "facts"
actually, not necessarily facts of his own. Maybe. That depends on what's
out there. Her reformation wasn't on the clip I believe, so not particularly
relevant in and of themselves. They would show that what was on the clip was
taken out of context, deliberately, etc.

Perhaps you haven't "established" this or that. It really doesn't matter,
since you're not a party to the case. I even dispute that she admitted she
was a racist. She admitted that she had to struggle against that.

So, twist all you want, you're not an attorney and your opinion about her
being a racist isn't really isn't germane to whether or not Brietbard
defamed her.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 6:27 PM, Charles C. wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.




I don't have to try hard. Let me see. Let's start with the signature
favored lately by one of this newsgroup's frequent liberal posters:

"The Republican Party is racist, and so is its base, which forms the bulk
of the tea party."






At the last GOP national convention. what percentage of the delegates
and alternates were blacks or latinos?



--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:08:27 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

That is the point of our legal system. You can get an attorney to
represent any opinion. You have taken one side. There are tens of
thousands of very qualified attorneys capable of taking the other
side.



You're not an attorney. If what an attorney says in court is nonsense,
expresses an opinion, or foists an opinion in the middle of a trial,
which
is what you're proposing, the judge will silence her immediately. You
can't
express opinions in the middle of a trial (opening and closing only
typically).


Perhaps I should not have used the word opinion. The defense lawyer
would simply present facts.
The woman did admit she was once a racist. The words on the video were
hers. The part that was opinion was whether she was actually reformed.
She gave an example of something that supported that claim later in
the tape. The open question is whether you could find someone who had
evidence that she did other things that refuted that reformation.
As Carville said during the Clinton debacle, "Drag a hundred-dollar
bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find". If they
turn up a few disgruntled USDA employees who have bad things to say
about Sherrod this whole thing could blow up in her face.

We still have not established that simply pulling actual excerpts out
of a longer recording and representing it as the truth can be called
slander/libel. If so, virtually every news outlet is guilty. They all
edit their raw tape to get the clips that support the agenda they are
presenting with their story. In a lot of cases they make the people on
the tape look like deadbeats or criminals even when there is no
evidence to support it.

I think, when push comes to shove, the other networks would circle the
wagons. The would condemn what Breitbart said but they would defend
his right to say it.

"Sue the *******" is not the answer to everything, no matter what the
ambulance chasing bottom feeders try to tell us on TV. The part they
leave out is your whole life can be laid bare in that court room.

Well, you're not an attorney, so your "opinion" and/or your representation
of the facts needs to be taken with a big grain of salt.

The defense attorney is supposed to supply a rebuttal of the "facts"
actually, not necessarily facts of his own. Maybe. That depends on what's
out there. Her reformation wasn't on the clip I believe, so not
particularly relevant in and of themselves. They would show that what was
on the clip was taken out of context, deliberately, etc.

Perhaps you haven't "established" this or that. It really doesn't matter,
since you're not a party to the case. I even dispute that she admitted she
was a racist. She admitted that she had to struggle against that.

So, twist all you want, you're not an attorney and your opinion about her
being a racist isn't really isn't germane to whether or not Brietbard
defamed her.



Gotta send this to the appropriate group.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 6:27 PM, Charles C. wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.




I don't have to try hard. Let me see. Let's start with the signature
favored lately by one of this newsgroup's frequent liberal posters:

"The Republican Party is racist, and so is its base, which forms the bulk
of the tea party."






At the last GOP national convention. what percentage of the delegates and
alternates were blacks or latinos?


No clue. I suppose if I were really inclined to notice such things, I
might be a racist and your accusation might have merit. Could have been 10
percent. Could have been 60 percent.
I really didn't notice or record the stats.

Do you really pay attention to such matters? Are you a racist?

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 6:52 PM, Charles C. wrote:


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 6:27 PM, Charles C. wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.




I don't have to try hard. Let me see. Let's start with the signature
favored lately by one of this newsgroup's frequent liberal posters:

"The Republican Party is racist, and so is its base, which forms the
bulk
of the tea party."






At the last GOP national convention. what percentage of the delegates
and alternates were blacks or latinos?


No clue. I suppose if I were really inclined to notice such things, I
might be a racist and your accusation might have merit. Could have been
10 percent. Could have been 60 percent.
I really didn't notice or record the stats.

Do you really pay attention to such matters? Are you a racist?





When one of the two major political parties fields candidates for
national office, I think it important to consider who that party and its
candidates represent. Oh, and it was 1.5 per cent.

From CNN:

"After seating a record number of African American delegates in 2004,
next week's Republican National Convention in Minneapolis/St. Paul will
have the lowest black representation in 40 years, according to a
convention guide that will be distributed next week to delegates at the
Republican National Convention by the Joint Center for Political and
Economic Studies (Joint Center).

"Blacks and the 2008 Republican Convention, released today by the
nonpartisan research institution that focuses on minority issues, notes
that African Americans will comprise only 1.5 percent of the total
number of GOP delegates, substantially below the record setting 6.7
percent in 2004.

"The 36 black delegates in 2008 represent a 78.4 percent decline from
the 167 black delegates at the 2004 GOP convention."

- - -


The GOP represents white Americans. I have no interest in voting for
candidates of a party that represents only white Americans.



--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get.

Would $10 million do it?
 

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 6:27 PM, Charles C. wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.




I don't have to try hard. Let me see. Let's start with the signature
favored lately by one of this newsgroup's frequent liberal posters:

"The Republican Party is racist, and so is its base, which forms the
bulk
of the tea party."






At the last GOP national convention. what percentage of the delegates and
alternates were blacks or latinos?


No clue. I suppose if I were really inclined to notice such things, I
might be a racist and your accusation might have merit. Could have been
10 percent. Could have been 60 percent.
I really didn't notice or record the stats.

Do you really pay attention to such matters? Are you a racist?




Do you seriously believe it was as high as 10 percent?

Would $10 million do it?
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 6:27 PM, Charles C. wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...


"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:


Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."


Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.

Complete BS. Please show us an example of this. You can't. You're just
lying.




I don't have to try hard. Let me see. Let's start with the signature
favored lately by one of this newsgroup's frequent liberal posters:

"The Republican Party is racist, and so is its base, which forms the
bulk
of the tea party."






At the last GOP national convention. what percentage of the delegates
and alternates were blacks or latinos?


No clue. I suppose if I were really inclined to notice such things, I
might be a racist and your accusation might have merit. Could have been
10 percent. Could have been 60 percent.
I really didn't notice or record the stats.

Do you really pay attention to such matters? Are you a racist?




Do you seriously believe it was as high as 10 percent?



I said, "No clue". I meant it. I don't record that kind of info in my
mind.
Does that mean I am a racist, a moron or both?

Would $10 million do it?
 

On 8/3/10 9:12 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:32:30 -0700,
wrote:

You're not an attorney. If what an attorney says in court is nonsense,
expresses an opinion, or foists an opinion in the middle of a trial, which
is what you're proposing, the judge will silence her immediately. You
can't
express opinions in the middle of a trial (opening and closing only
typically).


Perhaps I should not have used the word opinion. The defense lawyer
would simply present facts.
The woman did admit she was once a racist. The words on the video were
hers. The part that was opinion was whether she was actually reformed.
She gave an example of something that supported that claim later in
the tape. The open question is whether you could find someone who had
evidence that she did other things that refuted that reformation.
As Carville said during the Clinton debacle, "Drag a hundred-dollar
bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find". If they
turn up a few disgruntled USDA employees who have bad things to say
about Sherrod this whole thing could blow up in her face.

We still have not established that simply pulling actual excerpts out
of a longer recording and representing it as the truth can be called
slander/libel. If so, virtually every news outlet is guilty. They all
edit their raw tape to get the clips that support the agenda they are
presenting with their story. In a lot of cases they make the people on
the tape look like deadbeats or criminals even when there is no
evidence to support it.

I think, when push comes to shove, the other networks would circle the
wagons. The would condemn what Breitbart said but they would defend
his right to say it.

"Sue the *******" is not the answer to everything, no matter what the
ambulance chasing bottom feeders try to tell us on TV. The part they
leave out is your whole life can be laid bare in that court room.

Well, you're not an attorney, so your "opinion" and/or your representation
of the facts needs to be taken with a big grain of salt.

The defense attorney is supposed to supply a rebuttal of the "facts"
actually, not necessarily facts of his own. Maybe. That depends on what's
out there. Her reformation wasn't on the clip I believe, so not particularly
relevant in and of themselves. They would show that what was on the clip was
taken out of context, deliberately, etc.

I suppose you should watch the tape before you talk about as much as
you have. That was the whole point of her address, that she originally
screwed this farmer and that she got a conscience and eventually saved
his farm



Perhaps you haven't "established" this or that. It really doesn't matter,
since you're not a party to the case. I even dispute that she admitted she
was a racist. She admitted that she had to struggle against that.

So, twist all you want, you're not an attorney and your opinion about her
being a racist isn't really isn't germane to whether or not Brietbard
defamed her.


The fact still remains that he posted her words. I will grant that he
didn't post all of the speech but when was the last time you actually
saw Olbermann show all of a Sarah Palin (or pick anyone else he wants
to ridicule) speech? They cherry pick out the snippet that puts the
person in the worst light and then go off on it for 5 minutes.
That is why the media will flock to Breitbart's defense as a 1st
amendment issue, just like they did for Flynt.

The bet still stands. I have $10 that says this just goes away. I will
even give you odds, you put up a buck against my 10.
If it does go to court I will give you double or nothing she loses.


I'll take that bet if you wish to extend it. My buck against your 10. I
win if Breitfart settles in any way that favors the woman he slandered,
or if it goes to court.

--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get.

Would $10 million do it?
 

On Aug 3, 8:47Â*pm, "Charles C." wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...







"Charles C." wrote in message
m...

"Harry " wrote in message
news:KeSdnUj3Oe6JBMXRnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@earthlink. com...
On 8/3/10 6:27 PM, Charles C. wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Charles C." wrote in message
...

"Harry " wrote in message
news:JumdnSVoya8JncXRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@earthl ink.com...
On 8/3/10 7:31 AM, Jack wrote:

Bingo! The Tea Party is not a racist org.

How many large tea party rallies have you attended, Jackoff?
I've walked by two of them in DC and noticed plenty of signs,
tee-shirts, and what-not of the attendees with blatantly racist
artwork and phrases on them. Tea party types remind me of a time in
U.S. history when we were plagued by the "know nothings."

Many on the left (including some here) conclude that if one does not
fully endorse Obama and his agenda, one is a racist. Simple as that.