On 7/28/10 11:29 AM, Jack wrote:
On Jul 28, 10:30 am, "Harry wrote:
"Harry wrote in message

m...





On 7/28/10 10:18 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Jul 27, 6:11 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

"President Obama will make history as the first sitting president on
a
daytime talk show when he visits with the ladies of "The View." But
he'll be missing out on another historic occasion -- the Boy Scouts'
Jamboree marking the group's 100th anniversary, right in the
president's backyard."

Oh well... when they reach voting age he'll be long gone.

i was waiting to see how long it would be because some kluxer would
jump on this item

let's see...2 wars...a collapsing economy....healthcare issues

and he's worried about a darkie president who didn't show up for the
BSA in favor of a meeting at his mosque...

or some such nonsens

besides that, the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US. he's right to skip it.

bob, normally your posts provide a good belly-laugh then I move on,
but I have a feeling there's some really good material here...

Can you expand on "the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US"?

This I gotta hear.

Read up...

http://atheism.about.com/od/boyscout...ts_of_America_...

What a frekin' joke... They are comparing the Boy Scouts to the
Taliban... Well if the Boy Scouts are Taliban, the NAACP and the Black
Panthers are Bin Laden himself... LOL...

Naturally, the gist of the web article, about the discriminatory practices
of the Boy Scouts, went right over the head of Tosk, the ranking (and
rank) dummy in rec.boats.

,You always have to consider the source. Me. I'm a little skeptical about
anything containes at this site.http://atheism.about.comThat's just me.

--
Me

It's a rant/blog written by a nutjob.

The liberals don't seem to understand a concept as simple as "freedom
of association". It the concept that the courts correctly applied
when deciding that the BSoA were within their legal rights to control
who they allowed to associate with their underage children.

Funny, in that the liberals don't want anything like religion forced
on them, but they want to force open homosexuality on a private youth
organization.


As a private organization that is blatantly discriminatory, the Boy
Scouts should not receive any public funding, nor should they be able to
use any public facilities, nor should any public officials have anything
to do with them.

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and
sea scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our
activities.

On Jul 28, 11:33Â*am, Harry  wrote:

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and
sea scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our
activities.

So they won't allow you to be a Troupleader now, huh?

As a private organization that has broken no laws, they are part of
the public, and can make use of anything the public has access to.

They have been repeatedly supported by the US government. In fact,
your own messiah supports them:

"In January 2009, the American Humanist Association and eighteen other
nontheistic organizations sent an open letter to then President-Elect
Obama urging him not to serve as the Boy Scouts' honorary president
because of the Scouts' positions on religion. Obama accepted the
position and received the BSA's annual report from a group of Scouts
in February 2009."

Too bad all this makes you even more nuts.

In article a405cd9d-4d9e-4908-9baf-b9f44a34f780
@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jul 28, 10:30*am, "Harry ?" wrote:
"Harry ?" wrote in message

m...





On 7/28/10 10:18 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

*wrote in message
...

*wrote in message
...
On Jul 27, 6:11 pm, *wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

"President Obama will make history as the first sitting president on
a
daytime talk show when he visits with the ladies of "The View." But
he'll be missing out on another historic occasion -- the Boy Scouts'
Jamboree marking the group's 100th anniversary, right in the
president's backyard."

Oh well... when they reach voting age he'll be long gone.

i was waiting to see how long it would be because some kluxer would
jump on this item

let's see...2 wars...a collapsing economy....healthcare issues

and he's worried about a darkie president who didn't show up for the
BSA in favor of a meeting at his mosque...

or some such nonsens

besides that, the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US. he's right to skip it.

bob, normally your posts provide a good belly-laugh then I move on,
but I have a feeling there's some really good material here...

Can you expand on "the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US"?

This I gotta hear.

Read up...

http://atheism.about.com/od/boyscout...ts_of_America_...

What a frekin' joke... They are comparing the Boy Scouts to the
Taliban... Well if the Boy Scouts are Taliban, the NAACP and the Black
Panthers are Bin Laden himself... LOL...

Naturally, the gist of the web article, about the discriminatory practices
of the Boy Scouts, went right over the head of Tosk, the ranking (and
rank) dummy in rec.boats.

,You always have to consider the source. Me. I'm a little skeptical about
anything containes at this site.http://atheism.about.comThat's just me.

--
Me

It's a rant/blog written by a nutjob.

The liberals don't seem to understand a concept as simple as "freedom
of association". It the concept that the courts correctly applied
when deciding that the BSoA were within their legal rights to control
who they allowed to associate with their underage children.

Funny, in that the liberals don't want anything like religion forced
on them, but they want to force open homosexuality on a private youth
organization.

Yeah, they want those young boys ready when they get there so they are
gonna' start teaching it to kindergarten children... To progressives
(prohibitionists), indoctrination is ok as long as the right people are
doing it!



--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

On 7/28/10 11:56 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:33:57 -0400, Harry
wrote:

The liberals don't seem to understand a concept as simple as "freedom
of association". It the concept that the courts correctly applied
when deciding that the BSoA were within their legal rights to control
who they allowed to associate with their underage children.

Funny, in that the liberals don't want anything like religion forced
on them, but they want to force open homosexuality on a private youth
organization.


As a private organization that is blatantly discriminatory, the Boy
Scouts should not receive any public funding, nor should they be able to
use any public facilities, nor should any public officials have anything
to do with them.

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and
sea scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our
activities.

I suppose it is simply because they don't want to endure a "priest"
type scandal.

The Boy Scouts have already had those sorts of scandals.

On 7/28/10 11:48 AM, Jack wrote:
On Jul 28, 11:33 am, Harry wrote:

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and
sea scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our
activities.

So they won't allow you to be a Troupleader now, huh?

As a private organization that has broken no laws, they are part of
the public, and can make use of anything the public has access to.

They have been repeatedly supported by the US government. In fact,
your own messiah supports them:

"In January 2009, the American Humanist Association and eighteen other
nontheistic organizations sent an open letter to then President-Elect
Obama urging him not to serve as the Boy Scouts' honorary president
because of the Scouts' positions on religion. Obama accepted the
position and received the BSA's annual report from a group of Scouts
in February 2009."

Too bad all this makes you even more nuts.


It warms my heart to churn up garbage like you in my wake.

On 7/28/10 12:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:10:29 -0400, Harry
wrote:

On 7/28/10 11:56 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:33:57 -0400, Harry
wrote:

The liberals don't seem to understand a concept as simple as "freedom
of association". It the concept that the courts correctly applied
when deciding that the BSoA were within their legal rights to control
who they allowed to associate with their underage children.

Funny, in that the liberals don't want anything like religion forced
on them, but they want to force open homosexuality on a private youth
organization.


As a private organization that is blatantly discriminatory, the Boy
Scouts should not receive any public funding, nor should they be able to
use any public facilities, nor should any public officials have anything
to do with them.

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and
sea scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our
activities.

I suppose it is simply because they don't want to endure a "priest"
type scandal.

The Boy Scouts have already had those sorts of scandals.

Hence the policy. It may be backward thinking in the 21st century but
I bet more than half of the parents agree with the policy. The scouts
are struggling to survive and they simply reflect the values of their
target demographic.
Public funding is a separate issue but the government funds a lot of
things we find unacceptable on some level. A lot of people think
churches should pay taxes.
The recent document dump says we are funding the Taliban.


Do the boy scouts have a policy against child molesters? I suspect what
they want to prevent is child molestation, and that sort of activity
typically is not the kind of "fun" gay men prefer.

I can just hear the right-wing trash exclaim after some molester is
arrested for buggering Boy Scouts, "Well, at least he wasn't gay."

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/28/10 11:29 AM, Jack wrote:
On Jul 28, 10:30 am, "Harry wrote:
"Harry wrote in message

m...





On 7/28/10 10:18 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Jul 27, 6:11 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:

"President Obama will make history as the first sitting president
on
a
daytime talk show when he visits with the ladies of "The View."
But
he'll be missing out on another historic occasion -- the Boy
Scouts'
Jamboree marking the group's 100th anniversary, right in the
president's backyard."

Oh well... when they reach voting age he'll be long gone.

i was waiting to see how long it would be because some kluxer
would
jump on this item

let's see...2 wars...a collapsing economy....healthcare issues

and he's worried about a darkie president who didn't show up for
the
BSA in favor of a meeting at his mosque...

or some such nonsens

besides that, the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US. he's right to skip it.

bob, normally your posts provide a good belly-laugh then I move on,
but I have a feeling there's some really good material here...

Can you expand on "the boy scouts national organization is as fine
a
bigoted organization as we have in the US"?

This I gotta hear.

Read up...

http://atheism.about.com/od/boyscout...ts_of_America_...

What a frekin' joke... They are comparing the Boy Scouts to the
Taliban... Well if the Boy Scouts are Taliban, the NAACP and the Black
Panthers are Bin Laden himself... LOL...

Naturally, the gist of the web article, about the discriminatory
practices
of the Boy Scouts, went right over the head of Tosk, the ranking (and
rank) dummy in rec.boats.

,You always have to consider the source. Me. I'm a little skeptical
about
anything containes at this site.http://atheism.about.comThat's just me.

--
Me

It's a rant/blog written by a nutjob.

The liberals don't seem to understand a concept as simple as "freedom
of association". It the concept that the courts correctly applied
when deciding that the BSoA were within their legal rights to control
who they allowed to associate with their underage children.

Funny, in that the liberals don't want anything like religion forced
on them, but they want to force open homosexuality on a private youth
organization.


As a private organization that is blatantly discriminatory, the Boy Scouts
should not receive any public funding, nor should they be able to use any
public facilities, nor should any public officials have anything to do
with them.

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and sea
scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our activities.

You enjoyed the activities because you didn't have to put up with queers
groping you in your pup tent.

--
Me

On Jul 28, 12:12Â*pm, Harry  wrote:
On 7/28/10 11:48 AM, Jack wrote:





On Jul 28, 11:33 am, Harry Â*wrote:

It's sad for me to say that, because I was a cub scout, boy scout and
sea scout for many years in the good old days, and I enjoyed our
activities.

So they won't allow you to be a Troupleader now, huh?

As a private organization that has broken no laws, they are part of
the public, and can make use of anything the public has access to.

They have been repeatedly supported by the US government. Â*In fact,
your own messiah supports them:

"In January 2009, the American Humanist Association and eighteen other
nontheistic organizations sent an open letter to then President-Elect
Obama urging him not to serve as the Boy Scouts' honorary president
because of the Scouts' positions on religion. Obama accepted the
position and received the BSA's annual report from a group of Scouts
in February 2009."

Too bad all this makes you even more nuts.

It warms my heart to churn up garbage like you in my wake.

Things are as I want them. You're the one whining. It's obvious with
the speed and quantity of your responses in this thread that you are
the one "churned up", old boy. :-

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 27, 6:11 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT), Jack

wrote:

"President Obama will make history as the first sitting president on
a
daytime talk show when he visits with the ladies of "The View." But
he'll be missing out on another historic occasion -- the Boy Scouts'
Jamboree marking the group's 100th anniversary, right in the
president's backyard."

Oh well... when they reach voting age he'll be long gone.

i was waiting to see how long it would be because some kluxer would
jump on this item

let's see...2 wars...a collapsing economy....healthcare issues

and he's worried about a darkie president who didn't show up for the
BSA in favor of a meeting at his mosque...

or some such nonsens

besides that, the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US. he's right to skip it.

bob, normally your posts provide a good belly-laugh then I move on,
but I have a feeling there's some really good material here...

Can you expand on "the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US"?

This I gotta hear.

Read up...

http://atheism.about.com/od/boyscout... rejudice.htm



What a frekin' joke... They are comparing the Boy Scouts to the
Taliban... Well if the Boy Scouts are Taliban, the NAACP and the Black
Panthers are Bin Laden himself... LOL...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

I'm comparing YOU to the Taliban. You're clearly anti-American.

"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 7/28/10 10:18 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Jul 27, 6:11 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

"President Obama will make history as the first sitting president on
a
daytime talk show when he visits with the ladies of "The View." But
he'll be missing out on another historic occasion -- the Boy Scouts'
Jamboree marking the group's 100th anniversary, right in the
president's backyard."

Oh well... when they reach voting age he'll be long gone.

i was waiting to see how long it would be because some kluxer would
jump on this item

let's see...2 wars...a collapsing economy....healthcare issues

and he's worried about a darkie president who didn't show up for the
BSA in favor of a meeting at his mosque...

or some such nonsens

besides that, the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US. he's right to skip it.

bob, normally your posts provide a good belly-laugh then I move on,
but I have a feeling there's some really good material here...

Can you expand on "the boy scouts national organization is as fine a
bigoted organization as we have in the US"?

This I gotta hear.

Read up...

http://atheism.about.com/od/boyscout... rejudice.htm



What a frekin' joke... They are comparing the Boy Scouts to the
Taliban... Well if the Boy Scouts are Taliban, the NAACP and the Black
Panthers are Bin Laden himself... LOL...



Naturally, the gist of the web article, about the discriminatory practices
of the Boy Scouts, went right over the head of Tosk, the ranking (and
rank) dummy in rec.boats.

Naturally.